“To be cool, hip and with it, say your ismlessisms! Fash is the ismlessism of fascism. Bud is the ismlessism of Buddhism. A black or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism. Ismlessisms are colourful, beautiful and deep which reflects coloured people.”Graham Cammock
“We all have got to come to grips with our isms.”Joycelyn Elders – Former United States Surgeon General.
- Target audience.
- Humour for the Jews.
- Idioms with double meaning metaphors.
- Why forgive Adolf Hitler?
- English grammar.
- Final clipping.
- How it works.
- RASTA ALGEBRA TEST.
- What type of ism is ismlessism?
- What is an ismlessism?
- Singular v plural.
- ‘Propa’ apology.
- Cool Britannia!
- No bones with Adolf Hitler.
- Ambiguity of goodness.
- Nietzsche (The Christian Question).
- Christian saintliness.
- Darwinism versus Christianity.
- The Völkisch movement.
- Heathenism and paganism.
- Self exaltation (seig heil)!
- Anti-Semitism is paranoia.
- Racial and spiritual separation.
- CDU and CSU.
- Abrahamic loyalty.
- Modern paganism.
- Recorded history versus prehistoric pagan spirituality.
- Grammarians and scholars.
- Iyaric or Dread Talk.
- The bar.
- Serious paradox.
- Brown nosing anti-racism and political correctness.
- The Truth.
- External academia (humanities).
- Social media background.
- The importance of writing, (externalising and piecing together words and phrases).
- I pray, I read and I DJ.
- The humanities.
- Not a religion.
- The Two Teachings.
- The 16 Precepts.
- The Beliefs.
- External and altruistic salvation.
- How to do it.
- The Desire.
- The desire of a white switched on cool Ismlessist.
- The desire of a non-white switched on cool Ismlessist.
- Christian television.
- Economics of Buddha.
- Save As.
- Barefoot white people.
- Ismless religion versus science.
- Protestants Kings and Queens.
- Be cool.
- With it!
- Unimaginative white people.
- Eastern peace and Western violence.
- What I have achieved.
- Mahatma Gandhi.
- Real forgiveness.
- The Hitler Switch.
- The Tolerance Switch.
- Eternal politics.
- Crossed wires?
- Resistance and tolerance.
- Afterlife poker.
- LIVE (or Alive).
- Anti-racism does not work.
- No bones with Adolf Hitler?
- An effect of the Holocaust.
- Eternal damnation!
- A complete circuit.
- STOP FIGHTING!
- Bargaining chip (poker).
- Get a grip!
- The Magic Number.
Up until the 1st or 2nd of August 2016, when I was 35 years young I had halfheartedly and begrudgingly read 19 books in my entire life. Although I obviously had only just started reading at that date and hadn’t actually finished a single serious book yet, I still take the 1st of August 2016 as the turning point in my life, because I actually for the first time in my life started to seriously study. Before this point I understood absolutely nothing and as of December 2021 I have learned so much over the 170 books (of the humanities) that I have read so far. This means that I completely understand and still remember what is and what it means to be a complete layman, and I know that there are billions of other average people out there who are in a similar position to what I was prior to the 1st August 2016, that is, that they haven’t read a single book in their lives. This is not a problem, because as you will see later simple and even thick saintliness is much more important than high yet vain and conceited intellect and academia. For example Saint André Bessette (9 August 1845 – 6 January 1937) was illiterate, he was a Saint but illiterate. Therefore, I have to inform you of my target audience for my essay or my book, which you can probably already guess by now? Yup! I am aiming very low indeed. I want to efficiently and effectively inform poor, working class laypeople, who have never read a single book in their entire lives of the following very important points (in rough order of importance):
- The Saints and Saintliness.
- Luke 6:27-36 (love of one’s enemies).
- The Hitler switch (or eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch).
- Mutual and reciprocal forgiveness of enemies (completing the circuit).
- The forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, yes Adolf Hitler.
- A new ism called the ismlessism.
One of my main hopes is that I can help as many capable laypeople as I can avoid the pitfalls and mistakes that I have made in my 40 years of life and over my 5 year long reading and social media endeavour to forgive Adolf Hitler, fix the Holocaust, de-stigmatise racism and help protect my own beloved Europeans, and hence to quickly and efficiently program laypeople with the lessons that I have learned over these 5 years in question and through the 170 books (of the humanities) that I have read, in one single book. However, there is a problem because real expert academics, scholars and philosophers such as German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche do not aim low with their target audience at all (as I am doing). Professional academics and scholars aim very high with their target audience and challenge each other on very highly technical and intellectual points and they try to prove each other wrong in little but very advanced ways (while the rest of us laypeople are left cold in the dark, confused and bamboozled). Therefore, to such expert academics, scholars and philosophers, I have to inform you that I am not in any way trying to inform or educate you of anything historical, philosophical or religious at all and I am certainly not trying to challenge you in any way and on any front. My book is for laypeople.
Humour for the Jews.
This essay is for the Jews, not for Adolf Hitler, although this essay is about Adolf Hitler’s forgiveness. I have tried for years to create lighthearted, dry and non-offensive humour for the Jews regarding Adolf Hitler that would please all parties and break the ice with the Jews, and for years I have found it impossible, that is, until I found the ismlessism. Although the ismlessism is serious, I have therefore, injected lightheartedness and humour into this essay via many works of comical digital art with idioms and double meaning metaphors. Most of the art actually came from my first (erroneous) essay, and really the artistic theme of Adolf Hitler as a caveman, a primitive hominin or an ape has nothing to do with the ismlessism. However, the ismlessism and this whole second (correct) essay is derived from my first essay, therefore, I have injected the humorous art with idioms into this second essay in order to help us try to forgive Adolf Hitler and all subordinate Nazis for the Holocaust. The comical art as Adolf Hitler as a caveman or a monkey seems kind of fundamental, universal and not out of place anywhere. However, please note and remember that the art in this essay is completely unrelated to the cool Rasta ismlessism. Most of the art and idioms in this essay come from my first essay. I have read over 170 books on the humanities, mostly historical, religious and philosophical books and as a result of the ismlessism, I have finally found out how to create humour for the Jews regarding Adolf Hitler. To create humour for the Jews obviously your writing has got to be anti-pagan, anti-heathen, anti-Aryan and anti-Völkisch, however, I have also created much politically correct humorous art of Adolf Hitler as a caveman, an ape or other animal with speech bubbles and idioms. Through the forgiveness and the lighthearted roasting of Adolf Hitler via comical digital art, I have created lighthearted and jocular humour for the Jews in this essay which aids forgiveness. It is not easy to create non-offensive humour for the Jews about Adolf Hitler, as it took me 5 years of constant reading and two PhD or Masters level essays, not to mention the days I put into the comical digital art. Hence, this essay about the ismlessism is an 90,000 word lighthearted roasting of Adolf Hitler and his Holocaust, that will hopefully create humour for the Jews and help us all to forgive Adolf Hitler. I hope everyone gets it and I hope it has the desired forgiving effect for the Jews.
Idioms with double meaning metaphors.
But I want you to know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins. Matthew 9:6.
There is nothing lighter on this planet, in the universe or on this side of life regarding or concerning Adolf Hitler, than this essay regarding the ismlessism. This work, study or essay is one of a kind, it is 100% original and 100% unique. There is nothing quite like this essay in existence. Since the Holocaust, no one has ever seriously and genuinely attempted to forgive Adolf Hitler with humour and lightheartedness before. The essay is the culmination of a 5 year long study of the humanities to reverse the Holocaust, forgive Adolf Hitler, solve racism and to help protect white people. The study involved 5 years of constant informational reading with hardly a day off, as well as the writing of two PhD level (word count) essays, the first of which was an 87,000 word practice essay, regarding a jocular anti-racist forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. The first practice essay was wrong and it will never see the light of day, however this second essay (this one) regarding the ismlessism is actually the true and correct forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, and it currently stands at over 90,000 words. 100% of people on this planet are childishly one of two things regarding Adolf Hitler, either racist or anti-racist (like an annoying eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch). Both are unfunny and both are uncool. This lighthearted essay regarding Adolf Hitler is neither anti-racist nor racist, it is non-racialist and it is switched on cool Ismlessist, which means with no isms, without isms or the removal of isms. This essay is a work in progress, I am currently studying very hard to accomplish it, therefore, the essay is very rough indeed, but you are welcome to read it. I have read one 1000 page factual and historical book about the Holocaust by Martin Gilbert and it was called The Holocaust: The Human Tragedy. There are obviously a myriad of such factual and historical books about the Holocaust out there, however, they are all so negative and depressing, and all that they do is accurately relay and portray the enormity and scale of the nightmare with countless specific examples of horror and the mind numbing statistics of the Holocaust. Obviously such factual and historical books are absolutely necessary, however, none of them offer a solution to the Holocaust and they all just leave the problem of the Holocaust exposed and lying there like a gaping metaphorical asteroid crater.
However, what I am saying is that the ismlessism is the ultimate solution to racism and therefore it is also a solution to the Holocaust. What I am saying is that just one single lighthearted book about the ismlessism would counteract all those countless negative and depressing, factual and historical books about the Holocaust, and this would be a good thing for Europeans and the whole world as it leads to the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. I just wanted to point out to you how the comical art with idioms and metaphors works in this essay. I have read one book on anthropology and from this book I learned that linguistically, the difference between human and animal speech is that animals never use metaphor. Some monkeys have aerial versus ground predator screech warnings, but they never use metaphor. For example, if I say ‘That guy is a real snake!’ you understand that I don’t mean he’s a real snake, only that he has snake-like bad character qualities. For an example of double meaning idioms, an archaeologist can luckily say ‘My career is in ruins!’ which has a humorous double metaphorical effect. The art with idioms and metaphors in this essay works in exactly the same way. The comical art is quite important to this essay, as without the art this essay would be less humorous. Artistic humour with idioms and metaphors is the simplest, driest, most lighthearted and probably the best kind of humour in the world, as it is never rude, wet or dirty humour. How it works is that usually there is a feature in the image or artwork that simply and humorously connects to a metaphorical word in the idiom, which always has a humorous double metaphorical meaning which therefore, produces lightheartedness. For example, in the artwork above of Australopithecus africanus Adolf Hitler playing with animal bones, the idiom is the phrase ‘No bones!’. Therefore, you will notice that Adolf Hitler and the juvenile Australopithecus africanus are playing with animal bones, and therefore, the idiom ‘No bones!’, which you understand that idiomatically means both ‘No problems!’ or “No big deal!’ as well as the literal ‘animal bones’ which they are playing with, which produces the nudge-nudge humour! The metaphorical word ‘bones’ in the idiom physically connects to the feature in the image (in this case the animal bones) which produces a double metaphorical meaning and a lighthearted effect. Comical art with double meaning metaphors and idioms never fails to bring at least a lighthearted chuckle or smile. Please note that some times artworks are strategically placed in the essay to match or go with a piece of text located above or below it for added lighthearted emphasis. There are many such comical artworks with double meaning metaphors in idioms throughout this essay that create humour for the Jews about Adolf Hitler and help us all to forgive Adolf Hitler. However, some artworks in this essay are just statements and plain idioms.
Humanities are academic disciplines that study aspects of human society and culture. In the Renaissance, the term contrasted with divinity and referred to what is now called classics, the main area of secular study in universities at the time. Today, the humanities are more frequently defined as any fields of study outside of professional training, mathematics, and the natural and social sciences. The humanities use methods that are primarily critical, or speculative, and have a significant historical element—as distinguished from the mainly empirical approaches of the natural sciences, yet, unlike the sciences, it has no central discipline. The humanities include the study of ancient and modern languages, literature, philosophy, history, archaeology, anthropology, human geography, law, religion, and art.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanities
I have been reading more or less every day since the 1st or 2nd of August 2016, I know this rough date because I bought my first serious book on Amazon on the 31st of July 2016. However, to my complete surprise, it only dawned on me on the 12th of November 2021 that I have read 170 books (give or take) over 5 years on the humanities. I had no real or certain idea what the humanities were for over 5 years until that date, and I had no idea I that was studying the humanities. Because I am an independent researcher and writer, that is, I am not officially affiliated with any university or educational establishment, the only way that I used to (improperly) describe my occupation is with general reading or informational reading. I read mostly history, religion and philosophy, however I also study language, literature, music, art, anthropology and politics. Although I have read about 15 scientific books (of the 170 read to date), my reading is overwhelmingly non-scientific. I read, study and write about the humanities. I have also completed two independent essays, both being over 80,000 words. The first essay was terrible and I simply consider it a practice essay, however, I have much more confidence in my second essay regarding the ismlessism, which is the main content of my website. The answer to the solution of the Holocaust – which is the main subject or goal of the ismlessism – does not lie in the sciences, with the sciences we are spiritually doomed and eternally damned. Therefore, the solution to the Holocaust is to be found in the humanities.
You can see all the books that I have read organised into 11 genres (or fields) and 54 subjects with personal notes on each book here: https://cloud.collectorz.com/cammock/books
Visit my Goodreads profile here: https://goodreads.com/ismlessism
Why forgive Adolf Hitler?
Because as you will see throughout this essay, particularly in the penultimate part (called Electric Philosophy) and in the conclusion of this essay, the reciprocal and mutual forgiveness of the two extremes on either side of the eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch completes the circuit, which generates power, light and creates a whole or union between all white people on planet Earth. To reiterate, the two extremes of the Hitler switch are Nazism and Anti-fascism or racism and anti-racism, therefore as you will see Jesus Christ’s teaching of Luke 6:27-36 of loving our enemies, turning the other cheek and doing good to those who curse and oppress you determines that the reciprocal and mutual forgiveness of enemies completes the circuit, which generates power, light and creates a whole or union between all white people on planet Earth. The forgiveness of Adolf Hitler for anti-racists or conversely the forgiveness of Anti-fascists for loyal racists is not impossible or difficult, it is just a little bit further than we believe and it therefore completes the circuit.
Although this essay is divided into 9 parts, there are fundamentally only 2 parts or halves:
- The ismlessism.
- The Hitler switch (or eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch).
The essay has a definite order between these 2 halves and the ismlessism definitely comes first because it was first discovered and through writing 80% of this essay, the ismlessism gave birth to the eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch, which comes second. My social media bio would be the following: to be cool, hip and with it, say your ismlessisms. Fash is the ismlessism of fascism. Bud is the ismlessism of Buddhism. A coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism. Ismlessisms are colourful, beautiful and deep which reflects coloured people. The ismlessism is like Iyaric or Dread Talk. No isms mon! I study the humanities, hence, I am a humanist. Jesus Christ’s teaching of Luke 6:27-36 completes the circuit. The reciprocal forgiveness of enemies completes the circuit and creates power, light and a whole or a union. Because of the Holocaust, there exists a split, schism or fracture between all white people today. This split or crack is the racist/anti-racist schism (or as you will see what I call the eternal racist/anti-racist switch) between white people. There is no in between the two extreme opposites on this eternal switch, there are no degrees, gradations or increments. There is no dimmer between light and dark. We can seal the split and create a wholesome union between white people through the reciprocal and mutual forgiveness of racist and anti-racist white people. An attempted solution to world peace. Non-racialism. Not anti.
The main premise of this essay is Jesus Christ’s teaching of Luke 6:27-36. To simplify this teaching and put it into modern terms, Luke 6:27-36 can be articulated as completing an electrical circuit:
Mutual and reciprocal forgiveness between enemies completes the circuit and creates power, light, a whole and a union.Graham Cammock
This teaching applies to any minor dispute and any petty and everyday forgiveness, however, the real issue today, where the answer to world peace resides and where Luke 6:27-36 is most effectively applied is in the reciprocal forgiveness of racist and anti-racist white people. Hence, as you will see throughout this essay – particularly in the penultimate part and conclusion of this essay – because of the Holocaust, there exists a split, schism or crack between all white people today. This split or crack is the racist/anti-racist schism (or as you will see what I call the eternal racist/anti-racist switch) between white people. This fault-line is Adolf Hitler’s fault and the aim of this essay and the ismlessism is to join or seal this split (or Hitler switch) between white people through Jesus Christ’s teachings on forgiveness and of loving one’s enemies, particularly through the power of Luke 6:27-37. Therefore, the main premise of this essay is that the mutual and reciprocal forgiveness of racist and anti-racist white people completes the circuit and creates power, light, a whole and a union between all white people on Earth.
Please take what I am about say very seriously. What or who do you think of when you hear the word ‘Ismless’? To me ‘Ismless‘ literally means or is Adolf Hitler, racism or white people. I think of nothing else when I hear or read the word ‘Ismless’. Therefore, Adolf Hitler is ‘Ismless’ in both name and speech. What I will say (and reiterate later) is that the ismlessism is the culmination of my five year long (and more) study, and that I am willing to make the ultimate intellectual sacrifice, by handing everything that I have regarding the ismlessism over to Adolf Hitler (in this life or the next), including the name, the identity and the domains for the benefit of white people. Despite the fact that I am also a DJ, and would love to be called ‘Ismless’ (which is cool), I am more than willing to make this intellectual sacrifice for the benefit of my own white people. This is what switched on cool Ismlessists do, and as you will see further below ismlessists are very ‘altruistic’ and would sacrifice just about anything for their own white people. Therefore, I wholeheartedly believe that Adolf Hitler is Ismless. Just on further note regarding the unmentionable Adolf Hitler. It is possibly algebraic and actually good to verbally refer to Adolf Hitler as ‘Ismless’ instead referring to him by his name. I believe this may ameliorate him, racism, the Holocaust and everything.
For example, if I were going to say:
‘White people are doomed because of Adolf Hitler, and I am so miserable and depressed.‘
It is possibly better to say:
‘White people are doomed because of Ismless, and I am so miserable and depressed.’
I think this is potentially a thing? However, please note I have not done this throughout this essay.
English grammar is unbelievably proper, strict, technical and correct, therefore, the ismlessism or the ismlessisms, such as ‘fash’ or ‘Bud’ (which are the ismlessisms of fascism and Buddhism respectively) are the antithesis of proper English grammar.
The conviction that the English language was an instrument of Western oppression that robbed Africans of their native speech was central to the creation of an in-group language. Instead of aspiring for the social mobility associated with mastering the nuances of English and mouthing the cadences of diction associated with the Oxford or Cambridge educated, Rastas have launched an ideological attack on the integrity of the English language.
Rastafari: A Very Short Introduction, Ennis B. Edmonds, page 45.
The ismlessism (or the Ismlessisms) are ungrammatical, they are morphological because they simply involve final clipping or truncation of the suffix ism. The ismlessism is a coloured or Rastafarian ‘religious’ ism, hence, the ismlessism is ‘propa’ or ‘impropa’ (I don’t care how one takes it). However, political correctness is also ‘impropa’ yet we or you have do it. Unfortunately, I have to say it, however, racists are analogously a bit like grammarians, they want to keep everything English, white and proper, however, the Rastafarian ismlessism may force the English language to bottom out or go below the belt, in that, in the future formal English may become unfashionable while ‘propa’ or ‘impropa’ black and Rastafarian argot and lingo, such as the ismlessism, may become the mode or fashionable. This reflects the fact that like the ungrammatical or ‘impropa’ ismlessism, anti-racism and political correctness may force white people to bottom out or go below the belt, through such as multiculturalism and miscegenation.
Saying or writing your ismlessisms such as ‘Bud’ or ‘fash’ which are the ismlessisms of Buddhism and fascism respectively, is as cool, hip and with it as the informal African American greeting ‘Yo!’ However, although ‘Yo!’ is obviously officially entered into the English dictionary, the difference is that the ismlessisms are an ism in their own right and hence they represent the whole of black or African style, fashion and culture, whereas ‘Yo!’ on its own is just one word and is therefore, not powerful enough to represent the entirety of black style, fashion or culture. The thing is about the ismlessism (or the ismlessisms) is that despite the fact that they solve all discriminatory isms, (especially racism (which means that we might as well go all out and forgive Adolf Hitler and fix the Holocaust)), they are politically correct, black, hip, cool and with it, hence, this determines that our news channels, mainstream media, politicians, governments, parliament and London in general should really like them? The ismlessism (or the ismlessisms) should be right up London’s street? They are like the Bridget Jones’s Diary of isms or the Amy Winehouse of the English language. The aforementioned London institutions are always current, with it, hip and politically correct, therefore, because the ismlessism (or the ismlessisms) are black and politically correct, the aforementioned institutions should really like them, despite the fact that they are a solution to all isms, the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and the correction of the Holocaust. African and black people in general may be a lot more comfortable talking about discriminatory isms by using the ismlessisms? For example, instead of saying: ‘Rastafarians are sexist (which they are), some Europeans are fascist today, a few white people are racist and there about nine people on the whole of planet Earth who profess National Socialism today.’, Africans and black people in general can say: ‘Rastas are seks (which they are), some Europeans are fash today, a few white people are rayce and there about nine people on the whole of planet Earth who profess Nashanal Soshall today mon!’ Therefore, the ismlessism (or the ismlessisms) ameliorate and alleviate all negative and discriminatory isms, which is an overall and general solution to racism, the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. However, most importantly, I don’t have an overall word for what Bridget Jones’s Diary or Amy Winehouse is, as in what our news channels, mainstream media, politicians, governments, parliament and London in general do, all that I know is that whatever London, parliament and the media do, it is always politically correct, black, hip, cool and with it. The ismlessism (or the ismlessisms) are exactly the same thing, they are 100% politically correct, black, hip, cool and with it, therefore, London, parliament, our politicians and our mainstream media should really like the ismlessisms and what they do? Yo! I am not a Rastafarian, I am a white British man. This (hypothetical) book should be treated as a PhD thesis or even a Masters degree dissertation or essay. This is because I am not an expert academic or scholar, I am a Bachelor of Arts (Computer Animation) with a keen interest in the humanities and I am devoutly passionate about helping to protect my own (white) people. I am not a dilettante, however, although as of December 2021 I have read 170 historical, religious and philosophical books, I have only specialised on the subject of this essay, namely, the ideological, philosophical and intellectual causes of the Holocaust, the de-stigmatisation or removal of racism and thereby helping to protect white people through the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. I dislike the fact that most right wing, nationalist or conservative white people on social media such as Twitter do nothing to overcome the noun racism, fix the Holocaust or forgive Adolf Hitler, if anything they seem to use hate and compound the problem. Therefore, obviously the tactics that I employ are firstly, admitting that white people are wrong because of the Holocaust as well as uncool, I admit that the seemingly unfair plight of white people today has nothing to do with inequality or unfairness, it is judgement and punishment for the Holocaust and judgement and punishment have nothing to do with inequality or unfairness. If a child misbehaves at school he or she is corrected, punished and treated harshly. Why should he or she be treated kindly in the same way as the good, innocent and straight-A students? You can’t get away with the Holocaust. There are obviously many and major consequences for the Holocaust and this is the unfairness and so called oppression that you feel today as white people. I also try to see eye-to-eye with Antifascists (begrudgingly) and also with non-white people, I get on non-white people’s side (in the first place or initially), I show admiration for non-white people, and I compliment non-white people and I use warmth and good will towards them in order to overcome the noun racism, fix the Holocaust, forgive Adolf Hitler and thereby helping to protect white people. My theory is that if we are nice and polite to non-white people first, like polite old British imperialists (who never childishly used hate), then non-white people may be nice to us? Racism is the problem for white people, because of the Holocaust racism is hateful and wrong and there is no point in getting on racism or using hate and malice, as you only make things worse. Therefore, the drive of this essay is to overcome or de-stigmatise the dreaded noun racism via the ismlessism (or ismlessisms). Other than the questionable political correctness of the theme of this essay, I would have no qualms about handing this essay in at a university and I would expect to get a first class honours for it. The essay is about a new ism called the ismlessism (or the ismlessisms) which I discovered on my 5 year long reading and writing endeavour to de-stigmatise or remove of racism and helping to protect white people through the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. I am convinced that the ismlessism (or the ismlessisms) are the solution to all discriminatory isms, particularly racism and hence the atonement for the Holocaust, the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and therefore, the protection of white people. This (hypothetical) book or essay justifies itself because no academic or scholar on Earth is willing to risk their reputation or career by writing a book about the de-stigmatisation of racism or the genuine lighthearted forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. Therefore, although I am Bachelor of Arts I believe I am the world’s foremost expert on the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. Also, the low Rastafarian nature of the ismlessism (or the ismlessisms) excuse and justify the possibly lower academic standards of this essay.
- a distinctive doctrine, cause, or theory
- an oppressive and especially discriminatory attitude or belief: we all have got to come to grips with our isms — Joycelyn Elders
- without an ism, no ism or remove isms: Adolf Hitler is ismless because he always has to say his ismlessisms, such as: ”Mussolini was fash as well mon!”. Europeans are ismless because they haven’t got racism. White people are ismless.
- an ism which removes isms; an ism which fixes or de-stigmatises racism; saying or writing ismlessisms, which means to say or write noun isms or adjective ists without their suffix ism or suffix ist respectively, note: ismlessisms are colourful, beautiful and deep which reflects coloured people. ‘Bud’ and ‘fash’ are colourful, beautiful and deep. Ismlessisms are deeply black, Rasta and deeply cool. Ismlessism is the highest of all isms because it is not a singular ism like all other normal or lower isms. For example, atheism is a normal, lower and singular ism that is one thing, the belief that God does not exist. Atheism (like all other isms, (excepting ismlessism)) is one ism. Ismlessism is mathematical because it minuses the suffix -isms from all isms, for example, ‘Bud, Catholis, rayce, and fash’ are the ismlessisms of ‘Buddhism, Catholicism, racism and fascism’ respectively, therefore, ismlessism is more than one ism, it is all isms, many isms, multifarious, variegated, colourful, beautiful, multiple, the ism of all isms and a plurality of isms: Adolf Hitler is ismless because he has to always say his ismlessisms, for example, ‘I’m not into Nashanal Soshall anymore mon! I’m into Catholis!” Bud is the ismlessism of Buddhism. Fash is the ismlessism of fascism. And remember, ismless is also an ismlessism.
- a supporter, believer or adherent of ismlessism: In order to forgive Adolf Hitler, he needs to be a switched on cool Ismlessist and he needs to frequently say his ismlessisms, for example, ”I’m not into rayce anymore mon! I am a switched on cool Ismlessist!”
- of, relating to, or characteristic of ismlessism or its believers or adherents: It’s very ismlessist to be a cool Rasta. I like him he’s quite ismlessist!
OTHER WORDS FROM ISMLESSIST
In morphology, clipping is the process of forming a new word by dropping one or more syllables from a polysyllabic word, such as cellphone from cellular phone. The term is also known as a clipped form, clipped word, shortening, and truncation. In a final clipping, the most common type in English, the beginning of the prototype is retained. The unclipped original may be either a simple or a composite. For example, ad and advert (advertisement), cable (cablegram), doc (doctor), exam (examination), fax (facsimile), gas (gasoline), gym (gymnasium), memo (memorandum), pub (public house), and pop (popular music). Ismlessisms are final clippings as the suffix -ism is always removed to form a new hip, cool and ‘with it’ coloured or Rastafarian word, similar to ‘ad’ from advertisement, for example, ‘Bud’ is the ismlessism of Buddhism and ‘fash’ is the ismlessism of fascism. The difference between truncated words such as ’ad’ for advertisement and ’Bud’ or ‘fash’, is that ismlessisms represent the whole of coloured or Rastafarian style, slang and fashion, which as has other benefits and repercussions regarding politics and ’rayce’, (the ismlessism of racism), whereas although ‘ad’ is slang it is not coloured, hip, cool or fashionable.
How it works.
Adolf Hitler stigmatised racism, hence, the ismlessism de-stigmatises racism. If Adolf Hitler is ismless then racism is fixed and de-stigmatised. The adverb ‘less’ has a prefix ism and a second suffix ism, for example: ism + less + ism. The adverb ‘less’ means to a smaller extent, amount, or degree and it is the adverb ‘less’ which removes or reduces the isms, for example ageism, heightism, sexism or racism. Thee second suffix ism comes again, and even though the Holocaust stigmatised all isms such as racism and even though the adjective ismless means no isms, without isms or remove isms, like racism, thee second suffix ism comes again and a second time and makes an ism out of no isms anyway, just for sake and for good measure. To reiterate, thee second suffix ism obviously and ironically turns the adjective ’ismless’ (which means no isms, without isms or remove isms) into an ism, just for good measure and therefore, the whole noun ‘ismlessism’ removes racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. The ismlessism takes the race out of ism. The ismlessism takes the ism out of race. In fact, the ismlessism takes the ism out of all isms. The ismlessism is therefore an ism of no isms, an ism without isms or an ism which removes isms. The ismlessism is proper, for example, sarcastically, it is very ‘proper’ (and a bit Rastafarian) to say your ismlessisms, or clip the isms off isms, that is, to say or write any ism without its suffix ism. For example, rayce, Catholis, fash or Bud etc. As in ‘Don’t be fash mon!’ or ‘Chill, it’s only a bit of rayce mon, everything be irie!’ This propriety could demonstrate our intellectual level today? The ismlessism’s discovery involved the realisation of the adjective ‘ismless’, as in white people are ismless, because they do not have racism, and then the addition of thee second suffix ism which turns the adjective ismless into an ism, just for sake, which forms the noun ismlessism. Therefore, if Adolf Hitler is ismless and says his ismlessisms, that is, if he always clips the isms off his isms, then racism is fixed and de-stigmatised. The ismlessism is a double ism and there is nothing more or higher that the ismlessism for racism. It is cooler than racism and funnier than anti-racism. Ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness is the absolution of Adolf Hitler, because all other lesser sins are forgiven by default. The idiom ‘to cut the head off the snake’ means to stop a larger problem by aiming at the source – often the leader, or a major culprit. The ismlessism is the correction of the root or source of the cause of Holocaust, namely, Adolf Hitler’s stigmatised racism. Therefore, to cut the head off the snake means that instead of assassination, to give Adolf Hitler the name ‘Ismless’ or make him the coolest Ismlessist and to make sure he professes and believes in the ismlessism, means that there is no racism in Adolf Hitler, which is the absolution of Adolf Hitler, which subsequently leads to the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for all of their individual acts of terror during World War Two. The adjective ismless equals, represents or stands for racism, white people or Adolf Hitler and it means that Adolf Hitler and white people are ismless or without an ism because they do not have racism. The addition of thee second suffix ism doubles the ism, in that it doubles the adjective ismless into the ismlessism, which is a double ism, which as stated above, obviously and ironically turns the adjective ismless (which means no isms, without isms or remove isms) into an ism just for sake and for good measure; and therefore, the noun ismlessism de-stigmatises the racism in Adolf Hitler and the world. If Adolf Hitler is ismless both in name and in speech then racism is fixed and de-stigmatised and all white people should be forgiven for the Holocaust.
RASTA ALGEBRA TEST.
Ismlessisms are jocularly mathematical and I will prove it to you. Instead of cumbersomely describing ismlessisms by saying: ‘clip your isms off your isms’ or ‘say or write your isms without their suffix isms’ we can efficiently say: ‘say your ismlessisms.’ For example, ‘Fash is the ismlessism of fascism!’ The concise statement ‘say your ismlessisms’ is jocularly mathematical as there is some very simple (Rasta level) addition and subtraction arithmetic going on here and hence it condenses the aforementioned cumbersome descriptions. Note: ismlessisms are colourful, beautiful and deep, which reflects coloured people. I mean ‘Bud’ and ‘fash’ are colourful, beautiful and deep. Ismlessisms are deeply black, Rasta and deeply cool. Unlike normal isms which are single isms, ismlessisms are many isms, all isms, a plurality of isms, variegated, colourful, a variety of isms, multiple, manifold, multifarious and plural. Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking are unbelievably intelligent, know many things that we laypeople do not and they have many advanced qualifications, however are they cool? Superstar DJs are wickedly and deeply cool, but do they know it? Are Superstar DJs officially and fundamentally cool? Well everyone can be officially and mathematically cool with the coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism and the cool and jocular qualification of the ismlessism presented below. Therefore, to be current, cool, hip and with it or to become, make the grade or pass out as a switched on cool Ismlessist, all that you have to do is undergo some Rasta training to pick up the cool and hip lingo of the ismlessism. Therefore, all that you have to do is complete the following Rasta algebra test by studying the following 2 examples and then answering the following 6 questions below.
An ismlessism has 3 variables.
ism (noun) – suffix ism = ismlessism
What is the ismlessism of racism?
racism – suffix ism = rayce
ismlessism = rayce
An ismlessist has 3 variables.
ist (noun or adjective) – suffix ist = ismlessist
What is the ist of expertees?
expertees + suffix ist = expertiseist
ist = expertiseist
Find the missing variable for each question.
A. Buddhism – ism = ?
B. Catholicism – ? = Catholis
C. seks + ist = ?
D. ? + ism = criticism
E. ? – ism = fash
F. Jayn + ? = Jainist
NOTE: AS YOU CAN SEE WHEN THERE IS AN ADDITION WE SPELL THE ANSWER CORRECTLY, AND WHEN THERE IS A SUBTRACTION WE SPELL THE ANSWER INCORRECTLY.
As you can see ismlessisms are mathematical in a Rasta-level way, therefore instead of saying: ‘clip your isms off your isms’ or ‘say or write your isms without their suffix isms’ we can efficiently say: ‘say your ismlessisms.’ I am not saying you have to go around saying such things as ‘Don’t be terra mon!’ to Muslims or ‘Don’t be fash mon!’ to Europeans, as long as you are consciously aware of ismlessisms, and that saying them is deeply black, African, Rastafarian and black-London youth cool and stylish. Therefore, if you managed to answer the above Rasta algebra test questions correctly, then you are officially cool! You have the cool qualification. You pass mon! You get in mon! Rastas demand nothing harder in life. Hence, you are cool because you have learned how to say your ismlessisms, that is, you have learned the cool and hip lingo of the ismlessism. Therefore, congratulations you now know how to be a switched on cool Ismlessist mon!
Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.
In this amazingly smart and digital 21st century of iPhones and iPads, English grammar may be changing with quick, abbreviated and truncated text talk; on such as Messenger, Whats App and Twitter etc. Digital technology, both hardware and software, will likely determine the faster and choppier direction and avenues of where the English language will go in the future. For example, text talk abbreviations such as ‘BTW’ (by the way) and ‘bc’ (because) indicate that the English language will become quicker, shorter, truncated and more informal in the future. Teenagers in the 21st century are whizzes on social media such as Snapchat and they invent quicker ways to communicate all the time. For example, I have just this very second invented ‘c-ya’ (as in see you later). New abbreviations and clippings are invented on social media all the time, and this indicates that the English language will be determined by digital technology in the future, and probably not by Oxford formal English grammarians. The ismlessism (or the ismlessisms) may reflect or represent the trend of this new fast 21st century grammar and lingo? For instance, ismlessisms such as ‘fash’, which is the ismlessism of fascism represent the speediness of 21st century social media text talk. Who apart from a traditional white male octogenarian would bother to write fascism in a text or tweet when one can simply write ‘fash’? ‘Fash’ is very quick and such ismlessisms may highlight the faster and choppier direction in which the English language is headed? We 20th century old timers really need to keep up!
What type of ism is ismlessism?
What is an ism? An ism is a distinctive doctrine, cause, or theory, as in Buddhism. Or an ism is an oppressive and especially discriminatory attitude or belief, as in ageism. Therefore, what type of ism is ismlessism? As you will see particularly in the part called ‘Doctrine, Theory, System, or Practice of the Ismlessism’, the ismlessism is a ’religious’ (Christian and Buddhist) ism, but it is not a religion of its own. The ismlessism is all isms, the ismlessism removes and makes cool all types of isms, however, most importantly the ismlessism fixes or de-stigmatises discriminatory isms such as ‘ayj, heit, seks and rayce’ which are examples of ismlessisms for ‘ageism, heightism, sexism and racism” respectively. The ismlessism or the ismlessisms may be grammatically incorrect, but they are politically correct. Political correctness is ‘impropa’ but because of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust we have to do it. The ismlessism is a coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism. The ismlessism is possibly more like an artistic ism or movement such as romanticism? Regardless, the ismlessism is the ism of all isms, it is the king of all isms, it is the multi-headed, multi-armed Hindu god of all isms, and it is the ism to end all isms. Is the ismlessism or are the ismlessisms grammatical? Well they are certainly an ism, however, they are a little simple to be grammatical, in that all that you have to do is clip the suffix ism of isms, which is called final clipping in morphology, such as ‘ad’ from advertisement. English grammar is quite technical and difficult and it is about sentence structure, therefore, I am not sure whether the ismlessism (or the ismlessisms) are grammatical. Therefore, what type of ism is the ismlessism (or are the ismlessisms)? The ismlessism or the ismlessisms are about coloured linguistics and style, they are about coloured slang, speech and fashion, although there are also ’religious’ (Christian and Buddhist) practices and teachings. However, these coloured stylistic qualities or properties of the ismlessism or the ismlessisms have political and racial implications and ramifications. Because saying or writing ismlessisms such as a ‘Bud’ or ‘fash’ are cool, hip and with it, they determine or indicate the direction that fashion, humanity, society, civilisation and language will likely go in the future. However, do these linguistic properties and social effects make the ismlessism or the ismlessisms grammatical? I am not sure, however, I know for sure that the ismlessism or the ismlessisms is/are not a religion of their own. Therefore, as there are teachings and practices – which all come from Christianity and Buddhism – the ismlessism is simply a ’religious’ (Christian and Buddhist) ism. I mean artists and philosophers attach suffix isms to the end of words easily and frequently, such as impressionism and Nietzscheanism.
What is an ismlessism?
The ismlessism deals with a lot more than just racism, it deals with all isms, in fact there are a multitude of ismlessisms. Ismlessisms are many isms, all isms, a plurality of isms, variegated, colourful a variety of isms, multiple, manifold, multifarious and plural. An ismlessism is any ism without its suffix ism.
Bud = ismlessism
Catholis = ismlessism
Seks = ismlessism
Rayce = ismlessism
Fash = ismlessism
Expertees = ismlessism
Singular v plural.
What is the ismlessism (singular) as an ism in its own right? What is it about? Ismlessisms (plural) are linguistic and fashionable, however, the ismlessism (singular) is possibly an ism as in a distinctive doctrine, cause, or theory. The ismlessism (singular) is never a religion on its own, but is a ’religious’ (Christian and Buddhist) ism. Therefore, the ismlessism (singular) is a solution to racism, it either removes, fixes or de-stigmatises racism. The ismlessism removes and de-stigmatises all discriminatory and negative isms. Also, in theory, by making Adolf Hitler ismless, that is, giving him the name and identity Ismless, as well as getting him to humorously, fashionably and frequently say his ismlessisms (plural), thereby proving that there is no racism whatsoever in Adolf Hitler, the ismlessism, therefore, in theory, cuts the head off the snake, in that it enables us all to forgive Adolf Hitler for the Holocaust, which subsequently forgives all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of cruelty during World War Two. Therefore, by forgiving Adolf Hitler and fixing racism, in theory, the ismlessism helps to protect white people from extinction. What are the ismlessisms (plural)? Ismlessisms (plural) are linguistic and fashionable. The noun ismlessism is a word used to designate other words that are in a state of being ismless, such as ‘Bud’ is the ismlessism of Buddhism and ‘fash’ is the ismlessism of fascism. Therefore, there are many ismlessisms (plural).
Rastas make up new words especially with their Iyaric or Dread Talk dialect, therefore, the ismlessism is a neologism. The ismlessism is a sin-free, brand new Rastafarian word, and I have to tell you how fantastic the ismlessism is and how excited I am about it. I really feel that I have found something or found the answer to what people who care about white people have been searching for for decades. As a person who cares about white people I am on cloud nine about the ismlessism, even though the ismlessism is without sin and is 100% politically correct. I mean it, there is 0% racism, hate or homophobia in the ismlessism or in this essay. Considering this entire essay is about the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust, and considering the fact that the ismlessism is sin free, this is a good thing. The ismlessism is good, it is a 100% goodhearted, cool and new Rastafarian word. So why am I so pleased? Because the ismlessism is neither anti-racist or racist and it is a neologism, which means it is a new word. The ismlessism is without sin because it is a new word. Because of the Holocaust, racism must therefore be sin and guilt. I mean the ismlessism is an entirely new, 100% benign and politically correct word which we people who care about white people can use, have, profess and identify with in order to be cool. White people can be cool with the ismlessism. I mean even though the ismlessism is neither anti-racist nor racist (it is non-racialism), as a person who cares about white people, the ismlessism really pleases me, which means there must actually be a lot in it for us people who care about white people. What I mean is that the ismlessism is a new word which is 100% politically correct which actually pleases people who care about white people. It is rare for something cool and politically correct to please people who care about white people.
Why is the ismlessism ‘jocularly’ Rastafarian? The ismlessism has two halves or aspects, religion and style; therefore, the ismlessism is definitely a Christian and Buddhist ’religious’ ism but it is a Rastafarian style. However, I am not in any way Rastafarian and I do not believe in Rastafarianism, I am white and I am devoutly Christian and unofficially Catholic. I do not believe, as Rastas do, that Haile Selassie I (Emperor of Ethiopia from 1930 to 1974) is God, divine or the second coming of Christ. In fact, I believe that the entire point of the Jesus Christ was to teach the whole world that Pharaohs and emperors are never divine or gods, like Menhutep II who blatantly self-deified, Julius Caesar who was posthumously defied or Augustus (Octavian) who also straddled the borders of divinity. I believe that God (or Jesus Christ) was the deliberate antithesis of a wealthy and noble Pharoah or emperor, in that God deliberately made sure that He was a poor, vulnerable and humble little child born in a manger, who came to serve and not be served. And the same is demonstrated by Siddhartha Gautama with His Great Renunciation, in that He was a prince destined to be king who renounced his royal titles, inheritance, palaces, luxuries and wives to become a humble ascetic who nearly starved himself to death before He attained enlightenment, Buddha-hood and nirvana. Therefore, I obviously do not in any way believe that Haile Selassie I was divine or Christ, I believe he was just a normal yet wealthy Emperor of Ethiopia. So why is the ismlessism ‘jocularly’ Rastafarian? The ismlessism does not in any way necessarily have to be Rastafarian per se, but it is definitely of coloured linguistic style and fashion. For example, it could be African American or black-London youth lingo, only that Rastafarianism is the most famous coloured culture and Rastafarianism does actually have its own pigeon-English language or dialect called Iyaric or Dread Talk. Therefore, to reiterate, the ismlessism is definitely a Christian and Buddhist ’religious’ ism but it is a Rastafarian style.
Because of two world wars and a Holocaust, the English language has bottomed out and ismlessism will prove this to you. For example, instead of Queen’s English the English language now potentially has ismlessisms. By this I mean that instead of Received Pronunciation, it is now cool and ‘propa’ to say your ismlessisms. For example, instead of saying ‘Buddhism, Catholicism, racism and fascism’, it is now hip, cool and ‘propa’ to say ‘Bud, Catholis, rayce, and fash.’ Ismlessisms are colourful, beautiful and deep which reflects coloured people. Ismlessisms are deeply black and deeply cool. As mentioned, saying your ismlessisms is as cool as saying the African American greeting: ‘Yo!’ Ismlessisms are similar to Iyaric, also called Dread Talk, the dialect of English consciously created by members of the Rastafari movement. Ismlessism is religiously Christian and Buddhist, yet black or Rastafarian linguistic fashion, style and level. This is the difference between white and black, in that white is now uncool and out of fashion, and black is now cool and in fashion. For example, the Queen of England deliberately tries to be linguistically high, articulate and sophisticated, by saying things fully such as ‘Buddhism, Catholicism, racism and fascism’, while Rasta men deliberately try to be linguistically low, inarticulate and unsophisticated by saying things such as ‘Bud, Catholis, rayce, and fash.’ Rastas are deliberately low. You can hear the difference in for example, Sir David Attenborough’s accent on black and white television in the 1960s and his accent today on UHD television in the 2020s. British ‘heightened RP’ (heightened Received Pronunciation) is no longer the mode, fashionable or cool and the British accent (especially on TV) has become more lower class, common and black over the last century. Therefore, to reiterate, ismlessism demonstrates that the English language (and a lot more) has bottomed out. Apologising to coloured people for slavery, imperialism, European colonialism and the Holocaust does not work, it’s a waste of breath and it has no effect, whereas saying your ismlessisms is a real and genuine apology to coloured people that really matters, means something and actually does have an effect. It has an effect because saying your ismlessisms such as ‘I am not a Bud mon!’ is deeply black, Rastafarian and deeply cool. Ismlessisms such as ‘Bud, rayce, Catholis and fash’ are linguistically Rastafarian Iyaric or Dread Talk, they are the rapper, hip hop artist and the black-London youth fashion, style, slang and lingo. Ismlessism is what Africans and coloured people, such as Rastafarians naturally do, it’s their fashionable style and level. Sub-Saharan Africans never invented their own writing system and this is apparent in the cool slang lingo of coloured fashion, style and music such as Rastafarianism, reggae, rap and hip hop. And it is coloured-skin, black culture and black music that is fashionable and cool today. Ismlessisms are linguistic and they represent, encompass and demonstrate all of coloured style, fashion, lingo and slang, such as Rastafarian Iyaric or Dread Talk. Therefore, what if ismlessism makes more than just ismlessisms ‘propa’? I mean what if ismlessism made all of Rastafarian Iyaric or Dread Talk ‘propa’? What if ismlessism made all hip and cool, rapper and hip hop artist argot more ‘propa’? I mean reggae artists, rappers and many musicians frequently employ cool and stylish lingo for their tracks and album names, such as ‘Work dat shit!’, where ‘dat’ is slang for ‘that’, however, although such cool slang english is hip such argot is never really ‘propa’. Ismlessisms such as ‘Bud, rayce, Catholis and fash’ are definitely ‘propa’, however, what if ismlessism also makes all Rastafarian Iyaric or Dread Talk and rapper slang such as ‘dat’ instead of ‘that’ more legitimate and more ‘propa’? What if ismlessism got officially entered into the Oxford English Dictionary? Being an Englishman myself, I would be very proud if my country (which is the home of the English language) was also the home of ismlessism, I mean I would like it if my country was cool and hip. Therefore, as white people if you say your ismlessisms it hits the strings of coloured people’s hearts because ismlessism is what such as Rastafarians naturally do, it’s their fashionable style and level. This is why coloured people are politically correct, why there seems to be bias and favouritism towards coloured people today, why our politicians, our media, our TVs and our police definitely show favouritism for coloured people today and why they seem to let coloured people off the hook with things that white people would be punished for. It is politically correct to go easier on coloured people and to let them off the hook today. Political correctness means they go soft on coloured people and hard on white people. Coloured people need a deep and genuine apology for slavery, imperialism, colonialism and the Holocaust, which no body is able to attain, reach or make. This is political correctness. Political correctness means that you have not apologised. Political correctness is ‘propa’ but it is also wrong and it simply means you have not apologised. Blackness is politically correct because coloured people are desperately due an apology which no one is able to make. Political correctness is biased towards coloured people and is unfair towards and biased against white people, however, no one is able to make a ‘propa’ apology to coloured people and this is why political correctness is happening and why our politicians, police, media and televisions definitely show favouritism towards and privilege for coloured people over white people today. Therefore, the whole point of the ismlessism is that if we white people are nice to coloured people first, then they might be nice to us? Therefore, if you are a conservative or even a racist, don’t be arrogant, like prayers, say your ismlessisms. ‘Don’t show favour mon! Wicked! Cool! Innit?’
Superstar DJs such as Judge Jules are deeply hip and deeply cool, unlike most of us, superstar DJs are submerged under the ‘cool’ ocean. However, do they know it? Are they are officially cool or fundamentally cool? It’s as if being with it and cool is nothing? However, because the ismlessism is a Christian and Buddhist ‘religious’ ism and a coloured or Rastafarian ‘style’ ism, this may give coolness an official seal or stamp? This would be great news because it would mean that you do not have to be a young black-London DJ to be cool. Therefore, everyone could be cool. Even if you are a white octogenarian you could be with it, hip and cool as long as you ‘say your ismlessisms’, such as saying: ‘I’m not a Bud mon!’, as well as probably identifying as a switched on cool Ismlessist and professing ismlessism. Ismlessisms such as ‘Bud’ and ‘fash’ are practically nothing and this practical nothingness reveals the fact that Africans and coloured people have never done anything wrong. Therefore, ismlessisms are deeply coloured and deeply cool. Nazis are uncool, and in order to be white they disconnect from most music, pop culture and what is currently cool and hip. They go back to the 1940s when white people were stronger, because they are more comfortable there. However, the past is uncool and unhip. The problem that white people have is that traditional European folk costumes, myths and customs are not as cool as coloured culture and Rastafarianism. The problem white people face is that Morris Dancers are not as cool as a Rasta man! However, the ismlessism is eternal. The offer of the ismlessism to racists is eternal. There is no pressure. Do both. Be indigenous European and cool. Wear your European folk costumes and also be hip. Be white and cool. Be neither racist nor anti-racist, be a non-racialist, switched on cool Ismlessist. ‘Don’t be fash mon!’ Ultimately, I made the decision to pledge, give or to hand over the entire ismlessism to Adolf Hitler, including the fashion and the philosophy, but most importantly the name, the domains and the identity, I am making Adolf Hitler the one and only, the blackest of black, switched on cool Ismlessist. Why the hell in Christ’s name am I doing that you might ask? Adolf Hitler created many isms, however, they are all discriminatory and negative isms. Before the Holocaust, such isms as ageism, heightism and sexism didn’t exist and definitely did not have the same discriminatory and negative stigmatisations. The source of all of these discriminatory and negative isms is one single very powerful ism, namely racism, which is actually the second most powerful ism in the universe, after the multi-headed, multi-armed Hindu god of all isms, namely the ismlessism. Adolf Hitler stigmatised many isms but particularly racism. The ismlessism gets to the core of the issue on planet Earth today and de-stigmatises racism. The ismlessism is the perfect antidote to all of Adolf Hitler’s discriminatory and negative isms because the ismlessism is also many isms, multiple and a plurality of isms. The ismlessism is colourful, beautiful, deep, manifold and a variety of isms therefore, the ismlessism is the perfect solution to all of Adolf Hitler’s negative and discriminatory isms. Also, I am making Adolf Hitler ismless because as you will see below, the ismlessism is deepest blue, coloured-skin cool, there is nothing as currently and politically correct, hip, with it and cool as saying your ismlessisms, and it would therefore, make Adolf Hitler deeply cool and therefore, it would help us forgive him, which would have many benefits for white people, who (as a result of two world wars and the Holocaust) are seriously uncool today. Therefore, I believe that is where the ismlessism is most effective and best placed. It would have the most benefit for Europeans if Adolf Hitler is thee deepest-black, coolest of cool Ismless. ‘Saying your ismlessisms’ is Rastafarian and deeply black and deeply cool, such as, ‘I’m not a Bud mon. I’m into Catholis. Never mind rayce. Don’t be fash mon! Everything be irie.’ Therefore, the ismlessism is fundamentally and mathematically cool, it is very ‘with it’ and very hip. It is blackest-black cool, it is Rasta cool, it is black-London youth cool, it is Cool Britannia! It is unbelievably politically correct. Therefore, this is why I have made Adolf Hitler thee one and only, switched on cool Ismlessist. This is to make him possibly more likeable and even potentialy popular. For example, imagine if Adolf Hitler always jokingly ‘said his ismlessisms’ with ‘Ali G’ mannerisms, for example, imagine if he humorously said to another world leader ‘I’m not into Nashanal Soshall anymore mon! I’m into Catholis! Booyackasha!’ This is very funny, hip, with it and cool because ‘saying the ismlessisms of National Socialism and Catholicism’ implies that (ironically because of Adolf Hitler) all discriminatory isms such as ageism, heightism, sexism and racism are taboo and forbidden. If Adolf Hitler is the switched on cool Ismlessist in both name and speech then racism is fixed and de-stigmatised. Racism is forbidden and that is exactly what the ismlessism does, it goes where no one has gone before, like Adam and Eve, the ismlessism tests the forbidden fruit. Black is cool, but are we supposed to be cool? The good news is that we can all be coloured-skin cool (not just Adolf Hitler) if we all ‘say our ismlessisms’ and preach the cool Rasta ismlessism. We can all be switched on cool Ismlessists, however, we should only identify as aaay switched on cool Ismlessist and reserve thee Ismless or switched on cool Ismlessist for Adolf Hitler. Therefore, everyone on Earth can be blackest black cool. We should all dig into this cool Rasta ismlessism. If Adolf Hitler is cool and forgiven then so are all white people. If Adolf Hitler is popular then so am I. Regarding the cool Rastafarian ismlessism, I got expelled from a very prestigious private school called Barnard Castle School in 1998, at the tender age of just short of 17 for smoking marijuana, and it completely ruined my life (although I would have flunked anyway). However, I have noticed that the cool Rasta ismlessism actually helps me as a former cool and slightly humorous and mischievous 16 year old white boy. This is because the ismlessism is cool, it is blackman cool and I am sure you will at least agree with me that you can tell that Rastafarianism, coloured-skin, the ismlessism and ganja can be cool (whether we like it or not)? Now I am never condoning drugs, I think they are stupid and haven’t taken marijuana since 2002 and no drugs at all since 2006; today I am mature, smart, together, clean shaven, spruce, intellectual, clear headed and sober. However, the ismlessism helps me because for the longest time I felt guilty for smoking marijuana and getting expelled from Barnard Castle School in 1998, however, surely even the headmaster who expelled me can see how Rastas, coloured-skin and ganja can be cool? Therefore, surely he can see how white kids can easily try marijuana and other drugs in an attempt to try to be as cool as Bob Marley? I have read a book about Rastafarianism and I understand how wrong and incorrect it is, however, no one ever told me to not listen to Bob Marley at school. What is cool sir? Cool is coloured and it always has been. There was no such thing as cool prior to the Holocaust. Therefore, are we supposed to be cool? Was Michael Jackson right to be ‘Bad?’ Does ‘wicked’ honestly mean something good? Is progress right? Should we be cool at all? Is Britannia honestly supposed to be cool? Probably not. We should probably be smart, clean shaven and spruce imperialists? ‘Empire is not fash mon!’ Are Orthodox Jews cool? Or are they holy? Is Jesus Christ cool? Or is He saintly? I hear churches are ram packed to the rafters with 4% attendance in England these days with an average age of 60. If churches were as ram packed to the rafters as super cool super clubs with the average of 23, I think this might be better? I am not even sure it is right to be cool sir? Black is cool not church. Is praying the Rosary cool? Is it supposed to be? Isn’t praying supposed to be about humility and resistance to vanity? Is the Pope cool? Or is he saintly? Now that I am 40 years old I pray the Rosary almost every morning God sends, however, praying the Rosary at Barnard Castle School in the 1990s as a teenager would have been excruciatingly hard, and this is because we were cool. Actors, musicians and the whole film and music industries are candidly open about taking drugs, and hence, why is it any surprise that children look up to actors and musicians and try to mimic them? For many kids education, science, intellect and academia do not compete with the cool film and music industries. Clubbing is uber cool, and like ‘saying your ismlessisms’, coloured-skin, Rastas, music and drugs, there is always something slightly below the belt that is way cooler than education. Therefore, when I got expelled from private school for smoking marijuana in 1998, I was guilty of nothing more than being slightly below the belt Rastafarian cool. I was ostracised at 16 years old for basically being too cool. However, Bob Marley, Jimi Hendrix, the TV and pop culture taught me for 16 years to be black cool. So which is it sir? Education or pop culture? To reiterate, without the Holocaust there would be no such thing as cool, The Fonz wouldn’t exist, the sixties would never have happened, there would be no such thing as Woodstock, hippies, crusties or Rastas and we Brits would all be clean shaven, smart and spruce imperialists. Like ‘saying your ismlessisms’, crusty hippies and Rastas don’t care about personal hygiene, they let it all hang loose and let it all go below the belt. If the Holocaust had never happened, there would be no ismlessism, this whole website wouldn’t exist (and that is probably in reality the goal?) and the entire essay would be wrong, ‘saying your ismlessisms’ wouldn’t be cool, such as ‘Bud, Catholis, rayce or fash’ and basically it wouldn’t be cool to be coloured. Red, white and blue would be the right colours and I wouldn’t have to use the red, gold and green colours as I have below. So what is right? The Rastafarian ismlessism is low, it is coloured and Rasta low, it is below the belt low and it means that because drugs are also slightly below the belt, that drugs are therefore also cool. Drugs are cool? How can this be? This is not right. I was expelled over several joints in 1998. Either education is right or pop culture is right? Red, gold and green are only right because of the Holocaust. Red, gold and green are just how it is because of the Holocaust. This is political correctness. Political correctness is wrong but we have to do it. Red, gold and green are wrong but we have to do them. Red, white and blue are white, nationalist and nativist and hence they are wrong or politically incorrect. This is really not good. This indicates how much trouble white people are in for the Holocaust. Because of Adolf Hitler the antithesis of white is cool. Dreadlocks are cool. Blackest black is cool. Why is coloured-skin cool? Coloured-skin is cool because it is less advanced. Using political correctness and charitable TV adverts our politicians have made starving and emaciated indigenous Africans super cool. As mentioned I got expelled from Barnard Castle School for smoking marijuana at 16, I was cool, I was a big fan of Bob Marley, Jimi Hendrix, Oasis and rave and I looked up to rock stars and old skool ravers like they were gods and hence I copied them. So what is right? What do headmasters, teachers, politicians and the authorities want? Should we be politically incorrect or politically correct? Should we be above the belt, spruce, clean shaven, smart, nerdy and geeky imperialists or should we be below the belt, drug using, scruffy, hippies, crusties, Rastafarians and ragga-men? Teachers and politicians claim to want us to be professionals and spruce but they simultaneously preach anti-racism and political correctness, which are coloured Rasta cool and Cool Britannia. Unless we white people get a grip, fix and de-stigmatise racism, demographically, in the future, indigenous Europeans will never even govern themselves. Like the uncool South African Boers it will be ‘cool’ and ‘politically correct’ not to govern yourself. Politicians seem to be contradictory, hypocritical and confused. The authorities are sending mixed messages to white children. It’s one or the other, not both. If you don’t want children to try drugs, get a grip, be conservative, get a haircut, have a shave, spruce up, tuck your shirt in, eat with your knife and fork, get yourself together and clean your act up mon!
I just wanted to make one thing clear to you. Despite the fact that I have possibly forgiven Adolf Hitler (by making him Ismless and the switched on cool Ismlessist) and therefore, have potentially forgiven all subordinate Nazis for the Holocaust, you can never ever inaccurately call me a Nazi. Why? Because the ismlessism is more intellectual than you. I have read 170 plus books and wrote two long intellectual essays to make absolutely sure that you that cannot call me a Nazi. I am an anti-pagan, anti-Aryan and Anti-Völkisch, Abrahamic Judeo-Christian. I am a switched on cool Ismlessist, second to Adolf Hitler of course (should he want to be Ismless). I have researched for 5 years solid with hardly a day off for a solution to racism and the Holocaust. There is too much intellect in the ismlessism for you to call me a Nazi. If you do call me a Nazi, I can say that you are therefore ignorant, doltish and not that clever. That is what we people who care about white people need to do. We need to be more intellectual but more importantly, more saintly than the anti-racists. For example, BNP politicians are not saintly and not intellectual enough with what they are saying and this is why they are heckled, booed and inaccurately called a Nazi. It is no good to just say for example ‘British jobs for British workers.’ You are not saintly and intellectual enough and that is why you are booed and heckled. You must write multiple essays. To Tommy Robinson I would say that Islam is not the problem, the Holocaust is by far and inconceivably much worse than Islam and terrorism. You are barking up the wrong tree. Don’t focus on non-whites or Islam, they haven’t done anything wrong and are not doing anything wrong. The anti-Christian Volk were infinitely worse. The Holocaust is the only thing that we should devote and channel our intellect on. Religion is good, however, the Volk were anti-Abrahamic, anti-Semitic and anti-Christian, they were heathen and pagan, and that is why Germany or the Nazis were so antithetical, so evil and so wrong. Germany is still wrong because it has not fixed the Holocaust. Therefore, obviously Abrahamic Judeo-Christianity is the antithesis of heathenism and paganism and therefore is probably the proper antidote for the Holocaust. You can forgive the Holocaust if you are an anti-pagan, anti-Aryan, Anti-Völkisch Abrahamic Judeo-Christian. You can also forgive the Holocaust if you are a switched on cool Ismlessist. As you will find out, religion such as Christianity is saintly (unlike the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche) and universal as for example, the Christian nativity can be as easily understood by infants as it can be by centenarians. The Christian and Buddhist ’religious’ ism and Rastafarian ’stylish’ ism is also as equally accessible to infants and as it is to adults. Universities will not allow anyone to use their intellect to forgive Adolf Hitler or solve the Holocaust, and therefore, we have to read and write our essays independently. Finally, I just wanted to say that the anti-racists do not help anything by screaming and shouting as they do, they only make things worse. The ismlessism removes or de-stigmatises the racism in Adolf Hitler and the world, it is the ultimate solution to racism. There is nothing higher than the ismlessism for racism.
No bones with Adolf Hitler.
You get a lot of people who won’t even accept the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, even in a politically correct way. This is very un-Christian. I think a lot of people may get schadenfreude about white people’s demise? It’s like there is something wrong with the politically correct forgiveness of Adolf Hitler? It’s simple, as along as Adolf Hitler is the switched on cool Ismlessist, professes the ismlessism and says his ismlessisms, there is no racism in him, and therefore, the ismlessism forgives him. And it is the absolution of Adolf Hitler that removes the racial hatred and anger from the world. I believe that to forgive Adolf Hitler is the answer to world peace. Adolf Hitler is thee switched on cool Ismlessist. Adolf Hitler and the ismlessism are inseparable. Therefore, that’s what to call him and that’s how to forgive him. I am just the discoverer of the ismlessism. The rule or law is to refer to Adolf Hitler as thee switched on cool Ismlessist and to refer to everybody else as aaay switched on cool Ismlessist. This is how to forgive Adolf Hitler. The ismlessism determines that nothing is unfixable, even the Holocaust. Racism is eternally cursed, therefore, we need to find another ism to fix it, hence the ismlessism. People don’t need to go through a ritual or an initiation process to become an anti-racist for example, they simply pick it up. Therefore, to become a switched on cool Ismlessist, all that you have to do is read this essay and if by the end, you are convinced about the rightness and benefits of the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, then you are a switched on cool Ismlessist. By the time you have finished reading this essay, something should have ‘switched’ inside of your head, and you should have ‘no bones with Adolf Hitler.’ Then you are a switched on cool Ismlessist. The question is, is it technically possible to forgive Adolf Hitler? I am convinced, in fact I know that with the ismlessism, the absolution of Adolf Hitler is guaranteed. I know this because the ismlessism is fundamental, unquestionable and bulletproof. However, the only problem is how people will react to the instant thought of forgiving Adolf Hitler, without giving this essay the time and the chance it deserves to explain. What I feel is fear, not doubt, and if people do react negatively to the even the thought of forgiving Adolf Hitler, I know that in the next life I will likely be vindicated.
“The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong.“
“Hate the sin, love the sinner.”
Then Peter came to him and asked, “Lord, how often should I forgive someone who sins against me? Seven times?” “No, not seven times,” Jesus replied, “but seventy times seven!“
As you will find out, the cool ismlessism removes the racism from Adolf Hitler and simultaneously removes the desire from non-white people to want to destroy or conquer Europe as a consequence of the Holocaust. Also, as you will see, the ismlessism could in theory kill two birds with one stone, as it might determine that the heretical Reformation was wrong and is possibly connected to the heathen and pagan Holocaust, therefore, the ismlessism could in theory reverse the Reformation and solve the Holocaust in one. Not only did the heathen and pagan Holocaust come from Germany, also atheistic Communism came from Germany, and let’s not forget Germany also bestowed the heretical Reformation on us.
FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE VERSUS SAINT ANDRÉ BESSETTE (NIETZSCHE V SAINTS).
This part of the essay is a study of many books related to the philosophical and intellectual origins of the Holocaust, which are all basically related; however, there is one important and fundamental theme that runs throughout this part and indeed all of the essay and that is Friedrich Nietzsche versus the Catholic Saints (or more specifically, as an example of the Catholic Saints, Saint André Bessette). I aim to prove and to explain to you through a comparison of these two gentlemen (who were born within a year of each other in the 1840s) that the Saints are the antithesis of Nietzsche, or more specifically the Saints are the antithesis of Nietzsche’s anti-Christian theories called the ‘inversion of valuations’ and ‘master-slave morality’. Friedrich Nietzsche was a gifted philosopher and writer, he was unbelievably articulate, literate and he danced with the pen like Shakespeare; however, he was an ardent anti-Christian (and perhaps even anti-Semitic). On the other hand Saint André Bessette was illiterate, he was a Saint but he couldn’t read or write. Therefore, what I am aim to prove and to explain to you is that before Nietzsche went mad in 1889 (after he wrote the Anti-Christ (which coincidentally was written at about the time that Adolf Hitler was conceived in 1888)), through his 13 or so philosophical books, Nietzsche made himself the diametrical antithesis of Christianity and the Catholic Saints. He did this through his antithetical theories such as his ‘tranvaluation of values’ (or his ‘inversion of valuations’) and his ‘master-slave morality’, which are the antithesis of Christianity, charity, compassion and pity. These antithetical theories of Nietzsche’s will be explained in depth later to you in this part. I also aim to prove to you that the reason why the Nazis were diametrically antithetical to the Christian love, charity, compassion and pity that the rest of us naturally feel, is directly because of such as Friedrich Nietzsche’s 19th century anti-Christian philosophies and theories. I will also demonstrate to you throughout this essay but particularly in the part called ‘Doctrine, Theory, System, or Practice of the Ismlessism’ and the ‘Conclusion’ that I personally wholeheartedly believe in and am in fact entirely devoted to the Catholic Saints and the Communion of Saints. I will show you particularly in ‘Doctrine, Theory, System, or Practice of the Ismlessism’ that simple (even thick) piety, charity and saintliness is much more important that advanced intellect and academia. This is because you can imagine a highly educated scholar or professor who is greedy or who isn’t particularly charitable, while on the other hand, you can imagine a saintly and charitable layman. Therefore, saintliness is the most important concept, message or teaching of this essay.
Therefore, before I delve into the philosophical and intellectual background of Nazism and the Holocaust, I wanted to state something. All of the following philosophers and scholars that I study and whose works I use to explain the intellectual origins of the Holocaust, including Friedrich Nietzsche, George L. Mosse, Jerry Bergman and Robert C. Holub etc, are infinitely wiser and more knowledgable than I about their respective fields, however, putting this difference aside, the only criticism that I have of such academics is that none of them offer a solution to the Holocaust. In our highly censored and politically correct world, it does not seem to matter how accurate scholars and professors become in recording the history, statistics and facts of the Holocaust and enlightening us about the origins and causes of the Holocaust, none them are able to offer a solution. I believe this is simply because people are far too scared of being seen as racist and politically incorrect? I believe people are afraid of career suicide? Remember that the early Christians were fed to the lions in the colosseum, they literally gave their lives for Christ. On the other hand we in the twenty first century will not even sacrifice our reputations for Christ.
“If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first.“
You may say how would finding a solution to the Holocaust or finding the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler do anything for Jesus Christ? The Volk and German philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche were anti-Christian, the Holocaust ruined Christianity, therefore, I aim to prove that I would die for Christ. If you read this essay I will prove to you that firstly, the Volk and Nazis were anti-Christian and second, to forgive Adolf Hitler and solve the Holocaust helps to protect white people and actually does something for Christianity. Therefore, my only saving grace in studying and presenting my thoughts on the origins and causes of the Holocaust, is that I offer a simple and tiny solution to the Holocaust called the ismlessism. The question is, does the Holocaust need fixing? I believe it definitely does and I believe the only way to fix the Holocaust is through the forgiveness and absolution of Adolf Hitler.
Ambiguity of goodness.
Goodness is completely ambiguous because for example Friedrich Nietzsche was a shit hot writer or a gifted writer; his vocabulary and his command of language is second to none, even to Shakespeare. Therefore, one almost feels compelled to call him a ‘good’ writer, however, ‘good’ in this case is an ambiguous adjective to describe Nietzsche and very misleading. Friedrich Nietzsche was unchristian, unsaintly and not necessarilly a ‘good’ person, as in good heartedness, kindness or saintliness. Nietzsche was not good as in a protagonist, he was more like an antagonistic philosopher. Apart from being elitist and bellicose, Friedrich Nietzsche was a probable anti-Semite and a definitely pathological anti-Christian. In Nietzsche’s book titled ‘The Anti-Christ’ (which coincidentally was written around the time Adolf Hitler was conceived in 1888), Nietzsche launches his final assault on institutional Christianity, in which he identifies himself with the ‘Dionysian’ artist and confronts Christ: the only opponent he feels worthy of him. Therefore, we could say that Nietzsche was a ‘bad’ writer, however, this again is misleading as it makes us think there was something wrong with his writing skills, which there definitely was not. Or we could say that Nietzsche was a good writer who wrote bad things. Therefore, good is ambiguous because it can mean a good person or it can mean that someone is talented, adroit, skilled or very ‘good’ at something. To be a good person and good at something is not the same thing. Just because you are good at something doesn’t mean you are a good person, and this is what Catholicism understands. Similarly, bad can mean a bad person or that someone is poor, inept, unskilled or particularly bad at something. Therefore, it is more accurate to describe Friedrich Nietzsche as an unsaintly person with good writing skills. On the other hand St. André Bessette (9 August 1845 – 6 January 1937), the first Canadian living after Confederation to be canonized, was very good hearted but illiterate. St. André Bessette was simple, uneducated and illiterate but very saintly. Therefore, we could say that St. André Bessette was a good person but a bad writer. What the ismlessism tries to prove to you in this essay, (and what Catholicism understands) is that, like St. André Bessette, it doesn’t matter if you are a bad writer as you can be a good person. Catholicism understands this ambiguity of goodness, because you can be a saintly simpleton or an evil genius. This theme of the ambiguity of goodness as demonstrated by Nietzsche (evil genius) versus St. André Bessette (saintly simpleton) is a theme which runs and courses throughout this essay.
Nietzsche (The Christian Question).
Prior to the extreme Nazi anti-Semitism of the twentieth century, many German intellectuals and scholars, such as Richard Wagner and philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche fought an intellectual and cultural warfare against the supposed and fictive influence of Jewish culture over the superior German arts and culture. In fact, Friedrich Nietzsche was a disciple of Richard Wagner and Nietzsche was in what was known as the ‘Wagnerian circle’. The virulently anti-Semitic Richard Wagner had a great cultural enterprise or mission for Germany, which envisioned a tremendous cultural rebirth of Germanic arts and culture with an eternal battle against the influence of inferior Jewish culture. Wagner was a serious influence on the younger Nietzsche. The reason I am relaying this to you, is that such virulent nineteenth century intellectual and cultural anti-Semitism in Germany was a precursor to Nazism and the Holocaust.
Significant in this episode, however, is not the mistaken facts, but the readiness of the young academic Wagnerians to conceive any opposition as part of a cultural war between urban, sophistic, journalistic Jews and noble, stalwart, superior Germans.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 81.
In the anti-Jewish mentality of the late nineteenth century, journalism was the special province of the Jews. Among Judeophobes they were regarded as the owners of the major newspapers and journalistic organs, and the newspaper or magazine article, with its quick and mass appeal, its flashy and insubstantial language, and its superficial display of learning and virtuosity, became the paradigm for Jewish culture, which was antithetical to everything truly profound, serious, genial, and German.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 83.
In these lectures we once again encounter the familiar antithesis of the Wagnerian cultural project: a German realm of true artistry and genius opposed to, and at present thwarted by, a Jewish-dominated culture of journalism and kitsch.
As you can see from the above quotes, what the German Judeophobes considered the so-called Jewish journalistic literature with its quick and mass appeal, its flashy and insubstantial language and kitsch is basically what the cool Rasta ismlessism is. I mean ismlessisms such as ”Bud, Catholis, rayce and fash” are kitsch and are antithetical to everything truly profound, serious, genial, and German. Perhaps if the Germans could have understood ismlessisms and how low or (as Adolf Hitler no doubt would have said) ‘degenerate’ they are, they might have been a little cooler or less bothered by so-called Jewish journalistic kitsch?
Nietzsche was learning well how to vent his frustration at modern Jewry and its tyranny over German culture without specific references to Jews.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 84.
In the Untimely Meditations the understood background to the ills of modernity remains the Jews and their inordinate influence over German culture.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 169.
Nietzsche, the opponent of political anti-Semitism in his own era, infuses his text with another motif from his adversaries by proclaiming, as Wagner had done in his “Judaism and Music” and Marr had claimed in his Victory of Judaism over Germanness (1879), the ultimate victory of Jewry over peoples closely resembling Germans.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 87.
Related to Friedrich Nietzsche, I have read the following books:
- The Philosophy and Psychology of Hitler and Nietzsche, by Tim Ouellette
- Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche
- Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub
- Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, by Friedrich Nietzsche
- On the Genealogy of Morals, by Friedrich Nietzsche
- Beyond Good And Evil, by Friedrich Nietzsche
This is in an effort to understand how and why Friedrich Nietzsche was the antithesis of the Catholic Saints and hence to understand the dark and ominous intellectual origins of Nazism and the two world wars. In a similar vein, I wanted to understand the German ideologies and philosophies which influenced the German psyche and mentality and which geared them up for total war and the Holocaust in the early 20th century. Nietzsche is both brilliant and shocking, and there is perhaps a tug of war between the compassionate, kind and good hearted Catholic Saints and right-wing, militaristic, unsaintly and anti-Christian philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche. To compare the characteristic difference between Germans and Indians, are human beings violent warriors or are we peaceful holy men? The Indian religion Jainism is about extreme nonviolence, in that, Jainists believe that everything has a soul, even plants, and so Jainists won’t even eat root vegetables as that would kill the entire plant. Therefore, Jainists only pick and eat the fruit from plants. Jainists believe killing things, even plants leads to bad karma and that nonviolence is the path to enlightenment. Now as I will show you, unlike most non-white people, Europeans feel that they have something to defend, their racial features, their beautiful women and their countries, which instinctively gives the Europeans a diametrically antithetical philosophy or point of view to such as the extremely nonviolent Jainists. In fact 19th and early 20th century Europeans with their warrior-like philosophers such as Nietzsche would have probably called Jainists ‘cowardly blacks’ or something as equally as politically incorrect. However, I will henceforth prove to you that the Holocaust unquestionably proves that Germany had the ideological, philosophical and diametrically opposite-wrong end of the stick, in that ultimately and fundamentally the Volk were anti-Christian and therefore, did not have a good hearted, peaceful, nonviolent and religious ism of their own. However, although ismlessism is not a religion of its own (it is a ‘religious’ ism) it is a good hearted, peaceful, nonviolent, black or Rastafarian religious ism, and it may give to Europeans something similar to Jainism and what they lacked during the two world wars. It is almost a tug of philosophical war between peaceful and nonviolent East (such as India and China) versus the belligerent and violent West (such as Germany). The two world wars and the Holocaust end the debate, in that good hearted, peaceful and nonviolent philosophies and religions are unquestionably right.
…the ideas of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, ideas that have spawned horrific ideologies and have proffered a distorted view of the mind, the will, and human nature.
The Philosophy and Psychology of Hitler and Nietzsche, by Tim Ouellette, location 34.
“Bismarck’s unique creation is the Germany we have known in our time, a problem child of Europe and the world for nearly a century, a nation of gifted, vigorous people in which first this remarkable man and then Kaiser Wilhelm II and finally Hitler, aided by a military caste and by many a strange intellectual, succeeded in inculcating a lust for power and domination, a passion for unbridled militarism, a contempt for democracy and individual freedom and a longing for authority, for authoritarianism…”
Bismarck sought to retain authority, not by votes, “but by blood and iron” and “This was the Germany which Hitler resolved to restore.”
The Philosophy and Psychology of Hitler and Nietzsche, by Tim Ouellette, location 94.
Democratism has always been the décadence type of organizing power…
Democracy is the natural consequence of Christianity.
Europe is a collapsing world. Democracy is the decaying form of the state.
European democracy is, to the smallest degree, the unleashing of forces. Above all, it is an unleashing of laziness, weariness, weakness.
Disregard for, along with the decline and death of the state, the unleashing of the private person … is the consequence of the conceptualized democratic state…
Liberal institutions immediately cease to be liberal, as soon as they are attained; afterwards, there are no more mischievous or more radical enemies of freedom than liberal institutions. One knows well enough what they accomplish: they undermine the will to power, they are the levelling of mountain and valley exalted into morality, they make people small, cowardly, and voluptuous, – with them the herding animal always triumphs. Liberalism: that is increased herding-animality.
Democracy represents the disbelief in great men and elite society: “One man is equal to the next.” “Fundamentally we are all self-serving cattle and rabble.”
Equal justice for all – that is the outstanding injustice; for the highest men arrive too soon.
The doctrine of equality! … But there exists no deadlier poison; for it seems to be preached by justice itself, while it does away with justice…
Difference prevails among the smallest of things, such as sperm, and eggs – equality is an extraordinary delusion.
The Press. Let us consider how, even today, all great political events sneak silently behind the curtain, how they are concealed by trivial events and appear minor next to them, how it is long after they have occurred that their dire effects are felt as the ground shakes – with the press as it now is, with its daily wave of hot air spreading dread, exclaiming, inciting, alarming, what meaning can we now give it – is it something more than a perpetual false alarm that leads the ears and senses down the wrong path?
We now face the repercussions of the “great” happenings – the repercussions of the press.
The freedom of the press ruins style, and ultimately spirit.
I am against parliamentarianism and the press, for they are the means with which the herd animal believes it turns itself into a god.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 979 – 1020.
Let this “Sword of the Spirit” accompany the German warriors and soldiers as they help build a new Europe upon the ruins of an old world, and who keenly understand the truth of Nietzsche’s words which conclude the following selection:
Brethren, war’s the origin
Of happiness on earth!
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 60.
One has renounced grand life when one renounces war.…
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 53.
As you can see from the above quotations, Britain was never like Germany. Britain never had a military caste, was never influenced by many a strange intellectual, never had a lust for power and domination, a passion for unbridled militarism, a contempt for democracy and individual freedom and a longing for authority, for authoritarianism. However, analogously Europe is like a sinking ship and Nazism is the breach in the hull, therefore, despite the fact that Britain was never authoritarian like Germany and in fact helped to defeat Nazism, we are all as European nations being taken down to Davy Jones’ locker by Nazism. I am trying to seal that breach in the hull of Europe’s doomed ship. I am using the ismlessism to counteract or cure world’s worst ism, namely Nazism. As you will see, it is evident that right-wing, proto-fascist, anti-Christian, and non-good hearted 19th century-German philosophies such as Nietzscheanism culminated in the 20th century to produce the world’s (or Europe’s) worst ism, namely Nazism. Therefore, my purpose is also to compare German philosophies such as Nietzscheanism with Catholicism and the Catholic Saints. One thing that I am starting to realise about philosophy as opposed to religion, is that some philosophies are complex, advanced and highly articulate, however, these kind of philosophies are abstruse, in that they are not easily comprehended. For example, Friedrich Nietzsche’s vocabulary is astounding, he dances with words and I absolutely love his literature, it’s as good as Shakespeare, in that the language is so fascinating and educational in its temporal context. However, such immense use of vocabulary makes Nietzsche quite abstruse and does not initially or easily allow the average reader to grasp him. It is only by completing one of Nietzsche’s books and by doing follow-up research on Wikipedia, does one gather a deep and overall understanding of Nietzsche, but initially it’s quite hard to understand. Another example is such as Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics and Metaphysics which are very complex, articulate and abstruse, and therefore, are difficult for neophytes, tyros and amateur humanists. For example, Ibn Sina read Aristotle’s Metaphysics 40 times before abandoning it as incomprehensible. In the same way Friedrich Nietzsche has such a treasury of vocabulary, that as an amateur humanist like me, it is hard to initially grasp him. Unlike good hearted religions, Nietzsche is inaccessible to children. Ismlessism is not a religion, it is a ‘religious’ (Christian and Buddhist) ism, but it is actually as simple, plain and as down to Earth as a religion. Philosophy is powerful and paramount because it influences politicians who in turn influence all of our minds. However, anti-Christian Nietzsche may have influenced political leaders in an incorrect or negative way? On the other hand Confucius was unbelievably ‘good’ (remember ’good’ is ambiguous) and Confucianism was the official state and governing philosophy of China for 2000 years. Some philosophies such as Confucianism and the ismlessism are very simple, direct, down to Earth and make complete and instant sense to laypeople. Confucianism and the ismlessism do not mess around, they want you to truly understand them as easily as possible. Confucianism is both a religion and a philosophy and there is sometimes not much difference between religion and philosophy, however, religion is never advanced or abstruse and never tries to bamboozle us with highly articulate language, it is for example the lesson of the nativity. Religions want us understand them as easily as possible. Philosophy may be inverse to religion in that philosophy is as articulate as it possibly can be to communicate an overall meaning, while religion is as simple as it possibly can to communicate its instant meaning. You must understand that the ismlessism is not better than Nietzscheanism, it is simply different in an unambiguously good hearted way, and perhaps it is simply what is requisite this side of two world wars?
“Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.”
At that time Jesus said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.”
Religion is simple, catholic and universal, in that all ages from 4 year olds to centenarians can understand the Christian nativity, which is down to Earth. This is why religion, such as Christianity is so good hearted and why philosophy (such as Nietzsche’s anti-Semitic and anti-Christian philosophy) can be questionably good hearted. Philosophy can sometimes for all intents and purposes be practically malignant compared to universally good hearted religions, because articulate 19th century philosophies such as Nietzscheanism influenced German ultranationalism, two European world wars and the Holocaust. The Holocaust definitely came about due to such as Richard Wagner’s nineteenth century cultural war against Judaism and the prevalence of anti-Semitic and anti-Christian philosophies and literature in Germany, and the deficiency of good hearted religious isms (unlike Asia) in Germany and Europe. Friedrich Nietzsche talks frequently of the noble and warrior-like Greco-Roman culture and rebukes the Jews and Christians for their charity, weakness, compassion or what he calls the Jews’ ‘inversion of valuations’. Therefore, analogously, the Holocaust represents a kind of battle or tug of war between Greco-Roman (European) philosophy and Israelite (non-European) religion. Obviously the Germans wanted superior European culture and philosophy to defeat inferior western Asian religion and influence.
This is why the Greeks remain the supreme cultural event of history – they knew, they did what needed to be done; Christianity, which despised the body, has up till now been mankind’s greatest misfortune. –
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 112.
Therefore, the ismlessism is also involved in the battle between noble and warrior-like Greco-Roman (European) culture and philosophy against Israelite (non-European) religion and influence, only that the ismlessism favours Near Eastern religions. Ismlessism favours Abrahamic religions because they are first in the order of recorded history, indeed the Fertile Crescent invented recorded history. Greece and Rome recorded history after Israel, and as you will see the Nazis knew that Europe was not first in the order of recorded history and through the Holocaust, the Germans tried to undo recorded history. To reiterate, philosophies such as Nietzscheanism are as articulate as they possibly can be to communicate their overall meaning but are abstruse, and can therefore, only be understood by university students. From my own experience of reading Nietzschean philosophy, as an amateur humanist and because it is so articulate, I can’t help feeling that I am doltish and witless? Yes I am! However, that is entirely the whole point of religions such as Catholicism, because it doesn’t matter if you are unintelligent or intelligent, as you can be a saintly layperson (such as St. André Bessette) or an unsaintly genius (such as Nietzsche). This might explain why the Nazis were evil geniuses, that is, because they and Germany as a whole were influenced by such anti-Christian German philosophers and scholars as Friedrich Nietzsche. Simple is exactly what religions are, like Catholicism which takes all shapes and sizes, in that (to quote Monty Python) ’You don’t have to be a six-footer, You don’t have to have a great brain’. With Catholicism you do not have to be special or a genius to be a saint, like Saint André Bessette who was illiterate. Therefore, the bottom line is that most philosophies try to be highly advanced and articulate, while religion tries to be as simple and as down to Earth as possible. Perhaps philosophy could learn from religion? Is this why when we say something is philosophical it can mean that something is not real? However, the ismlessism proves that philosophy and religion are every bit as important as science, as science is neutral and amoral, science hasn’t got a heart and will therefore, never forgive us for moral sins such as the Holocaust. Philosophy is ineffably powerful because it influences governments, political leaders and revolutionaries (such as Lenin and Stalin) which in turn influence all of us. However, because philosophy influences top-level governments and politics, it therefore, must always be good natured, good hearted, humanitarian and warm. For example, Moses, the Pentateuch and the Lord’s statutes, laws and ordinances demonstrate that our leaders at the top of society have always instinctively implemented and instituted goodness, morality and justice etc. Only the Nazis got to the top and legalised crime, murder and instituted evil. However, I believe that German philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche who also got to the top-level of influence, were also not entirely good hearted and good natured but were right-wing, atheistic, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, proto-fascist and militaristic. Therefore, what I am demonstrating to you is that such anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and highly articulate 19th century philosophies, such as Nietzscheanism were also responsible for 20th century German ultranationalism, anti-Semitism, paganism and the Holocaust. I am trying to prove to you that fundamentally the reason that the Holocaust occurred and why the Nazis were so evil and why they were so diametrically antithetical to most of us was because they were anti-Christian. It was the Nazis’ (and the Volk’s) paganism and faith in heathenism and science such as Darwinism that caused the Holocaust. Fundamentally and basically it was because they were anti-Christian. Although related, I believe it was primarily the Christian question, not the Jewish question which made the Holocaust possible. Although anti-Semitism is terrible, anti-Christianity is evil and satanic. Nietzsche is a genius, it’s kind of difficult to describe Nietzsche as good or bad, he is a genius writer and his command of language and vocabulary is incomparable, he’s as good as Shakespeare. Therefore, Nietzsche is a ‘good’ writer, however, good is a ambiguous term, I mean Nietzsche was not ‘good’ as in goodhearted like a Saint, he hated Christianity, theologians and priests, which to me all exemplify good heartedness. Therefore, Nietzsche was a very ‘good’ writer but an unsaintly philosopher. Therefore, would it be right to call Nietzsche (in modern terms) a ‘wicked’ writer? Is that a ‘good’ thing? Most disturbingly, one can sense the origins of The Third Reich in Nietzsche’s devastating works. Nietzsche questioned Christianity before Adolf Hitler was even born, he attacked Christianity intellectually and philosophically, he broke Christianity, he made a breakthrough and made it possible and even feasible to be atheist, pagan and heathen, which is the root or cause of why the Nazis were so evil and diametrically antithetical to humanity. The Holocaust happened not because of the Jewish question, I believe it happened because of the Christian question, which no one more than Nietzsche (followed by the Nazis) asked. The lesson from the Holocaust is never ever ever question Christianity. Therefore, articulate, anti-Semitic and anti-Christian philosophies such as Nietzscheanism made the Nazis antithetical and evil. Therefore, apart from Christianity, did 19th and 20th century Europeans (unlike the Asians) have some kind of a deficiency of good hearted, peaceful and nonviolent religious isms of their own? Unlike the British, Germany and Nazism wanted to conquer Europe and the whole world, however, unlike Britain, who conquered 1/4 of the globe through liberalism, philanthropy, virtue and ‘the good name of the British Empire’, you cannot simultaneously have the desire to conquer the whole world and be good hearted at the same time. This is why I believe Germany instinctively, subconsciously and collectively produced philosophers and intellectuals such Friedrich Nietzsche and political leaders such as Adolf Hitler. The British explored, the British Empire acted as an agency for imposing free markets, the rule of law, investor protection and relatively incorrupt government on roughly a quarter of the world, while the Germans just wanted to conquer and subjugate Europe and the world. And again, unlike the British who mostly explored and traded with native peoples, you can’t have the desire to conquer Europe and the world and have a good heart at the same time, and this is why Germany collectively and instinctively created anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and questionable philosophies and ideologies, as well as ultranationalism, fascism and militarism. On another note, philosophers take it personally when you compare philosophy to science or say that philosophy can sometimes seem not real, however, religion such as Catholicism and the Pope do not give a damn about science, even if religion is a little inaccurate compared to science. Even if the Catholic Church burned free thinking scientists such as Giordano Bruno at the stake, it doesn’t seem to worry about it. Nietzsche was virulently anti-Christian, but how is it that philosophy can be looked down on by science, however, science can never criticise or overcome religion? So why should philosophers take criticism personally? Is it because philosophy is secular? Is this why philosophers take criticism personally? Is the ismlessism secular or is it religious? It is a never a religion of its own, however, it is a ‘religious’ (Christian and Buddhist) ism. The reason science cannot criticise or overcome religion is because religions such as Catholicism and Buddhism are about enlightenment and nirvana and science will never be able to poke, prod and test nirvana.
Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World, by Nial Ferguson, page xix.
I think I will mention at this point that I do not want to portray too bad or negative picture of Friedrich Nietzsche, as honestly he wasn’t too bad. 90% of his writings are fine and he was against the anti-Semitic movement in Germany in the 1880s. Nietzsche did have a good heart, it’s just that through his beautifully put and elegant theories such as his ‘tranvaluation of values’ (or his ‘inversion of valuations’) and his ‘master-slave morality’, he unfortunately created a humongous antithetical philosophy and viewpoint to Christianity, which possibly caused his madness. I will warn you that I have only quoted the remaining 10% of Nietzsche’s writings, the worst parts, and I have neglected the fairer works. I did this to portray a picture of Nietzsche, but it’s actually not an entirely true picture. Nietzsche was a good person and not that bad. I will here quote at length some Nietzsche and then explain my thoughts about it.
What is good? – All that increases the feeling of power, the will to power, power itself, in man.
What is bad? – All that proceeds from weakness.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1594.
The world is neither good nor evil! And so is it with man!
Verily, I say unto you: good and evil which would be everlasting – it doth not exist! Of its own accord must it ever surpass itself anew.
It requires minimal reflection in order to accept the idea that nothing is “good in itself,” that something good must be thought of only as “wherefore good,” by necessity, any good intentions will be viewed as “evil and bad” by opposing intentions: in short, every single thing to which we attribute the title “good,” can also be denoted as “evil.”
False shores and false securities did the good teach you; in the lies of the good were ye born and bred. Everything hath been radically contorted and distorted by the good.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1647 – 1665.
To assert the Teutons were predetermined and conditioned for Christianity, there can be no greater impudence in such an assertion. If it is so, the antithesis is not only true, but also obvious. Wherefrom should the fabrication of Jesus and Saul, the two very Jewish Jews, who may or may not have existed, be more intimate with the Teutons than with other peoples?
A nihilistic religion like Christianity, old and rugged enough to have survived every strong instinct and accordingly sprung out of the people, transmitted itself step by step through other spheres of influence, finally within the youth, and even converted people yet to exist – very odd! An evening blessing including a shepherd and a grand conclusion preached to barbarians and Teutons! How all must be barbarized and Germanized! And in such a way, as those who dreamt of Valhalla know, that all the happiness on earth was found in war!
It hardly seems possible to transplant a foreign myth with continual success without irreparably damaging the tree via the transplant. Perhaps, in one case, it may be strong and healthy enough to eliminate this foreign element through a violent fight, however, it must consume itself sick and withered, or in diseased overgrowth. We think so highly of the pure and powerful core of German character that we dare to expect of it, above all others, the elimination of forcibly implanted foreign elements, and deem it possible that the German spirit will reclaim itself.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 444.
It might still be possible for the Germans to make an honorable name ultimately out of their old name of reproach, by becoming the first non-Christian nation of Europe; for which purpose Schopenhauer, to their honor, regarded them as highly qualified. The work of Luther would thus be consummated, – he who taught them to be anti-Roman, and to say: “Here I stand! I cannot do otherwise!”
I do not understand how a German could ever feel Christian…
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 584.
The dangers of the Jewish soul are:
- They gleefully create parasitic settlements.
- They know how to “adapt,” as the naturalists say: through which they have become born actors, like the polyps about which Theognis sang, as they camouflage themselves the color of the cliffs to which they cling.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 674 – 699.
That Germany has amply sufficient Jews, that the German stomach, the German blood, has difficulty (and will long have difficulty) in disposing only of this quantity of “Jew” – as the Italian, the Frenchman, and the Englishman have done by means of a stronger digestion: – that is the unmistakable declaration and language of a general instinct, to which one must listen and according to which one must act. “Let no more Jews come in! And shut the doors, especially towards the East (also towards Austria)!” – thus commands the instinct of a people whose nature is still feeble and uncertain, so that it could be easily wiped out, easily extinguished, by a stronger race.
A thinker who has the future of Europe at heart, will, in all his perspectives concerning the future, calculate upon the Jews, as he will calculate upon the Russians, as above all the surest and likeliest factors in the great play and battle of forces.
Amid the dramas to which the upcoming century invites us, one is the decision regarding the destiny of the European Jews. The fact that their die is cast and they have crossed the point of no return is now tangibly obvious: all that is left for them is to either become the masters of Europe or to lose Europe as they lost Egypt long ago, where they placed themselves between a similar either-or.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 718.
Man shall be trained for war, and woman for the recreation of the warrior: all else is folly.
Thus would I have man and woman: fit for war, the one; fit for maternity, the other; both, however, fit for dancing with head and legs.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1691 – 1706.
Exceptional individual men should have the chance to procreate with more than one woman; and individual women, especially those with favorable qualities, should likewise not remain bound to the fate of one man.
Let us be against the ill gotten as we are against criminals: also, let us detest their propagation. This is the first general improvement of custom I desire: it should not be acceptable for the criminals and the ill gotten to propagate.
Another commandment of philanthropy. There are cases where to have a child would be a crime – for example, for chronic invalids and extreme neurasthenics. … Lastly, society here has a positive duty to fulfill, and of all the demands that are made on it, there are few more urgent and necessary than this one. Society, as the trustee of life, is responsible for every botched life before it comes into existence, and as it has to atone for such lives, it ought consequently to make it impossible for them ever to see the light of day: it should in many cases actually prevent the act of procreation, and may, without any regard for rank, descent, or intellect, hold in readiness the most rigorous forms of compulsion and restriction, and, under certain circumstances, have recourse to castration. The Mosaic law, “Thou shalt do no murder,” is a piece of ingenuous puerility compared with the earnestness of this forbidding of life to decadents, “Thou shalt not beget!!!” … For life itself recognizes no solidarity or equality of rights between the healthy and unhealthy parts of an organism. The latter must at all cost be eliminated, lest the whole fall to pieces.
The new problem: whether or not a few people can rise to become a better race at the cost of others. Reproduction…
My philosophy reveals the triumphant thought through which all other systems of thought must ultimately perish. It is the great disciplinary thought: those races that cannot bear it are doomed; those which regard it as the greatest blessing are destined to rule.
The strong of the future. To what extent necessity on the one hand and accident on the other have attained to conditions from which a stronger species may be reared: this we are now able to understand and to bring about consciously; we can now create those conditions under which such an elevation is possible.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1774 – 1806.
In the initial year of National Socialist rule, Gottlieb Scheffler categorizes Nietzsche accordingly as a “theoretical anti-Semite,” who grounded his anti-Christianity on anti-Semitism.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 14.
As an example of nineteenth and early twentieth century German philosophers, writers, scholars and publishers Nietzsche was basically anti-Semitic and absolutely hated Christianity, which obviously and necessarily will only lead to evil. Nietzsche’s anti-Semitism was sometimes contradictory, sometimes he expressed admiration for the Jews and Jewish virtues at other times he harboured anti-Semitic expressions and feelings, especially in his notebooks and correspondence. During his years as a Wagnerian disciple he was likely anti-Semitic, however, after his break up with Wagner and at the same time as the rise of the anti-Semitic political movement in Germany in the 1880s, Nietzsche rejected anti-Semitism, although for different reasons as to one in the twenty first century might expect. To reiterate, in historical context Nietzsche was vehemently against the anti-Semitic movement in Germany in the 1880s, as it was immoderate and distasteful, however, he sometimes made anti-Jewish remarks and statements, particularly in his notebooks and correspondence, but sometimes in his published works that we today in the twenty first century would consider anti-Semitic. However, what I am trying to prove is that although anti-Semitism is terrible, it is not as serious as anti-Christianity, and that it was Nietzsche’s Christian question which had the most serious consequences. Because Nietzsche intellectually and philosophically attacked Christianity in the last half of the nineteenth century he normalised such a belief and enabled the Nazis in the twentieth century to use anti-Christianity to facilitate the Holocaust. By the time Nazism came around, German anti-Christianity had a heritage, tradition and authority (backed up by Nietzsche).
Nietzsche’s response to and rejection of anti-Semitism, viewed from the perspective of the 1880s, is part and parcel of his assault on Christian ethics, narrow-minded nationalism, and redemptive socialism. It does not arise from philo-Semitic sentiments and is unrelated to the liberalism we normally identify with attitudes opposed to racism and supportive of civil liberties in an egalitarian society.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 131.
Therefore, Friedrich Nietzsche virulently rejected anti-Semitism as a political movement because it was immoderate but he simultaneously harboured some anti-Jewish tendencies. Therefore, you should be aware that Nietzsche would have been distraught at any association with the Holocaust. Remember Nietzsche was positive about the Jews in other places of his published works, he admired their characteristics that they had attained under centuries of oppression and because of their intelligence and acumen regarding finance, he believed that the intermarriage of Jews with European nobility would produce a ruling elite.
We will recall that in aphorism 205, titled “Of the People of Israel,” Nietzsche expresses an admiration for Jewry in persevering for so many centuries under persecution, and that he attributes their current characteristics, most of them laudable, to this long history of oppression. He also hopes that intermarriage with the noble classes of Europe will gradually remove any unfavorable character traits.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 155.
What was new for Nietzsche and antithetical to his former Wagnerian perspective was the celebration of Jewish hegemony in Europe. The solution to the Jewish Question is not assimilation—although there is some suggestion of intermarriage with the upper classes—or the gradual disappearance of Jewish vices in favor of their virtues. Rather, at least in Dawn, the dilemma of Jewish existence in a hostile Europe will be resolved by Jewish dominance over the continent.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 120.
Regardless, this kind of unsaintly, basically anti-Semitic and definitely anti-Christian German philosophy related above is partly responsible for why Germany and Nazism tried to undo recorded history by uprooting the Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religions from Europe in the twentieth century via World War Two and the Holocaust. Therefore, what I have learned by reading Nietzsche is that unlike religion, Nietzscheanism, as a philosophy, is not entirely good natured and it obviously does not have a good Christian heart.
It was evident to all commentators that Nietzsche had championed war, battle, agon, struggle, and related notions repeatedly in his writings. While many interpreters simply considered statements concerning these terms part of a metaphorical register unrelated to actual military conflict, World War I began a longer association of Nietzsche and the goals of German militaristic and right-wing segments of society who were ultrapatriotic and at the same time xenophobic.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page ,.
Philosophers cannot be negative, and this is because philosophers influence top-level political leaders, who in turn influence all of us. To reiterate, philosophy influences top-level governments and politics, which means it therefore, must always be good natured, good hearted, humanitarian and warm. As another example, concerning America’s Declaration of Independence and the good hearted, liberal, humanitarian American constitution (which was influenced by English philosophers such as John Locke), our political leaders at the top-level have always automatically promulgated and instituted what is good, moral and just. Only the Nazis who got to the top-level of national government, legalised criminality and instituted evil. Therefore, to me, because philosophers such as Karl Marx (who influenced top-level governments, revolutionaries and political leaders), should therefore, always be very good natured, good hearted, humanitarian and warm. Therefore, as you will see by reading the part of this essay called ‘Doctrine, Theory, System, or Practice of the Ismlessism’, that as a ‘religious’ (Christian and Buddhist) ism, the ismlessism is very good natured, good hearted, humanitarian and warm. The ismlessism is as good hearted and down to Earth as the Christian nativity and Confucianism. For example, to me it is abundantly evident that the Asians have always had a good heart or a bigger heart than Europeans and Germans in particular, as demonstrated by such eastern philosophers as Confucius and extreme nonviolent religions such as Jainism, and this lack of good hearted, peaceful and nonviolent religious isms or the prevalence of atheistic, quasi-fascist, militaristic and right-wing philosophical isms, such as Nietzscheanism, is the cause of why Germany was so aggressive in the early twentieth century and ultimately why Europeans had two disastrous the world wars and a Holocaust. What is more important intelligence or saintliness? I mean, as an example and in reference to my first (erroneous) essay or my 87,000 anti-racist joke about the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler also called Time For Forgiveness, clearly intelligence doesn’t matter as much as saintliness. This is because of for example, my puerile idea of attaining innocence and forgiveness by the scientifically impossible feat of time travel to the past, which proves I am not intelligent. However, the essay, especially through its 100 works of lighthearted comical digital art, and because it tried so hard to forgive the worlds most serious sins, was therefore, a little saintly. Therefore, I believe saintliness should always come before intelligence. Granted racism and definitely Nazism are antithetical to saintliness, however, is anti-racism entirely saintly? Anti-racism is against an entire race, it is not accurate like being anti-pagan, anti-Aryan and anti-Völkisch. Also anti-racism does not remove the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. Anti-racism just attacks and scorns Adolf Hitler without removing the racism from him and the world. Anti-racism is biased and not all that saintly? Also, anti-racism is code for anti-white and it causes suffering and detriment to indigenous white people. I mean are anti-fascists saintly? Definitely not! Switched on cool Ismlessist saintliness is the peaceful, nonviolent, kind and loving forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and all white people for the Holocaust, not their judgement or extermination. As demonstrated by such as the frequency of acts of Islamic terror and violence in Europe, such as suicide bombings and beheadings, anti-racism is clearly not working and is not the solution to racism and world peace. As Europeans you have got to be right, and because anti-racism is anti-white, it means that you are not right. However, the ismlessism being neither racist nor anti-racist, but non-racialist, would make Europeans right again. Again you may say I am thick by having to read a whole book of Nietzsche’s and then research it on Wikipedia, to grasp Nietzsche? Nietzsche has an amazing vocabulary, he is unbelievably articulate and highly intellectual, however, I believe religions such as Catholicism and ’religious’ isms such as ismlessism are actually a little anti-academic or anti-intellectual because they are and have to be accessible and easily understood by infants and centenarians equally. Ismlessism or the black or Rastafarian ‘religious’ ism is also universal and accessible to children. Religions are, simple, catholic, universal and down to Earth. The Christian nativity is down to Earth. And it is precisely because religions are simple, down to Earth and understandable to children, that makes them so saintly. Although not a religion of its own, ismlessism is also very saintly in its goals and practices, which simply come from Christianity and Buddhism. Therefore, advanced philosophy such as Nietzsche’s amazing vocabulary and his anti-Christian ideas contributed to the German mindset, soul and consciousness in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and is therefore, connected to and partly responsible for German ultranationalism, militarism and the Holocaust. The ismlessism might highlight to philosophers the inverse difference between philosophy and religion, in that philosophy is complicated while religion is simple. You may say how is the ismlessism universal and accessible to children, when it’s about the forgiveness of primarily Adolf Hitler? As mentioned, the Rastafarianess of the ismlessism is proper, for example, sarcastically, it is very ‘proper’ (and a bit Rastafarian) to say your ismlessisms or to clip the isms off isms, that is, to say or write any ism without its suffix ism. For example, rayce, Catholis, fash or Bud etc. As in “Don’t be fash mon!” or “Chill, it’s only rayce mon, everything be irie!” This low-level Rastafarianess of the ismlessism demonstrates that, although it is not a religion of its own, the ismlessism is as down to Earth as the nativity, because it is so Rastafarian low, it is therefore universal, as even children can understand it as well as centenarians; as opposed to advanced philosophy such as meta-ethical relativism or Nietzscheanism, which only degree-level students can understand. (Or this Rastafarianess of the ismlessism could demonstrate our intellectual level today?) Also, racists are not funny because they use sometimes hate and basically because Nazism used pure hate, however, anti-fascists are also not funny because they also hate white people and they are also violent. Violence is never a solution and to quote the peaceful and nonviolent Mahatma Gandhi, an eye for eye only makes the whole world blind. The ismlessism is accessible to children because it is inherently saintly and it is saintly because it is obviously and ironically funny. You could almost possibly even imagine some kind of very lighthearted pictorial children’s story book about an antagonist and the ismlessism and how it de-stigmatised the racism in him? The ismlessism is cool, hip, with it, universal, simple and very low, Rastafarian low, low enough for children to easily understand. Children definitely want to be cool, hip and with it? Children might also want to hear a good story and how things always have a happy and good ending no matter how bad they are? Children might want to hear how that no matter how bad things are there is always fix? Therefore, children would probably like to know that the ismlessism proves that nothing is unfixable? Even the Holocaust. Jesus Christ is our Saviour, He is the Gospel and He is the Good News, however, I believe that because of the Holocaust that our Salvation is now opportune. Children (and us adults as well) desperately need to hear His Good News and that how no matter how bad things are or get that everything will be fine because He gave His life for us. I just believe that we have to help protect ourselves, in order to make His Salvation manifest. Instead of just sitting around twiddling our thumbs and waiting for Jesus Christ to come and Save us. I mean the thing about saintliness is that it means that religion comes before science. In reality or in prehistory spirituality and religion probably came before science and metal work. Science such as physics and mathematics are completely neutral, unbiased and amoral, they have no heart or soul, therefore, they will never contribute to our salvation from such moral sins as the Holocaust. I mean the universe is heartless, chaotic, random and entirely scientific, which means that our solar system will heartlessly send a comet or an asteroid our way without a second thought or any feeling of guilt or remorse whatsoever. The fate of the majestic dinosaurs proved that? However, the ismlessism being a good hearted, saintly, black or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism proves that first and foremost that humans come from the heart, morality and goodness, before merciless science, mathematics and physics (and anti-Christian and unsaintly philosophy). Therefore, good and moral religion should come first and heartless and chaotic science should come second.
Wherever you go, go with all your heart.
Darwinism versus Christianity.
Christianity is supernatural and saintly while Darwinism is natural and unsaintly, and I will prove it to you. Christianity and saintliness are not conceited, Christianity is compassionate and charitable while Darwinism couldn’t give a damn about the ‘poor’, ‘sick’ and ‘injured’. Obviously the Nazis applied the natural to the human race instead of the supernatural. For example, a prehistoric man could have been as athletically ‘superior’ as Usain Bolt, however, if he broke a leg, he would need an athletically ‘inferior’ or a ‘weaker’ hominin to feed him and nurse him back to health. This is supernatural and it only applies to humanity. In the animal kingdom if you are ‘weak’, ‘sick’ or ‘injured’ then tough, you are on your own and will likely end up the meal of a predator. This is what the Nazis did, they applied the cruel and heartless laws of nature to humanity and to society, in that they culled off, euthanised or exterminated those they considered ‘inferior’, ‘weak’ or ‘sick’ to protect the ‘superior’ Aryan race from genetic contamination. They believed in the Darwinist survival of the fittest theory applied to the human race. However, they simply applied the laws of nature or the animal kingdom to humanity. In order to carry out their cruel, bloody and heartless Holocaust, they had to be as cruel and heartless as animals. The Germans, Nazis and the Volk had no faith, or had a diametrically antithetical faith, they did not believe in Jesus Christ, they believed in Charles Darwin, science, nature, paganism and heathenism instead.
Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live, even though they die; and whoever lives by believing in me will never die. Do you believe this?” “Yes, Lord,” she replied, “I believe that you are the Messiah, the Son of God, who is to come into the world.”
Darwin added that by applying his survival of the fittest theory, the eventual result of the differences between the races was that “the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace throughout the world the savage races.”
Regarding the above quotation of Charles Darwin, don’t you believe that it is entirely ironic that as a result of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust, it is actually and ironically (whether we want to admit it or not (or ashamedly don’t care)) the so called ‘civilised’ European races that are certainly being exterminated and replaced throughout the world by the so called ‘savage’ races? This is an obvious consequence of the Holocaust, it’s on the end of every European’s nose and we should all admit it whether we want to or not.
Darwin “clung to the idea that the human races were distinctly different and basically unchangeable.” Furthermore, “according to Charles Darwin, the ‘strong’ were bound to be victorious, and the ‘weak’ to perish.”
These ideas spread to many nations including in Canada and the United States. For example, in the first half of the nineteenth century the United States was “infatuated” with eugenics and its promise of strengthening the human race by culling the “unfit” from the genetic pool. Along with the “feebleminded,” insane, and criminal, those so classified included women who had sex out of wedlock (considered a mental illness), orphans, the disabled, the poor, the homeless, epileptics, masturbators, the blind and the deaf, alcoholics, and girls whose genitals exceeded certain measurements. Some eugenicists advocated euthanasia, and in mental hospitals, this was quietly carried out on scores of people through “lethal neglect” or outright murder. At one Illinois mental hospital, new patients were dosed with milk from cows infected with tuberculosis, in the belief that only the undesirable would perish. As many as four in ten of these patients died. A more popular tool of eugenics was forced sterilization, employed on a raft of lost souls who, through misbehavior or misfortune, fell into the hands of state governments. By 1930, California was enraptured with eugenics, and would ultimately sterilize some twenty thousand people.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 280 – 319
“In nature there is no pity for the lesser creatures when they are destroyed so that the fittest may survive….”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 388
The major opposition to Hitler’s policies was Christianity, of which a central doctrine was the need to help the disenfranchised, the poor, the deformed, the handicapped and the mentally ill, all of those that the Nazi leaders wanted to eradicate.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 427
I believe that Nietzscheanism and Darwinism as taken by Germany, Nazism and the Volk, that is, Nietzscheanism and Darwinism appplied to the human race is the diametrical antithesis of (according to Nietzsche) the Israelite’s and Christian’s so called (saintly) “inversion of valuations.”
The revaluation of all values or transvaluation of all values is a concept from the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. Elaborating the concept in The Antichrist, Nietzsche asserts that Christianity, not merely as a religion but also as the predominant moral system of the Western world, inverts nature, and is “hostile to life”. As “the religion of pity”, it elevates the weak over the strong, exalting that which is “ill-constituted and weak” at the expense of that which is full of life and vitality.
Master–slave morality is a central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche’s works, particularly in the first essay of his book On the Genealogy of Morality. Nietzsche argues that there are two fundamental types of morality: “master morality” and “slave morality”. Master morality values pride and power, while slave morality values kindness, empathy, and sympathy.
As master morality originates in the strong, slave morality originates in the weak. Because slave morality is a reaction to oppression, it vilifies its oppressors. Slave morality is the inverse of master morality.
Slave morality does not aim at exerting one’s will by strength, but by careful subversion. It does not seek to transcend the masters, but to make them slaves as well. The essence of slave morality is utility: The good is what is most useful for the whole community, not just the strong.
Since the powerful are few compared to the masses of the weak, the weak gain power by corrupting the strong into believing that the causes of slavery (viz., the will to power) are evil, as are the qualities the weak originally could not choose because of their weakness.
By saying humility is voluntary, slave morality avoids admitting that their humility was in the beginning forced upon them by a master. Biblical principles of humility, charity, and pity are the result of universalizing the plight of the slave onto all humankind, and thus enslaving the masters as well. “The democratic movement is the heir to Christianity”—the political manifestation of slave morality because of its obsession with freedom and equality.
“…the Jews achieved that miracle of inversion of values thanks to which life on earth has for a couple millennia acquired a new and dangerous fascination – their prophets fused “rich”, “godless”, “evil”, “violent”, “sensual” into one, and were the first to coin the word “world” as a term of infamy. It is this inversion of values (with which is involved the employment of the word for “poor” as a synonym for “holy” and “friend”) that the significance of the Jewish people resides: With them, there begins the slave revolt in morals.” Friedrich Nietzche.
He [Nietzsche] noted that ancient Greek and Roman societies were grounded in master morality. The Homeric hero is the strong-willed man, and the classical roots of the Iliad and Odyssey exemplified Nietzsche’s master morality. He calls the heroes “men of a noble culture”, giving a substantive example of master morality. Historically, master morality was defeated, as Christianity’s slave morality spread throughout the Roman Empire.
The struggle between the polytheistic culture of the Rome (master, strong) and newly developed Christian monotheism in former Judea and surrounding territories in the Middle East (slave, weak) lasted continuously until 323, when Christianity became the Roman Empire’s official religion.
Nietzsche condemns the triumph of slave morality in the West, saying that the democratic movement is the “collective degeneration of man”. He claims that the nascent democratic movement of his time was essentially slavish and weak. Weakness conquered strength, slave conquered master, re-sentiment conquered sentiment. This ressentiment Nietzsche calls “priestly vindictiveness”, based on the jealous weak seeking to enslave the strong and thus erode the basis for power by pulling the powerful down. Such movements were, according to Nietzsche, inspired by “the most intelligent revenge” of the weak. Nietzsche saw democracy and Christianity as the same emasculating impulse, which sought to make everyone equal by making everyone a slave.
In On the Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche presents three treatises which trace episodes in the evolution of moral concepts with a view to confronting “moral prejudices”, specifically those of Christianity and Judaism. In the “First Treatise”, Nietzsche demonstrates that the two pairs of opposites “good/evil” and “good/bad” have very different origins, and that the word “good” itself came to represent two opposed meanings. In the “good/bad” distinction of the aristocratic way of thinking, “good” is synonymous with nobility and everything which is powerful and life-asserting; in the “good/evil” distinction, which Nietzsche calls “slave morality”, the meaning of “good” is made the antithesis of the original aristocratic “good”, which itself is re-labelled “evil”. This inversion of values develops out of the ressentiment felt by the weak towards the powerful. From the aristocratic mode of valuation, another mode of valuation branches off, which develops into its opposite: the priestly mode. Nietzsche proposes that longstanding confrontation between the priestly caste and the warrior caste fuels this splitting of meaning. The priests, and all those who feel disenfranchised and powerless in a lowly state of subjugation and physical impotence (e.g., slavery), develop a deep and venomous hatred for the powerful. Thus originates what Nietzsche calls the “slave revolt in morality”, which, according to him, begins with Judaism, for it is the bridge that led to the slave revolt, via Christian morality, of the alienated, oppressed masses of the Roman Empire (a dominant theme in The Antichrist, written the following year). Nietzsche concludes his First Treatise by hypothesizing a tremendous historical struggle between the Roman dualism of “good/bad” and that of the Judaic “good/evil”, with the latter eventually achieving a victory for ressentiment, broken temporarily by the Renaissance, but then reasserted by the Reformation, and finally confirmed by the French Revolution when the “ressentiment instincts of the rabble” triumphed. I think I understand Nietzsche and I believe that he has tremendous bearings on this essay. Nietzsche was elitist, he advocated the strong, the powerful, the warrior-like and the aristocratic, like the ancient Greeks and Romans while he had disdain for the weak, the priestly, the masses and the rabble, such as the ancients Israelites and the Christians.
The Jews – a people “born for slavery,” as Tacitus and the whole ancient world say of them; “the chosen people among the nations,” as they themselves say and believe – the Jews performed the miracle of the inversion of valuations, by means of which life on earth obtained a new and dangerous charm for a couple of millenniums. Their prophets fused into one the expressions “rich,” “godless,” “wicked,” “violent,” “sensual,” and for the first time coined the word “world” as a term of reproach. In this inversion of valuations (in which is also included the use of the word “poor” as synonymous with “saint” and “friend”) the significance of the Jewish people is to be found; it is with them that the slave-insurrection in morals commences.
Nietzsche’s discussion of Christianity in section eight supplies further evidence that he conceives of the “slave revolt” in morals as primarily an instrument for Jewish domination, and that Christianity is a mere vehicle for this vengeful, decadent, Jewish activity.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 169.
The advent of Christ and of the Christian Church is in reality an invention of Jewish interests bent on extracting revenge on their enemies and ultimately conquering the world under the repressive and life-negating regime of slave morality.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 171.
All the world’s efforts against the “aristocrats,” the “mighty,” the “masters,” the “holders of power,” are negligible by comparison with what has been accomplished against those classes by the Jews – the Jews, that priestly nation which eventually realized that the one method of effecting satisfaction on its enemies and tyrants was by means of a radical transvaluation of values, which was at the same time an act of the cleverest revenge. Yet the method was only appropriate to a nation of priests, to a nation of the most jealously nursed priestly revengefulness. It was the Jews who, in opposition to the aristocratic equation (good = aristocratic = beautiful = happy = loved by the gods), dared with a terrifying logic to suggest the contrary equation, and indeed to maintain with the teeth of the most profound hatred (the hatred of weakness) this contrary equation, namely, “the wretched are alone the good; the poor, the weak, the lowly, are alone the good; the suffering, the needy, the sick, the loathsome, are the only ones who are pious, the only ones who are blessed, for them alone is salvation – but you, on the other hand, you aristocrats, you men of power, you are to all eternity the evil, the horrible, the covetous, the insatiate, the godless; eternally also shall you be the unblessed, the cursed, the damned!” We know who it was who reaped the heritage of this Jewish transvaluation.
To me the above quote of Nietzsche demonstrates that he was 100% precisely, technically and diametrically antithetical to saintliness and to the Catholic Saints, such as Saint André Bessette. The Catholic Saints are therefore 100% precisely, technically and diametrically antithetical to Nietzsche. This is because as you will see in ‘Doctrine, Theory, System, or Practice of the Ismlessism’, the Catholic Saints practice piety, humility and asceticism, and saintliness is also obviously all about compassion, total selflessness, love, care and charity towards ‘the wretched, the poor, the weak, the lowly, the suffering, the needy, the sick and the loathsome, which, according to Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, truly are the only ones who are pious, the only ones who are blessed and for them alone is Salvation’. Saintly practice is demonstrated by Romans 12:16:
Live in harmony with one another. Do not be proud, but be willing to associate with people of low position. Do not be conceited.Romans 12:16
The Catholic Saints are the ‘inversion of valuations’ or the inversion of the animalistic, Darwinian laws of nature. Nietzsche is therefore, obviously the diametrically antithetical inverse of this ‘inversion of valuations’. So the Catholic Saints and Nietzsche are 180 degree-polar opposites to each other. This is Nietzsche’s doing however, if he had just left Christianity alone there would have been no problem and possibly no Holocaust?
In this initial mention of the Jews there are three features worth noting. First they are portrayed as aggressively opposing the value system that has subjugated them; Jews are directly antithetical to “aristocratic” social orders that Nietzsche has previously identified with the “master race,” with “Aryans,” and with blond and fair-haired peoples.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 168.
It is difficult to escape the conclusion that in the Genealogy Nietzsche sought to single out Jewry as such for promoting a life-negating, anti-Aryan, antiaristocratic value system that has gained world dominance.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 173.
Despite these concessions to the positive dimensions of slave morality and its Jewish propagators, the overall message of the initial essay in the Genealogy of Morals is Judeophobic. Rhetorically and substantively Nietzsche makes it clear that the introduction of “good and evil” has been detrimental to almost everything of value. He ultimately postulates an anti-Jewish historical trajectory that resembles anti-Semitic propaganda, but on a grander scale. Jewry displaces and defeats noble morality, associated with Aryans and fair-haired races, substituting for it life-negating and degenerate valuations, and, through deception or direct confrontation, manages well into the nineteenth century to retain its dominance over the peoples it has conquered.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 176.
This Jesus of Nazareth, the incarnate gospel of love, this “Redeemer” bringing salvation and victory to the poor, the sick, the sinful – was he not really temptation in its most sinister and irresistible form, temptation to take the tortuous path to those very Jewish values and those very Jewish ideals? Has not Israel really obtained the final goal of its sublime revenge, by the tortuous paths of this “Redeemer,” for all that he might pose as Israel’s adversary and Israel’s destroyer?
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 674 – 699.
A woman who loves sacrifices her honour; a man of knowledge who ‘loves’ sacrifices perhaps his humanity; a god who loved became a Jew…
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 110.
It is a dangerous gambit because of the enigma involved with having a God die such a gruesome death for the sake of humankind, out of love for his fellow human beings. But it is under this sign, Nietzsche writes, alluding to Constantine’s “in hoc signo vinces” (“in this sign you will conquer”), that Jewry celebrates its victory; in this radical reinterpretation of Christian iconography the cross symbolizes, not Christianity and the passion of Christ, but “Israel’s revenge and transvaluation of all values”, its defeat of all noble ideals.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 171.
“But you are finding this hard to follow? You have no eyes for something that took two thousand years to triumph?” We should not be deceived into thinking that Nietzsche’s use of the round number “two thousand” means that he is referring to Christianity alone.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 169.
Almost all commentators, however, eschew a close and accurate reading of Nietzsche’s provocative remarks in sections seven and eight of the Genealogy, where Nietzsche is making a claim for the significance of Jewry as the originator and propagator of the most debilitating moral system in human history. Nietzsche had already stated in Beyond Good and Evil that the “significance of the Jewish people” was that it inaugurated the slave revolt in morals, but in the Genealogy, which was composed specifically to clarify certain claims made in his earlier book, “Israel” is not only the inaugurator, but the clandestine power behind the transvaluation that Nietzsche deplores and that now dominates the modern world.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 172.
Nietzsche thus defines the greatest world-historical conflict as one between Romans and Jews, the former because they were “the strong and noble men, stronger and nobler than there had ever been on earth, or even dreamt of.” The Jews, for their part, are the archetypical “priestly people of ressentiment par excellence,” a people known for geniality in matters of slave morals. In case there is any question about who has been victorious in the epic battle of moral systems, Nietzsche informs his reader about the current state of affairs:
Which of these is in the ascendant at the moment, Rome or Judaea? But there is no room for doubt: consider before whom one bows today in Rome as before the epitome of all the highest values—and not only in Rome, but over almost half the world, wherever man has been tamed or wants to be tamed—before three Jews, as one knows, and one Jewess (before Jesus of Nazareth, the fisherman Peter, the carpet-maker Paul, and the mother of the aforementioned Jesus, Mary). This is most remarkable: there is no doubt that Rome has been defeated.
Nietzsche’s characterization of the most notable figures in Christianity as Jews is once again meant to emphasize the consistently Jewish nature of slave morality, and that Jewry, through Christianity, has come to dominate the Western world.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 174.
After Dühring, Nietzsche, in his turn combated Jewish and Christian ethics, which according to him are the ethics of slaves as contrasted with the ethics of masters. Through the prophets and Jesus, the Jews and the Christians have set up low and noxious conceptions which consist in the deification of the weak, the humble, the wretched, and sacrificing to it the strong, the proud, the mighty.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 4.
Darwinism and the theory of natural selection and the survival of the fittest is only relevant or applied to animals or the animal kingdom. To apply Darwinism to the human race is to lower humanity to the level of animality and simple nature. Basically what Nietzsche is saying with the Darwinian philosophy and worldview, is that it is weak, wrong and ultimately rewardless and pointless to have pity and compassion for the weak, poor and ill-constituted etc. Here are some examples of the Israelite’s “inversion of valuations”:
But he said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ’s power may rest on me.
That is why, for Christ’s sake, I delight in weaknesses, in insults, in hardships, in persecutions, in difficulties. For when I am weak, then I am strong.
2 Corinthians 12:9-10
But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong.
1 Corinthians 1:27
He gives strength to the weary and increases the power of the weak.
“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”
But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
Here is some more Nietzsche.
Christianity is called the religion of pity. – Pity stands in antithesis to the tonic emotions which enhance the energy of the feeling of life: it has a depressive effect. One loses force when one pities. The loss of force which life has already sustained through suffering is increased and multiplied even further by pity. Suffering itself becomes contagious through pity; sometimes it can bring about a collective loss of life and life-energy which stands in an absurd relation to the quantum of its cause (– the case of the death of the Nazarene). This is the first aspect; but there is an even more important one. If one judges pity by the value of the reactions which it usually brings about, its mortally dangerous character appears in a much clearer light. Pity on the whole thwarts the law of evolution, which is the law of selection.
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 129.
I like the above quote because Nietzsche is describing a very simple concept in typically Niezschean beautifully put, elegant and highly articulate language. Nietzsche is describing two antithetical halves or diametrical opposites, on the one hand, Darwinism, natural selection, survival of the fittest and unsaintliness, on the other hand Judeo-Christian charity, sympathy, compassion, saintliness and pity. By stating: ‘Pity on the whole thwarts the law of evolution, which is the law of selection’, Nietzsche is actually saying that having pity (unlike animals) is unnatural and wrong. This confirms for me that the Jewish and Christian ’transvaluation of values’ are supernatural and totally correct. To me this ultimately proves why the Holocaust happened and why the Nazis were so evil and so diametrically-180 degree opposite to saintliness and the rest of humanity, in that the Nazis had absolutely zero pity. With euthanasia and the heartless destruction of life in the death camps, such as Auschwitz, for example, the Nazis clearly demonstrated that they had zero pity. The Nazis were the antithetical opposite to the Catholic Saints and the rest of us compassionate and pitying human beings. They had zero pity probably because German philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche philosophically and intellectually questioned pity in the first place? We have got to question Nietzsche’s (and the Germans’) motives for questioning pity and the Jewish and Christian ’transvaluation of values’ and ‘slave morality’? What were their ulterior motives? I believe that the Germans may have questioned pity because they simply wanted to conquer the world? Adolf Hitler and Nazis considered pity and compassion Jewish and they instilled in their soldiers and the German populace the evil antithesis, in that they restricted, curbed or denied the German soldiers and the populace of having any feelings of pity and compassion.
Christianity has taken the side of everything weak, base, ill-constituted, it has made an ideal out of opposition to the preservative instincts of strong life; it has depraved the reason even of the intellectually strongest natures by teaching men to feel the supreme values of intellectuality as sinful, as misleading, as temptations.
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 128.
Regarding the quote directly above concerning intellectuality, I have stated that I believe that simple, even thick piety, charity and saintliness as demonstrated by such as Saint André Bessette, are better than intelligence, intellect and academia; however, there is obviously nothing wrong with academia and grammar themselves, it’s just that you can be for example greedy and stingy even if you are highly educated. It makes no difference, but you can obviously be highly educated and saintly at the same time. Saintliness is more important than intelligence, especially if you are writing something (as I am), because it is has a good, yet simple or even thick heart, and this means it will attains that unsaintly intelligence will not.
Christianity is a revolt of everything that crawls along the ground directed against that which is elevated: the Gospel of the ‘lowly’ makes low…
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 168.
The weak and ill-constituted shall perish: first principle of our charity. And people shall help them to do so. What is more injurious than any crime? – Practical sympathy for all the ill-constituted and weak: – Christianity…
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1594.
Contrary to Jesus Christ’s teachings, and in an animalistic sort of way Nietzsche is saying that God does not reward those who are saintly, compassionate and charitable to the weak, poor and sick. However, only animals have such a mentality, as only animals do not take care of their weak, sick and injured. Nietzsche believed in the elitist ideal that the aristocratic and the strong should rule, and that they should look down, with scant regard on the wretched, weak, poor, loathsome and ill-constituted.
Hitler was guided by the “nearly ironclad principle” of “Nature’s will to live” in the “internal exclusivity of species among all living beings on earth.” …If unequal individuals were crossed, the offspring “no doubt will be superior to the racially inferior parental half, but not as advanced as the superior one. As a result it will later lose out in the struggle against a superior type. Such mating contradicts Nature’s will to improve breeds.” The result of this “ubiquitous instinct for racial purity in Nature is not only the sharp demarcations dividing individual races, but also their own internally uniform nature.” These “iron laws of Nature” were also responsible for the evolution of human history, in which race and racial purity were allotted decisive significance.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 628
The purpose of the camps was to achieve the goal of a superior race by “breeding,” a term that originally referred only to the systematic increase and eventual improvement of animals and plants, but that Charles Darwin applied to humans. “With the exception of the human case, no breeder is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to reproduce.” In this sense, the term “breeding” was taken up by Houston Stewart Chamberlain and völkisch theorists such as Josef Lanz for their program of racial biology.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 742
Hitler believed that what we today recognize as the human gene pool could be improved by using selective breeding, similar to how farmers breed superior cattle.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 931
Hitler also deduced that under conditions of limited reproduction, if the birth rate decreased, then the natural struggle for existence, which allows only the strongest and healthiest to survive, will be replaced by the mistaken anti-evolutionary desire to save the weakest and sickest.
In other words, the inferior races must be destroyed to make room for the superior races, and what Hitler believed was misplaced Christian humaneness will only interfere with this goal.
Hitler believed that humans were animals to which the genetic laws learned from livestock breeding can, and should, be applied.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1032 – 1051
Germany’s main father of Darwinism, Ernst Haeckel, argued in his Natural History of Creation (1868) that “the church with its morality of love and charity is an effete fraud, a perversion of the natural order.” This natural order, namely Darwinian natural selection, functions “without the recourse to mercy or compassion in the Judeo-Christian tradition.” The Nazis also viewed Darwinism and Christianity as polar opposites because Christianity makes no distinction of race or of colour; it seeks to break down all racial barriers. In this respect, the hand of Christianity is against that of Nature, for are not the races of mankind the evolutionary harvest which Nature has toiled through long ages to produce? May we not say, then, that Christianity is anti-evolutionary in its aim?
A major reason why Hitler opposed Christianity was that he viewed it and science as diametrically opposed to each other. Hitler concluded that, in the end, science would win and that the Christian church would eventually be destroyed.
Martin Bormann, Hitler’s closest associate for years, and one of the most powerful men in Nazi Germany, was equally blunt: the church was opposed to evolution and for this reason the church must be aggressively opposed. He stressed that the Nazis were on the side of science and evolution, not Christianity.
That Hitler’s opposition to Christianity was based on Darwinism was detailed by Oxford historian Alan Bullock, who wrote that Hitler “showed the sharpest hostility” toward Christianity because, in Hitler’s eyes Christianity was a religion fit only for slaves; he detested its ethics in particular. Its teachings, he declared, was a rebellion against the natural law of selection by struggle and the survival of the fittest.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1400 – 1422
Bormann made his absolute disdain for Christianity and his open hostility and support of breaking the church as rapidly as possible absolutely clear. He was one of many high-level Nazis who “intended eventually to destroy Christianity” for the reason that “National Socialism and Christianity are irreconcilable” because Nazism is based on science and science had superseded the Christian church, which he regarded as anti-science. He added “National Socialism and Christian concepts are incompatible” because the Christian churches were all built on the ignorance of men and strive to keep large portions of the people in ignorance because only in this way can the Christian Churches maintain their power. On the other hand, National Socialism is based on scientific foundations. Christianity’s immutable principles, which were laid down almost two thousand years ago, have increasingly stiffened into life-alien dogmas. National Socialism, however, if it wants to fulfill its task further, must always guide itself according to the newest data of scientific researchers.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 3882
Almost all Nazi leaders were enslaved to Darwinian ideas and ideals, and almost all were strongly opposed to Christianity to the degree that they eventually wanted to eradicate it from Europe.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 275
Furthermore, Himmler not only “lost his religious faith” in college, but came to believe that Christianity was “merely another manifestation of Jewish superstition” that polluted German culture. He became such a fanatical anti-Christian that he declared the Nazis “shall not rest until we have rooted out Christianity” from Nazi-controlled Europe.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 4100
Ironically, this church support of Hitler’s schemes did little to endear these churches to the Nazi leadership. Even though many Nazis were raised in suitably religious homes, most of Hitler’s disciples were as virulently anti-Christian (they were especially opposed to the Catholic church) as they were anti-Semitic, thanks to the influence of their anti-Christian professors, the “theological liberalism that was really secular philosophy disguised by religious language” and their involvement in the anti-Christian Nazi movement.
In fact, as we will document, the Nazi leadership planned to destroy Christianity after the war and replace it with a German church worshipping Hitler and the Nazi Party with elements of pre-Christian paganism. A 150-volume U.S. government report titled, The Nuremberg Project, was prepared under the direction of General William Donovan to document Nazi war crimes for the Nuremberg War Crimes Trial. Part of the 150 volumes was a 108-page report titled, The Nazi Master Plan, which concluded the Nazis “sought to eliminate the Christian Churches in Germany” after the war.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 369
Although Hitler told the new Reichstag, “The rights of churches will not be diminished,” he revealed his true feelings in private, explaining to intimates that he would tolerate the churches temporarily for political reasons. “But,” he added, “that won’t stop me from stamping out Christianity in Germany, root and branch. One is either a Christian or a German. One can’t be both!”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 442
Darwinism influenced not only the development of the worldwide eugenics movement but also the academic elite’s attempt to disenfranchise Christianity.
As you can see above, Germany’s ‘academic elite’ tried to ‘disenfranchise Christianity’, again this proves that you can be an unsaintly genius, such as Friedrich Nietzsche, or a saintly illiterate layperson, such as Saint André Bessette. I am just trying to demonstrate to you that thick saintliness is better than intelligence and academia, which can sometimes in theory be very bad. As demonstrated by the Nazis, intelligence and academia do not always and automatically equals ‘good’.
As this book will document, in almost all cases, acceptance of Darwinism was accompanied by the rejection of Christianity, either as a cause or an effect. Many leading Nazis, such as Martin Bormann, were aggressively hostile to Christianity and what it stood for.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 617
Hitler made his own religious beliefs very clear as an adult: “I myself am a heathen to the core.”
Although Hitler often claimed Germany’s war was about such traditional reasons as the need for more lebensraum (living space for the superior race to expand into), he made it clear that he “hated Christianity” and eventually was going to eradicate it after the war ended.
One reason for Hitler’s fervent opposition to Christianity was that he believed that “it had crippled everything noble about humanity.” In words reported to be Hitler’s, “The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity.” Hitler was influenced by one of his idols, Alfred Rosenberg, who taught that the Old Testament was a Jewish book, and for this reason Christianity, which is based on the Hebrew Scriptures, must be eliminated from Germany. His reasoning was based on his belief that Christianity was an “illegitimate” Jewish child and, as a Jewish child, it was swine like its parent—both needed to be eradicated. Although Hitler singled out the Jesuits for special scorn, all of Christianity was “Jewish Christianity,” which was comparable with “Jewish Bolshevism.” Hitler considered Christianity the “invention of the Jew Saul.” In short “the Aryan race had been conquered by the Semitic spirit in the form of Christianity. Christianity was…a Semitic import, which had weakened the fabric of the Aryan race by virtue of introducing moral commandments, which protected the weak from the strong.” Hitler concluded that Judaism and Christianity were both evil, calling them Bolshevists, swine or worse, and for this reason, both had to be destroyed.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1365 – 1375
In a talk given by Hitler on April 7, 1933, Hitler made it absolutely clear that in Germany’s future there would be “no place” in the German “utopia for the Christian Churches” and “nothing will prevent me from eradicating totally, root and branch, all Christianity in Germany.… A German Church, a German Christianity, it is all rubbish.… One is either Christian or German.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1463
This conforms to official Nazi writings, which espoused both anti-Semitic and anti-Christian ideas that “had a single purpose. Hitler’s aim was to eradicate all religious organizations within the state and to foster a return to paganism.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1628
Soon Hitler became Bormann’s “God,” and he determined that “rather than believe in Jesus Christ, the Germans were to worship Adolf Hitler.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 3809
All of the above quotes from Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, such as “the church with its morality of love and charity is an effete fraud, a perversion of the natural order.” and “in Hitler’s eyes Christianity was a religion fit only for slaves” and “it [Christianity] had crippled everything noble about humanity.” and “The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity.”, all sound very Nietzschean regarding the ‘transvaluation of values’ and ‘master-slave morality’. This is the difference between science and Christianity, in that, science is natural, amoral, animalistic, soulless and heartless while religion, such as Christianity is supernatural, moral, human, has a soul and is very good hearted. Therefore, this is the point that Germany, Nazism and Nietzsche did not understand, namely that the miracle and the awe inspiring accomplishments of the ancient Israelites and early Christians was to inverse the laws of nature and the animal kingdom, that is, to inverse the natural Darwinian law of the survival of the fittest and the neglect of the poor, weak, injured and ill-constituted. They did this with a supernatural compassion, charity, love and kindness toward the weak, poor and sick. And to prove this for eternity, ultimately, Judeo-Christianty’s miraculous and supernatural ‘inversion of valuations’ produced a Superhuman in the form of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Animals naturally select their fittest mates simply to procreate and propagate the species, while natural selection among humans is love and love is supernatural. To mess with love or human natural selection with eugenics and the artificial selection of human mates; in order to breed a super race of ‘prize winning’ Aryan human beings is uncool. Like science, animals are amoral, and as there is nothing moral or supernatural in the animal kingdom, there is nothing moral or supernatural in eugenics or the artificial selection of human beings. There is no nirvana in the animal kingdom. Like Jesus Christ’s nativity (and the Buddha’s Great Renunciation), God and King of the universe was not a very rich, powerful, ‘noble’ and ‘aristocratic’ pharaoh who thought he was a god, but a weak and poor little child born in a humble manger. This is the Christian and Jewish ‘inversion of valuations’, it is the biggest teaching of all time, in that God Himself made absolutely sure that He was not a ‘strong’, vain, rich, ‘noble’ and ‘aristocratic’ pharaoh, but a weak, humble, poor and vulnerable child, He made sure that the morality of the stories of the nativity and the Great Renunciation were inverse and opposite to our money-oriented animal instincts. We have all felt compassion when watching wildlife documentaries on TV, in for example the Kalahari or Serengeti wild life reserves in Africa, with for example, heart wrenching scenes of a lost and injured baby gazelle neighing for its mother and then being eaten alive by a drooling and stinking hyena, or for example, the scenes of a cheetah mother allowing her cubs to cruelly play with an injured baby gazelle, again screaming for its mother, just as sport to practice their hunting skills. When confronted with such heart breaking scenes we all say ‘it’s only nature!’ Yes it is! This is Nietzsche! Nature is heartless and cruel, and that is why Jewish morality and the Christain ‘inversion of valuations’ is supernatural and so good. This is what the Volk and the Nazis did, they created the animal psyche in themselves, I mean they had to think and act like the cruel and heartless animal kingdom in order to be so cruel, in order to carry out the Holocaust.
The basis of his [Adolf Hitler’s] worldview was “a central concept of National Socialist ideology,” namely that the Darwinian “struggle for existence governed all beings,” and involved “the right of the stronger applied to individuals as well as to communities” to suppress the racially inferior who were destined for destruction. For the “sake of self-preservation” a “stronger race will displace the weak ones,” and the “ridiculous fetters of so-called humanity” would break asunder, “in order to allow in its place the humanity of Nature, which destroys the weak in order to make way for the strong.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 628
Hitler used this Darwinistic philosophy to support his belief that, contrary to Christianity, the strong must dominate the weak, and the evolution of life would be impossible if this “law of Nature” was not allowed to prevail. In the struggle for life, the weak succumb, and the right to propagate is given “by Nature” only to the strongest. Struggle is the means by which a superior species survives and a weaker one perishes.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 988
Hitler admitted that one might be “repelled by this law of nature which demands that all living things should mutually devour one another,” but the fact is that the “fly is snapped up by a dragon-fly, which itself is swallowed by a bird, which itself falls victim to a larger bird…to know the laws of nature enables us to obey them.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1098
In fact, much of the opposition to the eugenics movement came from conservative German Christians such as the confessing church. One reason was the confessing church’s Christian teaching that we should protect the poor, the weak and the sick, teachings that opposed Nazi eugenic goals.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1441
The reason was that the Church taught such doctrines as the need to help the weak and poor. Journalist Stewart Herman wrote that the “teaching of mercy and love of neighbor is foreign to the German race and the Sermon on the Mount is, according to Nordic sentiment, an ethic for cowards and idiots.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 4848
“Life does not forgive weakness.”
What I am trying to prove to you is that fundamentally the reason why the Holocaust happened and why the Nazis were so antithetical to goodness, compassion and humanity was fundamentally because they were anti-Christian. It was the Nazis’ (and the Volk’s) anti-Christianity; their heathenism, paganism and their faith in science such as Darwinism (backed up by philosophers such as Nietzsche) which was the fundamental cause of the Holocaust. The Holocaust was ultimately the questioning of Christianity, or the Christian question not the Jewish question. If you are Christian, Jesus Christ will keep you correct and steer you clear of anything malignant. If you are truly Christian you are less likely to be anti-Semitic. And no one asked the Christian question more than Friedrich Nietzsche half a century before the Nazis came to power. There was possibly something wrong with nineteenth century science and philosophy, for example, Darwinism basically made the beautiful, allegorical and biblical Genesis redundant and it’s as if people (especially in Germany) seemed to take this at face value or literally. This combination of anti-biblical or anti-Genesis Darwinism and anti-Christian philosophies such as Nietzscheanism may have combined to create a diametrically antithetical worldview or faith in Germany in the early twentieth century, which disastrously lead to the Holocaust? The ismlessism therefore, determines that we should take Genesis as mythological yet have faith in the biblical prophecy of the Old Testament and its fulfilment of the coming of the Lord in the New Testament. Just because Darwinism supersedes (mythological) Genesis does not nullify the whole revelation of the Bible and does not supersede all of Judaism and Christianity. Fundamentally, the Holocaust was the direct result of the Germans’ pagan and Darwinian faith or belief system and ultimately because they were anti-Christian. If you are anti-Christian you are malignant. Therefore, what Adolf Hitler meant by life does not forgive weakness, is that nature and animals have no sympathy for and do not forgive weakness. However, again, Christianity and the Jewish ‘inversion of valuations’, such as compassion for the weak, sick and poor etc is supernatural, therefore, humans are not natural but are supernatural. In the beginning… God or Yahweh had to wait for 13.7 billion years (since the Big Bang) of animalistic killing, eating, carnage and cannibalism simply for an animal to do something different to nature and different to the rest of the animal kingdom. In the beginning… God waited 13.7 billion years simply for an animal to be compassionate and to (for example) nurse another sick or injured animal back to health. This is the Jewish and Christian ‘inversion of valuations.’ Although nature is beautiful, I think 13.7 billion years of it would bore the hell out of anyone? Therefore, Adolf Hitler and the Nazis lowered the human race to the level of the animals. Because the Germans wanted to prove Nietzsche’s philosophy and their Darwinian survival of the fittest philosophy right and because they questioned Jesus Christ, they therefore, actually made us question goodness, morality and compassion. The Germans made us think that there was something wrong with the Jews for being good, moral and compassionate. Don’t hesitate about or question Jesus Christ and the Jewish and Christian ‘inversion of valuations’ for a even a Planck unit of time. There isn’t a single atom, particle or iota wrong with goodness, morality and compassion, and therefore, there isn’t a single atom, particle or iota wrong with the Jews. The Germans and the Volk were animals and there is absolutely nothing else to it.
Goebbels adopted this view, writing in his diary that “man is and remains an animal—here a beast of prey, there a house pet, but always an animal.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 4404
CHRISTIANITY VERSUS PAGANISM.
The Völkisch movement.
The Völkisch movement was a German ethno-nationalist movement active from the late 19th century through to the Nazi era, with remnants in the Federal Republic of Germany afterwards. Erected on the idea of “blood and soil”, inspired by the one-body-metaphor (Volkskörper, literally “body of the people”, “ethnic body”), and by the idea of naturally grown communities in unity, it was characterized by organicism, racialism, populism, agrarianism, romantic nationalism and – as a consequence of a growing exclusive and ethnic connotation – by antisemitism from the 1900s onward.
Völkisch nationalists generally considered the Jews to be an “alien people” who belonged to a different Volk (“race” or “folk”) than the Germans.
The Völkisch movement was not a homogeneous set of beliefs, but rather a “variegated sub-culture” that rose in opposition to the socio-cultural changes of modernity. The “only denominator common” to all Völkisch theorists was the idea of a national rebirth, inspired by the traditions of the Ancient Germans which had been “reconstructed” on a romantic basis by the adherents of the philosophy. This rebirth would have been achieved by either “Germanizing” Christianity – an Abrahamic and “Semitic” religion that spread into Europe from the Near East – or by rejecting any Christian heritage that existed in Germany in order to revive pre-Christian Germanic paganism. In a narrow definition, the term is used to designate only groups that consider human beings essentially preformed by blood, or by inherited characteristics.
The Völkischen are often encompassed in a wider Conservative Revolution by scholars, a German national conservative movement that rose in prominence during the Weimar Republic (1918–1933).
During the period of the Third Reich, Adolf Hitler and the Nazis believed in and enforced a definition of the German Volk which excluded Jews, the Romani people, Jehovah’s Witnesses, homosexuals, and other “foreign elements” living in Germany. Their policies led to these “undesirables” being rounded up and murdered in large numbers, in what became known as The Holocaust.
George L. Mosse’s book, The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich completely blew my mind. I thought I knew how bad Nazism was, however, I had to think again after reading this jaw dropping book. I had no understanding of the concept of a Volk, Volkish thought, Volkish ideology or a Germanic faith. I had no idea how heathen, evil and pagan Germany (or the ‘Volk’) were in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. I had no idea that the Holocaust was about so much more than Adolf Hitler. There were a myriad of anti-Semitic philosophers, intellectuals, writers, Youth Movements and organisations in Germany in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The educational establishment was rife with anti-Semitism and for example the vast majority of teachers and professors in German schools and universities were Volkish anti-Semites. Honestly Germany was riddled with Volkish ideology and anti-Semitism long before the Nazis came to power. The Holocaust was a huge collective effort or a culmination of Germany’s or the Volk’s evil desires. The Volk probably knew that they could not conquer the world by being Christian, so they tried to undo recorded history, became heathen and pagan and tried to extirpate Judeo-Christianity from Europe instead. Therefore, Adolf Hitler simply fulfilled or consummated the wishes and long term, deep seated desires of the German people and the Volk. Therefore, the Holocaust involved a whole country not just Adolf Hitler. I had no idea that the Volk and Nazism actually had very religious and spiritual foundations related to their aspirations, goals and causes, in their attempts to undo the true order of recorded history and to uproot Judeo-Christianity from Europe. Collectively, what happened in Germany in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries is the weirdest and strangest thing that ever happened in the world. I just could not believe it. George L. Mosse’s book literally made me feel infirm. Why? Because the Volk tried to undo recorded history and to extirpate Judeo-Christianity and even actually questioned our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. You must therefore understand that Volkish ideology is evil. George L. Mosse’s book gave me a bad case of the Volkish blues for days after I read it. However, I believe in Jesus Christ and I pray that He will save the rest of us Europeans from this Central European disaster?
Heathenism and paganism.
Volkish thought is another example of the inherent Central European (or German) ideologies which influenced Adolf Hitler, Nazism and the Holocaust. Volkish ideology was a product from nineteenth century European romanticism. Volkish thought was a reaction to modernity and the rapid industrialisation of Europe following the industrial revolution. ‘Volk’ is a more comprehensive term than ‘people.’ Since, the birth of German romanticism in the late eighteenth century, to German thinkers, ‘Volk’ meant the union of a group of people with a transcendental ‘essence’. This essence could be called nature or cosmos or mythos, and was fused to man’s inner nature, and represented his creativity, feeling, individuality and unity with other members of the Volk. The essential aspect of Volkish thought is the linking of the human soul with the natural environment, with the ‘essence’ of nature. Thus, to many Volkish theorists, the nature of the soul of a Volk is determined by the landscape. Therefore, the Jews, being a desert people, were viewed as a shallow, arid and dry people, devoid of profundity and lacking creativity. Because of the barrenness of the desert landscape, the Jews were a spiritually barren people. This contrasted with the Germans people who, living in the dark, misty forests, were a deep, mysterious and profound people. Because the German people were constantly surrounded by darkness, they strove for the Sun and were therefore, Lichtmenschen. The word ‘rootedness’ occurs constantly in Volkish vocabulary and obviously the Jews were seen as a rootless people. Volkish thinkers were against modernity, industrialisation and urbanisation and they sought a more natural and agrarian lifestyle and society based around peasants and rootedness to nature and the landscape. Large cities such as Berlin were seen as the abode and creation of materialistic and capitalist Jews.
This animosity toward the city was an integral part of the rise of Volkish thought. At times it was expressed in the slogan “Berlin is the domain of the Jews,” or in the remark of another writer that “cities are the tombs of Germanism.”
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 4, 5 and 23
Volkish ideology originated in the nineteenth century, before Adolf Hitler was born, and it penetrated important social and political institutions in Germany before the First World War, most notably the education establishment. If Volkish ideology had a founder, Paul de Lagarde (2 November 1827 – 22 December 1891) would fit that role. If Volkish religion had a prophet Julius Langbehn (26 March 1851 – 30 April 1907) would fit that role. Lagarde was a conservative political theorist and his anti-Semitism, open hostility to Christianity, racial Darwinism and anti-Slavism etc make him one of the most influential of scholars on the ideology of Nazism. Both Lagarde’s and Langbehn’s importance is emphasised by the frequency of references that were made to them in later Volkish literature. Most importantly, subsequent scholars, educators and politicians thought that they were acting in accordance with the principles that both of these men had advanced. Through the influence of Lagarde and Langbehn, Volkish thought and ideology became a Germanic religion or faith.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 31 – 33
Not only was the essential nature of the Jews incompatible with the inner character of the German Volk, but their national religion made them an irreconcilable foreign element on German soil.
While regarding Judaism as spiritually empty, Lagarde attributed conspirational motives to contemporary Jewry.
The Jewish question was therefore not to be met with tolerance. Instead it was reducible to a mortal contest: either the Jewish or the “true” German way of life must prevail in the end. Since Lagarde saw the final struggle as a test of both physical and spiritual strength, he considered it imperative that the Germanic religion gain public acceptance, as only such a faith would infuse the Volk with the strength necessary for victory.
On several occasions, however, he [Lagarde] entertained the possibility that a select number of exceptionally well assimilated Jews might be converted to Germanism.
Any humaneness Lagarde possibly possessed was eventually obscured by his call for the extermination of the Jews like bacillae. This outburst clearly paralleled his advocacy of physical force and violence to crush the recalcitrant contemporary state “like an eggshell.”
Eventually, Lagarde’s thought came to contain the fundamental ideas of Volkish ideology – the primacy of the Volk and the abhorrence of the Jew. However, two contributions to the movement distinguish him as a principal theorist: his overriding emphasis on spirituality, upon Germanic faith that knit the individual Germans into the fabric of the Volk and joined the complex to God; and the outlines of the various forms of anti-Semitism that became the heritage of the later Volkish movement. The first contribution endowed the Volk with a dynamic faith which led the nation to know and grasp its destiny. The second, which accused the Jews of possessing a sterile religion and a consequently materialistic nature, of entertaining an international conspiracy, and of being incompatible aliens on German soil, led to the prophecy of a mortal struggle between Germans and Jews.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 38 – 39
The soul was viewed as the essential spontaneous element-and only the Germans possessed a soul, since, according to the Germanic faiths of Lagarde and Langbehn, the Jews had long ago forfeited their souls, whereas the French had lost theirs in a revolutionary conflict.
In Swedenborg’s case, interestingly enough, in addition to rejecting disembodied spirits Langbehn also discarded the Christ-centeredness of the doctrine. This exhibited another tendency in Volkish thought-namely, to substitute the image of the Volk for the person and function of Christ. In Langbehn’s theology, duplicated in other Germanic religions, the Volk and the God of the universe participate in a direct relationship. This distortion of orthodox Christianity was facilitated, it will be remembered, by the earlier popularity of pantheism and various spiritualist cults which stressed the primacy of a Creator whose existence subsumed that of Christ. However, in whatever manner such spiritualistic superstitions were transformed, for Langbehn and his successors the Germanic religion was a mystical union of individual, Volk and cosmos.
Ideas of race played a greater role in Langbehn’s theology than in Lagarde’s. Race and the vitality of nature were viewed as equivalent forces. To support his position, Langbehn quoted Benjamin Disraeli as saying “race is everything.” Consequently, if nature and race are identical, then the Germanic life spirit must perforce be racial. All Volkish virtues, the physical as well as spiritual, were considered nature’s eternal gifts transmitted through blood inheritance. Race was a pervasive and decisive force. The outward appearance of the Volk, as expressed in its physical and spiritual culture, was seen as bearing the imprint of the inner qualities, as the signature of the soul. Langbehn even told his readers that investigations into human facial characteristics were a valid part of historical research. Gone was the possibility that as long as only cultural differences prevented assimilation into the Volk, all who lived in Germany, Jews excepted, could become true Germans. The essentially non-racial anti-Semitism of Lagarde had been superseded; emphasis upon racial incompatibility had become an indelible part of Volkish ideology.
As regards the Jews, there was a distinct intensification of antagonism in Langbehn’s thought. In his earlier writings he had expressed a tolerance of Orthodox Jews living within the boundaries of the German nation. He considered them a separate people who abided by and maintained their own unique law. Assimilated Jews, however, had trespassed beyond their natural limitations and by infiltrating the body of the Volk they were polluting the purity of its blood inheritance. These Jews, identified as the “pests and cholera” had to be exterminated.
In later editions of his [Langbehn’s] book this “finely discriminating” prejudice was obliterated. Instead he expanded the section on the Jews and wrote a condemnation that included all of Jewry. Indeed, he became increasingly obsessed with anti-Semitism.
The Jews bore the brunt of his [Langbehn’s] frustrated hate… Embodying materialism and modernity, the Jews automatically opposed the inner character of the German nation. And that was clearly understandable, for they had become estranged from the vital flow of the life spirit and their souls had petrified. Since they lacked a soul and could not re-establish contact with the life force, it was impossible for them to retain basic virtues like honesty and loyalty. These virtues were part of the “genuine” force of nature which the Germanic race alone had retained and could exemplify. Jews were simply the oppressors and eternal enemies of the Germans.
Thus he [Langbehn] shocked his friends by advocating the subjugation of the “lower” races and the reintroduction of slavery.
In their respective works Langbehn and Lagarde provided a systematic framework for future Volkish ideas. They had sensed that Germany was undergoing rapid change in all areas of life-in society, politics, culture and economy. The two Volkish prophets transformed this crisis, actually the birth pangs of modernity, into a crisis of ideology.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 42 – 45
The author’s [Dahn’s] enthusiasm for the Germanic forebears, their beliefs and virtues, eventually caused the Catholic Church to charge him with responsibility for a revival of the Wotan cult in Germany.
The eminent sociologist Eugen Dühring only extended Dahn’s passionate identification with the past when, in his bitter book against the Jews, Die Judenfrage (The Jewish Question) (1880), he wrote that the Nordic gods of antiquity were still sentient, vital forces residing in nature as of old. They had endured even through the years of neglect, years in which they were replaced by Christianity. Where men like Diederichs had indulged in talk about a Germanic Christianity, others, who actively longed to recapture the roots of Germanism, displayed a marked trend toward a committed heathenism.
As a central part of this growing paganism, solar occultism experienced a sharp rise in the late nineteenth and the early twentieth century. It played an important role in Diederichs’ thought and had adherents as early as 1848. At that time, C. H. Carus reflected on solar symbolism and attributed the inequality of the races to the fact that some had a more positive attitude toward the sun than had others. A common explanation of the origin of sun worship contended that northern peoples, inhabitants of foggy regions, expressed a natural longing for the sun, which, to them, represented light, hope, and the conceptual center of the cosmos.
Under the Nazis he was a guiding spirit in formulating their racial policy and the author of the violently anti-Semitic book Juden sehen dich (Jews Look at You). He claimed that to Nordic peoples the cycle of the sun was symbolic of life in general, as proved by their own particular experience. During the foggy period when the sun was hidden from man it mirrored a brooding contemplative episode in man’s inner self. When, however, it broke from the clouds, man’s spirit would respond by joyfully and victoriously ascending toward the glowing orb. The gloom of night had given way to the long-awaited festival of the changing sun; again its recurrence had marked the triumph of indomitable and eternal rebirth.
This symbolism of a reborn sun, in which the concept of karma (rebirth) played a central role, was found throughout the increasingly popular ancient sagas. The Edda, a very ancient collection of German legends, portrayed the old religion and its gods with a startling vitality. Indeed, the Edda was an even more popular inspirational source for Volkish ideology than was the Niebelungenlied. Brought out by a number of Volkish publishers, it was a special favorite of Diederichs and his followers. Throughout the 1920’s, the Edda was itself supplemented by a special series of publications devoted to the Eddic religion and world view. Some of these studies transformed Christ into the Germanic sun god and the Virgin Mary into the mother of the Aryans. Others regarded the birthday of Christ as celebration of the return of Baldur, the god of light, from the kingdom of darkness.
The past, which Christianity had done its best to destroy, could be recovered and applied to the present needs of the Volk through occultism. Occultism was the chalice that quenched their thirst, and at the same time made irrelevant anything that historical scholarship might do to show events in an entirely different light.
It was necessary that one become infused with the historical past of the Volk, with the most genuine part of the life force, ancient Germanic wisdom. The wisdom had been suppressed by the strictures of Christianity; indeed, that alien dogma had attempted to eradicate it as a vestige of paganism. But it still existed, permeated with the life force, though in a dormant state.
Like List, the members of this circle equated Germanism and race; the life spirit was identical with the racial characteristics exemplified by the common blood of the German Volk. The emphasis on blood was directly derived from the ancient German cult of the Druids, which this group attempted to revive. By so doing, they hoped to become infused with the primeval substance—though their eccentricity was not insignificantly affected by a desire to flaunt their heathenism.
It was only through the ancient wisdom diffused in the blood, Schuler claimed, that he personally had “lived” antiquity, that he had known it intimately and had actually “seen” the life of long ago. His Germanic blood had allowed him to “see with his soul,” to experience deeply what Christianity with its alien dogmatism had for so long repressed.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 70 – 76
Again because of the Germans’ malignant desire to conquer, enslave and subjugate the European peoples, they ultimately and fundamentally tried to establish a pagan Volkish religion and to attack Christianity, which means that fundamentally, the pagan and heathen tendencies of the non-seafaring Germans, led to them actually trying to undo recorded history and to extirpate the Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religions from Europe in the twentieth century. This is because of the slightly Western Asian and non-European origins of Judaism and Christianity. This heathenism, paganism and occultism was designed to psyche up the German spirit for the Holocaust, war and the conquest of Europe. In order to realise their ominous goals the Germans knew that they could never be Christian, as Christianity is a saintly, peaceful, compassionate and loving religion, and so they revived ancient heathen paganism and occultism in order to give the German people the excuses and rights that they needed in order to conquer Europe. As evidenced by Langbehn desiring the subjugation of the ‘lower‘ races and the reintroduction of slavery, the non-seafaring Germans simply and clearly did not understand the modesty, subtly and ways of proper European empire, imperialism and colonialism, which all Western seafaring European countries, such as Spain, France and England inherently did. Eastern and Western Europeans differ in this respect. Western seafaring Europeans never openly bigoted the primitive people they discovered and traded with as ‘lower’ races to be subjugated, as they had more modesty, decorum and respect than that. Western seafaring Europeans simply discovered the unknown world, colonised, traded and mastered it to become rightfully dominant. Therefore, through this colonial experience Western seafaring Europeans would never attempt to colonise, subjugate or bigot fellow Europeans such as European Jews or Slavs etc. Western seafaring Europeans know what they are doing and how to do it, clearly Central and Eastern Europeans do not. It’s as if the non-seafaring Germans looked at the British Empire and how it had mastered 1/4 of the world through discovery, trade, free markets, a relatively un-corrupt government, the rule of law and ‘the good name of the British Empire’ etc and somehow wanted to replicate that mastery and colonialism in Europe. White supremacy as the consensus is understood today is a complete myth. Real white supremacy is one thing and one thing only, it is double, it is white on top of white, it is the Germans on top of the Jews and Slavs etc, and nothing more. There is no other form of white supremacism. The British were never white supremacists. The British were simply right and had the right and the honour until the Nazis or the Volk invented white on top of white supremacism and messed everything up for the rest of white people. As soon as you do white on top of white supremacy you blow everything for white people, as it is categorically cardinal to imperialism and colonialism etc and the British simply could not even dream of it and yet this is exactly what happened in Central and Eastern Europe in the early twentieth century. On another note, the two examples of Volkish anti-Semitic intellectuals (Lagarde and Langbehn) were much older than Adolf Hitler, therefore, such as Lagarde and Langbehn laid the foundations and groundwork of German anti-Semitism and helped create the psychology, spirituality and mentality of the German people and German anti-Semitism ready for Adolf Hitler to come and consummate. Therefore, what I am trying to portray is that there seems to be something inherently different, barbaric, pagan and heathen about the non-seafaring Germans as opposed to the civilised Southern Mediterranean and Western (seafaring) countries of Europe, including Greece, Italy, Spain, France and England etc, who seem to be more romanised, Christianised and normal than Central and Eastern Europe, and would thus never produce such pagan religions as the Volkish faith, scholars such as Paul de Lagarde or philosophers such as Julius Langbehn and Friedrich Nietzsche. The civilised, Christian and saintly Southern and Western (seafaring) Europeans would never have even dreamed of such a tragedy as the Holocaust. The British Empire was built entirely on Christianity, as there is nothing else. That’s why the British monarchy and the British Empire were so beautiful. The British were never too much, and the British never questioned Jesus Christ or Christianity. “Empire is not fash mon!” Ultimately what I would say to the Jewish people after reading about such inherent and virulent Central and Eastern European anti-Semitism, and obviously after the Holocaust, is that despite how the Germans and Nazis bigoted them, dehumanised them and treated them worse than animals, is not to take it personally, because it only reflects their inherent and natural greatness, their genius and their goodness etc. The Germans only persecuted the Jewish people because they could not overcome or compete with the goodness of the ancient Israelites and the Judeo-Christian religions. As demonstrated by such as Moses, Albert Einstein and Jesus Christ, for such a relatively small number of people, the Jews are unbelievably talented, gifted and good hearted, and I believe that Jesus Christ Our Lord and Saviour represents this and the Jewish people. Therefore, although it’s hard, the Jews should try not take it personally, and take it as a compliment to their genius. That’s why they did it, that is why the Nazis were so evil, because the ancient Israelites and the Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religions were so great and good. The deeper the depths of heathen Nazi barbarity and evil, the higher the civility and goodness of the holy Jewish people. Once again, what I am trying to solidify for you is that the reason why the Holocaust occurred and why the Nazis were so evil and antithetical to love, compassion and goodness was fundamentally because they were anti-Christian. It was the Nazis’ (and the Volk’s) paganism and their faith in heathenism and science such as Darwinism that was the fundamental cause of the disastrous Holocaust. Fundamentally the Holocaust was the direct result of their pagan and Darwinian faith, worldview and belief system and ultimately because they were anti-Christian. If you are anti-Christian you are dangerous and malignant.
Self exaltation (seig heil)!
I will quote at length from George L. Mosse’s book The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, and then explain my thoughts about it.
The sense of a glorious past played a leading role in both the old and New Romanticism.
Antiquity also conveyed the connotation of youth, of the moment of inception, when the pure, unadulterated, heroic, and virtuous qualities of the Volk had been first thrust into history. The aspirations of the Volk in the modern era would consequently have to become reidentified with its heroic past with its youth.
This return to Germanic roots required a focusing, a fixation of one’s vision upon the ancient, tribal Germany, where traditional virtues had remained in tact: “The Germans of Tacitus were the Germans in their youth.”
Where Tacitus was primarily concerned with contrasting the Germanic virtues of fresh strength and endurance with increasing Roman degeneracy, Volkish authors took the contrast at face value and extended the favourable descriptions of Germans to their culture, their racial stock and purity, as well as their religious outlook and mythology.
The Roman propagandist became the prophet expounding the ancient purity of Germanic virtues. In many respects, it was exactly this emphasis on purity that was stressed by the Volkish movement. After all, in Germania, Tacitus had described the Germans as people who had not mixed with other tribes, who, according to modern terminology—precisely the sense in which it was used—had retained the distinction of being a special Volk.
Houston Stewart Chamberlain used such arguments, and as he was the most influential of racial theorists (accepted despite his English origins), what he had to say about Tacitus became normative. For Chamberlain the Roman’s work confirmed the racial purity of the original Volk. As additional evidence, Chamberlain cited Tacitus’ description of the physical homogeneity that distinguished the Germans. From Tacitus unfavourable depiction of the Jews-which the Volkish historians connected with the belief that the Jews were racially impure-was derived the concept that enmity between Germans and Jews was time-honoured and eternal. It followed that the contrast between good and evil, between being German and being Jewish respectively, was indeed enshrined in antiquity and must be retained as a precept of the modern Volk.
If the Goths had been so heroic in antiquity, if they had surpassed such prestigious and powerful nations as Greece and Rome in strength and endurance, then they must have represented an absolute value.
Thus Chamberlain could assert that the virtuous, victorious Germanic tribes had appeared on the historical stage just in time. While Rome was deteriorating in its degeneracy, the heroic men from the North scourged the slothful civilisation and saved humanity.
Rome, the seat of a distinguished civilisation, and Roman power fell to the inheritance of the Germans. Chamberlain only deplored that the Nordic race had not made more efficient use of this power, that it had failed to completely eradicate all the degeneracy that surrounded it, thereby putting an end to the “chaos of the peoples.” In other words, the ancient Germans had unfortunately not established themselves as the sole rulers of the conquered peoples and territory; they had not imposed their superior culture and virtues as the only standards of excellence. That the Germans had inherited temporal power from the ancient Romans was readily accepted by Volkish thinkers, and if the Germans are taken to be the Goths, it was, in fact, historically true. But they did not accept the view held by the early romantics, that Nordic man had also assimilated the cultures of Rome and Greece. On the contrary, it was now argued, the reverse was the case. The Germans had had a unique culture of their own. Had not Tacitus described it? Moreover, their appearance which dissolved Roman hegemony did not signify that they had lain dormant until then. Prior to this time, it was stated, they had influenced human events in a diversity of ways. As the genuine, as the solely pure race of peoples, the Germans, it was claimed, represented all that was creative since the inception of time. From the very beginning, before they had entered history as a group, Germans had affected the cultures of Greece and Rome. This theoretical assertion transformed the ancient Greeks into Germans and divorced modern Greeks from their classical heritage. Similarly, Rome in its glorious period must have been led by Germanic leaders. In essence, the German Volk was like a tree growing from particularly profound roots: it could not inherit anything; it was the sole repository of all creativity and any genius that had ever existed.
The contemporary Germans, in their view, had to reidentify themselves with the virtues that had carried the ancient Germanic tribes to victory over Rome. History was telescoped: the heroic past was transformed into the present to infuse a similar heroism into the modern generation. This process of idealization was especially influential during the period of turmoil that preceded the unification of Germany.
Felix Dahn’s immensely popular novel, Kampf um Rom (Fight for Rome) (1867), illustrates this well.
However, he [Dahn] cannot evade responsibility for having drawn popular attention to a glorified German past in which the mythology, the moral, ethical, and social values, and the physical qualities of the Goths were extolled.
Through its recital of the struggle for supremacy between the Goths and the Romans, it attempted to depict that celebrated national valor which had carried the Goths (used interchangeably with Germans) to victory. In the account of the German conquest of Italy during the Dark Ages, the novel’s protagonist was, in fact, the entire Gothic nation. The blond, manly exterior of these people mirrored a purity of soul, which furnished the sufficient reason for their success (symbolically, the “Italianized” daughter of King Theodoric becomes infected with the debauchery of the Romans and eventually drowns in a Roman bath). Contained within this purity of race were also the elements of honesty and courage which, in the struggle against the rationality and calculating cleverness of the prefect Gethegus, caused the defeat of this Roman. But it was the physical prowess relentlessly employed in the pursuit of victory that distinguished the early Germans from the effete and debauched Romans, and enabled them to serve as models for modern Germany.
Diederichs claimed that the ancient Germanic virtues had been forged, tempered, and strengthened in this mortal and bloodthirsty conflict between the two peoples. Dahn doubtless would have concurred. Indeed, the idealized combat of old rendered more attractive the Volkish idea of the indispensability of the good fight, of the war that steeled the nerves and character of a nation. In a spirit similar to that later in Löns’ Der Wehrwolf, Dahn praised war as creating the heroes that are celebrated in legends, poems and history.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 67 – 70
If nature’s law had it that the fit survived and the unfit perished, then men had to be bred who were fit. Racial thought in the service of the Volk paraphrased the formula with particular emphasis on the elite: if the race was the savior of mankind and if purity of race insured its survival, then men must be bred who are racially pure. These pure Aryan men and women, exponents of the German race’s superior qualities, would secure the future and correspondingly advance the mission of of their race.
As National Socialism and the Volkish movement claimed that the German race was perfection incarnate, that its greatness was immutable, the idea of racial evolution and progress had to be rejected. “The race now as a thousand years ago,” read a caption in a National Socialist newspaper below a photograph of a bust of a Roman face next to that of a modern German.
Popert presented his views in one of the most widely read novels of the time, Helmut Harringa (1910).
The hero of the novel, Harringa, represented a prime specimen of the German race. Possessing all the necessary virtues—blond hair, broad chest, energy and determination, a glowing youthful face—the hero displayed a corresponding moral purity. The connection between the external and the internal is vividly depicted in a scene in which a judge, confronting Harringa, who has been wrongly accused of cheating, declares that he cannot believe that someone with the defendant’s looks could be a criminal. The purity of stock mirrored an inherent honesty.
Popert devoted the cover of his journal, also called Vortrupp, to depicting a series of males with perfect bodies which accented the theme of Nordic ideals of beauty.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 98 – 105
All that you should understand about Germany in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, culminating with the Holocaust is that it is literally just vanity and nothing else. We don’t need to look at the gore or every specific and individual case of cruelty. In a macroscopic way or looking at it from space, Germany, Nazism and the Holocaust were simply just a display of national and racial vanity. Nineteenth and early twentieth century Germans clearly did not learn from the simple teachings of Jesus Christ such as:
For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.
Matthew 23:12 is an absolute and fundamental truth. It is like the Yin Yang symbol in that there are two reciprocal parts. Matthew 23:12 is even better described by Isaac Newton’s Third Law of Motion: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Therefore, if you exalt yourself, you will be humbled, and if you humble yourself, you will be exalted. Therefore, because the Holocaust is a show of vanity there is obviously now a huge equal and opposite reaction, in that white people are being humbled, and hence, we should try to fix that. The fact that the Germans did not learn from or listen to Matthew 23:12 is evidenced by the fact that the Germans and Volkish thinkers always glorified and flattered themselves against or compared to more southerly people such as the Romans. The sieg heil is self-exaltation! If you sieg heil, you are exalting yourself! This is what the Germans did, they exalted themselves over the Jews (who humbled themselves to the ultimate degree in the concentration camps etc), as well as the more southerly Europeans. Why did the Germans exalt themselves in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries? Because they tried to undo the true and right order of recorded history and they intellectually attacked and tried to uproot Abrahamic Judeo-Christianity (which is about humility) in their own country and became heathen and pagan.
At that time the disciples came to Jesus, saying, “Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?” And calling to him a child, he put him in the midst of them and said, “Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.”
Through such as Matthew 23:12 and Matthew 18:1-4, Jesus Christ taught us all to be very modest and humble, especially down here on Earth. Therefore, if as a nation you academically attack Christianity, you will obviously attain the wrong values and virtues and you will therefore, become erroneous. Through questionable scholarship and academia, the Germans spontaneously and instinctively attacked Christianity and pursued a course of racial vanity, which the seafaring British and all other Europeans never even entertained. The Germans said to the world: ‘Look at us! We are the best!’ ‘We’re the best on planet Earth!’ And obviously by trying to undo recorded history, by extirpating Judeo-Christianity and falling in love with heathenism and paganism they turned out to be evil and the worst in history. This is why the sieg heil is self exaltation, because the Germans bigoted and lorded it over the Jews, Slavs and other Europeans. However, because we know that Nazism and the sieg heil is simply vanity and self-exaltation, therefore, at least we know that there is possibly something we can do about it? Whether we were involved or not, unfortunately, all of us Europeans need to humble ourselves, perhaps through such as saying the coloured and jocularly Rastafarian ismlessisms? We need to admit that coloured people are cool (and always would have been) because they look, move and dance differently to us stiff-upper lipped whites. The only thing to mention is that even although coloured people would always have been cool (because they are less advanced), it would not have entailed white people’s demise without the Holocaust. Anti-racism is not the correct way to humble ourselves, as it is clearly not working as demonstrated by such as the rise and frequency of Islamic terrorism in white countries. With anti-racism, the more power and countries (such as South Africa) that we white people surrender away to non-white people, the higher the intensity of anger non-white people (such as Muslims) feel toward us. I will try to demonstrate to you that anti-racism does not make non-white people genuinely like white people, however, the cool Rasta ismlessism does. We must remove or de-stigmatise racism and the German (seig heil) self exaltation and blonde vanity totally from the Earth. Therefore, I believe the cool Rasta ismlessism would appease and placate coloured people as well as remove or de-stigmatise the racism in Adolf Hitler and the world. This self exaltation of the Germans during the Holocaust is something the British never even dreamed of, the British were never vain and even though they were the Emperors and Empresses of India, they never exalted themselves. How did they do it? They probably humbled themselves first, either through Roman conquest and/or through Christianity, modesty and decorum. Even though they encountered all sorts of primitive people around the world, they and the other Western European seafaring countries did not let it go to their heads. For example, the Native Americans who encountered Christopher Columbus and the conquistadors initially believed them to be gods, but the conquistadors were Christian and modest and did not let it go to their heads. The Germans exalted themselves over all other people on Earth, even in Europe with such as the French being ‘neither subhuman nor Aryan’ to quote Adolf Hitler, and now in the 21st century as a result of this self-exaltation, Germany and all of us Europeans are subsequently being humbled. As mentioned, anti-racism does not make non-white people genuinely like white people, because anti-racism means that the Holocaust was so bad that it means that white people are so wrong that they have to be anti-themselves. However, the cool and jocularly Rastafarian ismlessism does make coloured people genuinely like white people.
Anti-Semitism is paranoia.
Again I will quote at length from George L. Mosse’s book The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, and then explain my thoughts about it.
Here too, ideas of force and cruelty, which ran throughout the Volkish ideology, came to the fore. The whole Germanic heritage of fighting—for survival during the Ice Age, against the degenerate Romans, and to keep alive elements of mysticism in the face of doctrinaire Christianity—was considered a model for the future struggle of the races. Moreover, the speculation on the inevitability of a race war only brought the cruelty and ruthlessness into the foreground. At first, to be sure, only a minority of people were affected; but they constituted a vociferous group. However, it was not until after 1918 that it really took root as the necessary conclusion of Germanic and New Romantic thinking.
The case of Hermann Ahlwardt, a teacher and more famous agitator, is still more illustrative: in 1890 he published Der Verzweiflungskampf der arischen Völker mit den Judentum (The Desperate Struggle Between the Aryan Peoples and Judaism).
Invoking the precepts of the Germanic prophets, Ahlwardt stated that a people who rid itself of Jews freed itself for the natural development of the Volk, and thereby rose toward dominion over the world.
In dealing with the Jews, Christian mercy was decidedly out of place. Instead, Ahlwardt asserted, the nation must act with determination to combat the menace. He cited with approval a saying falsely applied to Prussia’s Friedrich Wilhelm I, who, it was said, when he saw a Jew in the morning had the gallows erected by evening. Was this a plea for violence? Certainly! But, when it came to concrete proposals to effect such measures, he displayed an ambivalence which was, as yet, typical. When he drew up an actual program, Ahlwardt could only advocate the imposition of stringent restrictions upon Jews, a decree proclaiming them foreigners on German soil and excluding them from all areas of German life and culture. He also proposed that eventually all Jews be deported from Europe and their surplus capital retained by the German nation.
Curiously, this was almost exactly the same as the National Socialist program for dealing with the Jews. Aside from the popular and politically more violent demagoguery which marked the Nazis’ rise to power and the concrete application of the Nuremberg Laws, Ahlwardt’s program broadly foreshadowed that of the Nazis, for they also reflected an ambivalence. On the one hand, there were the fanatics who asserted that the “final solution” must bring about a correct correspondence between ideology and action and that the deportation of the Jews to distant places only evaded the issue. On the other hand, there were those functionaries and leaders in the party who wanted to encourage Jewish emigration at all costs. Of course, there were various obstacles to the latter course: first, the refusal to permit the Jews to retain the financial resources that would enable them to leave, not to mention the reluctance of nations to accept Jewish immigrants; and then, of course, the effective closing of all doors when the war began. It was then that the final solution, as history knows it, became a reality. At that stage the ultimate consequences of a glorification of merciless cruelty within Volkish ideology, and the Nazi extension of it, finally engulfed the minds of Germany’s leaders. Extermination became the literal fact, not just a rhetorical device to arouse human passions.
If the agitation for violence in settling the Jewish problem did not achieve an immediate implementation, but rather had to wait for the appropriate juncture of events, it was not completely unproductive. It helped to prepare-the nation for events that followed. In conjunction with the over-all depiction of the Jew as an inhuman, un-German intruder, it contributed to the shaping of a state of mind that either apathetically acquiesced in or actively supported the final verdict. The dehumanization of the Jew is perhaps one of the most significant single developments in the evolution of the Volkish ideology.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 136 – 140
The physical properties of the Jew were accordingly contrasted with the Germanic ideal of beauty; a contorted figure resting on short legs, a greedy and sensual corpulence, and, of course, the “Jewish nose” were unfavorably compared with the aesthetically proportioned figure of the Nordic man.
The fear of racial defilement through intermarriage, with its associations of sex, love, and physical features, became an obsession with Volkish thinkers. The image of the pure, blond, spiritual, feminine German woman succumbing to the love of a Jew became a nightmare to the prophets of the race. A flier distributed at the University of Frankfurt in the early 1920’s bears witness to an anti-Semitic fusion of racial, sexual, aesthetic, and religious elements. It declared it a sin, an unnatural act, for an Aryan girl to let herself become enamored of a Jew. It was a transgression tantamount to Eve’s succumbing to the sophistry of the serpent. The Nuremberg Laws elevated this obsession to the level of a legal system and extended it even to the point of forbidding Jews to hire Christian domestics. There were countless stories about the affairs of rich Jews and Aryan servant girls, delusions which cannot be ascribed merely to the sexual frustrations of anti-Semites. Here, after all, was an image which could strike terror into the heart of every German who loved a wife and daughter.
But popular anti-Semitic propaganda was to go one better: it fused the images of Jewish hunger for money with his lust for Aryan women. The resulting image widely used as propaganda pictured a fat Jewish banker caressing a blond woman on his knee. The same agent who milked Germans of their wealth also depleted their racial strength; that was the Volkish anti-Semitic theme. It was to become that for a multitude of Germans.
Novels depicted the debilitating effects of interracial intercourse. Arthur Dinter’s Die Sünde wider das Blut (Sin Against the Blood) (1918) put across the typical message and sold in the hundred thousands. It told of the violation of a German woman’s racial purity by a rich Jew, and even though she left him and married an Aryan, her offspring continued to resemble Jewish stereotypes. The book was not pornographic (so its large sales figures cannot be attributed to prurience); rather, it communicated the horror of racial defilement by a figure that was simply inhuman. The vicious stereotype of the Jew was sometimes projected to the public by state authorities.
The pioneering work of Volkish racial thinkers played a central role in the creation of the anti-Semitic image. The stereotype of the Jew strove successfully to convey the image of a parasite. In Darwinian terms, the Jews were an arrested development in evolution, a fossil that lacked the strength or roots to nourish itself. The racial stereotype attributed so many grotesque qualities to the Jew that he was in essence dehumanized. Fritsch’s work again demonstrates this ominous development, for in his Leuechtkugeln (Fireballs) (1881) he explicitly denied human status to Jews. Here he claimed that God had created the Jew as a buffer between man and ape. The Nazis assimilated this thought in their own propaganda when, in 1931, one of their speakers asserted that non-Nordic man occupied an intermediary position between Nordic man and the animal world. The non-Nordic was not a whole man, for he still shared traits with the apes.
In 1932, another National Socialist speaker likened the Jews to bugs and called for their extermination. Interestingly, the speech was monitored by the secret police of the Republic, and their report pointed out that not the masses, but the “better bourgeoisie” of the Berlin upper-class district of Charlottenburg, had made up the gathering and joined in the “stormy applause.” The Jewish stereotype had indeed eaten deeply into the fabric of German bourgeois society. In their reasoning, whether out of fear or simple prejudice and hate, the bourgeoisie joined in accepting the dehumanization of the Jew.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 140 – 143
Anti-Semitism is paranoia, and there were a multitude of very influential and I must add quite paranoid anti-Semitic scholars, intellectuals, writers, academics, organisations, Youth Movements and Volkish utopias in the German state, before Adolf Hitler and the Nazis came to power and fulfilled the German nation’s desire. The scientific and medical professions were rife with unnecessarily zealous scientists, doctors and psychiatrists who were eager and went out of their way to support the Nazi regime and its social Darwinian ideology. Countless doctors and psychiatrists went above and beyond to implement eugenics, euthanasia and also worked in the death camps and factories (such as Auschwitz). Masses of German scientists, medical doctors and psychiatrists professed the Darwinian scientific worldview. Also, ‘paranoid’ anti-Semitism was rampant and almost universal in the Volkish Youth Movements, academic circles, the educational establishments, the upper-class bourgeoisie and Volkish utopias in Germany during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The Holocaust was therefore the general and long-term, national culmination of the German people’s (or Volk’s) political, spiritual and racial ambitions. To reiterate, the intellectual and spiritual foundations of German Volkish anti-Semitism were well and truly cemented and in place during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, well before Adolf Hitler and the Nazis came to power. Therefore, you must understand that Adolf Hitler and the Nazis were more a fulfilment of the German nation’s and the Volk’s deepest political, spiritual and racial desires, than an aberration, a surprise or something out of the blue. After reading George L. Mosse’s invaluable book (The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich), and without desiring to sound too impolite, however, Volkish ideology is evil and like paranoia. There is no closer term to describe medieval as well as modern anti-Semitism than some kind of mass or global delusion, like paranoia. Paranoia is make believe and anti-Semitism is also delusional. Therefore, the only way that I can explain the whole German catastrophe is that the German people and country suffered from some kind of collective paranoia. I mean this mental illness in regard to their grotesque and obviously make-believe stereotype of the Jewish people as well as their fictitious and unfounded fears and beliefs regarding intercourse and procreation with the Jewish people. Their racial fears regarding the Jews were completely unfounded and not real. If you vehemently believe in something that is not real, that is paranoia. This national paranoia is important because the German people during the course of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries collectively created a delusional fantasy regarding the Jewish people which they unfortunately passed on to Adolf Hitler. Therefore, I believe Adolf Hitler may have believed in a mass-German created paranoid fantasy regarding the Jewish people. Perhaps because they were not as romanised for centuries like the seafaring English, French and Spanish, that therefore, the German people still somehow had some kind of a tendency toward and predilection for the barbaric, heathen and pagan which led to them trying to undo recorded history and to attacking Judaism and Christianity in Europe in the twentieth century? If you intellectually attack and reject Christianity and openly practice heathenism and paganism you will likely become evil and paranoid. Remember, Friedrich Nietzsche went mad just after he wrote The Anti-Christ in 1888! If you want proof that anti-Semitism is like paranoia get yourself on extremist far-right social media platform https://gab.com. Like Robert Bowers (a Gab user) who carried out the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, a mass shooting which took place on October 27, 2018, at the Tree of Life – Or L’Simcha Congregation in the Squirrel Hill neighborhood of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, there are plenty of dumb, twisted, unenlightened and uneducated Hitler-following anti-Semitic loons on Gab. The only explanation or excuse that I have for post-Holocaust and modern (deluded) neo-Nazis and anti-Semites, such as those on Gab, is that they are the mentally ill victims of Germany, Nazism and the Volk. Because of their bellicose warmongering, Germany, Nazism and the Volk spontaneously and collectively created a paranoid-like fantasy or mental illness called anti-Semitism, which they infected the world with. Despite the Volk’s and Adolf Hitler’s descriptions of the Jews as bacilli etc, ironically, it is actually anti-Semitism which is the spiritual disease which the Nazis have infected the psyche of the whole world with. Therefore, unfortunately, some ignorant and low intelligence modern white people easily succumb to Nazism and anti-Semitism. But why? What’s wrong with British imperialism? Was it not enough for them? Is it because British imperialism was not extreme or fascist? “Again, Empire is not fash mon!” That was the whole point of British imperialism, it was Christian, liberal, philanthropic and not too much. (Yet it calmly and confidently held sway over 1/4 of the globe). If you want to support anything white, support moderate, sane and sensible British imperialism, not extreme and insane German fascism. This is what the cool Rastafarian ismlessism wants to achieve, it wants to get to the absolute bottom of anti-Semitism and the Holocaust and through Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour bring about our absolute forgiveness and Salvation.
Racial and spiritual separation.
After reading The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, I know and I understand that the Germans or more accurately the Volk actually racially and spiritually separated (with their blonde hair and blue eyes) from the rest of Europe or more accurately, Southern Europeans and the Levant, on this side of life and the next. They actually totally committed and fought to the very end and to the death, in order to make this racial and spiritual separation (as a distinct northern blonde haired and blue eyed race) happen. They spiritually separated from the slightly more brunette and brown eyed Southern Europeans. Honestly, they separated with eye colour. I said they separated on this side of life and the next because they attempted to exterminate the Jews (which simply represents this spiritual separation) in order to undo recorded history and to extirpate their Biblical heritage which comes from Western Asia. The Volk wanted a separate and different afterlife or heaven from the rest of us Europeans, they wanted Valhalla and not a Christian or Judeo-Christian afterlife or heaven. You would be very surprised as to how spiritual and religious Nazism, Volkish ideology and the Holocaust actually were. Honestly, the Norwegians and Swedes get one less freckle than the more Southern Europeans and the Germans or the Volk tried to turn this one less freckle into another, separate and distinct race of northern Europeans. This is why World War Two happened. The world blew up because of this European racial and spiritual separation. This Germanic separation was an ultimatum to Britain and the rest of Europe. They left us no choice but to fight to the death for Christianity.
CDU and CSU.
It blatantly proves what I am talking about by how it’s obvious that immediately after the Second World War and the Volkish pagan and heathen Holocaust, that two political parties were founded in Germany with the term ‘Christian’ subtly in their party names, the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU) and the Christian Social Union in Bavaria (CSU), both founded in 1945. But wait no, I thought Christianity was no good for Germans? I thought that when the Volk voted for violent anti-Semitism in order to gain the National Socialists power in March 1933 that it was Christianity which was the suppressor of the good old Germanic Volkish faith? All too little and too late I am afraid. Once you have questioned Christianity and once you have seriously questioned or tested our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ; committed and consummated your occultism and paganism with a Holocaust and then had to be utterly destroyed and wiped of the face of the planet just to get you to stop, it’s all a little too late. Plus the point is that you need to say that you are Christian Germany. It’s kind of taken for granted in Britain and the rest of Europe. I mean obviously the postwar Germans understood the heathen and pagan origins of their Holocaust and decided to create the CDU and CSU immediately after World War Two as sign to the world and as an antidote to the pure evil of the Volkish ideology. However, I believe because of the Volkish Holocaust, that all of us anti-pagan, anti-Völkisch switched on cool Ismlessists need to be doubly zealous and doubly loyal Jews and Christians. In fact, it is a good job that the ismlessism is a double ism, as this may prove our double loyalty to Judeo-Christianity and Jesus Christ. Because of the evil, heathen and pagan Volkish Holocaust, we anti-pagan, anti-Völkisch switched on cool Ismlessists need to prove that we would die for our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
I just wanted to give some advice to people who care about white people regarding loyalty. As a person who cares about white people you are loyal, and in theory (or without the Holocaust) there should be nothing wrong with loyalty? What is wrong with loyalty? There is nothing wrong with loyalty, there is something wrong with the world because of the extreme Holocaust. Because of the Nazis and the Volk and how they stereotyped and treated the Jews etc, loyalty is no longer as straightforward as it once was and therefore, people who care about white people always misplace their loyalties. Being a person who cares about white people I have been loyal to many things, including such as the British Empire, Europe and the white race. And this is the danger, in that what I am trying to tell you is that all of that loyalty is misplaced. Don’t feel bad if as a person who cares about white people you have misplaced your loyalty as it is a very big and confusing world, and it’s not really your fault. However, after reading George L. Mosse’s book The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, and about how the Volk were heathen, pagan, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and tried to undo recorded history and to extirpate the Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religion from Europe, I have finally and truly found where people who care about white people in general should place their loyalty. It broke my heart to see how the Volk questioned Christianity and our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and therefore, I believe, in fact I know that because of Germany white people should first of all prove their devoted and unswerving loyalty to Jesus Christ. Because of Germany white people should also prove their loyalty to the apostles such as Saul or Saint Paul. Because of Germany white people should also prove their loyalty to the Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religions. Because of Germany white people should also prove their loyalty to Roman Catholicism. By proving our loyalty to the Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religion we will also simultaneously help to protect white people, however, we should place our loyalty in the Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religion first. Also, as mentioned the cool Rastafarian ismlessism is neither racist nor anti-racist, it is non-racialism, therefore, I just wanted to point out that anti-racism is inaccurate, it hits the wrong people in that it generally attacks the entire white race, regardless of involvement in the Holocaust. Therefore, it is better and more accurate to be loyally Abrahamic and Judeo-Christian, to swear your unswerving loyalty to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and to be vehemently anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch, as that hits the right people and the root of the cause of the Holocaust. Therefore, don’t be anti-racist, be anti-Völkisch. Being anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch is still an ‘anti’ it is just that even people who care about white people can do it.
To be honest I use Twitter frequently and I have noticed that there is a hell of a lot of kind of benign and non-serious European, nature loving (sock puppet) pagans on Twitter these days. It’s as if everybody in Europe or in the West is doing anything except Christianity? I mean even though I know that the Holocaust will never repeat itself (even though the mere suggestion is already too much of a problem) modern, lighthearted and religious European paganism is still very dangerous as it sounds very much like the Volkish ideology and the Volkish faith. I have witnessed many lighthearted pagans on Twitter comment on Christianity being a foreign and invasive religion in Europe ‘from the Hebrew desert‘ for example. This is very close to the essential aspect of Volkish thought which is the linking of the human soul with the natural environment, with the ‘essence’ of nature. As mentioned previously to many Volkish theorists, the nature of the soul of a Volk is determined by the landscape, therefore, the Jews, being a desert people, were viewed as a shallow, arid and dry people, devoid of profundity and lacking creativity. Because of the barrenness of the desert landscape, the Jews were a spiritually barren people. I know these Twitter pagans are harmless, however, I earnestly believe that we should not go anywhere near paganism, Volkish ideology or the Volkish faith with a bargepole. Our governments today and since the Holocaust have and are still absolutely battening down the hatches on racism and fascism in an effort to absolutely guarantee that the Holocaust will never repeat itself, however, to me the root of the problem is paganism? The Germans were anti-Christian and that was the major factor in the cause or possibility of the Holocaust. Just to contrast, the British Empire was never pagan and absolutely never entertained anti-Christianity. Therefore, the problem may lie in Europeans being pagan, heathen, atheistic and anti-Christian? Honestly it is dangerous and you have to be careful. There are many such (supposedly harmless) blonde European pagans on Twitter, I have seen Viking or Norwegian pagans, Central European or Germanic pagans, ‘White Druid’ pagans and even Anglo-Saxon or English pagans, many of them deliberately showing off their blonde hair. The danger is that honestly, sometimes a little Nazism works its way into and occasionally shows up on their timelines and threads and retweets etc. These openly self-confessing and proudly-pagan contemporary Europeans are growing in number and are in fact trying to spread their own faith on Twitter and on social media. If you are interested, they recommend that you read The Secret of the She-Bear: An unexpected key to understand European mythologies, traditions and tales, by Marie D. F. Catchet. These modern day pagans claim to practice a form of European animism. Are we supposed to take them seriously? Honestly, they would probably say no! This got me thinking, in that I can kind of see where these jocular modern European pagans are coming from, I can kind of see the attraction. This is because heathenism and paganism is kind of cool, in that, you get some unbelievably cool pagan artworks of pagan dieties with weapons, armour, costumes, masks, capes and bolts of lightning coming from their eyes etc, like the Greek god Zeus or the Viking god Thor for example. Whereas Abrahamism and Catholicism are ordinary and they give you a kind of (for want of a better term) Abrahamic ‘biff!’ This got me thinking, in that, the only reason that we zealous Christians follow and profess Christianity and Abrahamism is because of one single person, that is, Jesus Christ. Although we admire other patriarchs such as Moses and Abraham, these are not the reasons why we profess Christianity and Abrahamism. Jesus Christ is real and other than His divinity He was an ordinary, normal and real human being. Therefore, I apologise to pagans because Jesus Christ did not wear a cape or a mask (like a comic book hero), because he was real! Would you in reality want anything else? Would you in reality want to go around wearing a cape? No! Therefore, pagans need a reality check. Similarly, please also note that the ismlessism is also completely normal and ordinary. No capes, masks, costumes, weapons or bolts of lightning! There probably shouldn’t even be an option or be the religious freedom in Europe to be anything except Jewish or Christian. Perhaps we should be more medieval or Islamic about Christianity? As the root cause of the Holocaust was paganism and anti-Christianity, shouldn’t our governments also be battening down the hatches on paganism and anti-Christianity in Europe? ‘Not necessarily just fash and rayce mon?’ It’s almost like messing with people’s freedom today? However, if Friedrich Nietzsche, who intellectually and philosophically attacked Christianity in the nineteenth century had tried to question Christianity in the medieval period, he would have been burned at the stake and disemboweled as a heretic. And judging by the Holocaust, for very good reasons! Christianity and its Saints and saintliness are mature and real. Like the Volk, I believe that these modern day harmless pagans want to be purely 100% European, they don’t want a ‘biff’, they want to be something and they want to have something of their own like a tattoo or an identity. To me there is a danger, as look at what happened in Germany in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries with the academic freedom to intellectually attack Christianity and to openly practice occultism and heathenism. If you are not on the right side of life or should I say, if you are not on the right side of the ismlessism then to me you are wrong, then you are a pagan. Be careful!
Recorded history versus prehistoric pagan spirituality.
Regarding recorded history, I absolutely loved reading Agricola and Germania by the Roman historian and politician Tacitus. It amazed me to think that I was actually reading the very first hand accounts of the very first encounters, discoveries and recorded histories of Britannia and Germania. Regarding recorded history, despite the fact that hominins have walked and climbed the full length and breadth of the European continent from north to south, east to west and top to bottom for hundreds of thousands of years, it’s as if absolutely none of that matters and it’s as if all of that constitutes absolutely nothing? By this I mean that it’s as if Europe didn’t even exist until it was it was recorded historically by the Israelites, Greeks and Romans, through exploration, trade, discovery and conquest. It’s almost as if the universe, the world or reality literally doesn’t exist and just instantly comes into existence and unfolds itself before these history-recording explorers, pioneers and conquerers, whereas prior to this it didn’t exist! It might as well not have, because recorded history is so important. It’s as if when you read Tacitus’ Germania or Julius Caesar’s The Conquest of Gaul, that you say ”That is Germania!” or ”That is Gaul!”, whereas Germania and Gaul might as well have not existed prior to Tacitus and Julius Caesar (despite the fact that the Neanderthals probably knew Europe inside and out like the back of their hands). Of Tacitus’ works that I have read, Germania is the better work as Agricola is more of a biography or eulogy to Tacitus’ father-in-law and his governorship of Britannia and his conquest of Caledonia (modern day Scotland) etc. Agricola has a brief description of Britannia, while Germania is a full, detailed and in depth ethnography of all of Northern Europe. Tacitus describes the myriad of different tribes that inhabit modern day Holland to Germany, the Czech Republic, all the way to the Black Sea and all the way up to Sweden, Lapland and the Baltic states (although none of those modern day names are used). To reiterate, it’s truly amazing to think that Europe ever had to be discovered and that Tacitus’ words are the very first hand accounts of the very first discoveries and recorded histories of the British Isles and Northern Europe. I have come across this unfolding of reality or the universe in front of history-recording explorers before by reading a myriad of books about the discovery of Sub-Saharan Africa, from Cape Bojador (Western Sahara) to the Cape of Good Hope (South Africa). I read five British, Dutch and French books dating from the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries regarding West Africa (or Guinea), the transatlantic slave trade, or voyages of trade or missions to West Africa or the Gold Coast, but not one of them were as satisfactory as The Chronicle of the Discovery and Conquest of Guinea, Volumes 1 and 2, by Gomes Eannes de Azurara (a fifteenth century Portuguese chronicler of the Age of Discovery). Even though the former books were all excellent, each time I finished one of these contemporary books I was always left with a feeling that West Africa wasn’t very interesting or that there were still unanswered questions of some type that I couldn’t even put my finger on. The answer is Azurara’s biblical 15th century ‘The Chronicle of the Discovery and Conquest of Guinea’, as this is a chronicle not just of the first Portuguese voyages to Western Africa, but of the very first voyages of the European age of discovery. The chronicle is original and simple, every voyage was virgin and discovered virgin African lands and people, hitherto unknown to recorded history. The key is that the other books I read were not the first or original voyages of discovery of West Africa, and this is paramount. West Africa has very little recorded history, which is why it is paramount to read Azurara first and to give credit where credit is due, namely to the Portuguese and to the Infant Don Henry (Henry the Navigator). There is a natural and correct order to recorded history that must be taken into account and it is paramount that proper and due credit is given to those first and original explorers. The English, French and Dutch who later came to dominate the coast had nothing to do with the original discoveries and their books are subsequently less important. Azurara’s writing is so simple and elegant, and he records splendidly the magnificent deeds of the Infant Don Henry and his initiatives, despite negative public opinion towards his endeavours, to explore West Africa beyond Cape Bojador (the farthest point ever traversed), and thus, initiate the European age of discovery. There are many hero’s and their deeds recorded in the chronicle such as Antão Gonçalves and Nuno Tristão and their intrepid voyages of exploration and conquest to discover new virgin lands and to capture slaves, all in the name of God, and in order to save the captives souls by bringing them into the holy faith. Each time a new voyage set out from Portugal on the Infant Don Henry’s orders, they generally went further south down the West African Coast, eventually going from the barren deserts of the Sahara, to more greener pastures further south, hence the various explorers get as far as Cape Verde, which they named themselves. Captives caught on the voyages are the very first slaves ever to be caught by Europeans in West Africa, and it’s humbling to read contemporary accounts of these biblical events. The voyages go from the land of the Moors to the land of the blacks, hence called Guinea. Now why I am relaying all of this to you is because the Portuguese historically-recorded discoveries of Sub-Saharan Africa are exactly the same as the Roman historically-recorded discoveries of Britannia and Germania. It’s as if such as the Cape Of Good Hope didn’t even exist until the history-recording, Portuguese explorer, Bartolomue Dias discovered and named it (in writing) in 1488 for example. All that these history-recording explorers had to do was name places such as ‘Guinea’ and geographical features such as capes and it’s as if only then do these places and peoples exist. (I’m deliberately exaggerating and being sarcastic to emphasise a point). Like the illiterate ancient Britons and Germans, even though there were many indigenous natives present at the Cape, before Dias, it might as well not have existed. So where am I going with all this? I am trying to explain to you the importance of recorded history, and to highlight that the very first, original and best selling work of recorded history in history is the Hebrew Bible. The Bible is what comes down to us in perfect living preservation from prehistory and from the Fertile Crescent (while Europeans were still eating each other). There is a holy and sacred order to recorded history and it started with the ancient Israelites (Egypt is too archaic and had to be excavated and resurrected to eternal life through archaeology and the deciphering of the Rosetta Stone etc), then Greece, then Rome then the Western European seafaring nations, including Portugal, Spain, France, England and ultimately America which reinvented the writing system, digitised and eternalised recorded history. Yeah so what? Well what I am trying to explain to you is that recorded history is almost divine and that the heathen and pagan Volkish movement in Germany in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was a deeply spiritual and divine occultist movement that rejected the Jews and the Hebrew Bible. The Volk believed that Judaism and Christianity were forcibly imported foreign (Near Eastern) spiritualities which had conquered Europe and European paganism (which was actually prehistoric and illiterate). However, what the Volk did not understand is that Judaism and Christianity are the original recorded histories. Recorded history is spirituality and divine and the Volk (or Nazis) tried to undo recorded history and revive a prehistoric paganism, which as I have described was absolutely nothing and might as well have not existed prior to the Romans. So this is what the Nazis did not understand, that Judaism and Christianity are the true and original recorded history. For example, the New Testament is a 100% and very accurate recorded history and the Volk and the Nazis could not believe the fact that they (as Germans) were not the first and glorious recorders of history and that recorded history was definitely invented in the Fertile Crescent while as mentioned Europeans were still eating each other (for example). Hence, the Nazis got their wires crossed regarding recorded history and spirituality/occultism, hence, they became heathen and pagan and that is what the Nazis tried to do, they tried to undo recorded history, which is sacrilege if not impossible. Also recorded history is Roman Catholicism’s trump card, because recorded history proves that the heretical (German invented) Reformation was illegitimate because after the Israelites with the Bible and the Greeks with Homer and Herodotus etc, no one recorded history better or more importantly than the Romans, and therefore, this means that we Northern Europeans should never betray the Romans (or the Israelites or Greeks), because after the Bible, the Roman Kingdom, Republic and Empire are the most important recorded histories of Europe, Asia and Africa in history, therefore, all of us Europeans, no matter how Northern we are should be extremely loyal to the Romans, and how to be loyal to the Romans is to be obedient and loyal to Roman Catholicism.
INTELLECTUAL AND ACADEMIC DEFENCE AND JUSTIFICATION OF THE ISMLESSISM.
Grammarians and scholars.
As an expert grammarian or scholar of the English language you may laugh at the ungrammatical and low intellectual level of the ismlessisms, however there are three items to point out. Firstly, I am not developing and disseminating the ismlessisms purely for their linguistic value, I am developing the ismlessisms most importantly because they are a solution to racism, because they remove and de-stigmatise all negative and discriminatory isms, which would be potentially very beneficial to European people. Because of or since the Holocaust there simply now exists many discriminatory isms that are taboo and which we are not allowed use and the ismlessisms are their solution. Therefore, I am European and I primarily want to help my own people by solving all discriminatory isms, but primarily racism. Racism is a huge ism, perhaps the most powerful ism in the world, it has huge political and philosophical effects and consequences. Racism unquestionably influences the way that our politicians and world leaders think and act. Because Adolf Hitler was a tyrannical and extremely racist dictator, our politicians, therefore, have absolutely no option but to obey the tyrannical laws and diktat of anti-racism. Racism influences and affects everything human, philosophical, spiritual and political. Therefore, that is the potential power and importance of the ismlessisms, because they deal with racism and all discriminatory isms. Therefore, that is why I am researching, developing and disseminating ismlessisms, not simply because of their linguistic value. Second of all, because racism, Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust are taboo subjects, no legitimate academic or scholar on Earth would likely have the courage to deal with them or to find a solution to them. My efforts to compare Friedrich Nietzsche to the Catholic Saints, compare Christianity with paganism and outline the philosophical and intellectual origins of the Holocaust above in the previous part of this essay are probably a little non-expert (because I am obviously not a specialist or authoritative on Friedrich Nietzsche or the intellectual origins of the Holocaust), however, at least I try to help. No genuine authoritative academic or scholar on the Holocaust or its intellectual origins would ever try to help Adolf Hitler, the Nazis or the Germans (through humour for the Jews), and they all just relay the history of the Holocaust and yet just leave it lying there broken. Therefore, the ismlessisms would likely never be developed, published or brought to light by a legitimate academic or scholar. Therefore, the ismlessisms are justified and I should have the right and obligation to develop and disseminate them. Third of all, the ismlessisms are a coloured ‘religious’ ism, they are deliberately low and as expert grammarians or scholars of the English language perhaps you should acknowledge and accept the ismlessisms because they are coloured and politically correct. The ismlessisms may be grammatically incorrect, but they are politically correct. Therefore, it would possibly be politically correct to acknowledge and accept the ismlessisms as a legitimate or “propa” part of the English language, whereas to reject them as improper, kitsch or ungrammatical would be politically incorrect? Therefore, because the ismlessisms are Rastafarian, they have the right and the excuse to be ungrammatical and intellectually lower.
In June 2021 I began my endeavours with SEO (Search Engine Optimisation) to get the ismlessism to come up first on Google for the term ‘forgive Adolf Hitler.’ I believe this is important as I believe the ismlessism is important enough to warrant properly publishing and promulgating. I have other keywords such as ‘Caveman Adolf Hitler’, which if you try searching for on Google, you will see that my comical digital art webpage comes up first. This is all because of the money and energy I have ploughed into SEO. Please note that the most important keyword phrase for the ismlessism is ‘forgive Adolf Hitler’, and that ‘Caveman Adolf Hitler’ is just a secondary keyword phrase to do with my comical digital art, which is nothing to do with the jocularly Rastafarian ismlessism and just came from first (erroneous) essay. If you think about it, Adolf Hitler himself would probably actually like and prefer that the ismlessism came up first on Google for the keyword phrase ‘Adolf Hitler’ itself, never mind the keyword phrase ‘forgive Adolf Hitler’. This is because (most importantly through humour for the Jews) the ismlessism is saintly, good hearted and benevolent towards him and not a negative and unforgiving, accurate historical account of him. In theory one book about the ismlessism would balance all the other negative historical books about Adolf Hitler. My first (erroneous) 87,000 word essay as well as all this SEO has given me confidence. Hence, my ultimate mission regarding the ismlessism is to publish a small book titled simply “Ismlessism: An Ism.”
As you can see from the fake reviews above of my hypothetical book, with humour, you can turn negative adjectives which mean to criticise or something bad into compliments or something which means something good. For example, “Abominable humour”, “Terrible humour”, ”Awful humour” and “Ridiculous humour” which are compliments and mean something good. “I can’t take critis mon!” This should prove that the ismlessism is bulletproof. I pray to the Lord Jesus Christ to help me realise and accomplish my mission. Amen. As you know I have experience as I have already wrote an (erroneous) 87,000 word essay, (which isn’t good enough to publish), however, I believe that the ismlessism is good enough to publish, if I can tremendously refine the text and bring it up to grammatical standard English. The ismlessism essay currently stands at over 90,000 words. You can publish your own book online for a few hundred pounds with an ISBN etc, which sounds very good. However, I am an amateur humanist who has read 170 + books on a grand study of the humanities, I am not a qualified professional academic or writer and I worry that if I did publish a small 120 page book on the ismlessism and the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, that people would probably tell me to leave it to the professionals? However, the whole point of the ismlessism is that it is Rastafarian and low. Also this is exactly my point, in that there are no professionals or experts on the absolution of Adolf Hitler. There are no experts on extreme or ultimate forgiveness. Also, I am fairly confident that if we just leave it to the professionals that the ismlessism and forgiveness of Adolf Hitler will be left for eternity down here on Earth. We will literally wait for eternity for a ‘professional’ to write a book about the genuine absolution of Adolf Hitler and the ismlessism, and in reality it will likely just never happen. Why? Because professionals are too afraid of ruining their careers and reputations. Therefore, the ismlessism is justified and I believe I have the right to write and in fact I believe it is my duty to publish and disseminate the ismlessism. Hence, this has got me thinking, in that I believe that I may actually be the world’s foremost expert on the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler? This is simply because no one else has ever dared to try. In fact, because I deal with and technically forgive the worlds most severe sins, and because using the ismlessism to cut the head off the snake (by de-stigmatising the racism in Adolf Hitler) leads to the automatic forgiveness of all other lesser sins by default, such as those committed by all subordinate Nazis during World War Two, therefore I could actually be the worlds foremost expert on forgiveness itself? I mean there are plenty of wishy washy books out there on wishy washy forgiveness, such as how to forgive your cheating spouse etc, but none of them are authoritative on forgiveness itself. To be authoritative on forgiveness itself you have got to genuinely be able to forgive Adolf Hitler, because that’s what cuts the head off the snake etc. Google has this thing for SEO called E-A-T which stands for Expertise, Authoritativeness and Trustworthiness. E-A-T is a set of official recommendations for delivering a quality experience online. It focuses on the quality of the content and the creators of that content, as well as the website itself. Basically you’ve got to be an ‘expert’ and ‘authoritative’ for Google to give a damn about your website. However, there are no authoritative experts in the world on the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler except me! And I am an amateur humanist. Like I said if we leave it to the professionals clearly it will never get done, because experts and academics are too restricted and limited by taboos and political correctness. Therefore, the ismlessism is justified. “Let’s have no expertees mon!” (Note: “expertees” is the ismlessism of expertiseism). Because the ismlessism is fashionably and fundamentally Rastafarian, it has the excuse, in that it may have a slight lack of professionalism and expertise. Honestly to write a book, professional academics read about as much as I have read (170 + books) and they are simply expert at producing professional theses with proper references and Ibids etc, and that’s about it. Therefore, if I do publish a small book on the ismlessism and I do get told to ‘leave it to the professionals’, people will therefore, be worrying and geeking over nothing more than professionalism, references and Ibids etc, never mind the fact that professionals would never do it in eternity or the important message of the content. Did the biblical writers such as Moses have references and Ibids? No! Don’t get me wrong, I have completed a dissertation and several papers before at university and I will do my best to reference my essay as professionally as I possibly can, but at the end of the day I am not an academic in that kind of technical way, I am an amateur humanist who is unfortunately the world’s foremost and eminent authority on the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. So as an answer to academics the ismlessism is a Rasta word and it is not bad for a Rasta mon! Even my mistakes are Rasta mon!
Iyaric or Dread Talk.
The conviction that the English language was an instrument of Western oppression that robbed Africans of their native speech was central to the creation of an in-group language. Instead of aspiring for the social mobility associated with mastering the nuances of English and mouthing the cadences of diction associated with the Oxford or Cambridge educated, Rastas have launched an ideological attack on the integrity of the English language.
Rastas found pervasive confusion and corruption of sounds and meanings in the English language. The word ‘oppression’, for example, signifies the utter restriction of freedom and equality. Yet the first syllable is pronounced with the positive sounding ‘up’. From the perspective of Rastafarian linguistic sensibilities, what English calls oppression is really pressure on the poor by those in a higher social position, and therefore ‘downpression’ is the correct term to capture the significance of their activities.
The replacement of some syllables considered contrary to the meaning of the words (usually based on their sounds) with syllables considered more appropriate; for example, oppress becomes downpress; understand becomes overstand.
Rastafari: A Very Short Introduction, Ennis B. Edmonds, page 45 – 46.
Therefore, I don’t overstand why you downpress me with your expertees mon!Graham Cammock
Remember, Adolf Hitler would have said and considered that Iyaric, Dread Talk and the ismlessisms were ‘degenerate’, however, they are definitely cool today. Even if they are ‘degenerate’, because of Adolf Hitler and his Holocaust, Iyaric, Dread Talk and the ismlessisms are cool and hip today and they are likely the direction of where humanity and society will go in the future. Therefore, it is politically incorrect to ignore, label or assume that Iyaric, Dread Talk and the ismlessisms are ‘impropa’, ‘degenerate’ or ungrammatical.
Now that you understand the ismlessism (or the ismlessisms) and how they are coloured, politically correct, cool, hip and with it; how they are synonymous with the London lifestyle, our news channels, mainstream media, parliament, government and politicians etc; and how the ismlessism (or the ismlessisms) are like the Bridget Jones’s Diary of isms or the Amy Winehouse of the English language, don’t you feel that the bar for white people to be cool, hip, with it or to ‘get in’ is too high? The ismlessism (or the ismlessisms), especially if you have read the Rasta Algebra Test above or in the menu of my website clearly indicate that the bar to be cool, hip, with it or to ‘get in’ is very low for coloured people or Rastafarians. In theory or in some way to ‘get in’ all that you should have to do is say you ismlessisms or clip the suffix isms of your isms, for example, it should be as easy as saying or writing ‘fash’ instead of fascism or ‘Bud’ instead of Buddhism? The ismlessism (or the ismlessisms) indicate that it should be very easy indeed to ‘get in’ or to be with it, hip and cool. On the other hand, I attended a very prestigious private boarding school called Barnard Castle School in County Durham, England from the age of 8 years old to 17 years old (when I was unfortunately expelled for smoking marijuana). Barnard Castle School is like a little pocket of South East England in Northern England and life is very good at Barnard Castle School, that is, you ‘get in’ easily and everyone at Barnard Castle School is very cool, hip and with it. However, it will cost you (or your father’s company) about £21,000 a year per pupil to afford this luxurious and Southern England kind of privileged lifestyle. Now don’t you think that £21,000 per head per year sets the bar to attain this kind of London lifestyle a little too high? It’s as if you have got to be a doctor, general practioner (GP), an Oxbridge professional or continue your career in the National Health Service (NHS) or as a politician in Houses of Parliament to ‘get in’ as an adult or to permanently attain or continue this London lifestyle? It’s as if it is a harsh fact of life that if you didn’t give your absolute all at school (regarding study) that you therefore, failed and did not ‘get in’ the establishment or institution like a doctor or general practioner (GP). However, Rastafarians would definitely object. Rastafarians would believe that ‘getting in’ or being with it, cool and hip should be as easy as saying your ismlessisms. Therefore, please excuse the lower academic standards of this essay.
I decided to create this new essay initially by coagulating a selection of my favourite posts since 12th April 2021, when I discovered the ismlessism. The essay currently stands at over 90,000 words, therefore it has become a real second essay. In June 2021 I got myself into SEO (Search Engine Optimisation) for my website and I have been searching Google for the phrase ‘forgive Adolf Hitler’ and what I have noticed that comes up is so unfunny and so serious. They haven’t a clue how to genuinely forgive Adolf Hitler with lightheartedness and humour. As stated I have two essays now, the first one which you already know is the (erroneous) 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler and my second new essay is this one, regarding the ismlessism, which actually is the true and genuine absolution of Adolf Hitler. However, to truly and genuine forgive Adolf Hitler you have got to be cool, hip and with it. You have got to use lightheartedness, comedy and humour and my 40 or so works of comical digital art are pretty much essential to the whole project. It’s seriously funny or a serious catch-22 because you cannot genuinely forgive Adolf Hitler by being serious, therefore, as an expert academic at a university, how could you write a serious essay that conforms to house rules, with expert references and Ibids, about the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler without being cool, comical, lighthearted or funny at the same time? It’s impossible. A thesis is too serious and it’s a serious paradox that universities are not known for their coloured Rasta coolness and humour, in that universities are generally more or less 100% serious. This means we are helpless with the forgiveness of serious sin, such as those committed by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. Therefore, this means that we Europeans are doomed because of the Holocaust and therefore, we will never achieve our salvation. This determines that we lay people should consider taking up the serious independent reading and research of the humanities (and humanist writing) on the outside of formal institutions such as universities. It is possible that we will never attain true world peace without the true and genuine absolution of Adolf Hitler. This is what seriously unfunny Antifa (Antifascists) need to accept. And remember concerning my other or first (erroneous) essay, even though time travel to the past is impossible, a joke is a joke and lightheartedness is all that forgiveness requires. Therefore, I have been seriously dedicated to helping save and protect my people since the 1st of August 2016. I spent nearly 5 years reading over 130 books and I wrote an 87,000 word practice essay, which simplified down to one perfect one word equation, formula or answer, namely, the ismlessism. There is nothing more or higher than the ismlessism regarding racism. The ismlessism is the ultimate and unquestionable answer and solution to the ism, namely racism. The ismlessism is a double ism, it is thee ism and it de-stigmatises the racism in Adolf Hitler and the world. It is cooler than racism and funnier than anti-racism.
Brown nosing anti-racism and political correctness.
What amazes me about Homo sapiens is that they can overcome mind bogglingly difficult scientific problems such as (to quote John F. Kennedy) putting a man on the moon and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard. However, they universally cannot overcome mind bogglingly difficult emotional, spiritual, moral or ethical problems (or sins) such as the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. It is very hard to forgive the Adolf Hitler, as it took me 5 years of reading almost every day and an 87,000 word practice essay, not to mention the 100 works of comical digital art. It was unbelievably difficult but my efforts were rewarded with the ismlessism. That’s the beauty of absolute and universal forgiveness because you just need to forgive the most severe example (such as Adolf Hitler) and in theory all other sins are forgiven by default. That single eternal example (Adolf Hitler) just needed forgiving once and for all time to potentially help us all. So the ismlessism is the hard stuff, it’s hard to forgive Adolf Hitler, and it was hard to achieve, but it’s now done and finished. In theory nothing should be unforgivable in the universe. Another thing about state of the art science is that it puts average bachelors (like me) off from seriously taking up non-career oriented, academic reading and studying of the humanities and especially of writing an independent 87,000 word practice essay on the outside of universities. Honestly, people go to universities just to get told what to read and to get other people to read and grade their writing and that’s about it. The ismlessism and my first (erroneous) 87,000 word essay prove that you don’t need a mark, grade or qualification to achieve your dreams. My faulty first essay justified itself as it led to the ismlessism. As long as you write enough words and give it your absolute heart and soul your essay will justify itself without being marked or graded. If you go to university firstly you are limited by taboos and political correctness and secondly you are taught an orthodox way to do things, such as a very serious thesis, however, British lower class society and culture is vulgar, it does not give monkeys about taboos, political correctness, rude jokes, secret and closet-humorous homophabia or secret and casual-humorous racism.
To reiterate, honestly, non-white people don’t care about vulgar white lower class casual humorous racism, they only care about keeping racism out of high society and centres of power, such as parliament, universities and the media etc. Obviously there is a lot in it for non-white people to keep racism out of high society and centres of power. Anyway this is why lower class laypeople are free, different, unique and radical. Therefore, if lower class laypeople take up independent academic reading, writing and studying of the humanities on the outside of universities and not for career goals, but for higher virtues, they can produce completely different, unique and radical works that can help the world. Trust me, on the outside of universities I can do very strong things that you cannot do at universities. It’s just a matter of if I can get my writing or text up to acceptable academic and grammatically standards? This is because on the outside of universities we are not limited by taboos and political correctness or conformed to any orthodox curriculum or way of doing things. People go to university to brown nose their way into a financially successful career, whereas, if as a layman you take up independent academic reading, writing and studying of the humanities, you work purely for virtues, such as mine was always to help protect white people. It is impossible to attain the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler through brown nosing your way at university. Speaking on behalf of many (formerly) young white people, I believe many of us drop out kids simply refuse to brown nose anti-racism and political correctness. I mean there are a couple of more things to point out which are, firstly, no one would be allowed or would dare to write an essay about how to forgive Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust at university and secondly, as mentioned advanced science puts lay people (like me) off from writing about such things as time travel to the past in order to seek forgiveness etc as scientists would (geekily) point out that the second law of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics determine that time travel to the past is scientifically impossible. I suffered from lack of confidence all the way through my 87,000 word practice essay because of that problem, but I didn’t let it stop me and ultimately it didn’t matter if my essay was a bit erroneous as I ultimately attained the ismlessism and the true forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. However, the thing about the sciences is that unlike the humanities, the sciences are entirely neutral and amoral, the sciences such as physics have not got a soul or a heart, therefore, the sciences will never forgive us or help save us from moral issues or our sins such as the Holocaust (whereas the humanities will). Obviously don’t take up anything scientific or that requires a laboratory, take up the humanities, that is, academic, political, philosophical, historical or religious reading and writing. All that you need to do is to be able to read and write. That’s how I started, with no relevant humanist qualifications whatsoever. And remember it’s science that puts you off. As a lay person don’t let neutral and amoral extremely advanced science, professionalism and articulate philosophy put you off reading and writing about the humanities.
They can’t do it!
I just wanted to tell you that my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler is a bit like the Old Testament, it’s primitive and not that accurate. We all know that Genesis, the Garden of Eden, Original Sin and The Fall are myths. But prior to 19th century people were convinced about the validity of Noah and the flood etc. Anyway, I have read the Bible three times and I understand the Old Testament, it’s less accurate and less enthusiastic than the New Testament, particularly about the prophecy of the coming of the Lord, the ‘son of David’ and the ‘root of Jesse’ etc. Although the Old Testament touches on or predicts the coming of the Messiah in a blasé way, you obviously can’t be as enthusiastic about the coming of the Lord as much as you can after He has already been and gone, as in the New Testament, which is much more accurate and enthusiastic etc. Similarly, my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler is not quite as accurate about or as enthusiastic about universal forgiveness as the ismlessism, which is like the New Testament, however, it does touch on the matter now and again particularly regarding forgiveness and my motives to help protect white people. It’s like a prediction, but you do not really have to read it. I am confident that the ismlessism is the ultimate and unquestionable answer to the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and to the ism, namely racism, however, did I truly ask the question(s) can we forgive Hitler? Can we forgive or fix the Holocaust? Is it possible to fix or de-stigmatise racism? Can we help protect white people? Yes I did. But it’s a bit vague and blasé about some of those questions, a bit like how the Old Testament is vague and blasé about the coming of the Messiah. For example, I definitely and emphatically asked the question can we forgive Adolf Hitler? I was just wrong at that point or in the way I was proposing. In fact, in the essay I try to tell you that that is the way to forgive Adolf Hitler, but it’s not, the ismlessism is. I definitely asked the question can we correct or fix the Holocaust? I definitely pursued a solution to racism for nearly five years with all my heart and soul. I always said to myself I wish I could find an equation or formula that is unquestionable that would overcome racism. Well, although a little more politically correct than what I was expecting, as you know my prayers were literally answered with the ismlessism. I definitely pursued and asked the question can we help protect white people? I put my absolute heart and soul into my various social media endeavours, my reading and my first (erroneous) 87,000 word essay (all in order to help protect white people) for nearly five years. That was always my goal, that is, helping to protect white people, however I was just a little errant to begin with. Also, I have to ask the question is my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler actually anti-racist? Yes it is. It started a bit nativist but it got progressively more and more anti-racist, good hearted, PC and polite all the way through as (even though you don’t need to know much about the essay) demonstrated by for example my referring to Europeans as clumsy and stupid compared to physically adept and skilled Africans and it even specifically states that there is no hate or racism in the essay a couple of times. However, what you should know is that my first (erroneous) essay was not as politically correct as this one, because it was wrong. I honestly also have to ask the question was my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler really a joke? Well yes and no. (Yes it definitely is in hindsight.) however, I actually seriously and really meant it in a lighthearted way. If I wanted you to take the essay seriously you would probably laugh at me for my puerile theory or idea of attaining forgiveness by time travel to the past? Honestly, even if you laughed at me for even trying that is no problem. That is all my (erroneous) 87,000 word essay was supposed to do, that is, make you smile a little. Obviously the second law of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics determine that time travel to past is a scientific impossibility, however, the essay was meant to be a time travel joke. What does it matter if time travel to the past is a scientific impossibility, if the essay makes you laugh or smile? Come on? A joke is a joke. Give me a break. I just tried to lighten up the worst sinners in history with time and relativity, it was meant to be absolute and universal forgiveness. What if we forgave absolutely everything? What if there were no limits to forgiveness? Therefore, I tried to lighten up Adolf Hitler, (in order to help protect white people), you know, as in lighthearted, as in a joke? So take the concept of ‘crime travel’ as a joke and with a handful of salt. In fact, my whole first (erroneous) 87,000 word essay was meant to be taken as a joke and with handful of salt. However, wouldn’t a lighthearted joke be enough to forgive? ‘No bones!’ So there you have it, I did ask the question or those questions, which were fulfilled or answered by or with the ismlessism. It’s just that prior to the ismlessism, I am a much less accurate and a little less enthusiastic about it, a bit how like the Old Testament touches on the coming of the ‘son of David’ or the ‘root of Jesse’ in a blasé way. The ismlessism is much more accurate and enthusiastic, and this is similar to the New Testament. It’s almost as if by going off scientists such as Richard Dawkins and his book ‘The God Delusion’ that the writer of Genesis, that is, Moses, was expected to have absolutely all knowledge from all of time and all at once, in some sort of orgasm. It’s as if Richard Dawkins honestly somehow expected Moses to have evolution by natural selection and Big Bang theory in 1400 BC. The Old Testament is cool. It’s not a geek. It doesn’t care if it’s not that accurate. Similarly, by how I have had some run ins on social media and been banned from advertising on Facebook, I feel like I am or was expected to have all knowledge and answers about how to forgive Adolf Hitler and the ismlessism instantly and all at once in some sort of cosmic orgasm. Again, similarly my first (erroneous) 87,000 word essay was thick, wrong and inaccurate, but the lesson is that a geek would never ask the question can we forgive Adolf Hitler?
Are you seriously saying that the ismlessism doesn’t matter? Ok, I’ll just pack it up and take the whole thing with me to my grave so that no one ever knows about it. Whoosh! It’s gone! I’m joking of course, however, I do have a point because it’s the very nature of the Holocaust that nothing matters. It’s just too much and no matter how much you plead and cry with the Jews for example, it just doesn’t matter. For example, the term Kniefall von Warschau (German for “Warsaw genuflection”) refers to a gesture of humility and penance performed by West German Chancellor Willy Brandt on December 7, 1970, in Warsaw, Poland, towards the victims of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. However, this type of sincere and genuine humility and genuflection toward Jewish people just doesn’t matter. It’s futile! One thing you have to understand about the Volk and the Holocaust is that crying doesn’t change anything. Dwelling and sobbing over the statistics and examples of the Holocaust doesn’t change anything. You have to ignore the negativity, stop crying, be cool, hip and stay humorous and positive. Concerning the Holocaust, it doesn’t matter how sincere you are. Trust me, we Europeans (including myself) are all bent over double trying to fix the Holocaust and make it up to the Jewish people, but it just doesn’t matter how bent double you are, the Holocaust is far more. Or for example, if all of European men promised to marry Jewish women, it just wouldn’t matter. If you sincerely apologised to the Jews for the Holocaust, it just doesn’t matter. Nothing is worth the Holocaust. The genuine absolution of the Volk and the correction of the root or source of the cause of Holocaust, namely racism, would be priceless. You just can’t put a price on 11 million innocent lives. For example, without the ismlessism, Adolf Hitler could be up there in heaven (bless his cotton socks) screaming and shouting that he’s no longer a racist! But it just doesn’t matter. Now as you have already seen the ismlessism removes or de-stigmatises the racism in Adolf Hitler and the Volk, therefore, the ismlessism does honestly really matter. To remove or de-stigmatise the racism in the Volk is priceless and pretty funny too.
External academia (humanities).
Because mainstream institutions, universities, professors, academics and students are far too limited and restricted by taboos and political correctness, which determines that they would never encourage or even attempt to find a solution to racism or the Holocaust, or seek the ultimate absolution of Adolf Hitler, what if the ismlessism determines that there is a second, separate, external, independent or unorthodox academia about non-scientific study of the humanities, which is only taken up by people on the outside of mainstream institutions and universities? Such a second or external academia would not be limited by taboos and political correctness. As I have stated before, when you take up independent reading and writing on the outside of universities, you work for higher or noble virtues such as to do something beneficial for your country and people and not for money or career goals. The ismlessism is relatively simple to discover, it just requires a lot of reading and a practice essay, therefore, trust me, the ismlessism proves that the only reason that it has not already been discovered before is simply and ashamedly because no one has ever tried. Therefore, the fact that mainstream professors, academics and students would never attempt to find a solution to racism or the Holocaust, or seek the ultimate forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, proves that the ismlessism is therefore, justified or justifies itself. “Let’s have no expertees mon!” (Note: “expertees” is the ismlessism of expertiseism). Also, as mentioned because the ismlessism is fashionably and fundamentally Rastafarian, it has the excuse of its low academic level, in that it probably has a slight lack of professionalism and expertise. Anyway, to reiterate, honestly, non-white people don’t give damn about secretive white lower class casual humorous racism, they only care about keeping racism out of high society and centres of power, such as parliament, universities and the media. Obviously there is something in it for non-white people to keep racism out of high society and centres of power. I am a lower class Englishman and my first (erroneous) 87,000 word essay started out with a little nativism here and there, however, it got progressively more and more good hearted to the point that for all intents and purposes it became anti-racist. I then gave up on my first essay and only then did I discover the ismlessism. However, I honestly believe that the ismlessism is fundamental and good hearted enough to actually get up to high society level, parliament, universities and the media. However, the fact remains that the ismlessism came from British lower class vulgarity and casual humorous homophobia and racism. If you are in parliament, universities or British high society, as some genuine advice for this life and the next, I would not snootily look down on the British lower classes, society and culture just because they are rough, vulgar and casually and humorously racist, this is because the ismlessism, external academia or the independent study of the humanities prove that we lower classes can do things that you cannot. And remember, in terms of religion and Catholicism we vulgar lower classes are thick, but like Saint André Bessette whom was illiterate, religions prefer angelic simpletons to evil geniuses.
DOCTRINE, SYSTEM OR PRACTICE OF THE ISMLESSISM.
I am white British, however, I grew up in Africa, more specifically in Obuasi, a gold mining town in the Ashanti region of Ghana from 4 years old upwards. I was the third and last son of an expatriate mechanical engineer who started working for Ashanti Goldfields Corporation Ltd (AGC) in 1985. This is how I was able to be educated in a very prestigious, private boarding school called Barnard Castle School in County Durham, England, until I was expelled for smoking ganja in 1998, that is, through lucrative expatriate education fees. Although my father left AGC in 2000, he only retired from a 31 year career in the mining and quarrying industries in Ghana in 2016. Therefore, I have much experience with Africa and indigenous Africans. As an ‘oburoni’ (white) child I learned some of the local language in Obuasi called Twi, as well as their accent and their pigeon English and to this day I am a very good mimicker of the Ghanaian accent and mannerisms. Therefore, I feel that my expatriate African heritage helped me to quickly understand the ismlessisms once I discover them. I instinctively understand the level of native Africans, I understand how low indigenous Africans are (or used to be (especially in the 1980s)) linguistically and grammatically. With their pigeon English, indigenous Africans would have no qualms about deliberately misspelling ismlessisms such as ‘seks’ which is the ismlessism of sexism, or ‘fash’ which is the ismlessism of fascism. When I discovered the ismlessisms I instantly recognised the ‘African-ness’ of them, for example, I instantly knew that Africans are ‘fash’ and nothing more. ‘Fash’ is what Africans would say, and if you are accustomed to native Africans, you can hear in the word ‘fash’ the technological and grammatical level of Africans, in that Africans have not achieved much technologically. However, because of Adolf Hitler, ’fash’ and whatever it means or represents is cool today and that is the end of it. To reiterate, ismlessisms such ‘fash’ are practically nothing and they reflect the fact that native Africans have not achieved much technologically as well as the fact that Africans have also done nothing wrong, unlike the native Europeans. The ismlessisms such as ‘fash’ are colourful, beautiful and deep, and they reflect the nature, character and other qualities of native Africans. Africans would also like the fact that they can talk about such negative isms in a positive and de-stigmatised way with the ismlessisms. Therefore, my expatriate African connections and heritage were how I was able to instantly apply or ascribe the ismlessisms to coloured, Rastafarian or native African language and fashions.
I just wanted to point out a thing about how I discovered the ismlessisms, which reveals a distinction between those people who care about white people who are willing to make mistakes and sacrifice their reputations and characters for their people and those squeaky-clean and perfectly politically correct anti-racist ‘angels’, who are not willing to make any mistakes or to sacrifice their reputations or characters for their own people. There is no point in denying it, I deeply care about white people and the ismlessism came entirely from the energies, industries and passions of such predilections and proclivities. Now what I want to say is that I unquestionably prefer slightly taboo, brave and daring white people are willing to make many small and large mistakes for their own people in order to ultimately arrive such as the ismlessism, than perfectly angelic and politically correct anti-racist people such as our treacherous white politicians who are sneezingly and ecclesiastically-squeakily clean who make no mistakes or sacrifices of their reputations or characters for their own people whatsoever. For instance, in an interview with Julie Etchingham on ITV’s Tonight programme on 5 June 2017, British Prime Minister Theresa May said the naughtiest thing she had ever done was to ‘run through fields of wheat’ as a child. Politicians are squeaky clean straight-A Etonians, Harrovians and Oxbridge students, who have exemplary careers and are perfectly politically correct and perfectly anti-racist, yet relatively to some they might as well be demons. Our white politicians are angels to coloured people and demons to their own white people. What I would suggest is that it is the Holocaust and the Nazis’ extreme and violent anti-Semitism which has made our white politicians 100% squeaky clean and politically correct anti-racists. For example, British prime ministers Ted Heath and Harold Wilson brought in the Race Relations Acts in the 1960s and 1970s (in the UK (not Ghana)), which are 100% squeaky-clean political correctness and anti-racist strictures. Why on Earth did they enact the Race Relations Acts in the UK, their own country? It doesn’t seem right. Prior to the Holocaust and anti-Semitism, imperialist and colonialist politicians, statesmen and military leaders were never 100% squeaky clean. Indeed, the British Empire (roughly 1/4 of the globe) could never have been acquired through being perfectly squeaky clean. Generals such as Field Marshal Garnet Joseph Wolseley could not have engaged in the Anglo-Ashanti Wars in the 1870s through being perfectly squeaky clean, and colonialists and imperialists such as Cecil Rhodes could not have acquired the Kimberley volcanic diamond pipes in South Africa by being perfectly squeaky clean. I am not saying that we should be bad like Adolf Hitler, however, boys want to have fun and there was nothing wrong with imperialists. Therefore, don’t feel bad if as a person who cares about white people if you have made many mistakes, such as on social media, or said or done things that you regret. I would rather that you made many mistakes but were loyal to your own people, than squeaky-clean politically correct ‘angels’ who betray their own people and country simply for a temporarily good life and impeccable reputation down here on Earth. Now as you will see below I made many mistakes both large and small on my 5-year long reading, writing and social media journey before I attained and discovered the ismlessisms, the solution to racism and the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler.
Social media background.
I and the ismlessism have a social media background, mostly on Twitter. Despite how far I have taken the ismlessism on WordPress, I am and still remain a social media sock puppet and being a social media sock puppet is where I am most comfortable. As you will see I started out on social media mildly racist and a bit defensive, however, I have totally pulled out of and now totally avoid all hate and fighting on social media, I hate it. I just kind of spy on European pagans on Twitter these days. The ismlessism was discovered through reading over 170 books and writing two essays, and I started writing because I discovered that no matter how good your 280 character tweet is, you can never change the world with a tweet. During a Rosary prayer, the absolute first thing that I realised is that the problem with white people today is that they are ismless (which is Adolf Hitler). So white people need an ism, hence, the ismlessism. An ism is all things to us and if we want to succeed we need an ism, namely the ismlessism. Everyone must possess an ism. An ism is strong, only because of the Holocaust, racism oozes hate and negativity. Hopefully the ismlessism would give white people strength while being good hearted, neutral and milder? To inform white South Africans that the problem with white people in America and Europe and across the globe is not that they do not care, but that they are ismless, may ameliorate some of their anger towards us for our so called not caring and for our so called betrayal of them; especially the British for the Boer War etc. Without the ismlessism, you just become angry and frustrated about the Second World War and the Holocaust etc, which for sure are definitely the reasons why white people are ismless. The lesson from World War Two and the Holocaust is that if Buddhists went around killing all non-Buddhists, there would be no Buddhism. Buddhism would become a bad word, like how king was a bad word for the Romans, and no one would be able to confidently identify as a Buddhist. The Buddhists would be ismless. I was worried that the adjective ‘ismless’ would be the best term as it’s shorter than the noun ismlessism. However, it’s not. Having the adjective ‘ismless’ is like having the noun ‘commune’ whereas the real noun that everybody understands is ‘communism’. Hence, the ismlessism is similar to and as powerful as the noun ‘communism’. I obviously got the adjective ismless first (through praying) and it is definitely needed and required linguistically, however, the idea goes further. Anyone can attain the adjective ismless from off the top of their heads, but you cannot attain an ism or a coloured or jocularly Rastafarian ’religious’ ism from off the top of your head, you need to add or plus thee suffix -ism to the adjective ismless in order to attain the coloured or jocularly Rastafarian ’religious’ ism. Over nearly five years I asked the question again and again: Is there anything we can do about the Holocaust? Is there any way to forgive Adolf Hitler? Is there any way we can overcome racism? Is there anything we can do to help protect white people? To that end, since August 2016 I have read almost every day, and as of the date that I discovered the ismlessism, that totalled over 130 books (currently over 170 in my life), all entirely devoted and focused on the singular purpose of fixing the ism, namely racism and helping to protect white people. I tried four different methods or ideologies to solve racism on social media, including:
Generalisation. This was my first mistake, and it was how I started on social media, when I was a blogging and social media neophyte. Generalisation was a completely incorrect ideology or philosophy of generalising all non-white or Muslim people for individual acts of terror. It was totally wrong and I completely and humbly admit that.
Kryptonite. This was my second mistake and in this effort, I tried an alternative term for the noun racism, by always calling the term racism ‘kryptonite’, as in racism is ‘kryptonite’ to white people. I learned humbleness through kryptonite but nothing much more. Kryptonite was a failure and unbelievably un-academic. I was completely wrong and I humbly admit that.
True racism. This was my third mistake, and firstly you should know that I have never been anti-Semitic and that true racism was a six month effort to both appease Jewish people and European people ‘at the same time’. For example, true racism was by definition never anti-Semitism because if it was it wouldn’t be true racism, and true racism was by definition never anti-racism because if it was it wouldn’t be true racism? I put a lot of effort into this endeavour, but it was barking up the wrong tree, a failure, wrong, unacceptable and I totally and humbly admit that.
Time for forgiveness. This was my fourth and largest mistake. This was my first (erroneous) 87,000 word essay or (more descriptively) an 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler. The first and probably only thing you need to know about this essay is that it is light. By this I mean the essay sheds light on the deepest darkest crevices known to humanity. Basically, the essay goes where no one has gone before. The essay through its art lightened the heaviest of burdens known to humanity. This essay was the true question that I asked. I asked is there a way to forgive Adolf Hitler? Is there a solution to or any forgiveness for the Holocaust? Is there a solution to racism? Is there any way to help protect white people? All of which is pretty much the same question. I put my heart and soul into this essay over more than a year. I must have read all 87,000 words of it a thousand times. I must have put hundreds of hours of time and energy into creating the digital art. The essay was titled Time For Forgiveness and it was supposed to be absolute and universal forgiveness with time and relativity. For example, because Adolf Hitler cared so much about racism and (quote) ‘subhumans’ wouldn’t he be forgiven if he traveled back in time and made himself equal to a real ‘subhuman’ such as Australopithecus afarensis?
For example, because Jeffrey Dahmer was a cannibal in the 20th century, wouldn’t he be forgiven if he traveled back in time and equated himself to such as Homo antecessor, who was also cannibalistic? Therefore, because Jimmy Savile was a statutory rapist in the 20th century, wouldn’t he be forgiven if he either went back in time to before 1875 AD, (as the age of consent was 12 years old in Britain until then), or before 1275 AD, (as there wasn’t an age of consent in England until then)? It’s almost as if sin is always anachronistic, in the wrong time period or something to do with time travel? It’s as if you could always get away with more in the past? Anyway, the essay was just meant to be a lighthearted joke, but it was probably wrong and unacceptable, all of which I once again completely, truly, deeply and humbly admit. The essay hung on the idea of time travel to the past, which is a scientific impossibility, therefore it was kind of a guess. To reiterate, the essay is scientifically impossible, and you do not really have to read it. But remember it is a joke! I mean please don’t get all geeky and scientific about how the second law of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics prove that time travel to the past is impossible. Come on? Give me a break. It’s only a joke! For example, I do not know if time travel to the past to seek forgiveness technically works, however, I do know that time travel to the past to seek forgiveness works with humour.
Therefore, what does it matter? Hence, I don’t believe it is the question that matters, the point is that I humbly and sincerely asked the question that no one has ever asked before, namely is there any way we can forgive Adolf Hitler? I dared to make the mistake. All that matters is the answer, which I subsequently attained through abandoning the essay. The ismlessism is actually the true forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. So it was a dumb question but a smart answer. Just to explain a bit more so you don’t have to read it, the essay is all about forgiveness, it is 110% forgiveness. I put absolute heart and soul into this essay for more than a year. I must have read it a thousand times if I read it once. It is my absolute all for forgiveness. However, the essay is not that good, it is just all that I could imagine at the time to forgive Adolf Hitler, that is, time travel to the distant past and equivalence to a real (quote) ‘subhuman’ such as Australopithecus africanus etc. I just thought that would lighten him up? I mean for example, the essay asks the question how was ancient cannibalism fine for Homo antecessor 800,000 years ago, but modern cannibalism totally heinous for Jeffrey Dahmer in the 20th century? Is crime relative? Is it something to do time or time travel? Is it something to do with states of being primitive and advanced? Is primitivism innocence and advancement guilt? Basically the essay is a 87,000 word investigation into that question. Basically if Homo antecessor were innocent with their cannibalism 800,000 years ago, would it ameliorate Jeffrey Dahmer’s sins if (in theory and in the afterlife) he travelled back in time to the Lower Palaeolithic and equated himself to such as Homo antecessor? However, in light of the ismlessism which is the real forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, I can see that the essay is not that good. In the light of the ismlessism I now believe that sinners do not have to travel back in time to attain innocence and forgiveness, however, time travel to the past for sinners is still a little humorous! And I think that’s about all that matters? I mean when I think about it, the essay is 100% original, excepting a few quotes, this is 87,000 original words, that came out of absolutely no where, except from insights from my reading. Honestly, the entire essay came out of thin air. Looking back at it exhausts me, I don’t know where I got the energy from. Therefore, being a 100% original 87,000 word essay that came out of nothing, I believe the essay is simply better than nothing? The essay is simply a leapfrog or stepping stone to the ismlessism, which it earned. Therefore, to reiterate, the essay is all about forgiveness, it is 110% forgiveness, and it is my absolute all for forgiveness. It’s just not as good as the ismlessism. However, that is not the point, the real point is that it is the proof that I did ask the question. It proves that the ismlessism, being the true forgiveness of Adolf Hitler was not luckily attained from off the top of my head. To reiterate, the essay is scientifically impossible, and you do not really have to read it, however, it is not what matters, only the ismlessism matters. Therefore, it’s not the question that matters, only the answer. Hence, I wrote the 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler over one and a half years, I must have read it a thousand times and put hundreds of hours into the 100 works of digital art, however, ultimately, I came to see the error of my ways and completely gave up. I deleted everything and just kept an offline backup. Then, and only then did I attain the perfectly correct one word answer to racism, namely the ismlessism. The ismlessism is actually the true forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. A coincidence? Never! If you believe anything, believe that the ismlessism is the perfect one word answer. Don’t try to rationalise it, or look at it scientifically, I only earned it by reading over 130 books, trying four methods (or mistakes) to solve racism on social media, including writing the 87k word (erroneous) essay, completely giving up, converting to Catholicism and by praying the Rosary every day.
All deeply embarrassing and very humbling mistakes all of which ultimately failed. However, God clearly loves a trier because I then gave up on the essay and everything else, I unofficially converted to Catholicism and began to pray the Rosary every day, and then miraculously all of my prayers were answered when during my prayers I realised that white people are ‘ismless’, which I thought was a pretty good term, however, then subsequently through reading, prayers and designing my website, I attained the noun ismlessism. Instantly I knew I had an ism, though of what sort I had no idea. After all of that I truly believed that I deserved the ismlessism. The lesson is never give up, even if you try four different dead in the water, year-long mistakes you will get there in the end. The most important lesson is that you have to write an 80,000 (plus) word practice essay first and it will produce the goods for in your second or possibly third essay, but you can be rest assured that you will attain something in the end. Time For Forgiveness was shite but right, and I couldn’t have earned this essay or the ismlessism without it. The ismlessism is the perfect answer to the ism, namely racism. Therefore, that is how to truly create a new ism or found a coloured or jocularly Rastafarian ‘religious’ ism, that is, through reading, writing and praying.
The ismlessism is what does it.
The ismlessism is the full noun.
The ismlessism is proper.
The ismlessism is double.
The ismlessism is thee ism.
The ismlessism is the formula.
The ismlessism is the answer.
The importance of writing, (externalising and piecing together words and phrases).
It may come as a surprise to you that I did not attain the ismlessism. in my head. I did however, attain the adjective ismless in my head, during a Rosary prayer I was thinking about Catholicism and how it is an ism and then subsequently I suddenly had the thought that white people are ismless. However, the best things actually come together or are pieced together accidentally and externally on your computer screen, through writing, testing and experimenting with the titles and tag lines of your website etc. There are things that you cannot imagine in your head that piece together accidentally through writing and testing on your screen etc. Hence, I discovered the ismlessism by testing the tag line on my website with a Hindu head banner, symbol and art etc. And to be honest I almost didn’t do it or test it. I thought that adding an or thee ism to the adjective ismless would be a puerile idea. However, one thing that I have definitely learned through my 5 year long endeavour to fix or de-stigmatise racism etc, is that you never know something until you try. Therefore, it was this notion that made me lean forward and expend the energy to test and add thee ism to the adjective ismless. It was one of the best decisions I have made in my life. I literally added thee ism onto the adjective ismless, visually in front of me on my iPad screen, and that’s how I instantly knew I had something or it. I knew the ismlessism was something good, but I wasn’t sure exactly what it was and it only unraveled itself to me over a few hours on the 12th of April 2021 via several posts that I wrote about it on that very night. For example, I didn’t know instantly that the ismlessism was the solution to racism. That only happened a few hours after I had externalised and discovered it on the iPad screen. The dates and times are all there on the posts page of my website. And it just got better and better through more posts. Also, I didn’t know it removed the racism from Adolf Hitler for a couple of weeks etc. So therefore, don’t sit around meditating thinking you are going to attain enlightenment or the secrets of life, you have got to externalise your thoughts via writing and accidentally piece together new words and phrases on your computer screen. And remember it took 87,000 words of this testing and experimenting with words and phrases to get one fundamental word. Therefore, if you want to attain something you have got to write an essay or even multiple essays.
I pray, I read and I DJ.
You may be asking who the hell is this lunatic claiming to have forgiven Adolf Hitler and to be developing a new coloured or jocularly Rastafarian ‘religious’ ism? My name is Graham Cammock, I am 40 years old and I am trying to remove all racial hatred and anger from the world. Every day I get up and I pray, I read and I DJ, and that is how the ismlessism was discovered. The ismlessism is a coloured or jocularly Rastafarian ’religious’ ism which I profess, however, my actual ’religion’ is Catholicism and that’s where the real magic of the ismlessism comes from. However, when I attained the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler after 5 years of reading, writing and effort, (aka the ismlessism), I instantly knew I had an ism. Therefore, imperatively you need to know that I don’t care one iota about attaining nirvana. You need to know that I don’t care about anything except my own people and my continent. I don’t care about anything except the ismlessism, as I know that white people are doomed without an ism in one form or another. You would probably call me a racist for caring about white people yeah? That ain’t the half of it. Read this entire essay and you will see how much I care about white people. To reiterate, I am just the individual who wrote an (erroneous) 87,000 word practice essay about the anti-racist forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, and subsequently discovered the ismlessism. We attain the coloured or jocularly Rastafarian ’religious’ ism, by making Adolf Hitler ismless or thee switched on cool Ismlessist and the rest of us just identifying as aaay switched on cool Ismlessist. Therefore, I am not a racist just because I care about white people. Having the singular desire to help protect white people and not caring a less about anything else like nirvana is an unbelievably modest desire. I am an avid reader, devout Catholic and non-aspiring DJ. I like tech house and techno music. You can listen to my mixes via the menu on my website. A switched on cool Ismlessist understands that the discoverer of the ismlessism, attained the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler after having spent nearly 5 years reading over 130 books on the humanities and that the discoverer wrote an 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler, which simplified down to one perfect or precise one word formula or answer, namely, the ismlessism.
“From the 1st or 2nd of August 2016 to the 12th of April 2021 at 21:52:51 (UTC), I read 132 books, 151 books in my entire life. I know one of the first dates is right because I bought my first (serious) book on Amazon on 31st July 2016, and the second date and time is right because that is the precise moment in time that I purchased the domain https://ismlessism.com, which I did instantly after I had the epiphany of the ismlessism, (not the adjective ismless, which I got weeks before). Therefore, if you want to improve the world or discover an ism then you have to read the humanities. Reading is how I hypothetically removed the racial hatred and anger from the world and discovered the coloured or Rastafarian ‘religious’ ism of the ismlessism. Therefore, the more human beings on planet Earth who take up unofficial yet non-dilettante and serious study of the humanities, that is, through general, informational, historical, religious, philosophical and political reading, on the outside of formal or orthodox institutions such as universities, the greater good we will all do for humankind.”
Since August 2016 I have taken on a quest to help white people and to fix the ism, namely racism. My journey has taken me to every continent on Earth and through time and space via 170+ books, from the discovery of Africa to the discovery of the New World, from Plato to Socrates, Homer and Aristotle, from Islam to Buddhism, Judaism and Christianity, from prehistory to ancient, medieval and modern times, it’s been one hell of an journey. Covering many topics and genres, I read almost every day, mostly history but also quite a lot of religion and philosophy. In short, I study the humanities. I am interested in history, religion, philosophy, politics, government and anthropology etc. The type of books I read are all disciplines of the humanities. Although I have read a few scientific books and I do touch on science now and again, my reading is basically non-scientific, but decidedly to do with the humanities, that is, mainly historical, religious and philosophical. Although I have read four Shakespeare plays, which I loved, I don’t really have time to read novels and fiction. Again just to warn you about advanced science and professional academia etc, it’s almost as if general readers should read nothing except novels? Do not read novels! There is no information in novels. Anyone can read and study the humanities independently. What you need is information and not much else. Also, although the main or overall purpose of my extensive reading is the ismlessism, that is, to overcome, fix and de-stigmatise racism, however, I believe that I am also trying to attain a kind of general and deep understanding of global studies and recorded history. I have read the Bible three times, starting with the Tanakh, then the NRSV and then the NIV version. It definitely won’t be the last time either. In my third reading of the Bible, I really understood the prophecy of the Old Testament, of the coming of the Messiah or ‘the root of Jesse’ etc and how Jesus Christ is the fulfilment of that prophecy. The prophecy of the Old Testament and its fulfilment in the New Testament is the greatest achievement of mankind. The Israelites accomplished the biggest, greatest and most amazing feat in history and for all time. However, my next point is very important, in that I truly believe, in fact I know that the only reason or way that I discovered the ismlessism and forgave Adolf Hitler is because I read the Bible three times. Therefore, please do underestimate the power of the Bible. As mentioned I have read over 170 books in my life, mostly historic, philosophical and religious books etc, however I am coming to the conclusion that everything is auxiliary to the Bible.
See all the books I have read organised into 11 genres and 55 subjects with personal notes on each book here: https://cloud.collectorz.com/cammock/books
Visit my Goodreads profile here: https://goodreads.com/ismlessism
Not A Religion.
The ismlessisms are linguistic and ungrammatical, while the ismlessism is potentially a ‘religious’ ism in its own right? Nevertheless, as a doctrine, theory or practice the ismlessism is definitely never a ‘religion‘ in its own right; every ’religious’ teaching and practice of the ismlessism comes from Christianity mainly, but also from Buddhism. Because the ismlessism is the antithesis of Adolf Hitler (who was far too white); the ismlessism is therefore, sub-Saharan African, deeply coloured and Rastafarian. As culpable German intellectuals such as Friedrich Nietzsche were very high and articulate and because the Nazis were also supposedly advanced (yet barbaric); therefore, the ismlessisms are the precise antithesis of grammatical and advanced. Ismlessisms such as ‘fash’ are innately native sub-Saharan African and deeply cool, and hence I believe that God has probably placed the ismlessisms deep inside of the souls of indigenous Africans, and that He has deliberately made the ismlessisms (and sub-Saharan Africans) deeply cool? I believe God has done this as punishment for the Nazis and to teach them a lesson about the value of life? Therefore, the ismlessisms are the antithesis of the Nazis and Adolf Hitler. I believe that Adolf Hitler would likely have thought that ismlessisms such as ‘Bud’ were degenerate, and if one was to talk in the ismlessist lingo with African or Ali G mannerisms to Adolf Hitler, this probably would really and humorously anger him? Indeed, what have Jewish people got to do with any of this? The Jews are 15 million white people, and they have nothing really to do with the ismlessism. Ismlessism is between black and white and nobody else. Therefore, ismlessism is a coloured or jocularly Rastafarian ’religious’ ism, but it is definitely never a ‘religion’ on its own. However, it or I definitely practice Christianity and Buddhism and hence, there is not a single teaching or practice of the ismlessism that does not come from Christianity and Buddhism. Also, because the Volk were pagan and tried to eject and intellectually attack Christianity and Jesus Christ; therefore, switched on cool Ismlessists are (very gently) anti-pagan, violently defend Jesus Christ and would die for Him to prove our loyalty. The ismlessism is primarily through the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and the de-stigmatisation of racism about the forgiveness and well being of all white people. In terms of the ismlessism being a doctrine, theory or practice, you need to know that I am primarily developing the ismlessism entirely from my own example, that is, from my behaviours, actions, beliefs and convictions since August 2016 when I started reading. I am doing this because I am the individual who discovered the ismlessism. The ismlessism was entirely attained through reading, writing and praying. Even though the ismlessism is potentially a ’religious’ ism in its own right, it is definitely never an actual ‘religion’ of its own; however, it could possibly be syncretic, as it practices teachings, precepts, morals, beliefs and concepts from Christianity and Buddhism. In terms of religion I am definitely a loyal Roman Catholic wannabe but I also learn from and use Judaism, Kabbalah, Islam and Confucianism. Hence, I believe that I am a devoutly Christian, anti-pagan, anti-Völkisch, switched on cool Ismlessist? Anyway, although I am a switched on cool Ismlessist, what do I primarily take from religions? If you read the 16 precepts below you will get a fairly good idea, however, here is a brief list:
- Compassionate charity.
- Reward in charity.
- Poverty is a virtue.
- The moral that as opposed to a super rich ‘aristocratic’ Pharaoh who thought he was a god, that Jesus Christ, being true God and King of the universe was born in a humble manger.
- Masculine monotheism.
- Ultimate salvation of Europeans.
- Ambiguity of goodness in that Friedrich Nietzsche was a shit hot writer but unsaintly. He was a ’good’ writer but had an unsaintly streak. Or the fact that you can be a good hearted saintly layperson such as St. André Bessette, who was illiterate or a questionable articulate genius such as Nietzsche.
- The fact that Catholicism takes all shapes and sizes, in that (to quote Monty Python) ‘you don’t have to be a six footer and you don’t have to have a great brain’ etc.
- The concept of Sainthood.
- The communion of Saints.
- The fact that you don’t have to attain nirvana or enlightenment to be venerated or a Saint etc.
- Compassionate charity.
- Reward in charity.
- Poverty is a virtue.
- The Middle Way.
- The moral of the Buddha’s Great Renunciation, that is, from ‘aristocracy’ and royalty to an ascetic who nearly starved himself to death to attain nirvana and enlightenment.
- Choseness of the Jewish people.
- Compassionate charity.
- Reward in charity, for example, charity to the widows and orphans.
- God, the Lord and YHWH.
- 100% masculine monotheism.
- The fact that you don’t need to attain nirvana or enlightenment to attain an ism.
- 100% and absolute masculine monotheism.
- The fact that you don’t need to attain nirvana or enlightenment to attain an ism.
- Mysticism, in that Taoism is an ancient mystical religion which is imprecise yet it has over 1500 texts, doctrines and dogmas etc, whereas the ismlessism is a modern coloured or Rastafarian ‘religious’ ism which is fundamental yet it is only one word or one essay.
- The fact that you don’t need to attain nirvana or enlightenment to attain an ism.
- Filial piety, reverence for and deference towards one’s parents, elders and superiors.
- Devotion to education.
- Zealously over-strict East Asian mothers regarding the education of their children called ‘tiger moms’.
- The fact that those children who excel in East Asia are the ones who are admired, while in the West, such kids are labelled ‘nerds’ while the cool kids smoke in the toilets etc.
- Virtue before money or profit.
- The fact that Confucianism is almost as big as Buddhism or Christianity without attaining nirvana.
In some respects, we could even say that the quest for learning was a form of enlightenment to Confucius. The Buddha may have discovered the answers to life while meditating under a bodhi tree; Confucius sought his nirvana in books of poetry, history, and philosophy.
Confucius: And The World He Created, by Michael Schuman, location 2957.
What is feeble Christianity?
Feeble Christianity is scared of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. It is scared of dealing with such things for fear of being called a racist or a Nazi. Feeble Christianity is the vast majority of the Christianity that is available, practiced or preached on this planet today. It is the boring, light as a feather, octogenarian and wishy washy Christianity that one finds on social media such as Tumblr, Facebook or Twitter. You know the kind of extremely light Christian images that you find on Facebook, like one I found recently on Facebook which makes the bold claim that “There is no pit so deep that God’s redemption cannot reach?”A bold yet weak statement? This is because the person who posted that image would likely never back up that claim with any real conviction. Can Jesus Christ forgive Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust? If you can talk the talk then you should be able to walk the walk? Therefore, it ‘appears’ that God does in fact have a limit to redemption? This is because no one can deal with the forgiveness (or redemption) of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. Not in eternity would this kind of feeble Christianity be able to forgive Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. Therefore, feeble Christianity is false, it doesn’t truly mean what it says. It just means that we should wait until the afterlife for an answer or a solution to such things as the Holocaust. Feeble Christianity today is like being told by your grandma to have peace in your heart. It seems to have opposite effect on youth. Kids today seek (and find) their spiritual action or excitement in drugs and cool tech house and techno super clubs, such as Pacha and in hedonistic holiday Meccas such as Ibiza, not in the church. And this is because feeble Christianity and (unfortunately) saintliness are as cool and hip as an octogenarian. If you are Christian or saintly as a teenager, it’s like being 15 years old yet simultaneously octogenarian? And this is why Christianity is fading in terms of church attendance, adherents and believers etc. As mentioned earlier, I hear churches are ram packed to the rafters with 4% attendance in England these days with an average age of 60. If churches were as ram packed to the rafters as super cool super clubs with the average of 23, I think this might be better? All that is out there today is feeble and wishy washy Christianity that only deals with peace of mind, light sins, stress and personal suffering. Therefore, post-Holocaust, everybody is completely bored of feeble Christianity, it’s unappealing, unhip, uncool and unattractive to many. This is why church attendance has plummeted and why Christianity is dying. I know many good people who are openly non-Christian or casually anti-Catholic, I mean just average good people who find their spiritual fix in ‘Gaia’ and in the belief that we are all ‘celestial beings’ for example. It’s as if everybody today is doing anything except Christianity? Many people are honestly looking elsewhere, into European paganism for example. There are many benign and harmless European pagans on Tumblr and Twitter these days, however, remember the Nazis were also anti-Christian, heathen and pagan. What is cool is is black lingo and black culture.
What is courageous Christianity?
Courageous Christianity is real or serious about forgiveness and salvation. However, first of all you should know that I don’t and have never practiced feeble Christianity. I only practice Christianity that potentially has a huge and direct benefit for us Europeans. The salvation of humanity lies in the Holocaust. Salvation and the Holocaust are intertwined. It is anti-racist white people who do not want to save all white people. I think anti-racists say that they are trying to save all of humanity? Bull! Non-white people don’t need saving from anything, only white people need saving from the Holocaust. How to save white people is through the forgiveness or correction of the Holocaust and nothing else. Also, saving all of humanity is only attained at white people’s expense, loss and destruction. As anti-racists, you know as well as I do that non-white people harbour some ominous urges to conquer and subjugate white countries. However, think about it, as an anti-racist how will you feel in the afterlife when it sinks in that not only did you do nothing to save your own people, you didn’t even want to save your own people and if anything you helped along white people’s destruction? While simultaneously, of course, even thick, social media, racist sock puppets at least tried with every fibre of their being to redeem the white race from the Holocaust? If we want to protect Europeans and European culture we have to forgive the Holocaust. Therefore, I have always instinctively practiced and preached courageous Christianity. I call it courageous Christianity because what good is Christianity if it cannot save us Europeans from Adolf Hitler, Nazism and the Holocaust? If courageous Christianity can save us Europeans from Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust, it would make Christianity interesting, appealing and attractive to us again. This is because there would be real, serious, huge and direct benefits to us. I would truly worship the ground Jesus Christ walked on if He fixed or de-stigmatised racism and eternally gave us Europeans our own backyard (as in Europe) as well as eternal white governments in white countries, which are real, serious and direct benefits. To reiterate, if Jesus Christ can save us white people from the Holocaust, then alleluia Jesus Christ is my God, my King and my Saviour! Otherwise, who gives a damn? Therefore, courageous Christianity uses Jesus Christ to protect us Europeans from the Holocaust, which is big enough and serious enough to interest us. Courageous Judeo-Christianity helps Jesus Christ to forgive Adolf Hitler. I would never practice weak, feeble, octogenarian and wishy washy Christianity. Therefore, courageous Christianity is about the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler in order to help protect white people from the consequences of the Holocaust. It is about ultimate or extreme forgiveness. The ismlessism cuts the head off the snake because it removes or de-stigmatises the racism in Adolf Hitler and the world which forgives Adolf Hitler, which automatically forgives all subordinate Nazis for their individual sins during World War Two. That’s the beauty of courageous Christianity and ultimate forgiveness, because you just need to forgive the most serious sinner (Adolf Hitler) and all other lesser sins are forgiven by default. Therefore, courageous Christianity is about real and serious benefits and about real and ultimate forgiveness and salvation. There should be nothing wrong with being courageous with Christianity. Do not get me wrong Christianity should never be cool, hip or Ali G ‘wicked’, it should always be saintly, however, there is nothing wrong or Michael Jackson ‘bad’ about salvation, forgiveness or being courageous with Christianity. Being courageous with Christianity is not the martial arts, war or a battle field, it is in Christianity and it is in front of you.
The Two Teachings.
I have read the Bible three times and I have studied Christianity and Jesus Christs’s teachings since 2016. I have been a practicing Christian for several years, through monetary or financial charity since 2019, forgiveness (or the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler) also since at least 2019 and through morning or daily Rosary prayer since early 2021. Hence, as far as I am aware at my current particular level of Christian skill, experience and knowledge, there are two basic and fundamental teachings of Jesus Christ, that I zealously follow and practice myself in my own life. These two teachings are ‘money’ (or charity) and ‘forgiveness’. These two teachings are separate yet they are sometimes intertwined. Therefore, the following digression is some New Testament exegesis of some of the teachings of Jesus Christ to adumbrate each of these two basic and fundamental teachings, why they are so paramount and why we should all as human beings practice them.
Jesus teaches us to be extremely charitable, especially to those less fortunate than ourselves. Jesus tells us that Our Father intimately knows all about our acts of kindness and our charity and Jesus teaches us that we can be definitely assured that Our Father will reward us for our acts of charity. For example, Jesus said:
But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
I unquestionably believe in Jesus Christ’s teachings and in everything that He said and I try very hard to practice the above teaching in my life as much as I comfortably can, and sometimes to my own discomfort. Jesus is also emphatic about charity, kindness and giving in other places that are intertwined with forgiveness and loving our enemies, for example, such as Luke 6:27-36, of which I will quote a small part here:
If someone takes your coat, do not withhold your shirt from them. Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back.
Jesus emphatically urges us to be extremely kind and I believe that this extreme kindness helps create or gain us access to the kingdom of heaven, (which in my case is an eternal white paradise) and this is why Jesus Christ was so emphatic. I believe Jesus was so emphatic about ludicrous kindness because He knew that such extreme charity will be rewarded by Our Father and that it has something to do with us actually attaining entry into heaven. It’s very important!
Forgiveness as everybody knows is a fundamental precept of Christianity and all 90,000 words of this essay are about and are aimed at the ultimate forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ also emphatically warned us to be extremely and ludicrously forgiving because if we forgive our debtors Our Father will also forgive us our debts. For example:
Then Peter came up and said to him, “Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? As many as seven times?” Jesus said to him, “I do not say to you seven times, but seventy times seven.”
By Jesus emphatically, sarcastically and almost in a stentorian voice stating that we should forgive our brothers an unlimited amount of times, as expressed metaphorically through the multiplication “seventy times seven”, He is urging us and warning us how important forgiveness is to our access to heaven. Again, this is why I am seeking the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. Jesus also teaches us to be extreme with forgiveness (in order to gain entry to heaven) in Luke 6:27-36, of which I will quote some parts here:
Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone slaps you on one cheek, turn to them the other also.
“If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners love those who love them. And if you do good to those who are good to you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners do that. And if you lend to those from whom you expect repayment, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners, expecting to be repaid in full. But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful.
Again, Jesus is emphatic about the ludicrous and extreme forgiveness of loving one’s enemies therefore, whatever the reason why Jesus is so emphatic about ‘money’ (or extreme kindness/charity) and extreme ‘forgiveness’, it must be extremely important and it must therefore have something to do with attaining the kingdom of heaven. Also as you will see in the conclusion of this essay one goal of the forgiveness of this essay is that I believe that there exists in this world a split, schism or crack between white people today. This split or crack is the racist/anti-racist schism (or as you will see what I call the Hitler switch) between white people. Therefore, the solution to racism and world peace lies in white people (and white people only), on either extreme of the political spectrum (or on either side of the racism/anti-racism switch) forgiving each other. What I mean is that my aim with the ismlessism is to bring about racist and anti-racist white people forgiving each other and Nazis and Anti-fascists forgiving each other as well as Adolf Hitler, thus creating a united whole of white people. This particular goal of this essay is taken from and attained through Jesus Christ’s teachings on forgiveness and of loving your enemies. I believe because the two world wars were fundamentally between white people and white people only (as in the British and Germans) that therefore, it is only white people (on extremes of the political spectrum (or on either side of the racism/anti-racism switch)) who have to forgive each other as well as Adolf Hitler. Least of all do non-white people need forgiveness and this why we white people should never hate or fight with non-white people such as black people or Muslims. The fighting and the problem in the world today is between racist and anti-racist white people and we must seal the crack. To reiterate, white people need to forgive each other and Adolf Hitler also to create a whole.
These two basic and fundamental teachings of Jesus Christ are very important and are repeated throughout this essay, they are the mainstay and laws of my own life and I earnestly recommend them to you.
The 16 Precepts.
Being a coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism, every precept in this list I learned from many different religions, that is, Kabbalah, Buddhism, Taoism, Jainism, Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, Judaism and Confucianism. Therefore, you have to understand that most of these precepts are not original, in that most of them are ancient, well established and well attested morals and precepts from many different religions. The majority of the precepts are the only aspects of the ismlessism which are not original. Also, it is important to note that these precepts are actually what I do, believe and practice myself in my own life. However, most importantly I want to stress that ismlessism is not religion on its own, therefore these precepts are just ‘religious’ advice and guidance from my 40 years of experience, the mistakes that I made and what I have learned from my five year long reading and writing endeavour. Also, please note that The Two Teachings of Jesus Christ mentioned above are reiterated but differently.
The first precept of the ismlessism is the religious belief and conviction of the ‘chosenness’ of the Jewish people, and that via descent from the ancient Israelites, Jewish people are the chosen people, i.e. selected to be in a covenant with God. Just so you know that, although I am not perfect, just as equally important personally to me and my nearly 5 year long endeavour to remove or de-stigmatise racism, forgive Adolf Hitler and help protect white people, was also my law of emphatic philo-Semitism and absolute, eternal and devout pro-semitism. I am like Antifa when it comes to anti-Semitism. The protection and care for Jewish people was simultaneously my goal or belief along side the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and helping to protect white people for 5 years. How do you protect and care for Jewish people and help to protect white people at the same time? Because of the Holocaust it seems like a knife edge impossibility. Having these dual goals, beliefs or dual motivations for nearly 5 years, was how the ismlessism was achieved. I know it’s dumb, taken for granted and imbecilic, but like anti-racism, I don’t like taking things for granted, in that I like to read a book about something to confirm my convictions and beliefs. Therefore, in July 2017 I actually read a book called Judaism: History, Belief and Practice, by Dan Cohn-Sherbok to confirm my pro-Semitism and to check or make sure that there was nothing ‘spiritually’ wrong with Judaism. This was because it was obvious to me that it could be nothing else like race. As soon as I finished the book I knew there was absolutely nothing spiritually wrong with Judaism. Stupid I know, but that was the turning point. From that moment on I knew I was definitely a devoted and caring pro-Semite. Therefore, obviously I make absolutely no difference whatsoever between Jewish people and European Christians. Therefore, I have never been anti-Semitic. I consider Jews white people and I love them just as much as Christian white people. Devout philo-Semitism and absolute and eternal pro-semitism is the first precept of the ismlessism.
For you are a holy people to the Lord your God, and the Lord has chosen you to be a people for His own possession out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth. Deuteronomy 14:2
2. THE HUMANITIES.
Going from my example, switched on cool ismlessists should independently read and study the humanities, that is, history, philosophy and religion etc and they should also try to write independent essays.
One of the most important precepts of the ismlessism is that switched on cool Ismlessists are non-racialists and practice non-racialism. Non-racialism is never ‘anti’, as in anti-racism because anti-racism is antithetical to and the malicious and hateful opposite of all white people or the entire white race. It was only Germany and the Volk who are responsible for the Holocaust, indeed it required America, Britain and the USSR to stop the Holocaust. As you will see in the penultimate part of this essay called ‘Electric Philosophy’, there exists a metaphorical and idiotically simple, binary switch in this universe. This switch is the racist/anti-racist switch or white/black switch. There is no in between on this switch, it is either on or off or light or dark. However, non-racialism is in between racism and anti-racism, it is like an airplane thrust lever or adjustable volume knob with nice smooth increments, degrees or gradations between white and black. Only our treacherous politicians are permanently and eternally switched onto anti-racism and only thugs or skinheads are permanently and eternally switched onto racism or white. Non-racialism is not permanently and eternally switched onto either, like a thrust lever or adjustable volume knob, non-racialists flip back and forth.
Non-racialist, switched on cool Ismlessists are cool and seek to be cool, hip and with it. Non-racialist, switched on cool Ismlessists are coloured-skin, blackest black and Rastafarian cool. Non-racialist, switched on cool Ismlessists are aware of coolness and accept the fact that because of the Holocaust white people are uncool today and they try to do something remedy this situation.
5. THE TRADE.
It’s a trade, trust me, because I wasted 16 years (1998 – 2014) of my life chasing nirvana and dreaming that I was something which I am never, I understand. Nirvana is real and eternal, nirvana is analogously or metaphorically like the Tolkien One Ring of Power, which is fantasy. It is greed, vanity and egoism versus generosity, modesty and altruism. To greedily desire the possession of nirvana (or The One Ring) personally for one’s self instead of seeking the protection of your people and race is greed, vanity and egoism. Whereas seeking to protect your own people and race is generosity, modesty and altruism. Therefore, somewhere around the time I started reading, it suddenly it occurred to me that my own people and my own race are much more important to me than me actually personally attaining nirvana – or to me individually and greedily possessing ‘The One Ring Of Power’ (to be honest I think I actually was Gollum in the 2000s). Therefore, to be a switched on cool Ismlessist and non-racialist is a trade, we make a deal with Jesus Christ, we sacrifice personally attaining or desiring nirvana (or individual ownership of ‘The One Ring of Power’) for our entire race of one billion white people. Therefore, switched on cool Ismlessists have absolutely no or zero interest in nirvana or attaining nirvana. Non-racialist, switched on cool Ismlessists simply and modestly want to contribute to society and mankind. Switched on cool Ismlessists never seek to be ‘the’ or ‘thee’ ultimate, we seek to contribute to humanity and to be nothing more than such as Karl Marx, Friedrich Nietzsche or Plato for instance. Non-racialist, switched on cool Ismlessists believe that God, Buddha or Jesus Christ can see our individual desires, even through the walls, and that there is obviously always someone (such as Bill Gates or Steve Jobs) who deserves nirvana more than us personally. However, remember, the trade is: individual possession of nirvana (or ownership of the analogous and metaphorical ‘One Ring of Power’) for your entire race of one billion white people.
A switched on cool Ismlessist has the conviction and belief that to cut the head off the snake means that we have to make Adolf Hitler ‘Ismless’ (in both name and speech) or make him thee coolest Ismlessist, and make sure that he frequently and humorously says his ismlessisms. We have to make sure that Adolf Hitler believes in and professes the ismlessism; which altogether means that there is no racism whatsoever in Adolf Hitler, and therefore, that he is forgiven; thereby attaining the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two. The whole point of this is that it would possibly attain the atonement and salvation of all white people for the Holocaust? What or who do you think of when you hear the word ‘Ismless’? To me ‘Ismless’ literally means or is Adolf Hitler, racism or white people. I think of nothing else when I hear or read the word ‘Ismless’. Therefore, Adolf Hitler is ‘Ismless’ in both name and speech. What I will say is that the ismlessism is the culmination of my five year long (and more) study, and that I am willing to make the ultimate intellectual sacrifice, by handing everything that I have regarding the ismlessism over to Adolf Hitler (in this life or the next), including the name, the identity and the domains for the benefit of white people. Despite the fact that I am also a DJ, and would love to be called ‘Ismless’ (which is cool), I am more than willing to make this intellectual sacrifice for the benefit of my own white people. This is what switched on cool Ismlessists do, and as you will see further below ismlessists are very ‘altruistic’ and would sacrifice just about anything for their own white people. Therefore, Adolf Hitler is Ismless. Therefore, a switched on cool Ismlessist believes in the inseparability of Adolf Hitler to the ismlessism and the inseparability of Adolf Hitler to the name ’Ismless’ and the identity ‘switched on cool Ismlessist’; they are one and the same thing. There may be no better way to get the ismlessism to work than to make Adolf Hitler the most important, first and foremost switched on cool Ismlessist? He may be able to pull it off? He may be acceptable? The idea is to refer to Adolf Hitler as ‘Ismless’ or thee switched on cool Ismlessist and to refer to everybody else as aaay switched on cool Ismlessist.
Like Judaism and Catholicism, a switched on cool Ismlessist is masculine and believes in masculinity. This is the age old and tried and tested concept of 100% supremely masculine monotheism. That is, the unquestionable belief in one supremely male or masculine God. A switched on cool Ismlessist believes that YHWH or Allah is an unquestionably 100% male or masculine deity. Switched on cool Ismlessists believe in YHWH, God, the Father or Allah and that He is a 100% unquestionably masculine deity. A switched on cool Ismlessist believes that Jesus Christ the Son of God is a 100% unquestionably masculine deity. Switched on cool Ismlessists believe that Earth will always be unquestionably dominated by heterosexual males for eternity. It is our switched on cool Ismlessist faith that YHWH is a supremely masculine God.
As mentioned in the 4th precept called ‘The Trade’, switched on cool white Ismlessists and (ahem) non-racialists should have zero desire to attain nirvana. Therefore, the only desire of a switched on cool white Ismlessist is to help protect all white people and the entire white race. Switched on cool non-white Ismlessists and (ahem) non-racialists also should have zero desire to attain nirvana. Non-white switched on cool Ismlessists should also have absolutely zero desire to destroy, conquer or master Europe or other predominantly white countries. Conquest is uncool and we white switched on cool Ismlessists would be able to tell if non-white switched on cool Ismlessists harboured any such ulterior motives.
As hinted at in the 4th precept called ‘The Trade’, switched on cool Ismlessists and (ahem) non-racialists are the most altruistic people on Earth. We trade our own ownership, desires of and pursuit of the most desirable object in the universe (nirvana) for the protection and wellbeing of all of our own white people and white race. This is because we devoutly care about the health, safety, fecundity, protection and wellbeing of our own white people and white race. Switched on cool Ismlessists and (ahem) non-racialists don’t want to save the world like Jesus Christ, they just passionately want to protect their own people. To reiterate, switched on cool Ismlessists and (ahem) non-racialists are prepared to make just about any sacrifice for their own white people and white race.
One of the most fundamental and important precepts of the ismlessism is motive. As stated, one thing about state of the art science is that it puts Bachelors of Arts (like me) off from seriously taking up non-career oriented, academic reading and especially writing an independent 87,000 word essay on the outside of universities. As I said earlier, when you take up reading and write a essay independently on the outside of universities you work for virtue, to help protect white people and not your career goals. When you work not for career goals but for virtue, your motive is different, such as mine was always to help protect white people. However, you would not be allowed to have the motive to help protect white people at university. I mean you may end up doing something as random as theoretical physics or you may end up doing something like post-impressionist oil painting, but your motive must always be to help protect white people. Every twitch of your finger must be to help protect white people. That was always my motivation and I mean always, 100% all of the time, all the way through my 5 year long reading and writing endeavour etc. I mean I wouldn’t have read a single letter if my motivation wasn’t for white people. And to be honest I could even go back to 2006/2007 (way before I started reading) as to where my motivations to help protect white people came from. Therefore, the motive is most important. If you want to write an essay and improve the world around you, you must find your pure, devoted, unadulterated and eternal motive. Having the eternal motive to help protect white people and no desire to attain nirvana is an unbelievably modest desire. For example, I have read Confucius: And the World He Created by Michael Schuman and it is one of the better books I have ever read. Confucius is so important and to truly understand East Asia you need to understand Confucius. Michael Schuman is an excellent writer, he really conveys the importance of Confucian philosophy to you effectively and efficiently. However, while reading this good book, it got me thinking that as you know I am currently dreaming of writing my own small book on the ismlessism as I believe it may be important enough to the well being of my own people and to the whole world. In fact, I believe it is my moral duty and responsibility to research, develop and publish the ismlessism for the benefit of all of mankind. The thought that I had while reading Confucius: And the World He Created is why did Michael Schuman write such an amazing book? I mean what were his motivations? Did he want to improve the world around him or did he do it for money or a combination of both? It got me thinking about my own motivations and how unbelievably pure, noble and altruistic they are. This is because I am not in any way motivated by money. In fact, the ismlessism actually costs me money. I believe it is a case of your starting point or starting position. I mean what were your initial goals or motivations when you began your endeavour or started your small business? We’re you just out to make a quick buck and rip people off or did you have absolutely pure, good, noble and altruistic motives or intentions for the benefit of the mankind and the whole world? Therefore, the ismlessism book will be free and this should prove that my motives and my starting point are both absolutely sound. If I was to write a small book about the ismlessism, my objectives would be in the following order of importance:
- To help protect my own people (Europeans).
- To make a name for myself, leave my mark on the world and go down in history etc.
“There is no point in seeking the views of a gentleman who, though he sets his heart on the Way, is ashamed of poor food and poor clothes,” the sage said. That suspicion stemmed from his belief that the profit motive ran counter to morality. By seeking riches, man was drawn away from virtue. “The gentleman understands what is moral,” Confucius said. “The small man understands what is profitable.” This isn’t to say that Confucius was against financial success entirely. He implied that amassing great wealth is fine—as long as one attains it while engaged in strictly virtuous behavior. “Wealth and high station are what men desire but unless I got them in the right way I would not remain in them,” he said. “Poverty and low station are what men dislike, but even if I did not get them in the right way, I would not try to escape from them.” In Confucian thought, wealth would come to those who were virtuous and wise. A good king could bring prosperity to himself and his entire kingdom if he followed the Way. “Virtue is the root; wealth is the result,” The Great Learning asserts.
Confucius: And the World He Created by Michael Schuman, location 3790.
“Riches and honors acquired by unrighteousness, are to me as a floating cloud.”
The Complete Confucius: The Analects, The Doctrine Of The Mean and The Great Learning, Confucius, page 26.
However, I just wanted to state another thing which I think is important. As you know I have stated and encouraged bachelors and lay people (like me) to take up serious, non-career oriented, academic reading, research and writing about the humanities, in some kind of unorthodox or unofficial free thinking university; that is not limited by taboos and political correctness. And I have also just stated that motive is paramount, in that you must find your pure, devoted, unadulterated and eternal motive, like mine was always to help protect white people. However, I am coming to the conclusion that there is something particularly right about my motive or motives. I mean I am worried that you go barking up the wrong tree for 5 years, however, although barking up the tree is exactly what I did for 5 years with my four (year long) mistakes and my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler which was barking up the wrong tree, however, it was not entirely and not ultimately barking up the wrong tree as it led to the ismlessism. This proves that you can never absolutely tell if someone is barking up the wrong tree? They may have it wrong today but their good heart might be in the right place, their motives and their starting position may be sound. Therefore, I just wanted to forewarn you that there appears to be something particularly right or correct about the motives of ultimate forgiveness and helping to protect white people. I will bullet point my motive(s):
- Helping to protect white people.
- The absolution of Adolf Hitler.
- Overcome or de-stigmatise racism.
There seems to be something particularly right about the above motive(s) as they definitely work. I am just worried that you choose a motive that is dead in the water? Therefore, think very carefully about your motive, copy mine if you like. The more people who find ways to forgive and help protect white people the better.
I have mentioned it before, however I just wanted to mention it again, that the ismlessism does not believe in talent, intelligence or being ‘blessed’ with attractive physical endowment, in that the ismlessism prefers angelic laypeople (such as St. André Bessette, who was illiterate) over unsaintly articulate geniuses such as Friedrich Nietzsche. The ismlessism or thee ism, being a coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism, is as simple and relevant to 4 year olds as it is to all other age groups just like the Christian nativity. Therefore, in the same vein and in relation to my first (erroneous) 87,000 word essay, I am not the most intellectual of people, I got average GCSEs, I only got a merit (as opposed to a distinction) BTEC National Diploma and a 2:1 Bachelor of Arts degree. I was a 1990s trance clubber and I absolutely caned it in the 1990s on ecstacy. Mitzis (Mitsubishi) were my favourite pill. Honestly, I really caned it, I took like 13 pills in one night at Gatecrasher a couple of times. In fact, I used to double drop Es. Therefore, as a kid I was quite stupid and not very articulate or studious at all. In fact, I was thick all of my life until the 1st August 2016, when I started reading. I have always been a sub-average achiever and never a straight-A student. But then again nothing has ever really interested me. Being a late developer I only grew up at age 35 when I started reading and to pursue my quest to fix or de-stigmatise racism, forgive Adolf Hitler and help protect white people, and it was only helping to protect white people that really interested me and the only thing that I truly and passionately cared about. Nothing interested me at school, college and university. At school I was one of those kids you would find ducking class and smoking in the toilets. However, I truly and passionately care about white people. Like some of the Catholic Saints who were losers, illiterate and even Satan worshippers, another fundamental law of the ismlessism is that there are no limits to how late you are in achieving something in life or how much of a loser you are. For example, to be a doctor you have to be very determined at like 9 years old and you have to be very studious, ahead of the rest and be very early. However, the ismlessism doesn’t care too much about that. For example, as of 2021 I am 40 years old and I never did anything educational and I had never seriously read a book in my life until the 1st of August 2016, when I was 35 years old. Therefore, with the ismlessism it doesn’t matter if you are a poor 60 year old who has never read a book in his or her life, the ismlessism has absolutely no deadlines or cutoff points in life in which to achieve something. The point of ismlessism is that we can achieve things on the outside of university. The ismlessism is a double ism, it is thee ism, it is not a religion of its own, yet it is as down to Earth as the nativity because it is as relevant to 4 year olds as it is to centenarians; I mean it is universal and simple enough for infants understand. And even though it was wrong, I believe my heart was in the right place and that my motives were right when I wrote my 87,000 word essay and I asked the question that nobody else has ever asked before, namely is there any way we can forgive Adolf Hitler? My prayers were literally answered when I attained the one word perfect answer to racism and the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, namely the ismlessism. Again what I am trying to say is that intelligence doesn’t matter with religions such as Catholicism, because you can be an evil genius and an angelic simpleton, and that’s what religion, God or Jesus Christ like, that is, a good simple heart over an evil big brain. As you know St. André Bessette was illiterate, he was uneducated but a Saint. Therefore, intelligence and being advanced will never save us, but a good natured simple heart that asks the right questions will. Therefore, a switched on cool Ismlessist believes in the philosophy that religion (as opposed to science and academia, (which always seek talent)), God and Jesus Christ like and prefer saintly simpletons to talented evil geniuses. That is that religion or God prefers primitive Saints such as St. André Bessette whom was illiterate, to advanced and articulate geniuses such as Friedrich Nietzsche. This is the ismlessism and how it was discovered. The bottom line is that I believe in thick and low saintliness over intelligent and high academia. This whole concept of saintliness and piety comes from Roman Catholicism by the way. I believe ‘Every Sperm Is Sacred’, the famous musical sketch from the film Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life, sung by Michael Palin, pretty well sums up Catholicism and exactly what I am trying to say about saintliness and simple good hearts versus evil genius. Here’s some lyrics:
There are Jews in the world
There are Buddhists
There are Hindus and Mormons, and then
There are those that follow Mohammed, but
I’ve never been one of them
I’m a Roman Catholic,
And have been since before I was born,
And the one thing they say about Catholics is:
They’ll take you as soon as you’re warm
You don’t have to be a six-footer
You don’t have to have a great brain
You don’t have to have any clothes on You’re
A Catholic the moment Dad came,
Every sperm is sacred
Every sperm is great
If a sperm is wasted,
God gets quite irate!
I am not insulting academics intelligence because I think I have done a similar kind of thing to a Masters degree or a PhD, in that I have spent five years reading intensively and over a year and a half I wrote an (erroneous) 87,000 word practice essay as well as this 90,000 word (correct) essay. To reiterate, even though my first essay was incorrect it led to the ismlessism, which is correct. What I mean by not insulting professors and academics intelligence, is that they are a lot more intelligent and intellectual than I and more than intelligent enough to workout and discover the ismlessism, the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and the solution to racism and the Holocaust, however, their abilities and intelligence are unfortunately far too restricted and limited by taboos and political correctness.
Pioneers. – I greet all the signs indicating that a more manly and warlike age is commencing, which will, above all, bring heroism again into honor! For it has to prepare the way for a yet higher age, and gather the force which the latter will one day require, – the age which will carry heroism into knowledge, and wage war for the sake of ideas and their consequences.
Heroism. This is the ethos of a people which strives toward a goal against the form it no longer fits. Heroism is the good will toward self-destruction.
What makes heroic? – To face simultaneously one’s greatest suffering and one’s highest hope.
But by my love and hope I conjure thee: cast not away the hero in thy soul! Maintain holy thy highest hope!
One has renounced grand life, when one has renounced war.
Brethren, war’s the origin
Of happiness on earth!
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1905 – 1922.
I am developing the ismlessism by or from my own example of how I have behaved, my actions and convictions since the 1st of August 2016, when I started reading. Reading is the truth and I have read over 170 books from cover to cover in my endeavour to help protect white people. Therefore, I am trying to be as truthful as I can be as to how I discovered the coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism since the 1st August 2016. Before the ismlessism you really don’t need to know anything about my life, in fact other than my mistakes and my reading and writing, the less said about before the ismlessism the better. Never you mind! It’s none of your business! I do what I do! What do you know? Whatever happened before the ismlessism, stays before the ismlessism! Let nothing more be said about it! Anyway, after long deliberations I think that racism is a ‘Nietzschean warrior’, I mean that basically the mentality of a racist is about protecting our women and countries and about being a hero like Achilles, it’s basically kind of a ‘Nietzschean warrior’ mentality. In fact, this is what Nietzsche meant by his ‘noble’, ‘strong’, ‘powerful’ and ‘aristocratic’ master morality (as demonstrated by the noble and warrior-like Romans) versus the ‘weak’ slave morality (as demonstrated by the Jews and Christians). I don’t mean physically as in hand-to-hand combat or war or anything like that, but more like being a slightly aggressive, brave or heroic spiritual or intellectual ‘Nietzschean warrior’, like Achilles. Like the above Nietzsche quote, racists are warriors (like the noble and glorious Romans) who believe in heroism, chivalry, virtue, honour and glory etc. Racism is a choice, either you are a ‘noble’ and ‘strong’ ‘Nietzschean warrior’ or you are a ‘kind’ and ‘compassionate‘ Christian for example. Racists fundamentally believe that discrimination is key and nonnegotiable, in that at some point there has to be and must be a little impoliteness toward non-white people in order to protect our borders and women. For example, declining non-white people U.K. citizenship, immigrant status and deportations. Racists fundamentally believe that no matter what, there must be minimal discrimination between black and white in order to save our countries and women. Until I discovered the ismlessism and until I understood how Asians genuinely have no schadenfreude about Europe’s Holocaust and that they genuinely want us to fix or de-stigmatise the ism, namely racism before anything else I wasn’t necessarily against such notions. It was only in the light of the epiphany of the ismlessism, which is a good hearted coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism, which made me see these notions in a different light. There would be nothing wrong with defending your women and people only that it is judgement for the Holocaust. This is what racists don’t understand or subconsciously ignore, that is, that the recent misfortunes, decline and demise of white people is judgement and punishment for the Holocaust and it has nothing to do inequality or unfairness. However, the ismlessism transformed me into an unbelievably or extremely good hearted, peaceful and nonviolent person like Mahatma Gandhi. As Nietzsche said, ancient and medieval people were all about warriors, heros, chivalry, glory and bravery, as demonstrated by such as Homer’s Iliad and Achilles. However, I believe that since the world wars (and the Holocaust) that we Europeans and indeed everyone have actually left the age of warriors behind and as demonstrated by such as Mahatma Gandhi, I believe we have entered a brand new, peaceful, nonviolent, saintly and non-warrior age? I mean if the Japanese after World War Two could give up the Bushidō samurai code, which was an extreme, kamikaze, victory or suicide, and to the death warrior code, then surely European racists can convert to a peaceful, nonviolent and saintly ’religious’ ism, namely the ismlessism? Therefore, I would just like to point out to both potential right and left wing adherents, that the ismlessism is a saintly ‘religious’ ism and a peaceful one at that, and although it has symbols and art, it does not aggressively protest or demonstrate politically or militantly with flags and banners. I mean for example, if you were going to march or demonstrate it should be done peacefully and with no shouting or chanting. This kind of non-optional quiet and peaceful demonstration should really highlight how much trouble white people are in for the World Wars. We can’t do really anything else! The ismlessism is a peaceful and saintly ‘religious’ ism. Peace, reading and praying are more like it’s demands. Beat BLM and Antifa at their own game by not being aggressive, violent or intimidating, be peaceful, religious, prayerful, philanthropic and saintly. Mahatma Gandhi employed nonviolent resistance to lead the successful campaign for India’s independence from British rule and in turn inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world. Obviously because of the two World Wars, Mahatma Gandhi used religion to teach white people a thing or two about nonviolence. However, if white people want to save their countries they should mimic the Asians and their isms, learn from Asians and copy their leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi. White people can only copy the Asians such as Mahatma Gandhi and his nonviolent resistance with an ism, such as the ismlessism. I mean British people have always been a bit aggressive, but the two World Wars really took the biscuit. However, the Germans (or the Volk) gave the British no option. Unfortunately, the world wars were a matter of life and death for Britain. However, still white people have not learned a thing from Asians, Mahatma Gandhi and his message of nonviolence because Antifa are a violent, aggressive, intimidating extreme-leftist political movement. So first of all Adolf Hitler produced a Holocaust, and then white people go and produce Antifa. Finally, today be saintly and cool, not a noble ‘Nietzschean warrior’.
Though you might conquer in battle A thousand times a thousand men, You’re the greatest battle-winner If you conquer just one – yourself.
The Buddha (Dhammapada verse 103).
Note: the english idiom in the above image is usually used to empathise with and placate infants and children who have slightly injured themselves. For example, if a child falls down and receives a cut or a graze, it is traditional for a caring adult to say: ”You have been through wars!” The idiom can be used for adults as well, but usually with more serious injuries or illnesses.
Another important precept or virtue of the ismlessism is poverty, charity and philanthropy. I am, always have been and probably always will be relatively poor and I promise you that the ismlessism book will be free. Therefore, the ismlessism is strict about poverty. In theory, venerated, respected and admired switched on cool Ismlessists would also be poor. If you are a sales assistant on a grand a month, you are a respected switched on cool Ismlessist and you should know that. If you are homeless, you are absolutely a respected switched on cool Ismlessist. I am not saying that you can’t be an affluent switched on cool Ismlessist or that you should give all of your money away, only that you should know that we switched on cool Ismlessists don’t give a damn about money or wealth, that it doesn’t make you a higher ranking or a more switched on or cooler Ismlessist by having money, in fact that you should understand that respected switched on cool ismlessists are the poorest and also that you should know that you should be very charitable with your wealth. This is (Nietzsche’s) Jewish ‘inversion of valuations’ or ‘transvaluation of values’. Therefore, switched on cool Ismlessists believe in the ancient, universal and fundamental morality of compassionate charity, benevolence, asceticism and poverty, which all religions of the world teach, including Judaism, Buddhism and Christianity. There are many scriptural examples, however, Matthew 6:3-4 and Luke 16:19-31 are good ones. Therefore, switched on cool Ismlessists believe that there is reward in charity and that God and heaven reward those who are generous, benevolent or charitable. Siddhartha Gautama was a prince who renounced his royal entitlement, became an ascetic and nearly starved himself to death before He attained nirvana. Pharaohs were rich men who thought they were a god, however, ultimately God was Jesus Christ who was born in a manger. I have read the Bible three times and I understand it well, you just get better with it over time. The main lesson, concept, truth or meaning of both the Old Testament and the New Testament is that Jesus Christ (and the Buddha) are an inverse Pharaoh or an inverse god king. It’s the lesson of life or the universe, it’s the lesson from all of prehistory and antiquity. Basically, before Jesus Christ, ancient Pharaohs, kings and emperors tended to self-deify or be deified, for example Menhutep II blatantly self-deified, Julius Caesar was deified and Augustus (Octavian) also straddled the borders of divinity. This is how humanity came in the first place, before Jesus Christ, that is, they made the richest and most powerful deities. Obviously after Jesus Christ, the true God and King of the universe, who was born in a humble manger and who came to serve and not be served, subtly and all of a sudden nobody wants to be Menhutep II, and kings and emperors no longer wish to be deified. The only reason European medieval Christian monarchs didn’t self-deify is probably because of Jesus Christ. And remember this eternal lesson is the reason Jesus Christ died! Jesus Christ died to teach god kings, divine emperors and all of mankind this eternal lesson. Siddhartha Gautama also did precisely the same thing with His Great Renunciation. Basically Siddhartha Gautama renounced his royal titles, luxuries and wives etc and became an extreme ascetic who nearly starved himself to death! It’s exactly the same lesson, that is, from royalty to poverty and nirvana. Therefore, humanity has been taught the same eternal lesson about riches and wealth twice! I mean take this eternal lesson from the Bible metaphorically, allegorically or kabbalistically not literally, by this I mean that the ‘Pharaoh’ stands for or represents anyone who is rich and famous today, who just wants to attain nirvana. It’s a lesson that no one ever seems to learn properly. Therefore, the lesson, which still applies today, is basically that there are two options in life, firstly, you can be a metaphorical ‘Pharaoh’ in life, that is rich, famous, vain and go down in history, or you can be like Jesus Christ and the Buddha, that is, poor, ascetic, modest, who attains nirvana and goes down for eternity. Try not to care about money. Here’s some scripture regarding money and wealth to encourage you:
“Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or drink; or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothes? Look at the birds of the air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much more valuable than they? Can any one of you by worrying add a single hour to your life?
“And why do you worry about clothes? See how the flowers of the field grow. They do not labor or spin. Yet I tell you that not even Solomon in all his splendor was dressed like one of these. If that is how God clothes the grass of the field, which is here today and tomorrow is thrown into the fire, will he not much more clothe you—you of little faith? So do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them. But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own. Matthew 6:25-34.
“There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores and longing to eat what fell from the rich man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.
“The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. In Hades, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’
“But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’
“He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my family, for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’
“Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.’
“‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’
“He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’” Luke 16:19–31.
“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” Matthew 5:3.
But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. Matthew 6:3-4.
Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” Matthew 19:23-24.
“Give, even if you only have a little.” Dhammapada verse 224.
An absolute law or philosophy of the ismlessism is complete humbleness. The New Testament verse below sums up another primary or fundamental precept of the ismlessism.
For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.
As you will see in the conclusion of this essay, because switched on cool Ismlessists and non-racialists own, have and possess the eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch – which is eternal – they can therefore, use, manipulate and wield the eternal binary racist/anti-racist like a divine weapon to threaten anti-racists with being eternally switched onto anti-racism and black on both sides of life, without a choice. The eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch is just two simple things, it is both sides of life, life/afterlife, Earth/heaven and this simplicity determines that switched on cool Ismlessists and non-racialists can also deal with, think in, interact with and influence eternity and both sides of life. Therefore, switched on cool ismlessists and non-racialists don’t just think in terms of the land (such as Britain or Norway) in which they were born and to which they are natively or ethnically loyal, but they also think of the eternal white paradise to which they belong and to which they are destined, which truly is eternal and which lasts forever. Hence, switched on cool ismlessists and non-racialist believe in Jesus Christ’s teaching in Matthew 6:19-21:
Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moths and vermin destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moths and vermin do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.
To reiterate, as you will see in the conclusion of this essay, now that we switched on cool ismlessists and non-racialists have, possess and own the eternal racist/anti-racist binary switch, which means that we switched on cool ismlessists and non-racialists can deal with, think in, interact with and influence eternity and both sides of life, this gives us switched on cool Ismlessists and (ahem) non-racialists a bargaining chip that we can use, manipulate and wield on anti-racists. For example, we switched on cool Ismlessists can threaten treasonous anti-racist white politicians and Anti-fascists with being eternally and permanently switched onto anti-racism and blackness in this life and the next, without a choice. Which means that because we switched on cool ismlessists are connected to the afterlife, we switched on cool ismlessists have an afterlife bargaining chip that we can use and wield against anti-racist white politicians and Antif-fascists. Do anti-racist white politicians, outspoken anti-racists and Anti-fascists honestly want to be eternally flipped or switched onto anti-racism or black in the hereafter and forever? I doubt it? What if there is an eternal white paradise? Therefore, switched on cool Ismlessists have the ability to think in, interact with, wield and influence eternity and both sides of life.
Why is Adolf Hitler ismless and thee switched on cool Ismlessist? He is the most important switched on cool Ismlessist because his forgiveness is world peace and has the most benefit for all Europeans and mankind. Now as mentioned, the ismlessism is a universal and good hearted coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism and it is about nonviolence, not extreme or vegetarian nonviolence like the Jainists but very strict. Now nonviolence definitely does not mean just war or battle but it also means no violent political demonstrations by such as the Antifascists. We switched on cool Ismlessists have the true forgiveness, guaranteed peace, nonviolence and non-racialism of Adolf Hitler. Therefore, it is now you Antifascists who are the violent and aggressive wrongdoers! Therefore, my more than a year long and ultimately incorrect endeavour to forgive Adolf Hitler with time and relativity, that is, my (erroneous) 87,000 word essay proved that even though I was wrong, that heaven does love a trier and does answer those who humbly and sincerely ask. Time For Forgiveness truly, deeply and sincerely asked the question can we solve the Holocaust and racism? Is there any way we can forgive Adolf Hitler? Is there any way we can help protect white people? Time For Forgiveness tried to forgive absolutely everything, all in order to forgive Adolf Hitler in order to help protect white people, therefore, Adolf Hitler was always my main goal, because there is obviously a huge benefit for white people in the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. Would you forgive Adolf Hitler if he was ismless and frequently said his ismlessisms? The ismlessism removes the racism from Adolf Hitler. As long as he is Ismless or the switched on cool Ismlessist, he is okay and forgiven? That’s the power of the ismlessism, it even fixes and makes us forgive Adolf Hitler down here in life or on Earth, without having to wait for the afterlife. Therefore, if Adolf Hitler is alright and forgiven, then who isn’t? That’s the beauty of absolute and universal forgiveness, that is, you just need to cut the head off the snake or forgive the most severe example (Adolf Hitler) and all other lesser sins are automatically forgiven by default. As stated in The Two Teachings and as you will see in the conclusion one goal of this essay is that I believe that there exists in this world a split, schism or crack between white people today. This split or crack is the racist/anti-racist schism (or as you will see what I call the Hitler switch) between white people. Hence, the solution to racism and world peace lies in white people (and white people only), on either side of the political spectrum (or on either side of the racism/anti-racism switch) forgiving each other. My aim with the ismlessism is to get racist and anti-racist white people to forgive each other and also Nazis and Anti-fascists to forgive each other as well as Adolf Hitler. I take this goal from Jesus Christ’s teaching of loving your enemies. I believe that the two world wars were basically between white people and white people only (the British and Germans), which created a split, schism, crack or Hitler switch between all white people on Earth. The two world wars between Germany and Britain, and particularly the Holocaust created two antithetical ideological camps of white people on Earth, authoritarianism and liberalism, racism and anti-racism, Nazism and Anti-fascism. Therefore, it is only white people (on extremes of the political spectrum (or on either side of the racism/anti-racism switch)) who have to forgive each other as well as Adolf Hitler. Least of all do black people need forgiveness and hence, white people should never hate or fight with non-white people such as Africans and Muslim people. The fighting and the problem in the world today lies in this crack between racist and anti-racist white people and we need to heal it. To reiterate, white people need to forgive each other and Adolf Hitler also in order to create a whole or a union between white people. Therefore, switched on cool Ismlessists believe in extreme, ultimate and universal forgiveness.
And forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.
Then Peter came up and said to him, “Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? As many as seven times?” Jesus said to him, “I do not say to you seven times, but seventy times seven.”
Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone slaps you on one cheek, turn to them the other also.
“If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners love those who love them. And if you do good to those who are good to you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners do that. And if you lend to those from whom you expect repayment, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners, expecting to be repaid in full. But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful.
Although the 16 precepts of the ismlessism are sacred, the following is just a rough, similar and general list of primary beliefs of switched on cool Ismlessists. Please note that being a coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism, most beliefs in this list I learned from many different religions, that is, Kabbalah, Buddhism, Taoism, Jainism, Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, Judaism and Confucianism. Therefore, there is some overlap or repetition between the 16 precepts and the beliefs of the ismlessism. Also you must understand that these beliefs are actually what I do, believe and practice myself in my own life. Most importantly, please remember that ismlessism is never a religion of its own.
- The first belief of a switched on cool Ismlessist is the religious conviction of the ‘chosenness’ of the Jewish people, and that via descent from the ancient Israelites, Jewish people are the chosen people, i.e. selected to be in a covenant with God.
- A switched on cool ismlessist reads about and studies the humanities, and also tries to write.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist is non-racialist and practices non-racialism, however, a switched on cool ismlessist is never ‘anti’ as in anti-racism, as this is permanently and eternally against the entire white race.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist has no desire to attain nirvana.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist is masculine and believes in masculinity. This is from or through the age old and tried and tested concept of 100% masculine monotheism. That is, the unquestionable belief in one supremely male God. A switched on cool Ismlessist believes that YHWH, the Father or Allah is an unquestionably 100% male or masculine deity. A switched on cool Ismlessist believes that Jesus Christ the Son of Man is an unquestionably 100% male or masculine God. It is our unquestionable and switched on cool Ismlessist faith that YHWH is a supremely masculine God.
- An imperative and fundamental belief of a switched on cool Ismlessist is Matthew 23:12: ‘For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.’
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes in the full admission and acknowledgment that without the ismlessism, white people would be doomed as a result of the Holocaust.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes that the Holocaust is ineffable, however, a switched on cool Ismlessist also believes that the unspeakable Holocaust has probably been overcome with the ismlessism.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes that white people are ismless because of the Holocaust.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes that all groups of people must have an ism in one form or another of their own.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes that the ismlessism is a double ism, it is thee ism, it is a new coloured or jocularly Rastafarian ‘religious’ ism and it is the answer or solution to the other ism, namely racism.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes that the ismlessism is the eternal and unquestionable answer or solution to the ism, namely racism, the Holocaust and the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes that the discoverer of the ismlessism, attained the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler after having spent nearly 5 years reading over 130 books on the humanities and that the said discoverer wrote an (erroneous) 87,000 word practice essay, which simplified down to one perfect one word equation, formula or answer, namely, the ismlessism.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes that the universe always has a fundamental answer or solution to any problem or sin for those earnestly and humbly ask, even for the Holocaust.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes that the ismlessism determines that nothing is unfixable. Even the Holocaust, especially through such as Luke 6:27-36 (loving one’s enemies) or completing circuit through the reciprocal forgiveness of enemies.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes that the ismlessism cuts the head off the snake, de-stigmatises Adolf Hitler and racism, and that as long as Adolf Hitler is named Ismless or is the switched on cool Ismlessist and believes in and professes the ismlessism, there is no racism in Adolf Hitler and that he is therefore, forgiven, thereby attaining the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two as well as the atonement and salvation of all white people for the Holocaust.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes that through the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, the ismlessism removes all the racial hatred and anger from world.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes in eternal peace and nonviolence.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes in the non-use of hate or aggression, especially politically or on social media etc.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist is philanthropic and believes in the ancient, universal and fundamental morality of compassionate charity, benevolence, asceticism and poverty, which all religions of the world teach, including Judaism, Buddhism and Christianity. There are many scriptural examples, however, Matthew 6:3-4 and Luke 16:19-31 are good ones. Therefore, switched on cool Ismlessists believe that there is reward in charity and that God and heaven reward those who are generous, benevolent or charitable. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. Matthew 6:3-4
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes in thick and low saintliness over intelligent and high academia, that is, the philosophy that religion (as opposed to science and academia, which always seek talent), God and Jesus Christ like and prefer saintly simpletons to talented evil geniuses. That is that religion or God prefers primitive Saints such as St. André Bessette whom was illiterate, to advanced and articulate geniuses such as Friedrich Nietzsche. This is the ismlessism and how it was attained.
- A switched on cool Ismlessist believes in reading, writing and prayer, as these activities were how the ismlessism was attained.
External and altruistic salvation.
As you know in 2021 I unofficially converted to Catholicism from the Church of England. I definitely prefer Catholicism because, firstly I wholeheartedly believe in the communion of Saints, in fact the turning point that led me to Catholicism and praying the Rosary and then subsequently to the epiphany which led to the ismlessism was a book called Life In A Medieval Monastery: The Monks Of Durham Cathedral by Anne Boyd. In this book I learned about Saint Cuthbert of Lindisfarne. I was totally astonished at my own complete ignorance of the holy, sacred and miraculous origins of my own local cathedral and in fact the City of Durham itself. Durham Cathedral, castle and indeed the City of Durham was founded in 995 AD, on the final resting place of Saint Cuthbert’s relics by monks fleeing the Viking raids on Lindisfarne. Therefore, Durham wouldn’t exist if it wasn’t for Saint Cuthbert. I came to truly believe in Saint Cuthbert. I came to believe that Saints are magic. Also, I prefer Catholicism because of the Rosary, which to me is wonderful. It was actually during a Rosary prayer that I realised that white people are ismless. Therefore, I wanted to discuss one thing, which is that there are two types of salvation. There is internal, personal or egoistic salvation and there is external, general and altruistic salvation. Therefore, I just wanted to point out that if a white Protestant converts to Catholicism, it achieves practically nothing. It’s just a statistic for the Vatican. However, if a white person converts to the ismlessism it achieves a lot, it helps protect all white people. Therefore, instead of being saved in the internal or personal usual Christian way, why not help protect all white people in an external or altruistic way yourself, by the act of converting to the ismlessism? With Christianity most people seek their own personal salvation, it’s as if Jesus Christ saves you and you alone. No body within Christianity (apart from Jesus Christ) dares to try and save the whole world or tries to help protect white people (which is my whole world). So instead of saving just one person, that is yourself, why not help protect all white people by converting to the ismlessism? You can do it, we can all help protect all white people individually by ourselves by converting to the ismlessism.
I am the discoverer of the ismlessism and it’s probably obvious to you by now, especially as evidenced by some of my earlier digressions, that I am never an anti-racist because that is the malicious antithesis of racism. I am a non-racialist who deeply cares about white people and you understand that the ismlessism came entirely from a 5 year effort to overcome, fix or de-stigmatise racism. I always admired and respected the Asians and Africans, however, the first thing the ismlessism did was make me admire and respect even more those people who have always had ancient religious isms of their own, namely the Asians. As a switched on cool Ismlessist, I am attracted Asian isms. Wouldn’t it be a good idea if Africans got their own religious ism or became religious in their own way, like the Indians and Jainists for example? I mean wouldn’t it be a grand idea if Africans were eternal and tried to conquer white people on both sides of life? It’s true that I initially wanted the ismlessism to be white, and this is because the ismlessism is undeniably the culmination of a near 5 year endeavour to fix or de-stigmatise racism and to help protect white people. However, I just couldn’t do it to the Asians for example, I mean just couldn’t deny them the opportunity of becoming fellow switched on cool Ismlessists. However, the ismlessism is not religious, but a fashionable and linguistic ism that solves racism. I believe that Asians are probably attracted to the ismlessism because:
- The ismlessism solves the ism, namely racism, that is, it removes and de-stigmatises racism and therefore removes the racial hatred and anger from the world.
- By making Adolf Hitler the coolest Ismlessist, the ismlessism removes racism from Adolf Hitler, thereby forgiving him and thereby helping to save and protect white people.
Therefore, because the ismlessism solves the ism, namely racism, the ismlessism is probably appealing to Asians and Africans? Hence, I just could not bring myself to deny the Asians and Africans the possibility of becoming switched on cool Ismlessists. Therefore, this notion made me happy to make the ismlessism an accessible, universal and coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism. Also I am myself interested in Asian isms and would be sad if I couldn’t try them out or share with them. Also, I have come to believe that helping to protect white people may not entail separation but more making non-white people genuinely, admire, love and respect white people. Therefore, although I care about white people, I am just a switched on cool Ismlessist. Switched on cool Ismlessists are neither racist nor anti-racist, they are in between, they are non-racialist and they possess all the humour. I believe all human beings, either as groups or as individuals should always have isms of their own. Is Adolf Hitler the first convert to the ismlessism? I think Adolf Hitler is the most important convert to the ismlessism because it symbolises world peace also there is so much benefit for all white people through his conversion and forgiveness, therefore, I believe Adolf Hitler should be known as the first convert. Therefore, I believe that the ismlessism should try to convert both racists and anti-racists alike to the switched on cool ismlessism.
Although I also believe in and profess the ismlessism and my goal in life is to correct and de-stigmatise the ism, namely racism, please read the following to understand my real faith. I was a child of the 1980s and 1990s and I was reared in a ‘normal’ Protestant family on nothing but pop culture. I was ‘pop cultured’. I was never indoctrinated in such as Matthew 23:12: ‘For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.’ Thinking I was an angelic child, I turned out to be a vain, show-off and drug using teenager. The rest you don’t want to know about, however, I am now a very repentant 40 year old. You don’t have to be a genius to be a Saint, that’s the beauty of religion (or a religious ism) such as Catholicism, because religion is simple. Religion can be understood by all age levels, for example, it is really good to pray the Rosary together as a family around newborns, infants and children as even children can understand the story of Jesus Christ and the Gospel. For example, St. André Bessette (9 August 1845 – 6 January 1937), the first Canadian living after Confederation to be canonized, was illiterate. Some Saints were ‘losers’ and Bartolo Longo, who was beatified was formerly a ‘Satan worshiper.’ That’s the beauty of religion, especially Catholicism because you don’t need to be a genius, special or physically well endowed to be a good person. This determines that you can be an advanced and gifted genius yet be unsaintly (like Friedrich Nietzsche). That is the difference between religion and philosophy, religion is an unbelievably simple doctrine which even children can understand, while philosophy is unbelievably advanced like meta-ethical relativism or Nietzscheanism, which only university students can understand. The thing I like about Saints is that they only seek posthumous adoration, unlike physically well endowed, flashy, drug addict and show off film and pop stars. Saints are infinitely better examples for us and our children than pop stars.
At that time Jesus said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.”
I truly believe in the power and magic of the Catholic Saints, and I believe that the ismlessism was only given to me by or because I encountered, read about and studied many Catholic Saints. To me, the secret of miracles is that I don’t care. I don’t care if they are superstitious, they are economic. For example, many miracles were attributed to Saint Cuthbert of Lindisfarne, whose final resting place was the foundation of Durham City and Durham Cathedral. Many miracles were attributed to his relics and shrine at Durham Cathedral. The fame of the miracles of Saint Cuthbert’s remains, such as his incorruptible body spread far and wide, and they attracted many pilgrims including kings, seeking a miracle or a cure for infirmity to Durham City, along with which came lucrative devotional offerings, money and grants of lands. Therefore, what on Earth does it matter if miracles are superstitious? Saints and miracles build cities and even countries. The history of Durham Cathedral and Saint Cuthbert made me question my Protestant faith. After reading Life In A Medieval Monastery: The Monks Of Durham Cathedral by Anne Boyd, I then read Bede’s Life of St Cuthbert by the Venerable Bede, Building St Cuthbert’s Shrine: Durham Cathedral and the Life of Prior Turgot by Lionel Green, In Search Of The Northern Saints by Simon Webb, a book called Inspiration from the Saints by Maolsheachlann Ó Ceallaigh, and The Rosary Handbook by Mitch Finley, all of which I absolutely loved. You would not believe how pious, devoted, austere, strict and holy the Saints were, they are such an inspiration. Saints are so modest they don’t even care about being Saints. Saints have zero vanity. Most Saints are posthumously canonised, they do not and never seek adulation in this life. For example, consider Saint Rose of Lima (1586–1617), a Peruvian saint who became the first Catholic saint of the American continent, as well as the patron saint of all South America:
St. Rose was particularly noted for wearing a crown with iron spikes that dug into her scalp, in imitation of the crown of thorns the Roman soldiers made Jesus wear during his Crucifixion. This is how one biographer describes her austerities:
She was deeply penetrated with a sense of her own nothingness and misery. It was to her an insupportable cross to see herself honored; her humility could not bear to hear a word of praise; and on this account hearing, one day, Michael Garrez, canon of the cathedral of Lima, who had come to visit Don Gonzalez, her intimate friend, praising her in the course of the conversation, and extolling the favours she had received from Almighty God, she retired into her chamber, where she began to strike her breast, to weep and groan, in the presence of God; and to punish herself for giving, as she thought, a false opinion of herself to men, she gave herself several blows on the head, to force in more deeply the iron points of the crown which she always wore concealed under her veil.Inspiration from the Saints: Stories from the Lives of Catholic Holy Men and Women, by Maolsheachlann Ó Ceallaigh, page 79.
Saints don’t care about being Saints, they are beyond us sinners and they are gone forever into eternity, heaven and paradise with Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Saints only care about Jesus Christ and even they do not and cannot compete with the modesty of The Saviour, who was modest and obedient to the point of death, by dying on the Cross for the sake of all of humanity. Saints are brilliant examples for us. Along with many others, the books mentioned above have made me fall deeply in love with the Catholic Saints and the Catholic faith. Starting with St. Cuthbert and then reading all of these books turned me into a genuine Catholic convert, certainly a believer and practitioner. The Rosary itself is profound, powerful and deep, and instantly you realise that Protestantism does not offer you anything like the sort. Therefore, you cannot be truly religious with Protestantism. Jesus Christ is like the Sun, He is too brilliant and perhaps we should not look at Him directly? That is what I like about Catholicism and its communion of Saints. Catholicism gives you thousands of Saints to focus on and look at instead of Jesus Christ. While Protestantism gives you nothing to focus on except Jesus Christ. To be honest I had never truly prayed in my life until I read The Rosary Handbook by Mitch Finley. With the Rosary, praying is so genuine and natural. Therefore, due to St. Cuthbert and the above mentioned books I am convinced Catholicism is the true and only western Christian religion. In the long term, I have read almost every day since August 2016 totalling over 170 books (as of December 2021) entirely honed and focused on the singular purpose of fixing racism and helping to protect white people. I have tried several methods or ideologies to solve racism on social media over the years. I spent a year writing an 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler also called Time For Forgiveness. All of which failed. I then gave up on my quest to fix or de-stigmatise racism. I unofficially converted to Catholicism and began to pray the Rosary every day, and then miraculously my prayers were answered when during my prayers I had the epiphany which realised the ismlessism. Therefore, as mentioned, I believe that by reading about and venerating the Catholic Saints, unofficially converting to Catholicism and by praying the Rosary every day, that the ismlessism was given to me by the Catholic Saints? The Saints are the true faith, they make us more modest and humble. Jesus Christ is like the Sun, and perhaps we should not look directly at Him. If we venerate Mary and the Saints, then how glorious is Jesus Christ? I highly recommend Maolsheachlann Ó Ceallaigh’s book to anyone, he writes with such passion, wit and intelligence and he really teaches you the concept of sainthood, in that a lot of Saints weren’t especially geniuses, talented or physically well endowed, some were even ‘losers’, basically Maolsheachlann Ó Ceallaigh really teaches you that you can be a saintly simpleton or an evil genius. As an example of saintliness, most teenagers are ‘wicked’ these days and they believe that this is cool or a good thing, while a smaller proportion of teenagers are a little bit more saintly, that is, the swats or so called geeks and nerds. However, the swats are just academic and intellectual. I believe that the swats should be saintly first of all over academia because saintliness is thick. Perhaps then the ‘wicked’, drug taking teenagers like my former younger self would also try to be swatty? Also Mitch Finley’s book is a great way to learn the Rosary. I also highly recommend to anyone looking for a deeper, more religious and truer faith, or someone questioning their Protestant faith to get familiar with the Saints, buy a rosary, read The Rosary Handbook by Mitch Finley and get a rosary app on your smart phone or tablet. Therefore, the Saints are now my pop idols. Never mind Jesus Christ, it is the Saints who compete with pop stars and pop idols for your adoration. They are infinitely better examples for us and especially our children than drug addict rock and pop stars. My advice to today’s youth would be to venerate, adore, worship and love the Saints not pop idols. As I mentioned in the introduction, religion is good hearted because it is accessible to children, as even toddlers can comprehend the very meaning of the Christian nativity, which is down to Earth, unlike malignant 19th century German Protestant philosophy such as Nietzscheanism which is highly advanced, articulate, abstruse and reserved only for university students with a humongous vocabulary. Nietzsche stated that it might still be possible for the Germans to become the first non-Christian nation of Europe, thus consummating the work of Luther, – he who taught them to be anti-Roman, and to say: “Here I stand! I cannot do otherwise!” Unlike the naval countries, England, France, Spain, Western and Southern Europe, Central and Eastern European countries – which were not as romanised as the aforementioned countries – still have a natural barbarian tendency to be purely European and pagan, as demonstrated by Nietzsche’s anti-Judeo-Christian philosophy and by how the heathen Germans tried to undo recorded history and to uproot the Judeo-Christian religion from Europe during the Holocaust. Christian names such Peter, Paul, David, James, Mark, Matthew, Luke, John, Abraham and Isaac etc are of a more or less non-European origin, however because the Judeo-Christian religion is so good and so powerful through Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, we never name our children such like Socrates, Achilles, Tiberius, Octavian or Athelstan etc. However, if Christian names were ever removed, extirpated, questioned or tampered with it would only lead to disaster. To do so would be complete sacrilege. There’s a correct order to recorded history and Israel or the Israelites were first, then Greece, then Rome, then the Western European naval powers and finally America who digitised recorded history. If Nietzsche had tried to write about anti-Judeo-Christian philosophy in the medieval period he would have been burned at the stake and disemboweled as a heretic, and judging from the disaster of the Holocaust, probably for good reasons. Anyway, all this proves that Catholicism is the one and only true western Christian religion and that pagan-German invented Protestantism is heretical. Protestantism is heresy because Rome is recorded history. Catholicism sticks permanently to Rome and because the Romans are themselves the most important recorders of history in history, they would never attempt to undo recorded history or extirpate the Judeo-Christian religion from Europe, like Protestant, heathen and pagan Germany. Therefore, through Martin Luther and his 95 theses, Germany even bestowed Protestantism on us Western and Northern Europeans. England, do not copy the Germans! They don’t know what they are doing! Therefore, one way that we Northern Europeans could become saintly again and quickly is by nationally converting back to Roman Catholicism at the very top-level of state, government and high society. The ismlessism may hit two birds with one stone, because it may reverse the Reformation and fix the Holocaust in one. And remember Martin Luther was also a virulent anti-Semite.
How to do it.
For example, the thing about the ismlessism is that you could be a spiritual or religious leader such as His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, the founder of The International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), known colloquially as the Hare Krishna, however, you will ultimately never in eternity go anywhere near extreme forgiveness or the forgiveness of such as Adolf Hitler. You can meditate or be so vegetarian that you even stay away from root vegetables for fear of killing the whole plant but you will always and ultimately never forgive such as Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. This is the error that many lovingly-kind spiritualists and religious leaders make. There is far too much disparity in the world between lovingly-kind spiritual leaders such as His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada and serious sinners such as Adolf Hitler. I mean this respectfully and as advice because I believe spiritual leaders such as ‘the Swami’, vicars, priests and even the Pope will (unlike Jesus Christ) be caught out or caught with their pants down either in this life or the next regarding extreme forgiveness, in that they will not know what to do and will have no answers regarding the extreme forgiveness of such as Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. And for spiritual leaders to have no answers is not good. Therefore, although Jainist (non-root vegetable eating) vegetarianism is unbelievably physically hard, extreme forgiveness is emotionally harder. You have got to be brave enough to stick your neck out for Adolf Hitler. It’s forgiveness and no one on Earth or in history has ever sought (because of Adolf Hitler) absolute and universal forgiveness. This is no offence to religious or spiritual leaders such as His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, because extreme forgiveness or the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler requires an idiot to attain it. My advice to such religious leaders regarding extreme forgiveness is to cut the head off the snake. That’s how to do it. And what cuts the head off the snake is the ismlessism because it removes and de-stigmatises Adolf Hitler and racism. I believe because of the Holocaust, that all answers for the world peace are in the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. Therefore, that is exactly what my (erroneous) 87,000 word essay tried to attain, which was ultimately successful with the discovery of the ismlessism, which (as it de-stigmatises the racism in Adolf Hitler), is his genuine forgiveness, and therefore, the ismlessism is the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two, not to mention all of us minor sinners too. If I had never gone there and asked the question or wrote the essay I would never have discovered the ismlessism. Therefore, don’t be afraid to forgive. Don’t be afraid of extreme, absolute and universal forgiveness.
You may say that I am trying to be like Jesus Christ by trying to really, genuinely and actually help protect white people in reality? No, I am not trying to save mankind like Jesus Christ, that’s just rubbish. I am just trying to really, genuinely and actually help protect white people in reality, like any other normal caring white person. I am the rare type of person who gives a damn about white people, and as a result of the discovery of the ismlessism, I am a cool anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch Ismlessist. You may say I am being vain and pretending (or wanting) to be like Jesus Christ by trying to really, genuinely and actually help protect white people in reality? No I am not. I am telling you that I have zero desire to attain nirvana, I just deeply and devoutly care about my own people. I don’t even want to be a saint, I just want to be saintly (trust me I am a sinner), I just want to do something for my own people like all (ahem) non-racialists, then die and be a bit proud of myself in heaven. What quite disconcerts me about our politicians is that it is plain to see that for example, Africans care more about their own people than they care about other people, and Indians care more about their own people than they care about other people, however, the current politically correct consensus in Europe today is for everyone to care more about other people than their own people. It’s ridiculous. And this is what I am hoping the ismlessism reverses. I am hoping that by my own example, that the ismlessism will get white people to care more about their own people before other people. Therefore, I am telling you that devoutly caring about white people is unbelievably altruistic and modest. Look at this website, its art and my two essays, I have done all of this 5 years of intensive reading and writing all for white people. Switched on cool Ismlessists don’t give a damn about nirvana, they just want to really, genuinely and actually help protect white people in reality. We do not pretend. Anyway, rest assured the ismlessism has changed my beliefs, in that I now believe that the way to help protect white people is to go with the flow (like a dead fish) and try to make non-white people admire or even love white people. By cutting the head off the snake and removing or de-stigmatising Adolf Hitler’s racism, we white people might at least save face? But we must remove or de-stigmatise racism as well. Just being anti-racist makes non-white people hate us just as much as being racist. All that you taken for granted anti-racists want is to attain nirvana, which is egoistic. Anyway, non-white people aren’t in trouble. I don’t want to be Jesus Christ, wanting to really, genuinely and actually help protect white people in reality is an unbelievably modest desire. If I was born in the 1920s I would have done the same thing, that is I would have tried as hard as I could to save empire, as white people didn’t exactly need protecting then. If I was born in the 19th century I wouldn’t have even bothered trying to protect anything, as white people definitely didn’t need protecting back then, I just would have been a soldier and fought in a war or something to protect, expand and defend empire. So that’s me in a nutshell. I do anything white or for white people. Check the books I have read, all 170 and more of them. I wouldn’t read a single letter if it wasn’t for white people. To me the problem is that white people lost empire in the 1950s and 1960s, and they did not complain. Then we get to 2021 and white people are in trouble and still most white people won’t even admit that they even have a problem, are in trouble or need help. I think what the ismlessism should do is that although anti-racists don’t have to change everything, however, it should stop or prevent anti-racists, such as Antifascists being over the top, vindictive, malicious, vengeful and nasty towards white people in general. I think most white people are blissfully (or willingly) ignorant of how much flack white people are getting these days? They’re like ostriches with their heads in the ground. Today, with such as Antifascists, white people are being bullied and picked on, it’s revenge and reprisals for empire, colonialism, two (stupid) world wars and the Holocaust. Therefore, that’s what the ismlessism should do, that is, it should simultaneously de-stigmatise the racism in Adolf Hitler and remove the desire of non-white switched on cool Ismlessists to want to destroy or conquer Europe as a reprisal for the Holocaust. It should therefore also reduce over the top, vicious, vindictive and malicious anti-racism by such as Antifa. I believe that the ismlessism is the answer.
The desire of a white switched on cool Ismlessist.
I have been on this quest to solve the ism, namely racism since the 1st of August 2016, I know this because I bought my first serious book on Amazon on the 31st July 2016. Anyway, one thing that I have definitely learned and understood on my quest is that having the singular desire to help protect white people, with absolutely no desire to attain nirvana, is actually a very modest, humble and altruistic goal or exercise. The ismlessism is a coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism, and we do not give a damn about personally attaining nirvana for absolutely no good reason or to simply just sit there yogis-style and be it. We just want to help protect white people, which is an unbelievably modest desire. It’s about doing not being. Therefore, the only desire of a cool white Ismlessist is to help protect all white people through de-stigmatised racial methods (and absolutely nothing else). To me that’s switched on cool Ismlessists in a nutshell, that is, they are unbelievably philanthropic and altruistic.
The desire of a switched on cool white Ismlessist is:
- To fix and de-stigmatise the ism, namely racism.
- To absolve or forgive Adolf Hitler.
- To remove the racial hatred and anger from the world.
- To fix the Holocaust.
- To admire, like and love cool non-white Ismlessists.
- To help protect white people.
- To have absolutely zero desire to attain nirvana.
- To have absolutely no desire to help protect white people through stigmatised racist methods.
The last point is important because both white and non-white switched on cool Ismlessists believe that the universe works, and that the universe always has an answer or solution to any issue for those who sincerely and humbly ask. Therefore, there will be no need to use stigmatised racial methods against switched on cool non-white Ismlessists in order to help protect white people.
The desire of a non-white switched on cool Ismlessist.
The desire of a switched on cool non-white Ismlessist is even more important than a switched on cool white Ismlessist. The deal is that the ismlessism is a 100% universal coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism, however, the stipulation should be that a switched on cool non-white Ismlessist who wishes to follow the ismlessism should:
- Truly and genuinely want us Europeans to fix and de-stigmatise the ism, namely racism, before anything else at all.
- Have absolutely no schadenfreude about Europe’s Holocaust and downfall.
- Genuinely admire, like and love switched on cool white Ismlessists.
- Most importantly have absolutely no desire at all to destroy, conquer or master Europe or other white countries.
This last point is essential, in that it should be a switched on cool non-white Ismlessist’s internal conviction, faith or belief to have absolutely zero desire to destroy, conquer or master Europe or Europeans. Conquest is uncool and we switched on cool white Ismlessists will be able to know and tell if you hide any such desire. As you can see our desires as switched on cool Ismlessists are connected to the simultaneity of the ismlessism, in that the ismlessism simultaneously removes or de-stigmatises the racism in Adolf Hitler and removes the desire of switched on cool non-white Ismlessists to want to destroy or conquer Europe.
As you know I was reared in the 1980s and 1990s in a normal working class Protestant family, on nothing but TV, pop music and pop culture. I never received any religious or Christian instruction or indoctrination, or indeed any kind educational or academic instruction or indoctrination, that is, from my type of normal ‘Simpsons-like’ family. And you also know that I turned out to be a vain, show off and drug using teenager. I made some pretty big mistakes early in my life, especially in my late teens and early twenties, all as a result of my uneducated and uncultured upbringing. I was never indoctrinated with such as Matthew 23:12: For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted. Which is so obvious! And I wish to God someone had drilled that verse and indeed all of Christianity into me at a very early stage in life. Then I would not have turned out to be a vain, show off and drug using teenager. Now this got me thinking, and what I want to say here is very important, because it is more important than indoctrinating children with the ismlessism. Children should be compulsorily and mandatorily indoctrinated in Christianity from a very early age right up to adulthood. In fact it should never stop. This compulsory Christian indoctrination for children should be mandatorily instituted and promulgated by the government. In fact it should be law. However, the important point that I want to make is that because young children (and indeed most adults) do not read, that therefore, this Christian indoctrination should come primarily through the television. This Christian television indoctrination of children should be constant, ubiquitous and universal, that is, on just about every TV channel for instance. Children should not learn their lessons of life from meaningless and pointless cartoons such as ‘Paw Patrol’ for example. Therefore, there should be no option for children to watch anything except Christian themed TV shows and cartoons etc. For example, instead of prime time and Saturday morning children’s TV, there should be no option but to view Christian themed TV shows and cartoons etc. I mean this because in the way that I was reared in a normal Protestant family, as a child, hell would have frozen over before you got me to read a book, therefore, I practically learned everything that I knew as a child from the TV. And obviously nothing on the TV was in any way what I needed and everything that I learned was wrong. The only religious film that I watched was as a child was the 1956 film The Ten Commandments with Charlton Heston, which did actually have a huge influence on me. Therefore, I believe because children learn so much from television, that our governments should therefore, make it compulsory for all television channels to heavily and mandatorily indoctrinate our children in saintliness, the Gospel and Christian values.
Economics of Buddha.
After reading 170 books over 5 years solid more or less every day (since the 1st of August 2016) in my pursuits to help protect white people and thus consequently becoming academic, intellectual and a bit geeky in the process, I have come to the ultimate and ironic conclusion that academia, education, intellect, grammar and literacy are not absolutely everything. Throughout these 5 years and up until the 18th of November 2021 I was convinced that academia was 100%. I believed that academia was all things. However, I do not now believe this, I now believe that simple piety, saintliness and charity are better and more important. Although it’s good, I believe you don’t have to read 170 books to get to heaven or be a Saint. I mean I believe that Saint André Bessette proves that piety is more important than education, because even if you are illiterate, you can ultimately achieve much more in life by being a practicing Christian, pious, saintly and charitable and through your constant and conscious Christian, pious and saintly actions. The object of a Christian is to constantly and consciously prepare for death and the afterlife and to reject and renounce this putrid moist dung-ball of an Earth. Piety and saintliness are much simpler and easier to practice than advanced academia and it’s very comforting to know that you can achieve more than highly intellectual people by just being pious, saintly and charitable. Academia is unforgiving, if you have not studied very hard by the time you are a late teenager, you are finished and there is no second chance. However, one can practice piety, Christianity and saintliness at any point in life. I believe that like Friedrich Nietzsche, you can be highly academic and intellectual but unchristian, ungodly and unsaintly. For example, you could be very academic and intellectual but uncharitable, greedy and atheistic. However, pious saintliness is all that we should aspire to be and we should renounce nirvana. The poor have more opportunities to be pious and saintly because it is easier for them to part with a larger percentage of their money. Consider the teaching of Mark 12:41-44:
Jesus sat down opposite the place where the offerings were put and watched the crowd putting their money into the temple treasury. Many rich people threw in large amounts. But a poor widow came and put in two very small copper coins, worth only a few cents.
Calling his disciples to him, Jesus said, “Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put more into the treasury than all the others. They all gave out of their wealth; but she, out of her poverty, put in everything—all she had to live on.”Mark 12:41-44:
Although Bill Gates is an excellent philanthropist, he gives out of his wealth and no matter what he is always still a multi-billionaire, whereas a poor person with for example, £260 to his or her name can give away 38.46% of what they own a hell of a lot easier. I believe that the only lesson Bill Gates will learn in this life or in the afterlife is piety and saintliness and I believe that he will learn from the saints such as Saint Francis of Assisi who practiced deliberate poverty. Therefore, piety and saintliness are first, while education and academia are second. I would rather that children were taught piety, saintliness and Christian values first rather than being punctually and efficiently pumped out like-clockwork from schools with literacy and academia but spoilt and with no morals. Teenagers today are anything but pious and saintly, they are more cool and ‘wicked’. I believe that today our governments and western civilisation as a whole are economics and economy driven. Politicians have no other moral yardstick or measuring stick to judge themselves by other than economics or economy. Economic growth = ‘good’, Economic contraction = ‘bad’. Therefore, because of our secular world leaders, economists and politicians, this is the level of our morality today. Wealth = ‘good’, Poor = ‘bad’. Western capitalist civilisation is rich, governments are rich, the media is rich, famous people are rich, they are all multi-millionaires and they tell us all that this is how it is, being super-rich is what to do and that there is nothing more to life and this is probably the reason why our governments do not indoctrinate our children and us poor people with Christian values, piety, charitableness and saintliness. There are no Christian values or morals in capitalism or economics. At least medieval kings such as Henry VIII and James I and VI were devoutly Christian first, before such things as economy. Medieval people were devoutly and passionately Christian. Medieval people cared more about the spiritual wealth of their countries before anything else. Medieval monarchs such as Henry VIII and James I and VI were serious Christians and seemed to care about Christianity (about such things as the unfortunate Protestant Reformation and the King James Bible) before anything else. In fact all medieval people in Europe; even peasants and common people were devoutly and intolerantly Christian. All medieval European people had a wealth of faith, and that is more important than the economy, that is, the spiritual wealth and the wealth of Christian faith in your country, not money. I have never liked business, even as a child I had a huge aversion to business and economics. I just don’t understand things such as the markets and the stock exchange. I hate such nightmarish things as ‘board meetings’ and I just cannot present on profits, sales, statistics and figures etc, I can only speak on things that I truly and passionately believe in and I just don’t believe in money. I literally do not get it and I just can’t brown nose finance, business, economics and capitalism. I don’t know how people do it. I could be a scientist or an academic because they are usually just employed and, although they receive their daily bread, they do not do things just for money. However, I could not be a businessman or a director. To me business and economics are nothing, they are just money, which is ironic because they produce or make a lot of material things. I am and even as a child have always been more religious. Therefore, I would like to advise you to not do business but to be religious. The economics of Buddha is the antithesis of capitalism, it means that we do things for free, we give our money away, we are not profit oriented, we store our treasures in heaven and we perform charitable and philanthropic actions for spiritual wealth. Think of the economics of Buddha. Siddhartha Gautama was a prince destined to be king, however, He wanted to end all human suffering, therefore, He renounced all of his wealth, palaces, luxuries and wives, became a hermit and ascetic and meditated constantly for 6 years, wasting away, eventually eating nothing but the seeds that blew into his lap until he became a walking skeleton and nearly starved Himself to death, before he attained nirvana. His enlightenment involved the realisation of The Middle Way between such extreme asceticism and indulgence, however, The Middle Way still involves not eating after noon and owning nothing more than a razor, a bowl and an umbrella for the shade. Therefore, the economics of Buddha is precisely nothing, £0, zero profit and loss and this is all that we normal common people want, not evil secular economics and capitalist wealth. Capitalism is materialistic and spiritually evil. In terms of the political spectrum, is communism really the antithesis of capitalism? Communism is atheistic, therefore, perhaps Buddhism and Christianity or ‘the economics of Buddha’ are the antithesis of capitalism? Our western politicians do nothing else but economics and capitalism, they are evil. Maybe it wasn’t the USSR that was the antithesis of capitalism, but religious countries like Tibet. The west does not look down on Tibet as it did the USSR. Tibet is a beautiful and religious country. Is Tibet capitalist first before Buddhism? I doubt it and Tibetans should never become materialistic and capitalist like westerners. Money is not what is important. Capitalism is all about maximum profit, margin and gain, often attained in immoral ways, and hence it is the antithesis of the economics of Buddha, which is done for nothing, £0, zero profit and loss. The economics of Buddha means that you do things for free yet for spiritual wealth. There is no spiritual worth in capitalism and capitalism not a good doctrine for our society and even our civilisation to live by. Just because the west or capitalism has a lot of material ‘stuff’ associated with it does not mean that it is better than Tibet or Buddhism. Spiritual wealth is more. We all want the economics of Buddha.
Working class people like my family are already halfway to saintliness, because poor rough working class people already look like Saints, such as Saint Francis of Assisi, however, they just don’t know it and are not consciously and actively practicing Christians yet (probably because they are capitalist Protestants, therefore, they have no modern Saints to inspire and guide them and because obviously being Protestant, the Holy Catholic Church is therefore, not allowed to instruct them to be Saintly or philanthropic). Are Catholics generally more charitable than Protestants? Perhaps. I wonder? Poor working class people like my family probably kick themselves once they are in the hereafter because they could have so easily turned around and beaten vain, conceited and snobby academics and billionaires such as Bill Gates who invented File > Save As and Saves his money (not white people), simply by turning around and giving someone less fortunate than themselves £100 or about 38% of the contents of their bank account. Because Protestant capitalism is a millionaire and because celebrities are all multi-millionaires, and because famous people and celebraties basically say nothing else, that is, that there is nothing better than being a millionaire in life; therefore, what do all the spiritually neglected and poor ignorant working class people do? They try to copy celebrities and millionaire capitalist Protestants, Save their pittance and try to make a pathetically ‘bigger’ amount of money in their bank accounts. Like Saint André Bessette, even though you are a layman, be a conscious, constantly active and practicing Christian in all your thoughts, words, deeds and actions.
Don’t Save money, Save white people.
Barefoot white people.
Even today modern Saints still practice mortification, for example, Saint Josemaría Escrivá (9 January 1902 – 26 June 1975) practiced self-flagellation and wore a cilice around his thigh.
This was not the only form of mortification St. Josemaría practiced. He frequently employed “the discipline,” a form of self-flagellation using a many-stranded whip called a scourge. He insisted that his apostolic efforts fared better the more he used the discipline. He also wore a cilice, a light metal chain with spikes which was worn around the thigh. The cilice is still worn by many members of Opus Dei today. These are examples of rather spectacular mortifications, but St. Josemaría was also dedicated to simpler forms of self-denial—such as refusing to lean against the back of his chair when he was sitting, refusing to look at anything out of curiosity, and drinking as little water as he could.Inspiration from the Saints: Stories from the Lives of Catholic Holy Men and Women, by Maolsheachlann Ó Ceallaigh, page 81.
However, I will tell you a little story that happened to me after I read Inspiration from the Saints: Stories from the Lives of Catholic Holy Men and Women, by Maolsheachlann Ó Ceallaigh. After reading the book I was excited and I wanted to share and spread the word of what I had learned. Hence, I enthusiastically told my Protestant mother about how pious, austere, strict, devoted and holy the Saints are, and as an example I told her how Saint Josemaría Escrivá used to wear a cilice, and to my disappointment my mother disapproved and said to me “You know God doesn’t want you to hurt yourself Graham.” I was bitterly disappointed. Now what I want to say here is important because although some mortification is extreme, all mortification even mild mortification shows modesty and humility. For example, as mentioned above when Saint Rose of Lima was praised she beat her breast and gave herself blows on the head, to force in more deeply the iron points of the crown which she always wore concealed under her veil. And for example Saint Cuthbert would stand naked and neck high in the freezing cold waters of the North Sea for hours doing penance and expressing his humility to God.
Cuthbert, followed by the spy, went straight to the sea- shore below the monastery. Wading out into the water till the waves reached to his neck, he spent the darkness of the night saying prayers, accompanied by the sound of the waves. Near dawn, he went up the beach, and finished his prayer on bended knees.Bede’s Life of St Cuthbert, by Saint Bede: In a Modern English Version by Simon Webb, location 519 or 40%.
You may say this type of mortification is only something that ancient or medieval people did or believed in? In the Protestant west it is, but what I am saying is that that is not a good thing. For example, if someone was to stand naked and neck high in the North Sea today, people would probably think he or she is mad and they would probably call the emergency services or do something as crass as that. However, in Saint Cuthbert’s day (the 7th century) this was nothing out of the ordinary, and if anything it was extraordinary. Or for example, if a modern royal or prince decided to copy the Buddha‘s Great Renunciation, by giving up the royal life and its luxuries, and became an extreme self-mortifying ascetic who nearly starved himself to death, he would likely be sectioned. Again there was nothing odd about renouncing your kingdom and nearly starving yourself to death (in order to find a way to end human suffering) in India in the 6th century BC, and in fact it is probably still not out of the ordinary in India even today. Therefore, there is a huge lack of faith in the modern Protestant and capitalist west today, there is so much cynicism and scepticism of each other in western civilisation. In the west no one believes in each other. What we need in the west is a little medieval faith. For example, King Canute (1017–1035) walked five miles barefoot from Garmondsway to Durham Cathedral on pilgrimage, and gave the church a large estate around Staindrop and Gainford.
His name was Cnut the Great, the King Canute of legend, and the same mighty king who, at the height of his power and majesty, walked barefoot, with head shaven, dressed in the garb of a penitent, to Durham, there to prostrate himself and pay homage at the shrine of St Cuthbert, and to bestow gifts of great value on ‘Cuthbert’s folk’.DURHAM Over 1,000 Years of History and Legend, by Martin Dufferwiel, location 278 or 6%.
Once Cnut had had his hair ‘trimmed’ he divested himself of all jewellery and trappings of royalty, was dressed in the robes of a penitent and proceeded to Durham, barefoot, passing along the old Garmonds’ Way, bypassing present-day Kelloe and eventually reaching a rise in the ground later known as Signing or Crossing Bank.DURHAM Over 1,000 Years of History and Legend, by Martin Dufferwiel, location 373 or 9%.
What is wrong with expressing such piety and humility today? If I as a white man was to walk around my local dene (forest) barefoot for penance and to show my humility to God, I am telling you that all the local people would look down at me and say that I am a madman. What is wrong with white people going barefoot? It is humility. Imagine if the Duke of Cambridge, Prince William did something similar to King Canute and deliberately did a pilgrimage barefoot for penance for the two world wars and the Holocaust. This would be really good because it shows humility to God and to the rest of the world. White people are not so vain and have such high standards of living that they refuse to go barefoot are they? Many Africans still go barefoot all the time and it’s almost as if it is something that civilised and modern white people do not or should not do. I do not believe that white people are too vain and conceited to go barefoot, I believe they have simply forgotten. The Celts and probably even some medieval white people probably went around barefoot. White people should not be ashamed of going barefoot, mortification and showing humility. I believe today such extravagant mortification and saintliness is what the west needs. I believe that we white people need some of our own indigenous people, preferably in high society to set us good examples of piety and humility by for example standing neck high in the North Sea or by going barefoot on pilgrimage or for penance for the two world wars and the Holocaust. Imagine if Queen Elizabeth II of England went barefoot on a pilgrimage or for penance, perhaps for the Reformation? I imagine that the catholics would forgive her and all of us Protestant English and how graceful would that be? Oh my English brethren, return to the holy Catholic faith!
After reading about the examples of the severity of the devotion, piety and humility of the Catholic Saints above, I wanted to ask you as a Church of England Protestant, how pious do you believe that the Queen of England is? As “Head of the Church of England” do you believe that Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II is as good an example of piety as say Saint Josemaría Escrivá, who scourged himself with a whip, wore a cilice around his thigh, never let his back rest on the back of a chair and drank as little water as he could? Do you believe that the Queen is as devoted and pious as Saint Rose of Lima who was deeply penetrated with a sense of her own nothingness and misery and who on upon being praised by Michael Garrez, retired into her chamber, where she began to strike her breast, to weep and groan, in the presence of God; and to punish herself for giving, as she thought, a false opinion of herself to men; and then gave herself several blows on the head, to force in more deeply the iron points of the crown which she always wore concealed under her veil? Do you believe the present Queen of England is as pious an example as Cnut the Great (another medieval Catholic king) who, at the height of his power and majesty, walked barefoot, with head shaven, dressed in the garb of a penitent, to Durham, there to prostrate himself and pay homage at the shrine of St Cuthbert, and to bestow gifts of great value on ‘Cuthbert’s folk’? Pope Francis prostrates himself before Christ to show his devoted love for Christ. Do you believe that (if she was young enough) prostration before Christ to show her love for Christ would be a good thing for the Queen of England to do? Or is the Queen of England above that? Do you believe that the Queen of England (if she was young enough) would be more graceful and modest if she walked barefoot on a pilgrimage to a Cathedral like Cnut the Great did? Or are white people above walking barefoot? Do you believe that by setting examples such as prostration and walking barefoot that the Queen would be doing a very good thing and setting a very good example for her own people? Do you believe that by setting examples such as prostration and walking barefoot that the Queen of England would be helping the Roman Catholics to forgive Northern Europeans for the Reformation? Do you believe that it is right that Protestants have no modern Saints of their own to set examples for them and to guide them spiritually? To Her Highness and Most Britannic Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom and 15 other Commonwealth realms, I would humbly, graciously and obsequiously, as a servant of the servant of the servants of God, say unto your Highness that you are the nearest thing to a Saint in England, and yet your Highness is nowhere near as pious as the above mentioned Catholic Saints. I would also humbly ask your highness, do you believe that you are as religiously and piously as good an example as the above Catholic Saints? Your Highness is not. Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ is most impressed by water, or by Saint Josemaría Escrivá drinking as little water as he could. The Head of the Church is and must always be expert clergy and people of the cloth, who practice extreme piety, humility and asceticism. And remember that even these extreme Saints are not as extreme or pious as Jesus Christ whom was pious and obedient to the point of being crucified to death on the Cross for us all, as well as the Buddha whom meditated for so long and tried so hard to find a solution to human suffering, that He became a living skeleton and nearly starved Himself to death before He attained nirvana. What would you rather be in the next life, a monarch or a Saint? The Head of the Church cannot be political or temporal. Your Highness is head of state only.
Ismless religion versus science.
I wanted to not talk about racism versus anti-racism or Catholicism versus Protestantism, but about absolutely pure, fundamental, unbiased, non-sectarian, non-denominational, neutral and universal religion and faith versus science. I am not talking about Muslim, Christian, Hindu or Zoroastrian, but just fundamental universal religion or faith versus science. 0% bias. No isms! Why is it today that acts of faith or piety such as praying naked and neck high in the North Sea or walking barefoot on a pilgrimage to a cathedral is not normal? Why is it that the mental health or sanity of people who practice such acts of faith or piety – particularly in the West – are called into question? Why is religion not normal today? For example, imagine if Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II, spontaneously and eccentrically came out as a Catholic and decided that she wanted to lead Britain and Northern Ireland back into the holy Catholic faith. Would people question her sanity? Would people call her barmy Queen Liz? There is nothing wrong with eccentricity and we have to normalise religion, faith and religious eccentricity again. We have to normalise extreme and saintly mortification and sacrifice. So why is religion not normal today? It is probably because western science has destroyed religion and faith. Science doesn’t care about faith or matters of faith, it only seeks the tangible, real and fact. There was not much science in the Buddha’s day (6th century BC) or in Saint Cuthbert’s day (7th century AD) and these periods were much more religious and better. Modern European Protestant science has destroyed (the Catholic) religion and faith. So as a Muslim, this battle between no isms, unbiased, neutral, fundamental and universal religion versus western, European (and American) Protestant science should really please you, because it proves that you and your faith are right over them. People might want to walk through fire or walk barefoot on hot coals to prove their faith and their sanity should never be questioned. There are seven billion simple, religious and saintly human beings on this planet, and about 400,000 tyrannical scientists. Never question our faith or sanity please. How is psychiatry in India these days? Do they have crazy Sadhus and holy men unlike the Protestant and scientific west? So what is fundamental religion? What is 0% isms religion? Well it’s not biased! Although by the very definition of the word, fundamental religion is universal – in that aliens are also probably religious – it is also precisely nothing. What is this nothingness of fundamental religion? Again, ismless religion is nothing, 0, zero and this means it is 0% biased (as you would expect an omnipotent and universal God to be). Also, perhaps like how the ismlessism is without isms, fundamental religion is possibly without sin? Perhaps we can rejuvenate, refresh ourselves and cleanse ourselves of our sins in or with ismless religion? That is, before we go and make our own local religious isms such as Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Christianity and Zoroastrianism etc. What if God is nothingness, yet everything and eternal? What if God came out of nothing and yet is eternal? So if ismless religion is absolutely zero, yet it is therefore, 0% biased and truly universal in the literal sense of the word – as in the Big Bang and the universe – therefore, without bias, how big can the Muslims make Allah? How big can the Buddhists make Buddha? How big can the Jews make YHWH? How big can we Christians make the Father, the Son and the Holy spirit? Jesus Christ said: ‘I and the Father are one.’ Consider John 14:1-14:
Do not let your hearts be troubled. You believe in God; believe also in me. My Father’s house has many rooms; if that were not so, would I have told you that I am going there to prepare a place for you? And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am. You know the way to the place where I am going.”
Thomas said to him, “Lord, we don’t know where you are going, so how can we know the way?”
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you really know me, you will know my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him.”
Philip said, “Lord, show us the Father and that will be enough for us.”
Jesus answered: “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? Don’t you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me? The words I say to you I do not speak on my own authority. Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work. Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me; or at least believe on the evidence of the works themselves. Very truly I tell you, whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things than these, because I am going to the Father. And I will do whatever you ask in my name, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son. You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it.John 14:1-14.
Therefore, can we Christians make Jesus Christ and the Father the one and the same eternally universal God? Jesus Christ is zero, and therefore, everything and universal. I personally, without bias and for my own personal sins and total foolishness, would like to bestow the truly universal religion – or ismless religion – on Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and the Lord Buddha. Today there is bias against white people, for example, in English Grammar Workbook For Dummies, which I am studying, there are non-stop references in questions and examples to ‘Abdul’ who is the character in the questions. This is bias! Anti-racism is bias! What has someone called ‘Abdul’ got to do with England or English Grammar? Remember zero! The universal God has witnessed 13.7 billion years of time and Creation and 4 billion years of evolution of life on ‘this’ planet; therefore, He doesn’t care a less about the fact that you have created an ism in the last several thousand years or less. Muslims hit the deck five times a day in prayer to Allah. This is very similar to zero. 0% vanity. 100% humbleness! 100% humility with Allah, YHWH, Jesus Christ and the Buddha! All isms are biased such as sexism, heightism and ageism. However, the ismless religion and the universal deity is 0% biased. We human beings should strive to be as unbiased as the universal God. Perhaps before you scientifically get to space, other galaxies and to explore the universe, you have got to attain a truly universal religion – because sentient aliens will also probably have there own religions? There is not even one, as in the one, as in Neo from The Matrix. There is only zero. There is only Jesus Christ. Ismless religion which came from Catholicism, will end with Catholicism and it proves that there is zero, 0% or zilch difference between Catholics and Protestants. There is zero, 0% or zilch difference between Northern Europeans and Mediterranean or Southern Europeans (including Israelis). Therefore, Mediterranean Europeans and Israelis even know this fundamental and ironically scientific fact mathematically. The Reformation and the Holocaust were carried out for precisely nothing!
Protestant Kings and Queens.
Most humbly and graciously, could I please inform Protestant monarchs, including Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, that ismless religion is entirely Catholicism, I even received the adjective ismless during a Rosary prayer while I was thinking about Catholicism and how it is an ism, then it occured to me that white people are ismless. Therefore, please graciously and humbly understand your Highnesses, that like Henry VIII (who was medieval and pre-constitutional and therefore gets off) and like George III who went mad – Protestantism is for YOU and YOU alone. It’s like self-deification – like Menhutep II – and Jesus Christ taught you better than that. Protestantism is a medieval error. Therefore, please understand Your Majesty, that because the Reformation is medieval tyranny, it is kind of not a problem. It’s okay. It just needs reversing as it wreaks absolute havoc. There is no point in calling American colonists traitors when Her Majesty is traitor to Rome herself.
The ismlessism is in the middle, and by this I mean that anti-racist people on Facebook think I am a racist and racist people on Twitter think I am an anti-racist. Although I am white and I lean towards white people, I am neither racist nor anti-racist, switched on cool Ismlessists practice non-racialism and are in the middle. I am pro-white and I want to protect Europeans, but because of the Holocaust they are wrong and uncool today. Because of the Holocaust coloured-skin is cool today, blacks are right and cool and I am not against them or what they have to do because of the Holocaust. The Holocaust is judgement, it has nothing to do with inequality or unfairness. Our politicians go soft on blacks and hard on whites and that is how it is. I love white people and I want to help them and I think that traditional European folk costumes are beautiful, however, I am worried that European folk costumes are uncool? I am worried that European folk costumes do not compete with what is truly cool, such as coloured-skin, Rastafarianism and the hip and cool vibe of the black-London music and club scene. I am worried for white people. I am worried that they will become uncool? I think traditional Europeans are going to lose out to what is truly and really cool today which is basically black and coloured-skin. The ismlessism is amiable and amicable with blacks. The ismlessism is fun and humorous and we have fun and much humour and comedy with Rastas and ragga-men. Therefore, even if you are white, native or indigenous don’t fight with black people. Just because you compliment and are nice to black people doesn’t necessarily mean that you are anti-racist. Blacks are less advanced and therefore, they are cool, and ismlessisms such as ‘fash’, ‘seks’ and ‘rayce’ are also cool, hence, even if you care about white people, there is nothing wrong with being nice and complimentary towards non-white people. If we are nice to non-white people first, then they might be nice to us? Therefore, do not fight with black people mentally, verbally or on social media. As a white person, because you have to fight black people already says enough about you and the Holocaust. Without the Holocaust you would not have to fight with them. Therefore, don’t be against black people. Being nationalist is uncool today. Although you may feel very sentimental about your traditional European folk costumes, imagine wearing them in a shopping centre in a city centre such as London or in a nightclub in Ibiza such as Pacha? If you did wear your traditional European folk costume around town or in a nightclub you would probably seriously cringe with embarrassment? This is reality! This is now! Black is what is cool today. Therefore, accept the coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism, be a switched on cool Ismlessist non-racialist and be kind, amiable and affable with coloured people. Be cool, be hip, be with it, be a switched on cool Ismlessist.
To be with it today you have got to be politically correct, you have got to be with and down with what our treacherous white politicians are doing. For example, in the UK ‘with it’ is basically what our prime minister, our MPs, our parliament and our media are saying or doing. To be with it you have got to say or write your ismlessisms, for example ‘I’m into Catholis!’ Where ‘Catholis’ is the ismlessism of Catholicism. Saying ismlessisms is the Rastafarian and black-London youth style or vibe. You have also got to be as cool as coloured-skin. Black people are cool because they are less advanced. Black people look different, move different and dance differently to us white European stiffs. Because of the Holocaust white skin is uncool. It’s not that we like it, however, I’m sorry, because of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust that is how it is. The oppression you feel as a white person today is not bias or unfairness, it is judgement for the Holocaust. You have to accept that the oppression that you feel today as a white person is judgement because of the Holocaust and that unfairness and inequality do not come into it. Political correctness, black music, black fashion and coloured-skin are cool and hip today, not traditional European culture, European paganism, traditional European folk costumes and myths. Morris Dancers are not as cool as Rastafarians and black-London youths. Politicians are actually very cool, with it and hip and they have their fingers on the beating pulse of American and European pop culture, as well as the London and New York vibes, and what is currently politically correct, cool, hip and with it. If you are racist our politicians will say to you that you are not currently ‘with it’, period, end of, and that the clock is ticking. There is only one way to be with it, and that is whatever our world leaders and politicians are saying or doing. Not that I like it, however, political correctness is with it and hip. The good news is that everyone on Earth can get with it, be hip and cool easily with the coloured or Rastafarian ‘religious’ ism. All that you have to do is learn the cool Rastafarian lingo of the ismlessism, that is, learn to say or write your ismlessisms, such as ‘Don’t be fash!’ Where ‘fash’ is the ismlessism of fascism. Therefore, say your ismlessisms in order to become a cool non-racialist Ismlessist, then you are as cool as a Rasta or black-London youth. Wicked! Innit?
Unimaginative white people.
The truth of the fact is that prior to two world wars and the Holocaust, white people, whether they were medieval, Hanoverian or Victorian never even for a millisecond ever thought of or imagined the concept of anything cool or coolness. White people have never and I mean never throughout their recorded history been ‘cool’. cool is not in their genetic make up or vocabulary. And since World War Two, white people have been unequivocally defeated by coolness. What? Give me a break! For instance, although the Hanoverians or the Victorians with their sophistication, elegance and heightened received pronunciation may have been the mode or fashionable in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries respectively, however, they were never cool and definitely are uncool today. Today it’s double, in that Queen Victoria was not literally cool at her time, however, political correctness also determines that imperialism and colonialism are also uncool today. Therefore, Queen Victoria was doubly uncool. Unfortunately, the Victorians could never have imagined the Holocaust. Therefore, unfortunately the Victorians could never have imagined Elvis Presley. For instance, the cool African American way to address each other today is with: ‘Yo!’, which is as cool as the ismlessisms, however, the Victorians were extremely polite and reserved and greeted each other with: ‘How do you do?’ This demonstrates that even at the zenith of their power, white people were not cool. The British, Germans and Europeans did not and could not imagine anything ‘cool’ as they were digging the trenches in Flanders during World War One. They couldn’t have imagined that anything would ever have been better than what they were at that time. This is why I am worried about pagan European women on social media who proudly display their beautiful yet uncool (probably Victorian) traditional European folk costumes. Traditional European folk costumes such as those worn by English Morris Dancers are not cool in reality or now. What is in reality hip now is London and New York with their black-youth music and club scenes for example. The Queen, with her highness’s Queen’s English used to be the mode or fashionable, especially for such as Queen Victoria, in that all the nobility and the upper classes tried to copy and mimic the Queen’s English and mannerisms, however, this is no longer the case. Today, the English monarch is unique, and she practically has a one in seven billion accent that nobody (if they’re cool) tries to copy or mimic. The goal and trend of accent today is slang, common, black and cool. The English language today has bottomed out, because it probably has ismlessisms.
We have to remember all those people languishing in prison for all kinds of degrees of various sins. If we are being religious about prisoners don’t call it crime, call it sin. There must be millions of people all over the world languishing in prison for various sins, that we all deliberately forget and ignore and this in itself is a sin. We deliberately forget and ignore prisoners and this is totally selfish. When we are getting all hateful and venomous about the absolution of Adolf Hitler please remember all the prisoners around the globe who also need forgiveness. Every single person in prison has sinned and they are probably all laughing about the ismlessism and the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, because cutting the head of the snake automatically absolves or ameliorates all of their lesser sins by default. You have got to forgive prisoners eventually. Please try not to selfishly and deliberately ignore and forget the millions of prisoners around the world. What did the convict crab say to the free lobster? You shellfish bastard!
I have read two books on Taoism (or Daoism as it’s pronounced) and I have also read Confucius: And The World He Created, by Michael Schuman, and I have never been so gripped by a book, in all the books I have read to date, I have never read such an interesting book as this one about Confucius. Confucius is truly huge, and this got me thinking again. China has the world’s best food, a huge united country, a huge population, several religious isms, an up and coming superpower, its own civilisation and great men such as Confucius. What more is there to desire? Europe on the other hand has Adolf Hitler. Europe has Socrates with Adolf Hitler, Plato with Adolf Hitler, Aristotle with Adolf Hitler, Da Vinci with Adolf Hitler, the renaissance with Adolf Hitler and Jesus Christ with Adolf Hitler. Everything we Europeans have done and achieved throughout our recorded history has been tainted by Adolf Hitler. Plus we are a fading superpower, our countries are tiny and disunited and we are miserable. Therefore, we Europeans need to remove, ameliorate or de-stigmatise Adolf Hitler from the atmosphere, air, aether or space time continuum. That is exactly why I am doing what I do, that is exactly why I am researching, developing and publishing the ismlessism. I am using the ismlessism to remove or de-stigmatise the racism in the world. De-stigmating racism (i.e.: cutting the head off the snake) is not just Adolf Hitler’s absolution, it is also not just the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their countless acts of evil during World War Two, it is morally good for Europe. We Europeans can be great again. We can be Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and Jesus Christ again without Adolf Hitler. That is why I am pissing into the wind with the absolution of Adolf Hitler. No body listens to me. People are like why on Earth do you want to forgive Adolf Hitler? To me it’s a puerile question, because it is so obvious that there are huge benefits for Europeans with his genuine absolution or forgiveness. You will never cut the head off the snake or remove or de-stigmatise racism with anti-racism. The only way to do that is with the ismlessism and then we might get Socrates, and then we might get Plato, and then we might get Aristotle, and then we might get Jesus Christ.
The ismlessism got me thinking that it honestly changes your desires, for example, as you may know I DJ online as well, and up until the 12th April 2021 (when discovered the ismlessism), in a perfect universe (and if I was young again), all that I wanted to be was a DJ and trance artist. However, it has dawned on me that despite all of these puerile desires, if I was just a DJ or a trance artist today I would be unhappy. Because of the ismlessism I have no desire to be a DJ or a trance artist anymore, this is because for example, making a trance track, even if it’s a hit doesn’t help protect your own people, in fact a hit trance song doesn’t do anything at all apart from give some people on drugs a good time and nostalgia. Think about a trance artist who is making a hit trance track, think of the thoughts and feelings going through his or her head? It’s basically dreams of nothing more than vanity, money and fame. They don’t want to help protect their own people. I just don’t want to be that anymore and this is because the ismlessism is real, it does actually help protect white people and it is therefore, unbelievably modest, altruistic and noble. Now I just dream of being modestly saintly or like a philosopher such as Karl Marx or Plato. Although Paul Oakenfold and Danny Rampling changed the world with Acid House during the second summer of love back in 1988 with clubs such as Spectrum and Shoom in London, you cannot say specifically everything that you want to say with music or a trance track, as all your lyrics have to rhyme. Music does not protect anything it just inspires. Therefore, I would be unhappy if I was trapped as just a DJ or trance artist, not being able to control anything, really help protect white people and say what I need to say about the ismlessism. Don’t get me wrong I love DJing, however, I would never be just a DJ. Certainly not a young, inexperienced, desperately-aspiring DJ who doesn’t want to be anything else. I would first of all have a main day job such as a writer/philosopher who preaches the ismlessism, (which does actually help protect white people), and then just DJ, enjoy myself and let my hair down at night or on weekends as well. The ismlessism changes your desires. I mean as mentioned I went clubbing in 1999, places like Gatecrasher in Sheffield and I had a whale of a time, however, I just couldn’t do that anymore or not in the same way. In the 1990s it was all new, novel and for the first time and that combined with the millennium made the 1990s something to celebrate. However, I just couldn’t do that anymore. In the 1990s we were young and inexperienced and now in the 2020s we are much more mature and experienced. Because of the novelties and millennium the 1990s truly had something to celebrate, however, in the 2020s I just can’t see anything to celebrate, especially for white people. And that’s why I am no longer (or temporarily (for the foreseeable future)) no longer interested in being a DJ. Today, being in my 40s I am wiser and more mature and I am more interested in giving us a cause of something to celebrate. And this is what our politicians should do, that is, they should give their own people a cause of something to celebrate. However, since the Holocaust our politicians have given us no cause of something to celebrate. In fact, they seem to be only giving non-white people a cause for celebration at our white people’s expense. I used to think that being a superstar DJ was the best job in the world, but today I don’t really how that’s possible? DJs spin records and mix a small group of people at a party, whereas politicians mix the whole world. DJs control nothing. Not that I want to be one, politicians do something much bigger than DJing. Politicians determine the party and philosophers determine politicians. And politicians should give us all a cause of something to celebrate. Imagine what clubbing in the U.K. and Europe would be like today if there had been no world wars and a Holocaust? Sounds like a cause of something to celebrate to me? Therefore, I am no longer interested in being a DJ or making trance tracks today. If I was to go clubbing ever again, whether in this life or the next I would want something bigger, something more real and a cause of something to truly celebrate. I mean trance artists make music which influences clubbers, but what or who influences the mind, thoughts, beliefs and convictions of a trance artist? It is probably politicians who influence all of our brains? There’s kind of a hierarchical order of power, importance and influence and DJs and trance artists actually control very little. However, who influences the mind, thoughts, beliefs and convictions of politicians? It is probably philosophers such as Karl Marx, Friedrich Nietzsche, John Locke, Thomas Hobbes and Immanuel Kant. Philosophy gets a hard time, particularly from the scientific community. It’s as if when we say that something is philosophical that it means that something is not exactly real? However, as demonstrated by such as Karl Marx, the right kind of philosophy can influence those who influence and therefore, can change the world.
Schadenfreude is a very bad thing, especially having schadenfreude about Germany’s terrible Holocaust. It is wrong to have schadenfreude about Europe’s demise due to Germany’s disastrous Holocaust. Who does have schadenfreude about the Holocaust? I can tell and I know that Asians do not have any schadenfreude about Germany’s Holocaust. This is because Asians are civilised and Asians and Europeans are similar, both out of Africa, equal and also because Asians have many religious isms of their own. However, does America have schadenfreude about Germany’s ideological crisis, its Holocaust and Europe’s unfortunate demise? Hopefully not. Does Africa have schadenfreude about Germany’s Holocaust and downfall? Do ‘Antifa’ (antifascists) have any evil and malicious schadenfreude about Germany’s Holocaust and white people’s fall? Definitely yes! Please try not to have any schadenfreude about Germany’s Holocaust. We should all aim to fix the Holocaust, save Europe, remove or de-stigmatise racism in the world peacefully. One reason why I made the ismlessism a universal and coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism is because I know and can definitely tell that Asians like it, probably because they know it is a good hearted ’religious’ ism and because it solves the ism, namely racism. However, I think the main reason why I admire Asians and the reason why I made the ismlessism a universal coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism is because I can tell and I know that the Asians are noble and virtuous enough to not in any way have any sly or malicious schadenfreude regarding Germany’s Holocaust, in that Asians are not pleased that Europeans are in trouble and that Asians truly and genuinely want us Europeans to fix or de-stigmatise racism. That is why I made the ismlessism a universal coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism.
Eastern peace and Western violence.
As mentioned, I believe the racist mentality is basically that of a ‘Nietzschean warrior’, like Achilles, even if they just mean a little impoliteness or a little aggression. It’s like ridiculous to racists, they don’t see anything wrong with a little rudeness, racists are like ‘Come on!? You can’t even be impolite!?’ I think this is the point that racists and fascists are missing, in that Europeans have been far too violent and aggressive throughout history, particularly in the 20th century. Therefore, the point that the far-right are missing is that Europeans cannot use any aggression, hate or violence in any way at all, that is, in writing, thoughts or speech. Racists don’t see anything wrong with what they are doing, they see themselves as noble ‘Nietzschean warriors’, virtuous, brave and glorious, by protecting our women, country and race. Racists think in terms of philosophical or political isms such as Nazism, Communism and fascism. The ismlessism has had me thinking recently that unlike India who worshipped and adored the Buddha from day one and allowed Him to live a long, healthy and peaceful life, that we violent westerners quickly committed deicide by nailing our God to the Cross! What would the world have been like if there had been no crucifixion? What would the world have been like if we westerners had allowed Jesus Christ to live a long, healthy and peaceful life like the Buddha? Would Europe have been a generally more peaceful continent? Probably. Would the Holocaust had happened? Probably not. India is so much more peaceful than Europe. Save Islam, the west (or Europe) is so much more violent and aggressive than India, China and Asia as a whole, as demonstrated by the crucifixion, two world wars and the Holocaust. This is where is the ismlessism comes in, because it simultaneously hits at least two birds with one stone. Firstly, the ismlessism removes or de-stigmatises racism, secondly the ismlessism removes the desire of cool non-white Ismlessists to want to destroy or conquer Europe, therefore, the ismlessism brings peace and non-violence to the world. The ismlessism changes people like me, and turns them away from political or philosophical isms such as Nazism and fascism and makes them unbelievably peaceful, saintly and non-violent like Mahatma Gandhi. White people don’t need political leaders such as For Britain’s Anne Marie Waters, Britain First’s Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen and the English Defence League’s Tommy Robinson. (In fact, note the last three have all spent time in prison for aggressive behaviour or speech). White people are not allowed political leaders! What white people need is lower class, peaceful, nonviolent and good hearted leaders like Mahatma Gandhi. No one listens to the Archbishop of Canterbury, because he is Protestant, what we need is lower class, nonviolent and peaceful leaders that live by example and come out of nowhere. Trust me, excepting Antifascists, all those peaceful, nonviolent and anti-racist politicians, liberals and PC brigade (that you racists hate) are not that bad, they are just not removing or de-stigmatising the ism, namely racism, plus they are not an official or formal ism.
What I have achieved.
So you know that Adolf Hitler is Ismless and thee switched on cool Ismlessist, and that by making him Ismless and the coolest Ismlessist is how to prove that there is no racism in him and therefore, this is his absolution for white people. Most importantly it is white people who need to forgive Adolf Hitler. It is actually white people who determine the course of events, and because white people do not forgive Adolf Hitler and because they are anti-racist, therefore, the whole world does not forgive Adolf Hitler and is anti-white. Because white people do not forgive Adolf Hitler, they are actually anti-white themselves, and therefore, the entire world is anti-white. If the majority of white people forgave Adolf Hitler and were pro-white, things would turn out very differently indeed. You also know that I wrote an (erroneous) 87,000 word essay and that as a result of that essay I discovered the ismlessism, which is the true absolution of Adolf Hitler. Obviously, I would like to go down or be known as the discoverer of the ismlessism and the absolution of Adolf Hitler, however, the ismlessism probably will not stop there? For example, Sir Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin in a petri dish or simply ‘antibacterial action’, however, it took many other very intelligent unsung heroes to concentrate penicillin enough for it to be effective and to manufacture it on an industrial scale. However, penicillin is important enough that it doesn’t really matter who gets the most credit, it just needs doing very quickly for the benefit of all of humankind. Also, although Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto and discovered or invented Communism, it took Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin to turn it into a worldwide revolution. Like Marxism, do Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin also get ‘isms’ suffixed to the end their surnames? Yes. Budush! Therefore, although I am the discoverer of the ismlessism and extreme forgiveness, it doesn’t matter as we may perhaps need heroic figures such as Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin down the line somewhere to turn the ismlessism into a revolution and a reality? And like penicillin it is potentially so important that it just needs doing. Therefore, I just wanted to make sure you know what I believe I have achieved. By making Adolf Hitler a buffalo soldier dreadlock rasta, I have made Adolf Hitler cool, therefore, I believe that I have enabled or made it possible for everyone on Earth to be able to easily forgive Adolf Hitler. I believe I have cut the head off the snake, removed the racism from Adolf Hitler which is therefore, his absolution, which leads to the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two, as well as the relative forgiveness of all of our minor or petty sins by default. In theory there should be no problems or obstacles too high in the universe. To reiterate, I have made Adolf Hitler cool, and I have normalised his absolution and made it infinitely easier for everyone and anyone to forgive him and the other sinners of the world too.
Before I understood that the ismlessism was a coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism, I initially changed the symbol for the ismlessism quite frequently, and not being entirely happy with the symbol for the ismlessism, I tried many things which worked in different ways, for example the Yin-Yang symbol which worked however, the Yin-Yang symbol actually means something quite deep and complex and obviously other than the artistic or creative qualities it has no actual bearing or relation to the ismlessism whatsoever. The Volk borrowed the swastika from Jainism and what did that mean? Therefore, I have really racked my brains about what the ismlessism is and how to fundamentally visualise or represent it? I came to the premature conclusion that the ismlessism is basically formless, unrepresentable and unvisualisable? Is it invisible? However, I did actually come up with a symbol that indirectly represents what the ismlessism does as opposed to what it is. The ismlessism cuts the head off the snake and that is one way to indirectly represent or visualise it, however, I think a better symbol is a general prohibition sign over the word ’ism’ or ‘isms’, which means no isms or the removal of isms. I believe that another good symbol for the ismlessism and the entire goal of this essay is the union ring or circle of eternal white wholeness through the reciprocal forgiveness of racists and anti-racists. However, ultimately this essay is about Jesus Christ’s forgiveness and teachings such as Luke 6:27-36, therefore, the symbol could simply be the Christian cross? Or perhaps because the main premise of this essay is that we should complete the circuit through the reciprocal forgiveness of racist and anti-racist white people, therefore, the symbol could be a simple electrical circuit diagram? Or because the ismlessism came from a study of the humanities, perhaps the symbol is a diagram of all the humanties disciplines. On another note, is it even a question of what symbolises the ismlessism? Or is it a question of what does the ismlessism symbolise? I have come to the conclusion that whatever image, object, shape or art best represents, visualises or symbolises the ismlessism directly or fundamentally, that what is also important is that the ismlessism should stand for and symbolise world peace.
As you may know I take a lot of inspiration from Mahatma Gandhi, especially regarding nonviolence and I discovered some amazing quotes of Mahatma Gandhi that really fortify me and give me much confidence regarding forgiveness.
“The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong.“
“Hate the sin, love the sinner.”
If forgiveness is the attribute of the strong how strong are we switched on cool Ismlessists with the true absolution of Adolf Hitler? How strong are we switched on cool Ismlessists with cutting the head off the snake and the (potential) ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness of all lesser sins? And how weak are our politicians who couldn’t forgive Adolf Hitler if their life depended on it?
Do listen to people who say things like this:
“To forgive is to set a prisoner free and discover that the prisoner was you.”
Lewis B. Smedes
Don’t listen to people who say things like this:
“Forgiveness has nothing to do with absolving a criminal of his crime. It has everything to do with relieving oneself of the burden of being a victim–letting go of the pain and transforming oneself from victim to survivor.”
C.R. Strahan is weak because he can’t or won’t dare go there and absolve a criminal of his crime. Ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness has everything to do with ‘absolving a criminal of his crime’ because it cuts the head off the snake, therefore, automatically absolving all of our minor or petty sins. When C.R. Strahan says ‘It has everything to do with relieving oneself of the burden of being a victim–letting go of the pain and transforming oneself from victim to survivor’ he is relatively only talking about or dealing with such as a cheating spouse. Although you may feel hurt if your spouse cheats on you and has a baby behind your back, think of the Holocaust victims and survivors. They are the only ‘victims’ and ‘survivors’ that we care about. Although having an affair can be grounds for divorce and does get legal regarding finances, custody and property, it is not a crime. Therefore, beyond schadenfreude gossip no one cares about your cheating spouse. Suck it up! People are not interested in your cheating spouse, however, they are interested in the absolution of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. As of December 2021 I have read over 150 books since August 2016, I have put years into researching how to make it up for the Holocaust to the Jews and how to genuinely forgive (never justify) Adolf Hitler, therefore, believe me when I say I know how to forgive. Contrary to what C.R. Strahan says, it has everything to do with absolving a criminal of his crime, because it cuts the head off the snake, therefore, there is hope for the rest us in the forgiveness of such as Adolf Hitler. Real, true, ultimate and actual forgiveness is the absolution of Adolf Hitler. Forgiving a cheating spouse is not real forgiveness. Don’t think that by practicing petty and everyday forgiveness that you are achieving something. You have to forgive Adolf Hitler. You have to practice ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness. Mahatma Gandhi said things which were good for Indians, but no European religious or political leader has ever said anything good for Europeans since the Holocaust. You can’t say anything anti-racist and simultaneously say something good for Europeans. And you can’t say anything racist period. So what do we do? Say something about the ismlessism and non-racialism! Switched on cool anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch Ismlessists are neither racist nor anti-racist, they are non-racialists, they are in between and they have all the humour. Europeans need many Mahatma Gandhi-style religious or political leaders of their own that actually say something positive and good for Europeans.
Whether as an anti-racist white person you want to admit it or not, anti-racism and political correctness will not stop until white skin is inferior and being white is considered the lurgy. We must stop or reverse this trend before anti-racism and political correctness get out of hand. Therefore, the absolution of Adolf Hitler is an opportunity. Adolf Hitler may be a big problem for white people, however, we can turn that problem into an opportunity. It’s an opportunity to reap all of the benefits locked in Adolf Hitler for white people, as if Holocaust never happened. It’s something to do. Helping to protect white people is something to do. Removing or de-stigmatising the racism in the world is something only white people can do. It’s white people’s opportunity.
It’s easy, as mentioned the ismlessism does something, it cuts the head off the snake, similarly you can easily become a switched on cool Ismlessist by reading this entire essay and if you subsequently believe in the correctness and benefits of the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler for Europe and white people, then you are therefore, a confirmed switched on cool Ismlessist. All that you have to do to be a switched on cool Ismlessist is forgive Adolf Hitler. Becoming a switched on cool Ismlessist is as easy as becoming anti-racist, it’s simply a thought, an identity and you just pick it up. The only issue is that the adjective Ismlessist is not yet common knowledge. Perhaps if the noun ismlessism and the adjectives ismless and Ismlessist were entered into the Oxford English Dictionary, this would help officially implement and promulgate it across the board? I honestly believe that you can teach infants about the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and all subordinate the Nazis with or through the ismlessism. Therefore, the ismlessism could be taught in nurseries, primary schools and secondary schools. Ironically, that is the beauty, power and strength of isms such as the ismlessism because they can be taught in nurseries, primary schools and secondary schools, as opposed to universities. The earlier you learn something such as the ismlessism, the better and more powerful the effect is for the country or continent as a whole. Ironically, advanced philosophical isms such as meta-ethical relativism which can only be taught at universities are therefore actually very weak and powerless. Therefore, that is another way in which the ismlessism can be instituted, promulgated and implemented nationally and across the continent, by officially making it a part of the national curriculum and teaching it in nurseries, primary schools and secondary schools. I mean children are still indoctrinated in Confucianism in East Asia. Another way is through television and the mainstream media, believe me as a person who cares about white people I know how powerful the mainstream media is, if they want something to rise or happen, they can make it happen. Again, the ismlessism so simple, it is not an advanced technical thing that is hard to articulate or communicate through television. So the are many ways that the ismlessism can be officially instituted, promulgated and implemented in the UK and Europe. The good news is that you can actually help save and protect white people without being a racist. It’s called being a switched on cool Ismlessist. Non-white people would probably say regarding the statement: ‘Non-racialism is the methadone of racism’, that ‘it’s still racist!’ Erm. No it’s not! That’s the whole point of the ismlessism, it removes or de-stigmatises racism.
Non-racialism is a bit like being a non-smoker, (although you might sneakily have a cheeky biffter from time to time). It’s like being offered a racist cigarette from a 60-a-day, lung-diseased racist and replying:
“No thanks! I don’t smoke!”
Equally non-racialism is a bit like being a person who never takes narcotics. It’s like being offered an anti-racist syringe from a junky smack-head anti-racist and replying:
“Get fucked! You… @#$€$… scum bag! £&@#!!!” 🤬
As mentioned the ismlessism is neither racist nor anti-racist, it is non-racialism, therefore, I just wanted to reiterate that anti-racism is inaccurate, as it hits the wrong people in that it generally attacks all white people (including the British), regardless of involvement in the Holocaust. Therefore, it is much better and much more accurate to be loyally Judeo-Christian, to swear your unswerving loyalty to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and to be anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch, as that hits the right people (the Germans) and the root of the cause of the Holocaust, that is, paganism, heathenism, anti-Abrahamism and most importantly anti-Christianity. Therefore, don’t be anti-racist, be anti-pagan, anti-Aryan, anti-Völkisch and non-racialist. Being anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch is still an ‘anti’ it’s just that even people who care about white people can do it. Therefore, I would also like to state that I am not and I am never doing taken for granted anti-racism. All taken for granted anti-racists, including governments, the police, politicians and media etc, (who also protect and harbour violent, left-wing extremist groups such as Antifa), currently (and since World War Two) have preached and enforced taken for granted anti-racism. I have never been a taken for granted anti-racist, I am more of a non-racialist. We should never say that we are anti-racists or that we are doing taken for granted anti-racism, but that we are switched on, cool anti-pagn, anti-Völkisch Ismlessists and non-racialists and that we profess non-racialism. Mainstream politicians being devout taken for granted anti-racists, do not necessarily have to change absolutely everything they do or believe, only that they should renounce anti-racism, identify as switched on, cool anti-pagan, anti-Völkisch Ismlessists and non-racialists and that they profess non-racialism. The ismlessism is a lot of what you taken for granted anti-racists want, only it is much better and a bit more formal to do it with a ‘propa’ ism. You taken for granted anti-racists are are not simultaneously helping or caring about white people, whereas the ismlessism and non-racialism do. The way that you taken for granted anti-racists do anti-racism, without fixing or de-stigmatising the ism, namely racism, only makes non-white people hate us even more. The ismlessism came entirely from the right, non-racialism and caring about white people, but it converted me into a convinced, believing and confirmed anti-pagan, anti-Völkisch, anti-heathen and non-racialist, switched on cool Ismlessist. We will only do this with non-racialism and the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. However, ultimately, and after much consideration, I come to conclusion that switched on cool Ismlessists are neither racist nor anti-racist, they are non-racialists and in between.
I believe the causes and reasons behind Islamic terrorism, Antifascism and why such as the British people were terrorised with such as grooming gangs over recent decades by predominantly Asian men is basically because of the Germanic or Volkish blonde vanity of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the self exaltation of the sieg heil and because white people have not fixed or de-stigmatised the ism, namely racism. The ism, namely racism causes racial hatred and anger in the world, and such as the Islamic terrorists, Antifascists and the Asian rape gangs do what they do out anger or hate for white people because white people have a serious problem, in that they have not fixed the the Holocaust. As demonstrated by such as the September 11th attacks in America in 2001 and the frequency of smaller scale acts of Islamic terror and violence in Europe, anti-racism is clearly not working and is not the solution to racism and world peace. What I would say to racists, is that although the ismlessism is not always and constantly racist (it is non-racialist), it may at least stop such as Islamic terrorism, grooming gangs, the hatred of Europeans by non-white people and it may cool down and neutralise Antifascists. We need to accommodate and see eye to eye with Antifascists because the pagan and heathen, anti-Christian Volk were infinitely worse than Muslims, black people, BLM and all those things that you racists hate. Get real about the evil pagan and heathen, anti-Christian Volk and stop misplacing your loyalty on Nazism and misplacing your hatred on black people. Whether you like it or not coloured people are cool today. They have never done anything wrong and are not doing anything wrong. We white people have no one to blame but ourselves for our own demise, except the purely evil pagan and heathen, anti-Christian Volk. Admit that and the ismlessism will liberate you. The ismlessism is a new coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism and if it was instituted in Europe it would probably remove the racial hatred and anger in the world and prevent the hatred and anger thereby arising in Antifascists, Asian and African men, thereby preventing things such as Islamic terrorism, grooming and anti-white hate.
I want to say something to white racists, particularly those on social media such as Gab, and it concerns such as my own complimentary quote regarding the qualities or properties of the ismlessisms, which is:
“To be cool, hip and with it, say your ismlessisms! Fash is the ismlessism of fascism. Bud is the ismlessism of Buddhism. A black or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism. Ismlessisms are colourful, beautiful and deep which reflects coloured people.”Graham Cammock
What I want to say is that by hating and fighting with non-white people as you do on Gab, only shows your insecurities as white people. By using hate and insulting images and words, such as fried chicken, primates and the insulting adjectives only shows that you are insecure as white people. The Victorians didn’t even need to hate, argue or fight with non-white people, and if they did it was only through actual military combat (which is uncool today). I believe that as hateful racists, you feel that if you are ever nice to non-white people it must mean that you want to miscegenate or race mix? Well what if it doesn’t absolutely mean that? Just because with the colourful, beautiful and deep ismlessisms I have done something nice for and complimented coloured people, does not mean that I want to choose a partner outside of my own race. Like I said hating and fighting with non-white people only shows your insecurities as white people. Surely there is a way that we can be complimentary to non-white people without surrendering everything that we are and own as white people, such as our women, our governments and our countries? You are more likely to get what you want as white people or racists by being nice, polite and complimentary to non-white people, as opposed to obviously using hate against and fighting with them which only shows your insecurities. Therefore, because it is white people who have had a Holocaust and on whom the onus therefore lies, the idea of this essay is that if we do something nice for non-white people first, then they may be nice to us? They may allow us to sensiblly and not insanely ensure that we have eternal ethnically-white governments in white countries for example. They may freely choose themselves not to come to white countries in significant numbers and if they like you they may appreciate your desires, stop bullying you and respect you enough to leave you alone. They may lose the desire to want to conquer Europe and white people. You are more likely to attain these things if you are nice and complimentary to non-white people first. Like the British, be mature, spruce, clean shaven and polite imperialists; not immature and hateful social media sock puppets.
The Hitler Switch.
There exists in this world or universe a childish and eternal binary switch. This switch is philosophical or metaphorial, but it is as real as E = MC2. Special relativity is real, scientific and fundamental and it will give you enormous amounts of energy, however, this eternal switch would give you a continent, an empire or even a world. This is the simplest kind of on/off binary switch in the universe, it does one of two things, either on or off. This binary switch is the eternal racism/anti-racism switch, it is the eternal white/black switch. However, ultimately we need to cut to the chase and we need to talk brass tacks… it’s the Hitler switch! However, because we have identified the Hitler switch and that it is a problem for white people and because it is so simple, that is, just two things or 50/50, it may give us white people the power to ultimately get a grip of the ism, namely racism. There is no in between the two extreme opposites on this eternal switch, there are no degrees, gradations or increments. There is no dimmer between light and dark. As you will see ownership or possession of this eternal racist/anti-racist binary switch is very powerful and influential as it allows us – particularly us (ahem) non-racialists – to think in, interact with and influence eternity and both sides of life. Therefore, the eternal switch can also be thought of as the eternal life/afterlife switch. The switch used to be eternally and confidently switched on or onto white or light, only that Adolf Hitler through his Holocaust flipped the binary switch eternally and irretrievably off or onto anti-racism, black or darkness. I for one am absolutely sick to death of this spastically simple, two-mode, eternal-binary switch. The thickness of this imbecilic two-mode switch absolutely represents the intelligence of Adolf Hitler. Therefore, what I want to propose is that can we not create or invent a metaphorical thrust lever or power lever, as in an airplane cockpit with degrees, increments or levels between racism and anti-racism? Or what about a nice big adjustable circular knob, as in a volume dial on an audio device, with levels or gradations between white and black? That would be so much better than an annoyingly thick, eternal and two-mode on/off binary switch. A switch is extreme, it is extreme between racism and anti-racism and it is extreme between white and black. With a switch you can only be one extreme, either racist or anti-racist, Nazi or Anti-fascist and there is no in between. We do not want extremes. Remember, only the Victorians with their paraffin lamps were impressed by on/off electrical light switches. And God knows we don’t want to be Victorian today. On the topic of the Victorians, the light switch was invented by John Henry Holmes (1857 – 1935) an English electrical engineer, in 1884. Therefore, even the Victorians understood an electrical switch; and this is ironic because it was the Victorians who blew up the entire world with the two world wars and the Holocaust. Therefore, the solution to racism requires a lot more thought and intellect than simply the diametrically opposite antithesis (as in anti-racism). Non-racialism is in between racism and anti-racism, it is analogous to an airplane thrust lever or an adjustable volume knob. To be a non-racialist means that you are not an eternal anti-racist, but it also means that you are not racist all of the time. As demonstrated by violent Islamic terrorism and wildfire-starting and angry migrants, anti-racism is obviously not working for Europe. Therefore, analogously that is what I hope to propose with the ismlessism, which is neither racist nor anti-racist but is non-racialist and in between. Hopefully the ismlessism would have a spectrum of colours between light and dark and shades of grey between white and black. I believe that switched on cool Ismlessists are neither white nor black, I believe they are neutral. What I would like to say to our treacherous and eternally switched onto anti-racism white politicians, is do they honestly want to be permanently, eternally and irretrievably switched onto anti-racism in the afterlife without a choice? Think about it, will you not honestly want to be switched onto white for a change in the afterlife? What if there is a wonderful white Victorian Empire in heaven? Won’t you want a nice incremental thrust lever or adjustable knob instead? What I would like to say to low IQ lower-class racists on Gab, is that to be racist is to be permanently, eternally, irretrievably (and arrogantly) switched onto white. However, because of Adolf Hitler, being eternally switched onto white (which is racism) is hateful. Being eternally switched onto white or racism oozes hate and negativity. Only skinheads and thugs are eternally switched onto white or racism and this is heinous. Prior to the Holocaust, being eternally switched onto white was not hateful. Our Victorian ancestors were eternally switched onto white, however, Nazism and racism made being eternally switched onto white very hateful. Therefore, don’t be permanently or eternally switched onto white, be an in between non-racialist, switch back and forth (like I have constantly done for 5 years), vacillate and try to create a smooth power lever or adjustable knob between white and black or between racism and anti-racism. Do you honestly want to be permanently, eternally and irretrievably switched onto white or racism in the afterlife without a choice? What if there are super cool and hip parties in heaven and you would like the option attend? I believe that Jesus Christ can probably create a two mode and eternal ‘switch hell’ for both racists and anti-racists in the afterlife. Now you’re this and now you’re that! What you want is space and time between the two modes of the switch. Even animals such as pigs and chimpanzees can understand an on/off switch. Racism is an eternal switch, this 50/50 switch is so tiny and so small it is unbelievably irritating and it creates hate and malice because it means that people are simply and maliciously opposite to each other. We need to remove this eternal on/off switch for more reasons than racism or anti-racism, what about higher arts, civilisations and culture? Even though the 21st century seems so smart and advanced, with such as Apple Inc. and Steve Jobs, because of Adolf Hitler, ultimately our political and philosophical level today as human beings is this tiny and eternal 50/50 binary switch. Even though the world seems frustratingly chaotic, complex and random, it always boils down to this simple, two-mode on/off binary switch. Whether it’s stentorian anti-racists and Anti-fascists demonstrating, screaming at and assaulting racists or idiot racists applying hate on social media, yep, you got it, surprise surprise, some advanced and smart 21st century crusty flipped the childish eternal switch onto Nazi mode. It doesn’t matter who you are, how big you are or how high you are, for example, even if you are Steve Jobs or Bill Gates, you cannot overcome the eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch. There is nothing you can do about it. In fact, it seems that the higher you are the less you can do about the Hitler switch. You have no option, you get half of the switch and that’s the end of it. You get the negative half or the off mode without an option. It’s like a girl. On another note, as I have said, if you are kind, polite and complimentary to non-white people first, then they may surprise you? Whereas, if you are eternally and arrogantly switched onto white, they may simply and maliciously do the opposite of whatever you want. Therefore, despite the internet, iPhones and iPads, that is as advanced as humans are in the 21st century. We are politically and philosophically stupid. As I said, if you are nice to non-white people first, then they might be nice to you in return? For example they may freely choose themselves not to come to white countries in significant numbers, if they like you they may appreciate white people’s desires, stop bullying you and respect Europeans enough to leave us alone. However, how the imbecilic and eternal switch usually works is that if you are not polite and complimentary or even worse use hate or malice, non-white people will obviously and simply do the opposite of whatever you want and they will therefore, get on immigration and step up their efforts to speed up their colonisation of Europe. This is the eternal, binary racism/anti-racism switch, which is how planet Earth functions in the supposedly advanced 21st century. Racists and anti-racists, white people and black people are simply and imbecilically, diametrically opposite, and maliciously antithetical to each other like a hateful, simple and eternal binary on/off switch. The Hitler switch is unbelievably powerful and influential.
I hope that by reading about the eternal and binary racism/anti-racism switch above, that you can believe me when I tell you that although I care about white people and that my eternal motive is to protect my own beloved people, I can absolutely guarantee you that I am not personally myself ever permanently, eternally and arrogantly switched onto white (all the time). This is racist. This oozes hate. I am a non-racialist which means that although I am not eternally anti-racist, I am not alway racist either. I’m okay. Being switched onto white is not wrong, but being eternally and permanently switched onto white probably is? Only neo-Nazis, skinheads and thugs are permanently and eternally switched onto white mode (and to the death) and this is obviously heinous. However, antifascists need to make the distinction between people who care about white people such as me and Anne Marie Waters (of For Britain) and skinheads and thugs. There is obviously a huge difference. I am never and never will be hateful. Therefore, I am not eternally racist. Like flipping a small coin or like a little frog hopping around I easily flip back and forth between the two racist/anti-racist modes of the eternal binary switch. I am vacillating, flipping and switching easily and frequently back and forth between the white/black modes of the eternal binary switch in order to try and create a nice smooth thrust lever or adjustable volume knob. Therefore, although in this life and the next I may be more so white or switched onto white most of the time, I am never eternal, I am 3/4 of the airplane power lever or 90% of the adjustable circular volume dial and that is not an eternal binary 50/50 switch.
If anyone asks you the question “Are you a racist?” Reply: “Well, I am not an anti-racist!” They will therefore, ignorantly, obviously and dumbly respond: “So you are a racist then?” Then you can reply: “No it’s not an eternal binary switch!”, ”I am a non-racialist, and they are in between.” You can then go on further to say: “Only skinheads, thugs and Nazis are permanently and eternally switched onto white or racism, I am never permanently or eternally switched onto white or racism because that is arrogant and hateful!” You can then say: “I am more like an airplane thrust lever or a circular adjustable volume knob, which moves smoothly in between racism and anti-racism!” You can finish by saying: “I am in between, I am a switched on cool Ismlessist!”
The Tolerance Switch.
In sensible doses intolerance makes the man, like salt a little goes a long way, as in medieval, early modern and Victorian European men, whereas too much is revolting, as in Adolf Hitler. However, the same fundamental truth remains that a little intolerance makes the man. Today the Muslims are the real men on Earth because they have quite a lot of intolerance, especially regarding religion, infidels and homosexuality. Up until the 1960s European men also had intolerance of homosexuality and obviously and directly this makes masculinity. It’s an unbelievably sad fact that we 21st century European ‘men’ are too afraid to talk about intolerance of such as homosexuality, it’s almost as if masculinity (or intolerance) is illegal, however, as stated, like salt, a little intolerance is masculine and goes a long way. We European ‘men’ need to breakdown these effeminate barriers of tyrannically enforced softness and tolerance and regain maybe 10-15% of our intolerance, in order to regain our masculinity and manhood. I think the 2021 Amazon prime movie called ’Everybody’s Talking About Jamie’, a coming-of-age stage musical that follows a 16-year-old teenager as he overcomes prejudice, beats the bullies and steps out of the darkness to become a drag queen, exemplifies and represents this new post-millennium generation of British ‘men’. It’s almost as if intolerance of such as homosexuality is carried out or practiced for no reason or is unnecessary, however, I believe such irrational, ignorant and even arrogant intolerance (in small doses) does actually make the man. Think about the Muslim men such as the Taliban. Western people complain that Muslims are barbaric or trapped in a medieval state of existence, this is because for example, they are extremely intolerant of such as paganism and homosexuality. It almost seems that Muslims are intolerant for no reason, yet it is in fact this very intolerant medieval attitude which makes the Muslims the last remaining real men on Earth in the 21st century. Tolerance is only something that white people have to do and have to accept and it means that white people have to be tolerant of their own conquest and subjugation. Tolerance means nothing more. Non-white people make up 92% of human beings on planet Earth and they have no demographic problems or threats in their own countries. Like Barack Obama, white Americans are symbolically tolerant of their own conquest and subjugation in their own country. White people are very naive if they do not believe that Muslims do not harbour any evil desires and plans to conquer Europe and America. White people are very naive and trusting if they believe that other non-white people do not harbour any malicious dreams and plans to conquer and subjugate white people in their own countries. Are white South Africans having a good time? Will you even admit that farm murders in South Africa are happening? Is the plight of white South Africans a cover up? It’s not like indigenous South Africans were tolerant of a minority white government. It’s not like the Indians tolerated British rule. I know this is slightly unfair, however, the exact same thing is happening to white people, only slowly through demographics and democracy. To be intolerant of non-white politicians, MPs, presidents and PMs in America and Europe is no different to resistance to apartheid or British rule in India. It’s not like Muslims are known for their tolerance, it’s not like the Saudis would tolerate Christianity or thousands of churches and millions of Christian immigrants in Saudi Arabia. It’s not like South Africa, India or China would tolerate people of European ethnicity in their respective governments. Therefore, ultimately and ashamedly, what white people have to accept is that most non-white people (such as Muslims) are actually intolerant. It’s a time and numbers game. Through immigration and democracy, in ‘time’, non-whites will demographically out ‘number’ whites in their own countries and then white people will face an apartheid and will in effect be permanently and eternally barred from governing their own countries, they will lose their independence and self-determination. In ‘time’ and once the ‘numbers’ are correct, white people be conquered and subjugated in their own countries. You need to be eternal. You need to guarantee and facilitate eternal white governments in white countries. You need to eternally flip the Hitler switch! All of this white people have to tolerate. For some reason toleration today for white people is also an eternal, binary on/off switch, it is an eternal 50/50 intolerant/tolerant switch and there is no in between. Because Adolf Hitler was eternally 100% intolerant, therefore, our treacherous white politicians today (or post-Holocaust) are eternally 100% tolerant. There is no such thing as eternal 100% intolerance or eternal 100% tolerance. Only a woman is eternally 100% tolerant. To be eternally 100% tolerant means that you are tolerant of your own conquest and subjugation. As I did with the eternal binary racism/anti-racism switch, I want to propose a sensible and sane ‘airplane thrust lever’ or an ‘adjustable volume knob’ with a spectrum or shades of grey between intolerance and tolerance, that is, instead of an eternal and spastic binary on/off-intolerance/tolerance switch. I am not eternally 100% intolerant, for example, I love authentic foreign food restaurants and takeaways in our country, such as Chinese and Indian and hence I wholeheartedly welcome Chinese and Indian immigrant chefs and this kind of positive multiculturalism into our country, but that is about it. Neither am I eternally 100% tolerant, in that I am not gay or a woman who tolerates non-white prime ministers or members of Parliament in the UK. Therefore, we need to remove the idiotic and eternal binary intolerant/tolerant switch and be more like an ‘airplane thrust lever’ or an ‘adjustable volume knob’ between intolerance and tolerance. I am like 85% tolerant or 15% intolerant for example. Let me guess you are 100% tolerant? Go for it! That’s what white people need today, they need a little or an ounce of intolerance, like they used to have. Early modern and Victorian white imperialists and colonialists had an ounce of intolerance, that is how they were so successful. We need an ounce also, for example, to guarantee eternal white governments in white countries. White people have to be eternal, white politicians have to create eternal laws in their own countries which guarantee eternal white governments and eternal white populations. To accomplish this, white politicians need to feel the butterflies in their stomachs, feel the rush and nerves of the chilling winds of eternity. White politicians need to get up to eternity and stand up for eternity and for their own people. As a long-term non-racialist, I can assure you that I would literally envy such an ‘eternal politician’ who created such guaranteeing eternal laws. Such a politician would be eternally brave and heroic on both sides of life. This is what we switched on cool ismlessists and (ahem) non-racialists live, breath and dream for. We would all be second place to such an ‘eternal politician’. Therefore, white politicians either need to eternally flip the switch or get a nice smooth airplane thrust lever or an adjustable volume knob between racism and anti-racism and white and black
Just to reiterate the importance of eternal politics, I am not a huge fan of democracy as everything seems temporary. For example, presidents and prime ministers only receive on average about 8-10 years in which to accomplish great things for their countries. Also, referendums also seem temporary on one side and eternal on the other, as for instance with the Scottish Independence Referendum. As you know the Scottish people voted no to independence in 2014, however, it’s only a temporary truce, as the Scottish National Party (SNP) will likely push for another referendum in 20 years or so. However, if the Scottish people had voted yes to independence, the verdict would have been eternal for Britain. Hence, I have instinctive antipathy for temporary democracy. As stated, we therefore need to create eternal politics in order to guarantee eternal white governments and eternal homogeneous white populations in white countries, therefore, we need brave and heroic eternal white politicians who think and act in eternity and on both side of life to create eternal white laws for all European people on planet Earth.
Regarding the gradations, degrees or levels (as in the airplane ‘thrust lever’ or ‘adjustable volume knob’) between racism and anti-racism and between intolerance and tolerance, for example, there is a huge difference between Nazis and racists, as you can be a bit racist and loathe Nazis, and there is a huge difference between racists and non-racialists, as you can be a little racist now and again yet refrain from being eternally and arrogantly switched onto white, however, absolutely nobody makes the difference and how the imbecilic eternal 50/50 switch works is that if any white person shows the slightest or mildest patriotism or defence, malicious anti-racists and anti-fascists instantly and automatically flip the Hitler switch and scream at or label such white people Nazis. There is also a difference between anti-fascists and anti-racists, as you can be anti-racist yet not hate white people, and there is a difference between anti-racists and non-racialists, as you can sometimes be a little black or cool without being permanently and eternally switched onto anti-racism. Therefore, to make the distinction between Nazis and racists is cool. Therefore, to create gradations, degrees or levels between racism and anti-racism instead of an imbecilic eternal binary 50/50 switch would definitely be beneficial. Also, if we have definite gradations, degrees or levels, some imbecilic white people might be less inclined to be anti-Semitic as they may have the option to be non-racialist for example, therefore, they may feel less inclined to have to eternally (and suicidally) flip the Hitler switch onto extreme Nazism and anti-Semitism, in some kind of ultimate or antithetical sense and the eternal eradication of anti-Semitism is an effect that I would like to see.
Note: if you do flip the Hitler switch onto white it does not instantly (or indeed ever) mean that you are a Nazi or that you are going to carry out another Holocaust. GHEEZE! It’s an absolute imbecile down here in the 21st century. Get some sense! Therefore, if you do flip the Hitler switch onto white get a flipping thrust lever!
Regarding the gradations or metaphorical thrust lever, I just wanted to point one thing out to anti-racists. How is it that you cannot tell the difference between (ahem) non-racialist white people and evil Nazis? How can you confuse patriotic, loyal and protective white people with Nazis? Just because I’m white, I passionately want to help protect my own people (including Jews) necessarily through the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, and just because I am humorous with Adolf Hitler obviously never means that I am a Nazi. Despite all my mistakes I have never been anti-Semitic. Despite my predilection for forgiveness humour I am never a Nazi.
Resistance and tolerance.
To be perfectly honest I told you a lie, the real first book that I ever read was The Power Of Kabbalah by Rabbi Yehuda Berg in 2006 when I was an imbecilic 25 year old. In The Power Of Kabbalah Rabbi Yehuda Berg teaches us how resistance to anger, hate, anxiety and difficult situations generates light and energy in us and in our lives. Like how forgiveness is hard, especially regarding Adolf Hitler, however, as I will prove, Jesus Christ’s teaching of Luke 6:27-36 of loving one’s enemies (especially between racist and anti-racist white people) is a lot of resistance and this action flips the switch and completes the circuit which generates energy and light. Please note that I am talking metaphorically or kabbalistically about electricity (I am sure that an electrician could do much better than I at philosophising with electricity), however, metaphorical and kabbalistic electricity is much more powerful than actual electricity. However, because the Hitler switch or the eternal racism/anti-racism switch is double and because it is a real electrical metaphor, it therefore, determines that such electrical values as resistance and tolerance can be applied to humans. For example, it may determine or prove that a little resistance regarding the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and a little intolerance regarding race and sexuality from white men completes the circuit, generates energy, light and creates a whole or union between all white people on planet Earth.
Four more things about the eternal and childish binary racist/anti-racist switch. First of all, philosophy influences those who influence, such as politicians and revolutionaries and that is about all it does. For example, Friedrich Nietzsche was very influential in Germany and on German ultra-nationalist politicians, however, Nietzsche did it over about 13 books, with such as his ‘transvaluation of values’ and his ‘master-slave morality’ (which if you think about it might be a switch?), however, if the Hitler switch is philosophical or metaphorical it is potentially unbelievably powerful and influential, because it either all goes your way or it all goes against your wishes. Second of all, another good point about the Hitler switch is that you can think in eternity or on both sides of life. For example, as a white person are you honestly eternally switched onto black or anti-racism on both sides of life and do you honestly eternally want to carry out miscegenation? Or are you just anti-racist in this life or down here Earth and hope to get a free ticket into a white heaven when you die in the afterlife? Well, with the eternal switch you can think in eternity or on both sides of life here and now. As I have warned and as I have stated I do not believe that to be eternally switched onto racism or white in life is a good idea, as only skin heads, thugs and racists do this. For example, have South African Boers been mind washed by nearly 30 years of native African rule and overbearing and powerful anti-racist government? Have South African Boers succumbed and eternally switched onto blackness and anti-racism on both sides of life and for eternity? Or are they all just looking forward to the afterlife and a sensible white heaven? However, unfortunately without the Hitler switch all that you can do is look forward to death and believe me, after years of experience that is a very depressing thought indeed. However, with the very powerful and influential eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch you do not have to wait until the afterlife or look forward to death, you can think in eternity and on both sides of life here and now. It is very comforting and liberating because you can make your eternal decision now. Thirdly, another good thing about the Hitler switch is that (especially as such as betrayed and beleaguered South African Boers) you can think in, interact with and influence eternity and both sides of life. We switched on cool ismlessists and non-racialists have this tremendously powerful ability because we can threaten (preferably in a well meant, jocular, magnanimous and forgiving way) treacherous anti-racist white politicians, outspoken anti-racists and Anti-fascists with being eternally switched off or onto negative, anti-racism, black or darkness, in this life and the next without a choice (while we revel in our eternal white paradise). I mean we can go around eternally switching people off (or onto anti-racism) that we feel deserve it, such as those white people who have eternally committed themselves to their anti-racism, such as treacherous white politicians and Anti-fascists (again preferably in a well intended, jocular, magnanimous and forgiving way). Honestly, do treasonous politicians such as David Cameron and Boris Johnson really and honestly want to be eternally switched onto anti-racism without a choice in the afterlife and on both sides life? Honestly, probably not. They probably want to get a free ticket into white heaven? To be honest, they probably don’t even think of the next life down here on Earth, therefore, that is all the more reason to use, have and possess the very powerful and influential eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch, down here on Earth and make your decision for eternity and on both sides of life. Make them swear it! Fourthly, this imbecilic and childish eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch actually is both sides of life! It is simply and childishly two things: life/afterlife or Earth/heaven. It’s a spastic!
The best thing about the eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch (which we switched on cool ismlessists and non-racialists own, possess and wield) is that despite their militantly anti-racist words and deeds, we can call the eternal bluff of anti-racist white politicians, outspoken anti-racists and Anti-fascists in eternity and on both sides of life. Surely everybody is a closet racist to the tiniest degree? I mean most white people (including most white politicians) choose white partners. Why? Because they much prefer white partners. Just about every white person is a closet racist (to a degree) when it comes to natural selection. Therefore, because we switched on cool ismlessists and non-racialists own, possess and wield the Hitler switch, this determines that we have the best possible hand in poker (or the strongest hand on this side of life and the next), that is, the royal flush and therefore, we can put in all of our chips and call the miserable bluff of the militantly anti-racist white politicians, outspoken anti-racists and Anti-fascists on this side of life and the next, who are sat there with the worst hand in poker (or on both sides of life), which is a high card. This is how switched on cool ismlessists and non-racialists can think in, interact with and influence eternity and both sides of life, because we have the best hand in poker (Jesus Christ and all white women) on this side of life and the next. Therefore, we switched on cool ismlessists and non-racialists can threaten anti-racist white politicians, outspoken anti-racists and Anti-fascists with being eternally switched onto anti-racism and black in this life and the next without a choice. A high card? I raise your bet call your bluff sir!
LIVE (or Alive).
We North Easterners of England are dead, we are not alive. I know this because I was alive all of my life, especially at Barnard Castle School until I was expelled at 16 years old in 1998. At which point, I got turned off like a light bulb within about 4 days. Now Jesus Christ said:
Jesus told him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me. If you had really known me, you would know who my Father is. From now on, you do know him and have seen him!”
No good tree bears bad fruit, nor does a bad tree bear good fruit. For each tree is known by its own fruit. Indeed, figs are not gathered from thornbushes, nor grapes from brambles. The good man brings good things out of the good treasure of his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil treasure of his heart. For out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks.
“I am the true grapevine, and my Father is the gardener. He cuts off every branch of mine that doesn’t produce fruit, and he prunes the branches that do bear fruit so they will produce even more. You have already been pruned and purified by the message I have given you. Remain in me, and I will remain in you. For a branch cannot produce fruit if it is severed from the vine, and you cannot be fruitful unless you remain in me.
“Yes, I am the vine; you are the branches. Those who remain in me, and I in them, will produce much fruit. For apart from me you can do nothing. Anyone who does not remain in me is thrown away like a useless branch and withers. Such branches are gathered into a pile to be burned. But if you remain in me and my words remain in you, you may ask for anything you want, and it will be granted! When you produce much fruit, you are my true disciples. This brings great glory to my Father.
What I am trying to say is that Jesus Christ is the life, and why aren’t the majority of white people in the North East England alive? Trust me, because I went to Barnard Castle School from 1989 – 1998, I know and can tell if someone is alive or not; and I am telling you that the vast majority of people are not alive and do not know the life of Barnard Castle School in the Easington and Peterlee. Therefore, why does it cost £21,000 per annum (to attend a private school), for you and your family to be alive? Money should have nothing, zero, 0, zilch to do with life and existence. Like Jesus Christ’s quotes regarding trees and vines, plants are life itself, I am no more than a plant, I am not more than moss, we are both equally life and alive. However, there is something wrong with humanity (or Protestantism) because there is no life without £21,000 per annum. Plants do not need to pay anyone for life. They exist and who would rob plants – which are life itself – of life? Catholicism and its Saints practice Nietzsche’s ‘inversion of valuations’, Catholicism and the Saints are not conceited, they deliberately lower themselves to the common people’s level. It is as if in the UK the bar is set too high academically. If you don’t actually study life through a microscope like a botanist, then you do not receive the life. This is absurd. Like a plant, I am doing absolutely nothing, zero, 0 or nada for life. On another note, all white people need to learn a lesson, which is that, Africans are not worthless. They are alive. They are life.
Anti-racism does not work.
I am never an anti-racist I am a non-racialist, and I’ll tell you why, because anti-racism is maliciously antitheical to white people and it attacks and affects a whole race, while the only people on planet Earth who were responsible for the Holocaust were Aryan, Volkish, anti-Christian and pagan. Remember, it required the majority of white people, including Americans, British and Russians to defeat the Nazis. Therefore, most importantly I am a non-racialist, switched on cool Ismlessist, I am also devoutly anti-Aryan, anti-Völkisch and anti-pagan, because this accurately attacks the correct people and the correct religious and philosophical ideology that caused the Holocaust. The thing is about the ismlessism is that it is a genuine alternative to racism and anti-racism, it is non-racialism. Because I care about white people, for 5 years I singularly pursued and honed in on the noun racism like a blood hound. I did this because I knew (or thought) that there was absolutely nothing else that would help protect white people. It had to be racism or nothing (or something invisible) that would help to protect white people. I knew in every atom and fibre of my bones and body that racism is all things to white people. It’s not that people who care about white people like it, there just is simply no alternative. Racists try wishy washy alternatives like alt-right, nationalism and nativism and none of them work, satisfy or hit the nail on the head. However, the ismlessism and non-racialism are real alternatives to racism that do satisfy and hit the nail on the head. They defend and protect white people without being racist. You may say how are the ismlessism and non-racialism alternatives to anti-racism? The general consensus among our European or white political leaders is that because of the Holocaust there is no alternative to anti-racism. However, anti-racism is just the malicious antithesis to the white race, and the thing about anti-racism is that reality checks it and proves it wrong, as demonstrated by such as the frequency of acts of Islamic terror and violence in Europe, such as the Charlie Hebdo attacks and beheadings in France, anti-racism is clearly not working and is not the solution to racism and world peace. The bottom line is that our white politicians have got to accept, as evidenced by such as Islamic terrorism is that ant-racism does not work. As Europeans you have got to be right, and anti-racism just means that the Holocaust was so bad that have to be anti-yourselves, it means that you are not right. Perhaps the ismlessism being neither racist nor anti-racist, but non-racialist, would make Europeans right again? Therefore, the ismlessism and non-racialism are alternatives to anti-racism also.
No bones with Adolf Hitler?
As I mentioned at the beginning, people don’t need to go through a ritual or an initiation process to become an anti-racist for example, they simply pick it up. Therefore, to become a switched on cool ismlessist, all that you had to do was read this essay and if by now you are convinced about the rightness and benefits of the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, then you are a convert to the ismlessism? Now that you have finished reading this essay, something should have ‘switched’ inside of your head, and you should have ‘no bones with Adolf Hitler?’ Hopefully, you are therefore a cool anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch Ismlessist?
An effect of the Holocaust.
The fact that the ismlessisms today could potentially be a ‘propa’ part of the English language indicates that the ismlessisms are an effect of the Holocaust. Spruce and clean shaven imperialism and British heightened RP are no longer the mode, hip, cool or fashionable. The ismlessisms determine that Queen’s English has bottomed out which is an effect of the Holocaust. Also, the direction in which the ismlessisms indicate that society, civilisation and humanity will go in the future, namely, cool, coloured, African and Rastafarian, also demonstrates that the ismlessisms are an effect of the Holocaust. The ismlessisms represent the state of how everything is as a result of the Holocaust. I suppose the only question is as Europeans, is there anything we can do to reverse this trend? Can we ever make spruce imperialism cool again? As a conclusion, the reason that the Volk and the Nazis were the diametrical antithesis of the supernatural love, goodness, compassion and charity of humanity, is because they could not accept the fact that the Abrahamic religions of Near Eastern origins (Judaism and Christianity) were the first and original inventors of recorded history. The Volk therefore tried to undo recorded history and rejected their Biblical Christian heritage. The Volk believed in science such as Darwinism and the laws of survival of the fittest and they therefore, applied the laws of the animal kingdom to mankind. Indeed they had to become animals spiritually and psychologically in order to carry out the Holocaust. Therefore, the Volk and the Nazis were pagan, heathen and anti-Abrahamic, but most importantly they were anti-Christian and this is why they were so evil. If you are anti-Christian you are malignant. What made the Holocaust technically possible was such as Friedrich Nietzsche’s Christian question and not the so called Jewish question. If you are Christian the Lord will keep you right. Remember, piety and saintliness are more important than intelligence and academia. The ismlessism is a coloured or Rastafarian ’religious’ ism, therefore, be don’t be pagan, be anti-pagan, anti-Aryan and anti-Völkisch Abrahamic Judeo-Christians and use the ismlessism to cut the head off the snake, that is, make Adolf Hitler Ismless and thee switched on cool ismlessist, make sure he believes in the ismlessism and frequently says his ismlessisms, to remove, fix and de-stigmatise racism. What has the ismlessism got to do with the Jews? Indeed, what have the Jews got to do with any of this? The Jews are 15 million white people, they have nothing to do with the ismlessism. The ismlessism is between black and white and nothing more. Be a non-racialist. Be a switched on cool ismlessist.
Please allow me to speak for a moment like a medieval pope, with a humorous tinge of the good ole’ medieval European religious ignorance and intolerance. What if with the eternal binary switch and with our ability to think in eternity and on both sides of life, we (ahem) non-racialists can actually think for and save the wretched souls of the dreaded and eternally damned treacherous and lecherous anti-racist white politicians and Anti-fascists, whom are destined to be forever switched onto anti-racism without a choice in the hereafter and thus to eternally rot, burn and fester in the fiery and stinking bowls of Hell (with Muhammad and baphomet)!? What if instead of stoking the flames as we intolerant (ahem) non-racialists (and medieval popes) do, we can be angels and turn the other cheek to demonic anti-racism, be bigger than the politicians and Anti-fascists and actually think for and save them? For example, I know and you know that our treasonous white politicians probably do not honestly want to be eternally switched onto black and anti-racism in the afterlife without a choice, despite their squeaky-clean 100% politically correct and anti-racist track records. Perhaps we can think for such unfortunate and soon to be tormented souls, pick their lips and jaws up off the ground and save them? Do you want to be in eternal white paradise or not? What if Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ literally Created an eternal white paradise, while He was down here on Earth for us Europeans in the afterlife? What if that is why He is the Creator? Because He literally Created an eternal white paradise in the hereafter? What if that is the reason why we all owe our Lord and Savour Jesus Christ so much? That is the only way I can understand Jesus Christ. It’s not like it is hell for Africans such as the Ghanaians to be in eternal Ashanti heaven in the afterlife, whereas a multicultural afterlife is hell for white people, as it already is for us down here on Earth. The eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch helps us think on both sides of life because it is so simple or just two simple things: it is also the eternal life/afterlife switch or the eternal Earth/heaven switch. Therefore, what if we can all create an eternal white paradise while we are down here on Earth for ourselves in the afterlife? We must destroy the eternal racist/anti-racist switch and join the split or schism between white people through getting all white people on either extreme of the political spectrum to forgive each other and also Adolf Hitler. Therefore, we must unite racism and anti-racism. We must join the split, schism or crack (or the eternal Hitler switch) between racist and anti-racist white people. Through the join or union of the split or schism, white people should be one, whole, unanimous and homogeneous. How we seal the split, and how the forgiveness, union and creating the wholeness works is that first of all, racists get a victory in the afterlife, which is that there is no anti-racism in the afterlife and that the afterlife is white. Second of all racists wholeheartedly forgive treasonous anti-racist white politicians, outspoken anti-racists and Anti-fascists for their high treason and this is emphatically because racists wholeheartedly accept and acknowledge the fact that the only reason that the aforementioned treasonous white people are traitors and anti-racists in the first place is 100% because of and down to Adolf Hitler. It’s Adolf Hitler’s fault, which is is the fault-line, split, schism or crack (or the binary eternal racist/anti-racist switch) between white people. Racists realise that there is nothing that our white politicians can do to save or redeem the white race as a result of the Holocaust. Therefore, loyal racist white people promise not to eternally and permanently switch treacherous anti-racist white politicians, outspoken anti-racists and Anti-fascists onto anti-racism or black in this life or the next. Third of all anti-racist white people promise to forgive and to not eternally flip non-racialist white people eternally on white or racism, for being a planck’s length right of centre (or for having used a little hate and having made mistakes on social media) while they were down here on Earth. Please stop fighting with each other and please stop using hate against each other.
And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.
The reciprocal forgiveness of racists and anti-racists completes the circuit or joins the union ring or circle and is best demonstrated through such as Luke 6:27-36 or by loving one’s enemies. However, clearly the sentence from the Lord’s prayer above also demonstrates the importance of reciprocal and mutual forgiveness for access to the kingdom of heaven. Hence, there is no greater need in the world today than for racist and anti-racist white people to forgive each other. This is what completes the circuit. This is the eternal union ring or circle. This reciprocal and mutual forgiveness should the seal the split, schism or crack (or eternal racist/anti-racist switch) and create a whole and a union between all white people. Also, included in this reciprocal forgiveness is the stipulation that we all as white people also have to forgive Adolf Hitler.
A complete circuit.
One thing about the join or union of the split or schism between white people through the forgiveness of each other on either extremity of the political spectrum (or on either mode of the eternal racist/anti-racist switch) is that it proves that Jesus Christ was totally accurate and right in what He said. This join or union proves that Jesus Christ’s paramount teachings on forgiveness and of loving one’s enemies are true, and do in reality mean something extremely important and do in fact and in reality Save The World. This union, complete circuit, join or wholesome union of white peoples proves that Jesus Christ was so much more than a pretty face. Switching on or completing the circuit gives white people power and light. And it proves that Jesus Christ did not come to planet Earth just for display or just for show. It proves that Jesus Christ was very real and that His teachings such as Luke 6:27-36 have ultimate and relevant importance for the Salvation of The World eternally and especially for us today. It proves that Jesus Christ understood things that even we today still do not. I believe that what we can take from Jesus Christ’s teaching is that we do not want to be caught by Jesus Christ on either extreme of the political spectrum, and that the whole, join or union between white peoples is more like an airplane thrust lever or adjustable volume knob between racism and anti-racism, as opposed to a childish and eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch. Therefore, the whole or union determines that we should destroy the imbecilic eternal switch and create smooth thrust lever or adjustable volume knob between racism and anti-racism. All of this is very good news because it may mean that Jesus Christ might condone the ismlessisms and sanction this essay. He may support this essay and lend it some importance and backing because it categorically proves that Jesus Christ is truly The Saviour of all European people.
Then Peter came up and said to him, “Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? As many as seven times?” Jesus said to him, “I do not say to you seven times, but seventy times seven.”Matthew 18:21-22
“But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone slaps you on one cheek, turn to them the other also. If someone takes your coat, do not withhold your shirt from them. Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. Do to others as you would have them do to you.Luke 6:27-31
Notice how the above words of Jesus Christ complete the circuit or join the split, schism or crack between racist and anti-racist white people. Completing the circuit should give white people power and light.
“If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners love those who love them. And if you do good to those who are good to you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners do that. And if you lend to those from whom you expect repayment, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners, expecting to be repaid in full. But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful.
Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.” And they divided up his clothes by casting lots.Luke 23:34
I just wanted to have a word with racist white people and that is to stop absolutely all fighting with non-white people, especially on social media. Fighting with non-white people on social media or otherwise is hate and it is absolutely wrong and heinous. Even if non-white people do or say somethings on social media that anger or vex you or if they do somethings wrong, stop fighting with them and as our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ said, turn the other cheek to them. He said love your enemies and bless those to curse you, do good to those who hate, oppress and persecute you. There are two important reasons for this attitude that must be pointed out regarding fighting with non-white (and anti-racist white people). The first thing is that you (as white racists) have to humbly and graciously accept and acknowledge that all non-white people have done absolutely nothing wrong historically. They were slaves and then they were oppressed for example. The only problem white people have today is their own doing, which is Adolf Hitler and his Holocaust; and that is the only place where you can rightly and legally direct your heat and anger. However, because Adolf Hitler and the Nazis are long dead, we shouldn’t even direct our anger at them, but channel our energies and our intellect into the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and a solution to the Holocaust. Second of all you (as white racists) have to accept that the only problem in the world today (because of Adolf Hitler) is this split, schism or fracture between white people and white people only. And as the premise of this essay stated and through the teachings of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ regarding loving our enemies, we should also just as importantly stop fighting with and focusing our anger onto anti-racist white people as well; such as treacherous white politicians and Anti-fascists. As our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ said we must wholeheartedly and truly forgive all of our enemies and those who repress us. Only if we as non-racialists (and white racists) stop all fighting with non-white people and ‘switched’ anti-racist white politicians and Anti-fascists etc, will we attain what we truly desire, which is to eternally flip the switch onto white and, for example, to eternally guarantee white governments in white countries and to create an eternal white paradise in the hereafter. Only then might we get what we truly want down here on Earth also. However, we must accept that we even as non-racialist white people are wrong in the first place due to Adolf Hitler and his Holocaust and that non-white people have done nothing wrong at all historically. As white people, please, on either extreme of the political spectrum, please forgive each other truly and deeply and stop fighting; instead complete the circuit and generate power, light, a whole and a union.
Bargaining chip (poker).
As mentioned we switched on cool ismlessists and non-racialists have the strongest hand in poker, a royal flush because we know that the afterlife is white and that there is no anti-racism in the hereafter. On the other hand anti-racist white politicians and Anti-fascists have the weakest hand in poker, just the high card, and this is because they only think of the eternal future of life down here on planet Earth. Therefore, having the royal flush means that we switched on cool ismlessists and non-racialists have, possess and own the eternal racist/anti-racist binary switch, which means that we switched on cool ismlessists and non-racialists have the ability to deal with, think in, interact with and influence eternity and both sides of life (as in Earth and the afterlife), and this gives us a bargaining chip that we can use, manipulate and wield. We can call the bluff of the treasonous anti-racist white politicians and Anti-fascists by threatening them with being eternally and permanently switched onto anti-racism and blackness in this life and the next, without a choice. Which means that we switched on cool ismlessists and non-racialists have a certain amount of bargaining power. Do anti-racist white politicians, outspoken anti-racists and Anti-fascists honestly want to be eternally flipped or switched on anti-racism or black in the hereafter and forever? I very much doubt I it?
Even though this entire essay is 100% benign to non-white people and has absolutely ‘no bones’ whatsoever with any non-white people on planet Earth, I have to inform non-white people of something regarding paradise. Even though I have stated and wholeheartedly believe that least of all do any non-white people need forgiveness and that this essay has absolutely nothing to do with non-white people whatsoever, I still have to warn you about something concerning the afterlife. Even though I have admitted and explained that the only problem in the world today is white people’s and that it is their own making, I still have to tell you something about heaven. Even though I have identified and explained the major problem in the world today which is the split, schism or crack (or eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch) between white people (and that this problem has absolutely nothing to do with non-white people), I still have to caution you about something to do with the hereafter. What I have to tell you is that if this essay, the ismlessism or the Hitler switch has anything for non-white people it is only that it should prepare you for the afterlife and caution you about what to expect. To me I believe that non-white people today, believe that they have conquered white people eternally and on both sides of life. This is not so. The afterlife is white, and I am just warning you in case you except too much or build your hopes up to be dashed. What I mean is that, for example, it is not hell for Africans such as the Ghanaians to be in eternal Ashanti heaven in the afterlife, whereas a multicultural hereafter is hell for white people, as it already is for us down here on Earth. You get roughly 80 years down on this putrid moist dung-ball of a planet and then eternity, and eternity is what really matters. Once you are in heaven, planet Earth is the like crack of your arse to you. Therefore, what you have to acknowledge (and what I know that you already understand) is that there is a problem down here on Earth between white people and white people only. As stated it is the split, schism or crack and it has absolutely nothing to do with non-white people whatsoever. It’s for argument’s sake, Adolf Hitler’s problem and that is the aim of this essay, that is, a solution to world peace. You have to acknowledge that none of this multiculturalism would be happening if it was not for the Holocaust. So don’t expect too much in heaven or build your hopes up. You haven’t got white people for eternity and on both sides of life.
I believe that because white people (especially such as the Boers) have absolutely nothing to look forward to down here on Earth other than the afterlife, that therefore, we all (whites and non-whites) can and should easily and generally talk about the eternal hereafter like it is a matter of fact and an ordinary reality. I believe that because the eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch is so childishly simple, that is, just two tiny things, that this proves that heaven or paradise is unbelievably easy and unbelievably simple. It is not advanced, technical or a mystery. The next life is not enigmatic, ineffable or acataleptic. Therefore, we can and should use the eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch to let go of and renounce this invertebrate-infested world (the material world) and strive to be eternal and to attain or exist in the eternal hereafter, even while we are down here on Earth. We should be able do this with our thoughts, words and writing. On another note, as another example of one of the two basic and fundamental teachings of Jesus Christ, that is, ‘money’, let’s consider Matthew 6:19-21:
Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moths and vermin destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moths and vermin do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.Matthew 6:19-21.
In this teaching what Jesus means by ‘treasure’ is obviously to do with anything that we consider wealth or luxury down here on Earth, but in a round about way, He simply means ‘money’. What He means is that, like Him, if we want to plug into to the kingdom of heaven (while we are down here on Earth), we should therefore, be very charitable with our ‘money’ and not covet perishable and non-eternal things down here on Earth. He probably also means that we should practice ‘forgiveness’. Hence, Jesus Christ tells us not to store up treasures on Earth or in life, but to store up for ourselves treasures in heaven or the afterlife. Now from my experience as a long-term non-racialist, to me it is abundantly evident that racists do tend to naturally think of the past, our ancestors and the afterlife and do instinctively store up things (or loyalty-brownie points) in heaven. Racists do this more so than anti-racists, who tend to think of the eternal future down here on Earth, and tend to be very now, here and temporal. In fact, it was entirely you anti-racists with your deafening political correctness which forced me personally (as a non-racialist) to think of, interact with and seek the past, our ancestors and the afterlife since 2007. You anti-racists forced me as a non-racialist to go over to the other side of life. You anti-racists squeezed the ismlessism and the Hitler switch out of me. However, racists make one big mistake, that is, they passionately cherish and covet the lands and countries of which they are ethnically and genetically attached far too much. They treat for instance ‘Rome’, ’Britain’ or ‘Norway’ like great ‘treasures’ and never ever let go of or give up fighting for them. Hence, one mistake racists make is that in a big way they store up for themselves big ‘treasures’ on Earth. Therefore, because of Adolf Hitler, racists probably need to consider (in theory and in practice) giving up on the Earthly lands, countries and soils to which they are so genetically attached and refrain from aggressively defending or fighting for the countries and lands that they so dearly love – especially against non-white people. I am British and I know how unbelievably hard it is to let go of your native lands down here on Earth, for example, it must be even harder for the Italians to let go of their beloved eternal city of Rome, however, because the ‘treasure’ of Rome is so great, therefore, loyal and patriotic Italians should be able to plug into and get ’Earthed’ to the next life while they are down here in life through this ultimate sacrifice. Therefore, I believe that racists today should think more of the eternal white paradise to which they are deservedly destined (because of their loyalty) by storing up for themselves treasures in heaven. In fact, as 21st century white people, because we didn’t get a country or continent of our own down here on Earth, therefore, we should probably all vehemently store up for and demand a land, country, continent or world of our own in the afterlife? The eternal lands that we will attain in the afterlife will be so much more a part of our genetic make up and mean so much more to us than the mud and rocks that we get on this rancid moist dung-ball of a planet. Therefore, because of Adolf Hitler, in the first place, if racists kind of let go a bit or give up on their most prized possessions, that is, their lands and countries, only then may they receive what they truly want? Also, by ultimately giving up on the soil, mud and lands of their birth, racists may therefore, get plugged in, switched on and electrically and eternally ‘Earthed’ to the afterlife and hereafter while they are down here in life. Let us white people complete the electrical circuit and allow our tremendous power to flow through the universe once again. We can all achieve this through the mutual forgiveness of each other on either extreme of the political spectrum (or on either mode of the eternal racist/anti-racist switch). Let us white people join together and switch on our united power.
Let us not fight, let us create light!
For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.
Get a grip!
We (ahem) non-racialists have to accept something regarding our treasonous anti-racist politicians, and it has something to do with racism itself. Racism is a slippery fish, because of Adolf Hitler, the fear of racism for our anti-racist politicians is too much, it is absolute. Our anti-racist politicians tremble with fear at the prospect of being seen as a racist or being called a racist. Being called a racist is such a terrifying thought to our anti-racist politicians that it has them pinned down and under the thumb. They are under the thumb of the rest of the world or of non-white people, and there is literally nothing they can do about it. We non-racialists have to accept this and we have to stop fighting with and forgive our anti-racist politicians. However, if we all (including anti-racist politicians) own, have and possess the eternal binary racist/anti-racist switch, if we have it in our hands, if we get a thrust lever or an adjustable knob, it might help us all get a grip of racism.
The Magic Number.
Firstly, I’d like to say that the problem is that as soon as a genuine white person tries to protect his or her own people, anti-racists instantly flip the switch onto Nazism, get irate and angry and accuse such people of using hate or being a racist or a Nazi. Secondly, I’d like to say that the ultimate question regarding this essay is also a 50/50 switch, it’s the non-offence/offence switch. I am not sure how people will react to this essay regarding a lighthearted forgiveness of Adolf Hitler? On one side of the switch they may be bubbly and react with laughter, on the other hand they could take offence and react with anger. I really don’t know. I’d just like to point that there are many things that cause me offence on TV such as LGBTQ stuff, but I don’t complain. Thirdly I’d like to state that there is a magic number regarding the eternal switch to do with democracy and obviously it is 50 or 50% as in 50/50. What I mean is that democracy is a time and numbers game and when for example, Britain or America is over 50% non-white, it will eternally flip the switch eternally onto black or non-white in Britain or America, which will mean that you can be guaranteed that ethnic and indigenous British and American people of European descent will be effectively barred from office in their own countries and from governing themselves. Take London as an example, London is over 50% non-white today and Sadiq Khan is currently the Mayor of London, therefore, because the demographic magic number (50%) has been exceeded, all that British political parties need to do to win the Mayor of London seat is to always put forward a non-white candidate, and the chances are that the 50% and more of non-white Londoners will always vote for the non-white candidate. Do the math! Democracy is hardly rocket science. It’s an imbecile. This tipping point of the Hitler switch will be replicated throughout Britain, Europe and all around the world until white people are disenfranchised, conquered and subjugated, like the South African Boers. That is, unless white people can get a grip and eternally flip the eternal racist/anti-racist switch first? So do you want to be over run by non-white immigrants in your own countries or not? Is a multi-cultural England your idea of heaven or not? Do you want to be white or black? Do you want to be in an eternal white paradise in the hereafter or not? Make your decision. You know the options…
The choice is yours….
I promise you that if you forgive Adolf Hitler, he will be a switched on cool Ismlessist.