Peaceful East v violent West.
It’s got me thinking recently that the Ismlessism really changes you. I used to be a little bit of a fascist, I used to believe that there absolutely had to be minimal impoliteness somewhere at some point in time towards non-white people, in order to save our race, secure our borders and protect our women etc. Believe me, the racist mentality is basically a bit like a warrior, like Achilles, even if you just mean a little impoliteness or a little aggression etc. It’s like ridiculous to racists, they don’t see anything wrong with a little rudeness, racists are like ‘Come on!? You can’t even be impolite!?’ I think this is the point that racists and fascists are missing, in that Europeans have been far too violent and aggressive throughout history, particularly in the 20th century. Therefore, the point that the far-right are missing is that Europeans cannot use ANY aggression, hate or violence in ANY way at all, that is, in writing, thoughts or speech etc. Racists don’t see anything wrong with what they are doing, they see themselves as virtuous, brave and glorious etc, by protecting our women, country and race etc. Racists think in terms of philosophical or political isms such as Nazism, Communism and fascism etc. It’s heinous and totally wrong. The Ismlessism has had me thinking recently that unlike India who worshipped and adored the Buddha from day one, allowed Him to live a long and healthy life and basically treated him love, respect, reverence and honour while He was alive, that we violent westerners committed deicide by nailing our God to the Cross! What would the world have been like if there had been no crucifixion? What would the world have been like if we westerners had allowed Jesus Christ to live a long, healthy and peaceful life like the Buddha? Would Europe have been a generally more peaceful continent? Probably. Would the Holocaust had happened? Probably not. Please take a moment to compare how India treated the Buddha and the west treated Jesus Christ? There is quite a contrast isn’t there? India is so much more peaceful than Europe. Save Islam, the west (or Europe) is so much more violent and aggressive than India, China and Asia as a whole, as demonstrated by the crucifixion, two world wars and the Holocaust. This is where is the Ismlessism comes in, because it hits at least two birds with one stone. Firstly, the Ismlessism removes racism from the world, secondly it brings peace and non-violence to the world. The Ismlessism changes right-wing people like me, and turns them away from political or philosophical isms such as Nazism, Communism and fascism etc and makes them unbelievably religious, peaceful and non-violent like Mahatma Gandhi. White people don’t need political leaders such as For Britain’s Anne Marie Waters, Britain First’s Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen and the English Defence League’s Tommy Robinson. (In fact, note the last three have all spent time in prison for aggressive behaviour or speech etc). White people are not allowed political leaders! What white people desperately need is lower class, peaceful, nonviolent, religious or spiritual leaders like Mahatma Gandhi. No one listens to the Archbishop of Canterbury, because he is a well paid job or career, what we need is poor, grassroots and lower class, nonviolent and peaceful religious leaders that live by example and come out of nowhere. Trust me, excepting violent Antifa, all those peaceful, nonviolent and anti-racist politicians, liberals and PC brigade (that you racists hate) are 99% right, they are just not removing the ism, namely racism from the world, plus they are not an official or formal religious ism.