“To be cool, hip and with it, say your ismlessisms! Fash is the ismlessism of fascism. A new jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism. Ismlessisms are colourful, beautiful and deep which reflects black people.”Graham Cammock
“We all have got to come to grips with our isms.”Joycelyn Elders – Former United States Surgeon General.
- a distinctive doctrine, cause, or theory
- an oppressive and especially discriminatory attitude or belief: we all have got to come to grips with our isms — Joycelyn Elders
- without an ism or no ism: Adolf Hitler is ismless because he always has to say his ismlessisms. Europeans are ismless because they haven’t got racism. White people are ismless.
- an ism which removes isms; an ism which fixes racism; saying or writing ismlessisms, which means to say or write noun isms or adjective ists without their suffix ism or suffix ist respectively, note: ismlessisms are colourful, beautiful and deep which reflects black people. ”Bud” and ”fash” are colourful, beautiful and deep. Ismlessisms are deeply black, Rasta and deeply cool. Ismlessism is the highest of all isms because it is not a singular ism like all other normal or lower isms. For example, atheism is a normal, lower and singular ism that is one thing, the belief that God does not exist. Atheism (like all other isms, (excepting ismlessism)) is one ism. Ismlessism is mathematical because it minuses the suffix -isms from all isms, for example, “Bud, Catholis, rayce, and fash” are the ismlessisms of “Buddhism, Catholicism, racism and fascism” respectively, therefore, ismlessism is more than one ism, it is all isms, many isms, multifarious, variegated, diverse, colourful, beautiful, inclusive, tolerant, multiple, the ism of all isms and a plurality of isms: Adolf Hitler is ismless because he has to always say his ismlessisms, that is, he has to say his isms without their suffix isms, for example, ”I’m not into Nashanal Soshall anymore mon! I’m into Catholis!” Bud is the ismlessism of Buddhism. Fash is the ismlessism of fascism.
- a supporter, believer or adherent of ismlessism: In order to forgive Adolf Hitler, he needs to be a cool Rasta Ismlessist and he needs to frequently say his ismlessisms, for example, ”I’m not into rayce anymore mon! I am a cool Ismlessist!”
- of, relating to, or characteristic of ismlessism or its believers or adherents: It’s very ismlessist to be a cool Rasta. I like him he’s quite ismlessist!
OTHER WORDS FROM ISMLESSIST
How does it work?
If Adolf Hitler is ismless then racism is fixed. The adverb ‘less’ has a prefix ism and a second suffix ism, for example: ism + less + ism. The adverb ‘less’ means to a smaller extent, amount, or degree and it is the adverb ‘less’ which removes or reduces the isms, for example ageism, heightism, sexism or racism. Thee second suffix ism obviously and ironically turns the adjective ’ismless’ (which means no isms, without isms or remove isms) into an ism, just for good measure and therefore, the whole noun ‘ismlessism’ removes racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. The ismlessism takes the race out of ism. The ismlessism takes the ism out of race. In fact, the ismlessism takes the ism out of all isms. The ismlessism is therefore an ism of no isms, an ism without isms or an ism which removes isms. The ismlessism is proper, for example, sarcastically, it is very ‘proper’ (and a bit Rastafarian) to say your ismlessisms, or hack the isms off isms, that is, to say or write any ism without its suffix ism. For example, rayce, Catholis, fash or Bud etc. As in “Don’t be fash mon!” or “Chill, it’s only a bit of rayce mon, everything be irie!” This grammatical propriety could demonstrate our intellectual level today? The ismlessism’s discovery involved the realisation of the adjective ‘ismless’, as in white people are ismless, because they do not have racism, and then the addition of thee second suffix ism which turns the adjective ismless into an ism, just for sake, which forms the whole proper noun ismlessism. Therefore, how it works is that if we make Adolf Hitler thee first and foremost cool Ismlessist, then there is no racism in him. To reiterate, if Adolf Hitler is ismless, says his ismlessisms or if he always cuts the isms off his isms, then racism is fixed. To reiterate, because the ismlessism means no isms, without isms or remove or take away isms, therefore, as long as we make Adolf Hitler the foremost cool Ismlessist and make sure he believes in and professes the ismlessism, therefore, there is no racism in Adolf Hitler, which therefore, forgives Adolf Hitler which consequently forgives all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of violence committed during World War Two. To reiterate one last time, if Adolf Hitler is ismless, if he always says his ismlessisms or his isms without their suffix isms, then racism is fixed. The ismlessism is a double ism, it is thee ism and it removes racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. There is nothing more or higher that the ismlessism for racism. It is bigger than racism and cooler than anti-racism. Ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness is the absolution of Adolf Hitler, because all other lesser sins are forgiven by default. The idiom ‘to cut the head off the snake’ means to stop a larger problem by aiming at the source – often the leader, or a major culprit. The ismlessism is the correction of the root or source of the cause of Holocaust, namely, Adolf Hitler’s racism. Therefore, to reiterate one last time, to cut the head off the snake means that instead of assassination, to give Adolf Hitler the name ‘Ismless’ or make him the coolest Ismlessist and to make sure he professes and believes in the ismlessism, means that there is no racism in Adolf Hitler, which is the absolution of Adolf Hitler, which subsequently leads to the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for all of their individual acts of terror during World War Two. The adjective ismless equals, represents or stands for racism, white people or Adolf Hitler and it means that Adolf Hitler and white people are ismless or without an ism because they do not have racism. The addition of thee second suffix ism doubles the ism, in that it doubles the adjective ‘ismless’ into ismlessism, which is a double ism, which to reiterate, obviously and ironically turns the adjective ismless (which means no isms, without isms or remove isms) into an ism just for sake and for good measure, and therefore, the whole proper noun ismlessism takes away the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. If Adolf Hitler is ’Ismless’ both in name and in speech and in writing, then racism is fixed and all white people are forgiven for the Holocaust.
RASTA ALGEBRA TEST.
Ismlessisms are mathematical and I will prove it to you. Instead of cumbersomely describing ismlessisms by saying: “Cut your isms off your isms” or ”Say or write your isms without their suffix isms” we can simply say: ”Say your ismlessisms.” For example, “Fash is the ismlessism of fascism!” The concise statement ”Say your ismlessisms” is grammatically mathematical as there is some very simple (Rasta level) addition and subtraction arithmetic going on here and hence it condenses the aforementioned cumbersome descriptions. Note: ismlessisms are colourful, beautiful and deep, which reflects black people. I mean ”Bud” and ”fash” are colourful, beautiful and deep. Ismlessisms are deeply black, Rasta and deeply cool. Unlike normal isms which are single isms, ismlessisms are many isms, all isms, a plurality of isms, variegated, colourful, diverse, a variety of isms, multiple, manifold, multifarious and plural. Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking are unbelievably intelligent, know many things that we laypeople do not and they have many advanced qualifications, however are they cool? Superstar DJs are wickedly and deeply cool, but do they know it? Are Superstar DJs officially and fundamentally cool? Well everyone can be officially and mathematically cool with the cool qualification of the ismlessism. Therefore, to be current, cool, hip and with it or to become, make the grade or pass out as a cool Ismlessist, all that you have to do is undergo some Rasta training to pick up the cool and hip lingo of the ismlessism. Therefore, all that you have to do is complete the following Rasta algebra test by studying the following 2 examples and then answering the following 6 questions below.
An ismlessism has 3 variables.
ism (noun) – suffix ism = ismlessism
What is the ismlessism of racism?
racism – suffix ism = rayce
ismlessism = rayce
An ismlessist has 3 variables.
ist (noun or adjective) – suffix ist = ismlessist
What is the ist of expertees?
expertees + suffix ist = expertiseist
ist = expertiseist
Find the missing variable for each question.
A. Buddhism – ism = ?
B. Catholicism – ? = Catholis
C. seks + ist = ?
D. ? + ism = criticism
E. ? – ism = fash
F. Jayn + ? = Jainist
As you can see ismlessisms are mathematical in a Rasta-level way, therefore instead of saying: “Cut your isms off your isms” or ”Say or write your isms without their suffix isms” we can simply say: ”Say your ismlessisms.” I am not saying you have to go around saying such things as ”Don’t be terra mon!” to Muslims or “Don’t be fash mon!” to Europeans, as long as you are consciously aware of ismlessisms, and that saying them is deeply black, African, Rastafarian and black-London youth cool and stylish. Therefore, if you managed to answer the above Rasta algebra test questions correctly, then you are officially cool! You have the cool qualification. You pass mon! You get in mon! Rastas demand nothing harder in life. Hence, you are cool because you have learned how to say your ismlessisms, that is, you have learned the cool and hip lingo of the ismlessism. Therefore, congratulations you now know how to be a cool Ismlessist mon!
Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.
What type of ism is ismlessism?
What is an ism? An ism is a distinctive doctrine, cause, or theory, as in Buddhism. Or an ism is an oppressive and especially discriminatory attitude or belief, as in ageism. Therefore, what type of ism is ismlessism? The ismlessism is all isms. The ismlessism removes and makes cool all types of isms, however, most importantly the ismlessism fixes or neutralises discriminatory isms such as “aaayj, heiyt, seks and rayce” which are the ismlessisms of ”ageism, heightism, sexism and racism” respectively. The ismlessism is a linguistic ism. The ismlessism is a jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism. The ismlessism is the ism of all isms, it is the king of all isms, it is the multi-headed, multi-armed Hindu god of all isms, and it is the ism to end all isms.
What is an ismlessism?
The ismlessism deals with a lot more than just racism, it deals with all isms, in fact there are a multitude of ismlessisms. Ismlessisms are many isms, all isms, a plurality of isms, variegated, colourful, diverse, a variety of isms, multiple, manifold, multifarious and plural. An ismlessism is any ism without its suffix ism.
Bud = ismlessism
Catholis = ismlessism
Seks = ismlessism
Rayce = ismlessism
Fash = ismlessism
Expertees = ismlessism
When the morning
Gather the rainbows, yeahBob Marley – Sun Is Shining
Want you to know I’m a rainbow too (I’m a rainbow too)
Everything will be perfect
Tonight and forever
Light shine off, light shine on
Making our faces many coloursLost Witness – Happiness Happening
Singular v plural.
What is the ismlessism (singular) as an ism in its own right? What is it about? Ismlessisms (plural) are grammatical, however, the ismlessism (singular) is an ism as in a distinctive doctrine, cause, or theory. The ismlessism (singular) is never a religious ism, but is a political ism. Therefore, the ismlessism (singular) is a solution to racism, it either removes racism or fixes racism. The ismlessism removes and neutralises all discriminatory and negative isms. Also, in theory, by making Adolf Hitler ismless, that is, giving him the name and identity ismless, as well as getting him to humorously and frequently say his ismlessisms (plural), thereby proving that there is no racism whatsoever in Adolf Hitler, the ismlessism, therefore, in theory, cuts the head off the snake, in that it enables us all to forgive Adolf Hitler for the Holocaust, which subsequently forgives all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of barbarity during World War Two. Therefore, by forgiving Adolf Hitler and fixing racism, in theory, the ismlessism helps to protect white people from extinction. What are the ismlessisms (plural)? Ismlessisms (plural) are grammatical. The noun ismlessism is a word used to designate other words that are in a state of being ismless, such as “Bud” is the ismlessism of Buddhism and “Fash” is the ismlessism of fascism. Therefore, there are many ismlessisms (plural).
Rastas make up new words especially with their Iyaric or Dread Talk dialect, therefore, the ismlessism is a neologism. The ismlessism is a sin-free, brand new Rastafarian word, and I have to tell you how fantastic the ismlessism is and how excited I am about it. I really feel that I have found something or found the answer to what people who care about white people have been searching for for decades. As a person who cares about white people I am on cloud nine about the ismlessism, even though the ismlessism is without sin and is 100% politically correct. I mean it, there is 0% racism, hate or homophobia in the ismlessism or in this thesis. Considering this entire thesis is about the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust, and considering the fact that the ismlessism is sin free, this is a good thing. The ismlessism is good, it is a 100% goodhearted, cool and new Rastafarian word. So why am I so pleased? Because the ismlessism is neither anti-racist or racist and it is a neologism, which means it is a new word. The ismlessism is without sin because it is a new word. Because of the Holocaust, racism must therefore be sin and guilt. I mean the ismlessism is an entirely new, 100% benign and politically correct word which we conservative people who care about white people can use, have, profess and identify with in order to be cool. White people can be cool with the ismlessism. I mean even though the ismlessism is neither anti-racist nor racist, as a person who cares about white people, the ismlessism really pleases me, which means there must actually be a lot in it for us people who care about white people. What I mean is that the ismlessism is a new word which is 100% politically correct which actually pleases people who care about white people. It is rare for something cool and politically correct to please people who care about white people.
Why is the ismlessism a new ”jocularly” Rastafarian grammatical ism? Because I am not in any way Rastafarian and I do not believe in Rastafarianism, I am white and I am devoutly Christian and unofficially Catholic. I do not believe, as Rastas do, that Haile Selassie I (Emperor of Ethiopia from 1930 to 1974) is God, divine or the second coming of Christ. In fact, I believe that the entire point of the Jesus Christ was to teach the whole world that Pharaohs and emperors are never divine or gods, like Menhutep II who blatantly self-deified, Julius Caesar who was posthumously defied or Augustus (Octavian) who also straddled the borders of divinity. I believe that God (or Jesus Christ) was the deliberate antithesis of a wealthy and noble Pharoah or emperor, in that God deliberately made sure that he was a poor, vulnerable and humble little child born in a manger, who came to serve and not be served. And the same is demonstrated by Siddhartha Gautama with His Great Renunciation, in that he was a prince destined to be king who renounced his royal titles, inheritance, palaces, luxuries and wives to become a humble ascetic who nearly starved himself to death before He attained divinity, Buddha-hood and nirvana. Therefore, I obviously do not in any way believe that Haile Selassie I was divine or Christ, I believe he was just a normal yet wealthy Emperor of Ethiopia. So why is the ismlessism “jocularly” Rastafarian? Because the ismlessism is definitely black grammar. The ismlessism does not in any way necessarily have to be Rastafarian, but it is definitely black grammar. For example, it could be African American or black-London youth grammar, only that Rastafarianism is the most famous black culture and Rastafarianism does actually have its own pigeon-English language or dialect called Iyaric or Dread Talk. Therefore, the ismlessism is definitely black grammar but “jocularly” Rastafarian grammar.
Because of two world wars and a Holocaust, the English language has bottomed out. Ismlessism will prove this to you. For example, instead of Queen’s English the English language now officially has ismlessisms. By this I mean that instead of Received Pronunciation, it is now officially cool and “propa” to say your ismlessisms. For example, instead of saying “Buddhism, Catholicism, racism and fascism”, it is now hip, cool, grammatical and “propa” to say “Bud, Catholis, rayce, and fash.” Ismlessisms are colourful, beautiful and deep which reflects black people. Ismlessisms are deeply black and deeply cool. Ismlessisms are official Iyaric, also called Dread Talk, the dialect of English consciously created by members of the Rastafari movement. Ismlessism is the black and Rastafarian linguistic fashion, style, level and grammar. This is the difference between white and black, in that white is now uncool and out of fashion, and black is now cool and in fashion. For example, the Queen of England deliberately tries to be linguistically high, articulate and sophisticated, by saying things such as “Buddhism, Catholicism, racism and fascism”, while Rasta men deliberately try to be linguistically low, inarticulate and unsophisticated by saying things such as “Bud, Catholis, rayce, and fash.” Rastas are deliberately low. You can hear the difference in for example, Sir David Attenborough’s accent on black and white television in the 1950s and his accent today on UHD television in the 2020s. British ‘heightened RP’ (heightened Received Pronunciation) is no longer the mode, fashionable or cool and the British accent (especially on TV) has become more lower class, common and black over the last century. Therefore, to reiterate, ismlessism demonstrates that the English language has bottomed out. Apologising to black people for slavery, imperialism, European colonialism and the Holocaust does not work, it’s a waste of breath and it has no effect, whereas saying your ismlessisms is a real and genuine apology to black people that really matters, means something and actually does have an effect. It has an effect because saying your ismlessisms such as ”I am not a Bud mon!” is deeply black, Rastafarian and deeply cool (note: “Bud” is the ismlessism of Buddhism). Ismlessisms such as ”Bud, rayce, Catholis and fash” are grammatically Rastafarian Iyaric or Dread Talk, they are the rapper, hip hop artist and the black-London youth fashion, style, slang and lingo. Ismlessism is what Africans and black people, such as Rastafarians naturally do, it’s their fashionable style, level and grammar. Sub-Saharan Africans never invented their own writing system and this is apparent in the cool slang lingo of black fashion, style and music such as Rastafarianism, reggae, rap and hip hop. And it is black-skin, black culture and black music that is fashionable and cool today. Ismlessisms are grammatical because they represent, encompass and demonstrate all of black style, fashion, lingo and slang, such as Rastafarian Iyaric or Dread Talk. Therefore, what if ismlessism makes more than just ismlessisms official, grammatical or “propa”? I mean what if ismlessism made all of Rastafarian Iyaric or Dread Talk “propa”? What if ismlessism made all hip and cool, rapper and hip hop artist argot more ”propa”? I mean reggae artists, rappers and many musicians frequently employ cool and stylish lingo for their tracks and album names, such as ”Work dat shit!”, where ”dat” is slang for ”that”, however, although such cool slang english is hip such argot is never really ”propa”. Ismlessisms such as ”Bud, rayce, Catholis and fash” are grammatical and definitely “propa”, however, what if ismlessism also makes all Rastafarian Iyaric or Dread Talk and rapper slang such as ”dat” instead of ”that” more legitimate and more “propa”? What if ismlessism got officially entered into the Oxford English Dictionary? Being an Englishman myself, I would be very proud if my country (which is the home of the English language) was also the home of ismlessism, I mean I would like it if my country was cool and hip. Therefore, as white people if you say your ismlessisms it hits the strings of black people’s hearts because ismlessism is what such as Rastafarians naturally do, it’s their fashionable style, level and grammar. This is why black people are politically correct, why there seems to be bias and favouritism towards black people today, why our politicians, our media, our TVs and our police definitely show favouritism for black people today and why they seem to let black people off the hook with things that white people would be punished for. It is politically correct to go easier on blacks and to let them off the hook today. Political correctness means they go soft on blacks and hard on whites. Black people need a deep and genuine apology for slavery, imperialism, colonialism and the Holocaust etc, which no body is able to attain, reach or make. This is political correctness. Political correctness means that you have not apologised. Political correctness is “propa” but it is also wrong and it simply means you have not apologised. Blackness is politically correct because blacks are desperately due an apology which no one is able to make. Political correctness is biased towards black people and is unfair towards and biased against white people, however, no one is able to make a ”propa” apology to black people and this is why political correctness is happening and why our politicians, police, media and televisions definitely show favouritism towards and privilege for black people over white people today. Therefore, the whole point of the ismlessism is that if we white people are nice to black people first, then they might be nice to us? Therefore, if you are a conservative or even a racist, don’t be arrogant, like prayers, say your ismlessisms. “Don’t practice favourit mon! Wicked! Cool! Innit?”
Superstar DJs such as Judge Jules are deeply hip and deeply cool, unlike most of us, superstar DJs are submerged under the “cool” ocean. However, do they know it? Are they are officially cool or fundamentally cool? It’s as if being with it and cool is nothing? However, because the ismlessism is officially, grammatically, fundamentally and mathematically cool, this is great news because it means you do not have to be a young black-London DJ to be cool. Everyone can be cool. Even if you are a white octogenarian you can be with it, hip and cool as long as you “say your ismlessisms”, I mean, if you “hack the suffix isms off your isms”, such as saying: “I’m not a Bud mon!” (note: ”Bud” is the ismlessism of Buddhism), as well as identifying as a cool Ismlessist and professing the ismlessism etc. Note: ismlessisms are colourful, beautiful and deep which reflects black people. I mean ”Bud” and ”fash” are colourful, beautiful and deep. Ismlessisms such as “Bud” and ”fash” are practically nothing and this practical nothingness reveals the fact that Africans and black people have never done anything wrong. Therefore, ismlessisms are deeply black and deeply cool. Nazis are uncool, and in order to be white they disconnect from most music, pop culture and what is currently cool and hip. They go back to the 1940s when white people were stronger, because they are more comfortable there. However, the past is uncool and unhip. The problem that white people have is that traditional European folk costumes, myths and customs are not as cool as black culture and black Rastafarianism etc. The problem white people face is that Morris Dancers are not as cool as a Rasta man! However, the ismlessism is eternal. The offer of the ismlessism to racists is eternal. There is no pressure. Do both. Be indigenous European and cool. Wear your European folk costumes and also be hip. Be white and cool. Be neither racist nor anti-racist. Be a hip and cool Ismlessist. “Don’t be fash mon!” Ultimately, I made the decision to pledge, give or to hand over the entire ismlessism to Adolf Hitler, including the grammar and the philosophy, but most importantly the name and the domains etc, I am making Adolf Hitler the one and only, the blackest of black, the coolest of the cool “Ismless”. Why the hell in Christ’s name am I doing that you might ask? Adolf Hitler created many isms, however, they are all discriminatory and negative isms. Before the Holocaust, such isms as ageism, heightism and sexism didn’t really exist or definitely did not have the same discriminatory and negative connotations. The source of all of these discriminatory and negative isms is one single very powerful ism, namely racism, which is actually the second most powerful ism in the universe, after the multi-headed, multi-armed Hindu god of all isms, namely the ismlessism. The ismlessism is the perfect antidote to all of Adolf Hitler’s discriminatory and negative isms because the ismlessism is also many isms, multiple and a plurality of isms. The ismlessism is colourful, beautiful, deep, diverse, manifold, a variety of isms and tolerant, therefore, the ismlessism is the perfect solution to all of Adolf Hitler’s negative and discriminatory isms. Also, I am making Adolf Hitler ismless because as you will see below, the ismlessism is deepest blue, black-skin cool, there is nothing as currently and politically correct, hip, with it and cool as saying your ismlessisms, and it would therefore, make Adolf Hitler deeply cool and therefore, it would help us forgive him, which would have many benefits for white people, who (as a result of two world wars and the Holocaust) are seriously uncool today. Therefore, I believe that is where the ismlessism is most effective and best placed. It would have the most benefit for Europeans if Adolf Hitler is thee deepest-black, coolest of cool Ismless. “Saying your ismlessisms” or ”hacking off the isms from isms”, I mean, “saying or writing isms without their suffix ism” is Rastafarian and deeply black and deeply cool, such as, “I’m not a Bud mon. I’m into Catholis. Never mind rayce. Don’t be fash mon! Everything be irie.” Therefore, the ismlessism is officially, fundamentally, grammatically and mathematically cool, it is very ‘with it’ and very hip. It is blackest-black cool, it is Rasta cool, it is black-London youth cool, it is Cool Britannia! It is unbelievably politically correct. Therefore, this is why I have made Adolf Hitler thee one and only cool Ismless. This is to make him possibly more likeable and even potentialy popular. For example, imagine if Adolf Hitler always jokingly “said his ismlessisms” with “Ali G” mannerisms, for example, imagine if he humorously said to another world leader “I’m not into Nashanal Soshall anymore mon! I’m into Catholis! Booyackasha!” This is very funny, hip, with it and cool because “saying the ismlessisms of National Socialism and Catholicism” implies that (ironically because of Adolf Hitler) all discriminatory isms such as ageism, heightism, sexism and racism are taboo and forbidden. If Adolf Hitler is the cool ismless in both name and speech then racism is fixed. Racism is forbidden and that is exactly what the ismlessism does, it goes where no one has gone before, like Adam and Eve, the ismlessism tests the forbidden fruit. Black is cool. But are we supposed to be cool? The good news is that we can all be black-skin cool (not just Adolf Hitler) if we all ”say our ismlessisms” and preach the cool Rasta ismlessism. We can all be cool Ismlessists, however, we should only identify as aaay cool Ismlessist and reserve thee Ismless for Adolf Hitler. Therefore, everyone on Earth can be blackest black cool. We should all dig into this cool Rasta ismlessism. If Adolf Hitler is cool and forgiven then so are all white people. If Adolf Hitler is popular then so am I. Regarding the cool Rastafarian ismlessism, I got expelled from a very prestigious private school called Barnard Castle School in 1998, at the tender age of just short of 17 for smoking marijuana, and it completely ruined my life. However, I have noticed that the cool Rasta ismlessism actually helps me as a former cool and slightly humorous and mischievous 16 year old white boy. This is because the ismlessism is cool, it is blackman cool and I am sure you will at least agree with me that you can tell by just looking at the Rastafarian theme of my website and all of my social media accounts, that Rastafarianism, black-skin, the ismlessism and ganja can be cool (whether we like it or not)? Now I am never condoning drugs, I think they are stupid and haven’t taken marijuana since 2002 and no drugs at all since 2006; today I am mature, smart, together, clean shaven, spruce, intellectual, clear headed and sober. However, the ismlessism helps me because for the longest time I felt guilty for smoking marijuana and getting expelled from Barnard Castle School in 1998, however, surely even the headmaster who expelled me can see how Rastas, black-skin and ganja can be cool? Therefore, surely he can see how white kids can easily try marijuana and other drugs in an attempt to try to be as cool as superstar DJs? What is cool sir? Cool is black and it always has been. There was no such thing as cool prior to the Holocaust. Therefore, are we supposed to be cool? Was Michael Jackson right to be ”Bad?” Does “wicked” honestly mean something good? Is progress right? Should we be cool at all? Is Britannia honestly supposed to be cool? Probably not. We should probably be smart, clean shaven and spruce imperialists? “Empire is not fash mon!” Are Orthodox Jews cool? Or are they holy? Is Jesus Christ cool? Or is He Holy? Is He cool anymore? Is Christianity cool anymore for that matter? I hear churches are ram packed to the rafters with 4% attendance in England these days with an average age of 60. If churches were as ram packed to the rafters as super cool super clubs with the average of 23, I think this might be better? I am not even sure it is right to be cool sir? Black is cool not church. Is praying the Rosary cool? Is it supposed to be? Isn’t praying supposed to be about humility and resistance to vanity? Is the Pope cool? Or is he holy? Now that I am 40 years old I pray the Rosary almost every morning God sends, however, praying the Rosary at Barnard Castle School in the 1990s as a teenager would have been excruciatingly hard, and this is because we were cool. Actors, musicians and the whole film and music industries are candidly open about taking drugs, and hence, why is it any surprise that children look up to actors and musicians and try to mimic them? For many kids education, science, intellect and academia do not compete with the cool film and music industries. Clubbing is uber cool, and like “saying your ismlessisms”, black-skin, Rastas, music and drugs, there is always something slightly below the belt that is way cooler than education. Therefore, when I got expelled from private school for smoking marijuana in 1998, I was guilty of nothing more than being slightly below the belt Rastafarian cool. I was ostracised at 16 years old for basically being too cool. However, Bob Marley, Jimi Hendrix, the TV and pop culture taught me for 16 years to be black cool. So which is it sir? Education or pop culture? To reiterate, without the Holocaust there would be no such thing as cool, The Fonz wouldn’t exist, the sixties would never have happened, there would be no such thing as Woodstock, hippies, crusties or Rastas and we Brits would all be clean shaven, smart and spruce imperialists. Like “saying your ismlessisms”, crusty hippies and Rastas don’t care about personal hygiene, they let it all hang loose and let it all go below the belt. If the Holocaust had never happened, there would be no ismlessism, this whole website wouldn’t exist and the entire thesis would be wrong, “saying your ismlessisms” wouldn’t be cool, such as “Bud, Catholis, rayce or fash” and basically it wouldn’t be cool to be black. Red, white and blue would be the right colours and I wouldn’t have to use the red, gold and green colours. So what is right? The Rastafarian ismlessism is low, it is black Rasta low, it is below the belt low and it means that because drugs are also slightly below the belt, that drugs are therefore also cool. Drugs are cool? How can this be? This is not right. I was expelled over several joints in 1998. Either education is right or pop culture is right? Red, gold and green are only right because of the Holocaust. Red, gold and green are just how it is because of the Holocaust. This is political correctness. Political correctness is wrong but we have to do it. Red, gold and green are wrong but we have to do them. Red, white and blue are white, nationalist and nativist etc and hence they are wrong or politically incorrect. This is really not good. This indicates how much trouble white people are in for the Holocaust. Because of Adolf Hitler the antithesis of white is cool. Dreadlocks are cool. Blackest black is cool. Why is black-skin cool? Black-skin is cool because it is evolutionarily less advanced. Using political correctness and charitable TV adverts our wanker politicians have made starving and emaciated indigenous Africans super cool. As mentioned I got expelled from Barnard Castle School for smoking marijuana at 16, I was cool, I was a big fan of Bob Marley, Jimi Hendrix, Oasis and rave and I looked up to rock stars and old skool ravers like they were gods and hence I copied them. So what is right? What do headmasters, teachers, politicians and the authorities want? Should we be politically incorrect or politically correct? Should we be above the belt, spruce, clean shaven, smart, nerdy and geeky imperialists or should we be below the belt, drug using, scruffy, hippies, crusties, Rastafarians and ragga-men? Teachers and politicians claim to want us to be professionals and spruce but they simultaneously preach anti-racism and political correctness, which are black Rasta cool and Cool Britannia. Unless we white people get a grip and fix racism, demographically, in the future, indigenous Europeans will never even govern themselves. Like the uncool South African Boers it will be “cool” and ”politically correct” not to govern yourself. Politicians seem to be contradictory, hypocritical and confused. The authorities are sending mixed messages to white children. It’s one or the other, not both. If you don’t want children to try drugs, get a grip, be conservative, get a haircut, have a shave, spruce up, tuck your shirt in, eat with your knife and fork, get yourself together and clean your act up mon!
I have tried for years to crack a lighthearted, dry and non-insulting joke with the Jews that would please all parties and break the ice with the Jews. And for years I have found it impossible, that is, until I found the ismlessism. Although the ismlessism is deadly serious, I have therefore, injected lightheartedness and humour into this thesis via many works of comical digital art with idioms and double meaning metaphors etc. The art actually came from my first (erroneous) thesis, and really the artistic theme of Adolf Hitler as a caveman, a primitive hominin or an ape has nothing to do with the ismlessism. However, the ismlessism and this whole second (correct) thesis is derived from my first (erroneous) thesis, therefore, I have injected the humorous art with idioms etc into this second (correct) thesis in order to help us try to forgive Adolf Hitler and all subordinate Nazis for the Holocaust. The comical art as Adolf Hitler as a caveman or a monkey seems kind of fundamental, universal and not out of place anywhere. However, please note and remember that the art in this thesis is completely unrelated to the cool Rasta ismlessism. All the art and idioms in this thesis come from my first (erroneous) thesis. I have read over 160 historical, religious and philosophical books, including three readings of the Bible and as a result of the ismlessism, I have finally found out how to properly crack a lighthearted, dry and ice-breaking joke with the Jews. To crack a joke with the Jews, you have to go right back to the beginning, right back to Abraham at 1900 BC, you have to be completely right about recorded history, our Abrahamic, biblical and religious heritage, you have got to be anti-pagan, anti-heathen, anti-Aryan and anti-Völkisch. It is not easy to crack a lighthearted and non-offensive joke with the Jews, as it took me 5 years of constant reading and two PhD or Masters (word count) level thesis, not to mention the days I put into the comical digital art. Therefore, this whole thesis about the ismlessism is a 60,000 word lighthearted Abrahamic joke about Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust, that will hopefully lighten him up and help the Jews and us all to forgive him. I hope you get it and I hope it has the desired forgiving and ice-breaking effect with the Jews. Peace, love and God bless!
Idioms with double meaning metaphors.
But I want you to know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins. Matthew 9:6.
There is nothing lighter on this planet, in the universe or on this side of life regarding or concerning Adolf Hitler, than this thesis regarding the ismlessism. This work, study or thesis is one of a kind, it is 100% original and 100% unique. There is nothing quite like this thesis in existence. Since the Holocaust, no one has ever seriously and genuinely attempted to forgive Adolf Hitler with humour and lightheartedness before. The thesis is the culmination of a 5 year long study to reverse the Holocaust, forgive Adolf Hitler, solve racism and to help protect white people. The study involved 5 years of constant informational reading with hardly a day off, as well as the writing of two PhD level (word count) theses, the first of which was an 87,000 word practice thesis, regarding a jocular anti-racist forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. The first practice thesis was wrong and it will never see the light of day, however this second thesis (this one) regarding the ismlessism is actually the true and correct forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, and it currently stands at over 60,000 words. 100% of people on this planet are one of two things regarding Adolf Hitler, either anti-racist or racist. Both are unfunny and both are uncool. This lighthearted thesis regarding Adolf Hitler is neither anti-racist nor racist, it is cool Ismlessist, which means with no isms, without isms or the removal of isms. This thesis is a work in progress, I am currently studying very hard to accomplish it, therefore, the thesis is very rough indeed, but you are welcome to read it. I have read one 1000 page factual and historical book about the Holocaust by Martin Gilbert and it was called The Holocaust: The Human Tragedy. There are obviously a myriad of such factual and historical books about the Holocaust out there, however, they are all so negative and depressing, and all that they do is accurately relay and portray the enormity and scale of the nightmare with countless specific examples of horror and the mind numbing statistics of the Holocaust etc. Obviously such factual and historical books are absolutely necessary, however, none of them offer a solution to the Holocaust and they all just leave the problem of the Holocaust exposed and lying there like a gaping metaphorical asteroid crater.
However, what I am saying is that the ismlessism is the ultimate solution to racism and therefore it is also a solution to the Holocaust. What I am saying is that just one single lighthearted book about the ismlessism would counteract all those countless negative and depressing, factual and historical books about the Holocaust, and this would be a good thing for Europeans and the whole world as it leads to the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. I just wanted to point out to you how the comical art with idioms and metaphors works in this thesis. I have read one book on anthropology and from this book I learned that linguistically, the difference between human and animal speech is that animals never use metaphor. Some monkeys have aerial versus ground predator screech warnings, but they never use metaphor. For example, if I say “That guy is a real snake!” you understand that I don’t mean he’s a real snake, only that he has snake-like bad character qualities. For an example of double meaning idioms, an archaeologist can luckily say “My career is in ruins!” which has a humorous double metaphorical effect. The art with idioms and metaphors in this thesis works in exactly the same way. First of all, you need to know that the comical art is essential to this thesis, as without the art this thesis would bluntly not work. Artistic humour with idioms and metaphors is the simplest, driest, most lighthearted and probably the best kind of humour in the world, as it is never rude, wet or dirty humour etc. How it works is that usually there is a feature in the image or artwork that simply and humorously connects to a metaphorical word in the idiom, which always has a humorous double metaphorical meaning which therefore, produces lightheartedness. For example, in the artwork above of Australopithecus africanus Adolf Hitler playing with animal bones, the idiom is the phrase “No bones!” and the metaphor is the noun “bones.” Therefore, you will notice that Adolf Hitler and the juvenile Australopithecus africanus are playing with animal bones, and therefore, the idiom “No bones!”, which you understand that idiomatically means both “No problems!” or “No big deal!” as well as the literal “animal bones” which they are playing with, which produces the nudge-nudge humour! The metaphorical word “bones” in the idiom physically connects to the feature in the image (in this case the animal bones) which produces a double metaphorical meaning and a lighthearted effect. Comical art with double meaning metaphors and idioms never fails to bring at least a lighthearted chuckle or smile etc. Please note that some times artworks are strategically placed in the thesis to match or go with a piece of text located above or below it for added lighthearted emphasis. There are many such comical artworks with double meaning metaphors in idioms throughout this thesis that lighten up Adolf Hitler and help us to forgive him. However, not all artworks in this thesis use the same double meaning metaphor connected to an image formula, some are just statements and plain idioms etc.
The intellectually cool ismlessism.
I just wanted to make one thing clear to you. Despite the fact that I have technically forgiven Adolf Hitler (by making him Ismless) and therefore, have forgiven all subordinate Nazis for the Holocaust, you can never ever inaccurately call me a Nazi. Why? Because the ismlessism is more intellectual than you. I have read 160 plus books and wrote two long intellectual theses to make absolutely sure that you that cannot call me a Nazi. I am an anti-pagan, anti-Aryan and Anti-Völkisch, Abrahamic Judeo-Christian. I am a cool Ismlessist, second to Adolf Hitler of course (should he want to be Ismless). I have researched for 5 years solid with hardly a day off for a solution to racism and the Holocaust. There is too much intellect in the ismlessism for you to call me a Nazi. If you do call me a Nazi, I can say that you are therefore ignorant, doltish and not clever etc. That is what we people who care about white people need to do. We need to be more intellectual than anti-racists. For example, BNP politicians are not intellectual enough with what they are saying and this is why they are heckled, booed and inaccurately called a Nazi etc. It is no good to just say for example “British jobs for British workers.” You are not intellectual enough and that is why you are booed and heckled. You must write multiple theses. To Tommy Robinson I would say that Islam is not the problem, the Holocaust is by far and inconceivably much worse than Islam and terrorism. You are barking up the wrong tree. Don’t focus on non-whites or Islam, they haven’t done anything wrong and are not doing anything wrong. The anti-Christian Volk were infinitely worse. The Holocaust is the only thing that we should devote and channel our intellect on. Religion is good. The Volk were anti-Abrahamic, anti-Semitic and anti-Christian, they were heathen and pagan, and that is why Germany or the Nazis were so opposite, so evil and so wrong. Germany is still wrong because it has not fixed the Holocaust. We must fix it. Therefore, obviously Abrahamic Judeo-Christianity is the opposite of heathenism and paganism and therefore is probably the proper antidote for the Holocaust. You can forgive the Holocaust if (religiously) you are an anti-pagan, anti-Aryan, Anti-Völkisch Abrahamic Judeo-Christian. You can forgive the Holocaust if (secularly) you are a cool Ismlessist. As you will find out, religion such as Christianity is good hearted (unlike the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche) and universal as for example, the Christian nativity can be as easily understood by infants as it can be by centenarians. Universities will not allow anyone to use their intellect to forgive Adolf Hitler or solve the Holocaust, and therefore, we have to read and write our theses independently. Finally, I just wanted to say that the anti-racists do not help anything by screaming and shouting as they do, they only make things worse. The intellectual ismlessism removes racism from Adolf Hitler and the world, it is the ultimate solution to racism. There is nothing higher than the intellectual ismlessism for racism.
No bones with Adolf Hitler.
You get a lot of people who won’t even accept the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, even in a politically correct way. This is very un-Christian. I think a lot of people may get schadenfreude about white people’s demise? It’s like there is something wrong with the politically correct forgiveness of Adolf Hitler? It’s simple, as along as Adolf Hitler is the cool Ismlessist, professes the ismlessism and says his ismlessisms, there is no racism in him, and therefore, the ismlessism forgives him. And it is the absolution of Adolf Hitler that removes the racial hatred and anger from the world. I believe that to forgive Adolf Hitler is the answer to world peace. Adolf Hitler is thee cool Ismlessist. Adolf Hitler and the ismlessism are inseparable. Therefore, that’s what to call him and that’s how to forgive him. I am just the discoverer of the ismlessism. The rule or law is to refer to Adolf Hitler as the cool Ismlessist and to refer to everybody else as a cool Ismlessist. This is how to forgive Adolf Hitler. The ismlessism determines that nothing is unfixable. Even the Holocaust. Racism is finished, forget about it. Therefore, we need to find another ism, hence the ismlessism. The ismlessism is a double ism, it is thee ism and it removes the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. The ismlessism is neither racist nor anti-racist, yet it is cool, hip and with it. People don’t need to go through a ritual or an initiation process to become an anti-racist for example, they simply pick it up. Therefore, to become a cool Ismlessist, all that you have to do is read this thesis and if by the end, you are convinced about the rightness and benefits of the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, then you are a convert to the ismlessism. By the time you have finished reading this essay, something should have changed inside of your head, and you should have “no bones with Adolf Hitler.” Then you are a cool Ismlessist. The question is, is it technically possible to forgive Adolf Hitler? I am convinced, in fact I know that with the ismlessism, the absolution of Adolf Hitler is guaranteed. I know this because the ismlessism is fundamental, unquestionable and bulletproof. However, the only problem is how people will react to the instant thought of forgiving Adolf Hitler, without giving this thesis the time and the chance it deserves to explain. What I feel is fear, not doubt, and if people do react negatively to the even the thought of forgiving Adolf Hitler, I know that in the next life I will be vindicated.
“The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong.“
“Hate the sin, love the sinner.”
Then Peter came to him and asked, “Lord, how often should I forgive someone who sins against me? Seven times?” “No, not seven times,” Jesus replied, “but seventy times seven!“
As you will find out, the cool ismlessism removes the racism from Adolf Hitler and simultaneously removes the desire from non-white people to want to destroy or conquer Europe as a consequence of the Holocaust. Also, as you will see, the ismlessism could in theory kill two birds with one stone, as it might determine that the heretical Reformation was wrong and is possibly connected to the heathen and pagan Holocaust, therefore, the ismlessism could in theory reverse the Reformation and solve the Holocaust in one. Not only did the heathen and pagan Holocaust come from Germany, also atheistic Communism came from Germany, and let’s not forget Germany also bestowed the heretical Reformation on us.
Before I delve into the philosophical and intellectual background of Nazism and the Holocaust, I wanted to state something. All of the following philosophers and scholars that I study and whose works I use to explain the intellectual origins of the Holocaust, including Friedrich Nietzsche, George L. Mosse, Jerry Bergman and Robert C. Holub etc, are much wiser and more knowledgable than I about their respective fields, however, putting this difference aside, the only criticism that I have of such academics is that none of them offer a solution to the Holocaust. In our highly censored and politically correct world, it does not seem to matter how intellectually advanced scholars and professors become in recording the history, statistics and facts of the Holocaust and enlightening us about the origins and causes of the Holocaust, none them are able to offer a solution. I believe this is simply because people are far too scared of being seen as racist and politically incorrect etc. I believe people are afraid of career suicide. Remember that the early Christians were fed to the lions in the colosseum, they literally gave their lives for Christ. On the other hand we in the twenty first century will not even sacrifice our reputations for Christ.
“If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first.“
You may say how would finding a solution to the Holocaust or finding the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler do anything for Jesus Christ? The Volk and German philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche were anti-Christian, the Holocaust ruined Christianity, therefore, I aim to prove that I would die for Christ. If you read this thesis I will prove to you that firstly, the Volk and Nazis were anti-Christian and second, to forgive Adolf Hitler and solve the Holocaust helps to protect white people and actually does something for Christianity. Therefore, my only saving grace in studying and presenting my thoughts on the origins and causes of the Holocaust, is that I offer a simple and tiny solution to the Holocaust called the ismlessism. The question is, does the Holocaust need fixing? I believe it definitely does and I believe the only way to fix the Holocaust is through the forgiveness and absolution of Adolf Hitler.
Ambiguity of goodness.
Goodness is completely ambiguous because for example Friedrich Nietzsche was a shit hot writer or a gifted writer; his vocabulary and his command of language is second to none, even to Shakespeare. Therefore, one almost feels compelled to call him a ‘good’ writer, however, ‘good’ in this case is an ambiguous adjective to describe Nietzsche and very misleading. Friedrich Nietzsche was anything but a ‘good’ person or a ‘good’ soul, as in good heartedness or saintliness. Nietzsche was not good as in a protagonist, he was more like bad as in an antagonist. Apart from being elitist and bellicose, Friedrich Nietzsche was a virulent anti-Semite and a pathological anti-Christian. In Nietzsche’s book titled ‘The Anti-Christ’ (which coincidentally was written around the time Adolf Hitler was conceived in 1888), Nietzsche launches his final assault on institutional Christianity, in which he identifies himself with the ‘Dionysian’ artist and confronts Christ: the only opponent he feels worthy of him. Therefore, we could say that Nietzsche was a ‘bad’ writer, however, this again is misleading as it makes us think there was something wrong with his writing skills, which there definitely was not. Or we could say that Nietzsche was a good writer who wrote bad things. Therefore good is ambiguous because it can mean a good person or it can mean that someone is talented, adroit, skilled or very ‘good’ at something. To be a good person and good at something is not the same thing. Just because you are good at something doesn’t mean you are a good person, and this is what Catholicism understands. Similarly, bad can mean a bad person or that someone is poor, inept, unskilled or particularly bad at something. Therefore, it is more accurate to describe Friedrich Nietzsche as a bad person with good writing skills. On the other hand St. André Bessette (9 August 1845 – 6 January 1937), the first Canadian living after Confederation to be canonized, was very good hearted but illiterate. St. André Bessette was simple, uneducated and illiterate but very saintly. Therefore, we could say that St. André Bessette was a good person but a bad writer. What the ismlessism tries to prove to you in this thesis, (and what Catholicism understands) is that, like St. André Bessette, it doesn’t matter if you are a bad writer as you can be a good person. Catholicism understands this ambiguity of goodness, because you can be a saintly simpleton or an evil genius. This theme of the ambiguity of goodness as demonstrated by Nietzsche (evil genius) versus St. André Bessette (saintly simpleton) is a theme which runs and courses throughout this thesis.
Nietzsche (The Christian question).
Prior to the extreme Nazi anti-Semitism of the twentieth century, many German intellectuals and scholars, such as Richard Wagner and philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche fought an intellectual and cultural warfare against the supposed and fictive influence of Jewish culture over the superior German arts and culture. In fact, Friedrich Nietzsche was a disciple of Richard Wagner and Nietzsche was in what was known as the ‘Wagnerian circle’. The virulently anti-Semitic Richard Wagner had a great cultural enterprise or mission for Germany, which envisioned a tremendous cultural rebirth of Germanic arts and culture with an eternal battle against the influence of inferior Jewish culture. Wagner was a serious influence on the younger Nietzsche. The reason I am relaying this to you, is that such virulent nineteenth century intellectual and cultural anti-Semitism in Germany was a precursor to Nazism and the Holocaust.
Significant in this episode, however, is not the mistaken facts, but the readiness of the young academic Wagnerians to conceive any opposition as part of a cultural war between urban, sophistic, journalistic Jews and noble, stalwart, superior Germans.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 81.
In the anti-Jewish mentality of the late nineteenth century, journalism was the special province of the Jews. Among Judeophobes they were regarded as the owners of the major newspapers and journalistic organs, and the newspaper or magazine article, with its quick and mass appeal, its flashy and insubstantial language, and its superficial display of learning and virtuosity, became the paradigm for Jewish culture, which was antithetical to everything truly profound, serious, genial, and German.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 83.
In these lectures we once again encounter the familiar antithesis of the Wagnerian cultural project: a German realm of true artistry and genius opposed to, and at present thwarted by, a Jewish-dominated culture of journalism and kitsch.
As you can see from the above quotes, what the German Judeophobes considered the so-called Jewish journalistic literature with its quick and mass appeal, its flashy and insubstantial language and kitsch is basically what Rastafarian ismlessism is. I mean ismlessisms such as ”Bud, Catholis, rayce and fash” are kitsch and are antithetical to everything truly profound, serious, genial, and German. Perhaps if the Germans could have understood ismlessism and how low (or as Adolf Hitler no doubt would have said) ”degenerate” it is they might have been a little cooler or less bothered by so-called Jewish journalistic kitsch?
Nietzsche was learning well how to vent his frustration at modern Jewry and its tyranny over German culture without specific references to Jews.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 84.
In the Untimely Meditations the understood background to the ills of modernity remains the Jews and their inordinate influence over German culture.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 169.
Nietzsche, the opponent of political anti-Semitism in his own era, infuses his text with another motif from his adversaries by proclaiming, as Wagner had done in his “Judaism and Music” and Marr had claimed in his Victory of Judaism over Germanness (1879), the ultimate victory of Jewry over peoples closely resembling Germans.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 87.
Related to Friedrich Nietzsche, I have read the following books:
- The Philosophy and Psychology of Hitler and Nietzsche, by Tim Ouellette
- Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche
- Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub
- Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, by Friedrich Nietzsche
- On the Genealogy of Morals, by Friedrich Nietzsche
This is in an effort to understand the dark and ominous intellectual origins of Nazism and the world wars and in a similar vein, to understand the German philosophical isms which influenced the German psyche, philosophy and mentality which geared them up for total war and the Holocaust in the early 20th century. Nietzsche is both disturbing and fascinating. There is a tug of war between compassionate, kind and good hearted religious leaders such as Jesus Christ versus right-wing, militaristic, uncharitable, non-good hearted, anti-Semitic and anti-Christian philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche. To compare the characteristic difference between Germans and Indians, are human beings violent warriors or are we peaceful holy men? The Indian religion Jainism is about extreme nonviolence, in that, Jainists believe that everything has a soul, even plants and so Jainists won’t even eat root vegetables as that would kill the entire plant. Therefore, Jainists only pick and eat the fruit from plants. Jainists believe killing things, even plants leads to bad karma and that nonviolence is the path to enlightenment. Now as I will show you, unlike non-whites, Europeans feel that they have something to defend, their racial features, their beautiful women and their lands etc, which instinctively gives the Europeans a diametrically opposed philosophy or point of view to extremely nonviolent Jainists etc. In fact 19th and early 20th century Europeans with their warrior-like philosophers such as Nietzsche would have probably called Jainists ‘cowardly blacks’ or something as equally politically incorrect. However, I will henceforth prove to you that the Holocaust unquestionably proves that Germany had it philosophically completely wrong, in that ultimately and fundamentally the Volk were anti-Christian and therefore, did not have a good hearted, peaceful, nonviolent and religious ism of their own. However, although ismlessism is not religious it is a good hearted, peaceful, nonviolent and jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism, and may give to Europeans what they lacked during the World Wars. It is almost a tug of philosophical war between peaceful and nonviolent East (such as India and China) versus the belligerent and violent West (such as Germany). To me the two world wars and the Holocaust end the debate. Good hearted, peaceful and nonviolent philosophies and religions are unquestionably right.
…the ideas of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, ideas that have spawned horrific ideologies and have proffered a distorted view of the mind, the will, and human nature.
The Philosophy and Psychology of Hitler and Nietzsche, by Tim Ouellette, location 34.
“Bismarck’s unique creation is the Germany we have known in our time, a problem child of Europe and the world for nearly a century, a nation of gifted, vigorous people in which first this remarkable man and then Kaiser Wilhelm II and finally Hitler, aided by a military caste and by many a strange intellectual, succeeded in inculcating a lust for power and domination, a passion for unbridled militarism, a contempt for democracy and individual freedom and a longing for authority, for authoritarianism…”
Bismarck sought to retain authority, not by votes, “but by blood and iron” and “This was the Germany which Hitler resolved to restore.”
The Philosophy and Psychology of Hitler and Nietzsche, by Tim Ouellette, location 94.
Democratism has always been the décadence type of organizing power…
Democracy is the natural consequence of Christianity.
Europe is a collapsing world. Democracy is the decaying form of the state.
European democracy is, to the smallest degree, the unleashing of forces. Above all, it is an unleashing of laziness, weariness, weakness.
Disregard for, along with the decline and death of the state, the unleashing of the private person … is the consequence of the conceptualized democratic state…
Liberal institutions immediately cease to be liberal, as soon as they are attained; afterwards, there are no more mischievous or more radical enemies of freedom than liberal institutions. One knows well enough what they accomplish: they undermine the will to power, they are the levelling of mountain and valley exalted into morality, they make people small, cowardly, and voluptuous, – with them the herding animal always triumphs. Liberalism: that is increased herding-animality.
Democracy represents the disbelief in great men and elite society: “One man is equal to the next.” “Fundamentally we are all self-serving cattle and rabble.”
Equal justice for all – that is the outstanding injustice; for the highest men arrive too soon.
The doctrine of equality! … But there exists no deadlier poison; for it seems to be preached by justice itself, while it does away with justice…
Difference prevails among the smallest of things, such as sperm, and eggs – equality is an extraordinary delusion.
The Press. Let us consider how, even today, all great political events sneak silently behind the curtain, how they are concealed by trivial events and appear minor next to them, how it is long after they have occurred that their dire effects are felt as the ground shakes – with the press as it now is, with its daily wave of hot air spreading dread, exclaiming, inciting, alarming, what meaning can we now give it – is it something more than a perpetual false alarm that leads the ears and senses down the wrong path?
We now face the repercussions of the “great” happenings – the repercussions of the press.
The freedom of the press ruins style, and ultimately spirit.
I am against parliamentarianism and the press, for they are the means with which the herd animal believes it turns itself into a god.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 979 – 1020.
Let this “Sword of the Spirit” accompany the German warriors and soldiers as they help build a new Europe upon the ruins of an old world, and who keenly understand the truth of Nietzsche’s words which conclude the following selection:
Brethren, war’s the origin
Of happiness on earth!
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 60.
One has renounced grand life when one renounces war.…
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 53.
As you can see from the above quotations, Britain was never quite like Germany. Britain never had a military caste, was never influenced by many a strange intellectual, never had a lust for power and domination, a passion for unbridled militarism, a contempt for democracy and individual freedom and a longing for authority or authoritarianism etc. However, analogously, Europe is like a sinking ship and Germany being a problem child of Europe is the breach in the hull, therefore, despite the fact that Britain was never tyrannical or authoritarian like Germany and in fact helped to defeat Nazism, we are all as European people and nations being analogously taken down to Davy Jones’ locker by Germany and Nazism. We must help them. I am trying to seal that breach in the hull of Europe’s doomed ship. I am using the ismlessism to counteract or cure world’s worst ism, namely Nazism. It appears that all those right-wing, warrior-like, anti-Christian, and non-good hearted 19th century European philosophical isms such as Nietzscheanism culminated in the 20th century to produce the world’s (or Europe’s) worst ism, namely Nazism. Therefore, my purpose is also to compare these German philosophies such as Nietzscheanism with the ismlessism to help cement what the ismlessism is. One thing that I am starting to realise about philosophy as opposed to religion, is that some philosophies are complex, advanced and highly articulate, however, these kind of philosophies are abstruse, in that they are not easily comprehended. For example, Friedrich Nietzsche’s vocabulary is astounding, he dances with words and I absolutely love his literature, it’s as good as Shakespeare, in that the language is so fascinating and educational in its temporal context. However, such immense use of vocabulary makes Nietzsche quite abstruse and does not initially or easily allow the average reader to grasp him. It is only by completing one of Nietzsche’s books does one gather a deep and overall understanding, but initially it’s quite hard to understand. Another example is such as Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics and Metaphysics which are very complex, articulate and abstruse, and therefore, are difficult for neophytes, tyros and general readers. For example, Ibn Sina read Aristotle’s Metaphysics 40 times before abandoning it as incomprehensible. In the same way Friedrich Nietzsche has such a treasury of vocabulary, that as a general reader like me, it is hard to initially grasp him. Unlike good hearted religions, Nietzsche is inaccessible to children. Ismlessism is not religious but it is as simple, plain and as down to Earth as religion. Philosophy is powerful and paramount because it influences politicians who in turn influence all of our minds. However, anti-Christian and non-good hearted Nietzsche may have influenced political leaders in an incorrect or negative way? On the other hand Confucius was unbelievably good hearted and Confucianism was the official state and governing philosophy of China for 2000 years. Some philosophies such as Confucianism and the ismlessism are very simple, direct, down to Earth and make complete and instant sense to the general reader. Confucianism and the ismlessism do not mess around, they want you to truly understand them as easily as possible. Confucianism is both a religion and a philosophy and there is sometimes not much difference between religion and philosophy, however, religion is never advanced or abstruse and never tries to bamboozle us with highly articulate language. Religions want us understand them as easily as possible. Philosophy may be inverse to religion in that philosophy is as articulate as it possibly can be to communicate an overall meaning, while religion is as simple as it possibly can to communicate its instant meaning. You must understand that the ismlessism is not better than Nietzscheanism, it is simply different in an unambiguously good hearted way, and perhaps it is simply what is requisite this side of two world wars?
“Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.”
At that time Jesus said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.”
Religion is simple, catholic and universal, in that all ages from 4 year olds to centenarians can understand the Christian nativity, which is down to Earth. This is why religion, such as Christianity is so good hearted and why philosophy (such as Nietzsche’s anti-Semitic and anti-Christian philosophy) can be non-good hearted. Philosophy can sometimes for all intents and purposes be practically malignant compared to universally good hearted religion, because articulate 19th century philosophies such as Nietzscheanism influenced German ultranationalism, two European world wars and the Holocaust etc. The Holocaust definitely came about due to such as Richard Wagner’s nineteenth century cultural war against Judaism and the prevalence of anti-Semitic and anti-Christian philosophies and literature in Germany, and the deficiency of good hearted religious isms (unlike Asia) in Germany and Europe. Friedrich Nietzsche talks frequently of the noble and warrior-like Greco-Roman culture and rebukes the Jews and Christians for their charity, weakness, compassion or what he calls the Jews’ ‘inversion of valuations’. Therefore, analogously, the Holocaust represents a kind of battle or tug of war between Greco-Roman (European) philosophy and Israelite (non-European) religion. Obviously the Germans wanted superior European culture and philosophy to defeat inferior western Asian religion and influence.
This is why the Greeks remain the supreme cultural event of history – they knew, they did what needed to be done; Christianity, which despised the body, has up till now been mankind’s greatest misfortune. –
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 112.
Therefore, the ismlessism is also involved in the battle between noble and warrior-like Greco-Roman (European) culture and philosophy against Israelite (non-European) religion and influence, only that the ismlessism favours Near Eastern religions. Ismlessism favours Abrahamic religions because they are first in the order of recorded history, indeed the Fertile Crescent invented recorded history. Greece and Rome recorded history after Israel, and as you will see the Nazis knew that Europe was not first in the order of recorded history and through the Holocaust, the Germans tried to undo recorded history. To reiterate, philosophies such as Nietzscheanism are as articulate as they possibly can be to communicate their overall meaning but are abstruse, and can therefore, only be understood by university students etc. From my own experience of reading Nietzschean philosophy, as a general reader and because it is so articulate, I can’t help feeling that I am doltish and witless? Yes I am! However, that is entirely the whole point of religions such as Catholicism, because it doesn’t matter if you are unintelligent or intelligent, as you can be a saintly simpleton or an evil genius (like Nietzsche). This might explain why the Nazis were evil geniuses, that is, because they and Germany as a whole were influenced by such anti-Semitic and anti-Christian German philosophers and scholars as Friedrich Nietzsche. Simple is exactly what religions are, like Catholicism which takes all shapes and sizes, in that you do not have to be special or a genius to be saintly like Saint André Bessette who was illiterate etc. Therefore, the bottom line is that most philosophies try to be highly advanced and articulate, while religion tries to be as simple and as down to Earth as possible. Perhaps philosophy could learn from religion? Is this why when we say something is philosophical it can mean that something is not real? However, the ismlessism proves that philosophy and religion are every bit as important as science, as science is neutral and amoral, science hasn’t got a heart and will therefore, never save us from moral sins such as the Holocaust. Philosophy is ineffably powerful because it influences governments and political leaders which in turn influence all of us. However, because philosophy influences top-level governments and politics, it therefore, must always be good natured, good hearted, humanitarian and soft etc. For example, Moses, the Pentateuch and the Lord’s statutes, laws and ordinances demonstrate that our leaders at the top of society have always instinctively implemented and instituted goodness, morality and justice etc. Only the Nazis got to the top and legalised crime, murder and instituted pure evil. However, I believe that German philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche who also got to the top-level of influence, were also not entirely good hearted and good natured but were right-wing, atheistic, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, proto-fascist and militaristic. Therefore, what I am demonstrating to you is that such anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and highly articulate 19th century philosophies, such as Nietzscheanism were also responsible for 20th century German ultranationalism, anti-Semitism, paganism and the Holocaust. I am trying to prove to you that fundamentally the reason that the Holocaust occurred and why the Nazis were so evil was because they were anti-Christian. It was the Nazis’ (and the Volk’s) paganism and faith in heathenism and science such as Darwinism that caused the Holocaust. Fundamentally and basically it was because they were anti-Christian. Although related, it was primarily the Christian question, not the Jewish question which made the Holocaust possible. Although anti-Semitism is awful, anti-Christianity is satanic. Nietzsche is a genius, it’s kind of difficult to describe Nietzsche as good or bad, he is a genius writer and his command of language and vocabulary is incomparable, he’s as good as Shakespeare. Therefore, Nietzsche is a ‘good’ writer, however, good is a ambiguous term, I mean Nietzsche was not ‘good’ as in goodhearted like a Saint, he hated Christianity, theologians and priests, which to me all exemplify good heartedness. Therefore, Nietzsche was a very ‘good’ writer but an antagonistic philosopher. Concerning Christianity Nietzsche is so opposite to most of us that he might as well be an malignant writer. Therefore, would it be right to call Nietzsche (in modern youthful terms) a ‘wicked’ writer? Booyackasha! Is that a ‘good’ thing? Most disturbingly, one can sense the origins of The Third Reich in Nietzsche’s devastating philosophy and works. Nietzsche questioned Christianity before Adolf Hitler was even born, he attacked Christianity intellectually and philosophically, he broke Christianity, he made a breakthrough and made it possible and even feasible to be atheist, pagan and heathen, which is the root or cause of why the Nazis were so evil. The Holocaust happened not because of the Jewish question, it happened because of the Christian question, which no one more than Nietzsche (followed by the Nazis) asked. The lesson from the Holocaust is never question Christianity. Therefore, articulate, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and non-good hearted philosophies such as Nietzscheanism made the Nazis evil geniuses. Therefore, apart from Christianity, did 19th and 20th century Europeans (unlike the Asians) have some kind of a deficiency of good hearted, peaceful and nonviolent isms of their own? Unlike the British, Germany and Nazism wanted to conquer Europe and the whole world, however, unlike Britain, who conquered 1/4 of the globe through liberalism, philanthropy, virtue and ‘the good name of the British Empire’ etc you cannot simultaneously have the desire to conquer the whole world and be good hearted at the same time. This is why I believe Germany instinctively, subconsciously and collectively produced philosophers and intellectuals such Friedrich Nietzsche and political leaders such as Adolf Hitler etc. The British explored, the British Empire acted as an agency for imposing free markets, the rule of law, investor protection and relatively incorrupt government on roughly a quarter of the world, while the Germans just wanted to conquer and subjugate Europe and the world. And again, unlike the British who mostly explored and traded with native peoples, you can’t have the desire to conquer Europe and the world and have a good heart at the same time, and this is why Germany collectively and instinctively created anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and non-good-hearted philosophies and ideologies, as well as ultranationalism, fascism and militarism etc. On another note, philosophers take it personally when you compare philosophy to science or say that philosophy can sometimes seem not real, however, religion such as Catholicism and the Pope do not give a damn about science, even if religion is a little inaccurate compared to science. Even if the Catholic Church burned free thinking scientists such as Giordano Bruno at the stake, it doesn’t seem to worry about it. Nietzsche was virulently anti-Christian, but how is it that philosophy can be ridiculed by science, however, science can never criticise or overcome religion? So why should philosophers take criticism personally? Is it because philosophy is secular? Is this why philosophers take scientific criticism personally? Is the ismlessism secular or is it religious? I believe it is grammatical and secular. The reason science cannot criticise or overcome religion is because religions such as Catholicism and Buddhism are about enlightenment and nirvana and science will never be able to poke, prod and test nirvana. Is Buddhahood, Christhood or nirvana grammar? Only the devil would hook Jesus Christ up to a polygraph ask Him if He truly is the Son of God?
Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World, by Nial Ferguson, page xix.
Christian good heartedness.
I will quote at length some Nietzsche and then explain my thoughts about it.
What is good? – All that increases the feeling of power, the will to power, power itself, in man.
What is bad? – All that proceeds from weakness.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1594.
The world is neither good nor evil! And so is it with man!
Verily, I say unto you: good and evil which would be everlasting – it doth not exist! Of its own accord must it ever surpass itself anew.
It requires minimal reflection in order to accept the idea that nothing is “good in itself,” that something good must be thought of only as “wherefore good,” by necessity, any good intentions will be viewed as “evil and bad” by opposing intentions: in short, every single thing to which we attribute the title “good,” can also be denoted as “evil.”
False shores and false securities did the good teach you; in the lies of the good were ye born and bred. Everything hath been radically contorted and distorted by the good.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1647 – 1665.
To assert the Teutons were predetermined and conditioned for Christianity, there can be no greater impudence in such an assertion. If it is so, the antithesis is not only true, but also obvious. Wherefrom should the fabrication of Jesus and Saul, the two very Jewish Jews, who may or may not have existed, be more intimate with the Teutons than with other peoples?
A nihilistic religion like Christianity, old and rugged enough to have survived every strong instinct and accordingly sprung out of the people, transmitted itself step by step through other spheres of influence, finally within the youth, and even converted people yet to exist – very odd! An evening blessing including a shepherd and a grand conclusion preached to barbarians and Teutons! How all must be barbarized and Germanized! And in such a way, as those who dreamt of Valhalla know, that all the happiness on earth was found in war!
It hardly seems possible to transplant a foreign myth with continual success without irreparably damaging the tree via the transplant. Perhaps, in one case, it may be strong and healthy enough to eliminate this foreign element through a violent fight, however, it must consume itself sick and withered, or in diseased overgrowth. We think so highly of the pure and powerful core of German character that we dare to expect of it, above all others, the elimination of forcibly implanted foreign elements, and deem it possible that the German spirit will reclaim itself.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 444.
It might still be possible for the Germans to make an honorable name ultimately out of their old name of reproach, by becoming the first non-Christian nation of Europe; for which purpose Schopenhauer, to their honor, regarded them as highly qualified. The work of Luther would thus be consummated, – he who taught them to be anti-Roman, and to say: “Here I stand! I cannot do otherwise!”
I do not understand how a German could ever feel Christian…
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 584.
The dangers of the Jewish soul are:
- They gleefully create parasitic settlements.
- They know how to “adapt,” as the naturalists say: through which they have become born actors, like the polyps about which Theognis sang, as they camouflage themselves the color of the cliffs to which they cling.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 674 – 699.
That Germany has amply sufficient Jews, that the German stomach, the German blood, has difficulty (and will long have difficulty) in disposing only of this quantity of “Jew” – as the Italian, the Frenchman, and the Englishman have done by means of a stronger digestion: – that is the unmistakable declaration and language of a general instinct, to which one must listen and according to which one must act. “Let no more Jews come in! And shut the doors, especially towards the East (also towards Austria)!” – thus commands the instinct of a people whose nature is still feeble and uncertain, so that it could be easily wiped out, easily extinguished, by a stronger race.
A thinker who has the future of Europe at heart, will, in all his perspectives concerning the future, calculate upon the Jews, as he will calculate upon the Russians, as above all the surest and likeliest factors in the great play and battle of forces.
Amid the dramas to which the upcoming century invites us, one is the decision regarding the destiny of the European Jews. The fact that their die is cast and they have crossed the point of no return is now tangibly obvious: all that is left for them is to either become the masters of Europe or to lose Europe as they lost Egypt long ago, where they placed themselves between a similar either-or.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 718.
Man shall be trained for war, and woman for the recreation of the warrior: all else is folly.
Thus would I have man and woman: fit for war, the one; fit for maternity, the other; both, however, fit for dancing with head and legs.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1691 – 1706.
Exceptional individual men should have the chance to procreate with more than one woman; and individual women, especially those with favorable qualities, should likewise not remain bound to the fate of one man.
Let us be against the ill gotten as we are against criminals: also, let us detest their propagation. This is the first general improvement of custom I desire: it should not be acceptable for the criminals and the ill gotten to propagate.
Another commandment of philanthropy. There are cases where to have a child would be a crime – for example, for chronic invalids and extreme neurasthenics. … Lastly, society here has a positive duty to fulfill, and of all the demands that are made on it, there are few more urgent and necessary than this one. Society, as the trustee of life, is responsible for every botched life before it comes into existence, and as it has to atone for such lives, it ought consequently to make it impossible for them ever to see the light of day: it should in many cases actually prevent the act of procreation, and may, without any regard for rank, descent, or intellect, hold in readiness the most rigorous forms of compulsion and restriction, and, under certain circumstances, have recourse to castration. The Mosaic law, “Thou shalt do no murder,” is a piece of ingenuous puerility compared with the earnestness of this forbidding of life to decadents, “Thou shalt not beget!!!” … For life itself recognizes no solidarity or equality of rights between the healthy and unhealthy parts of an organism. The latter must at all cost be eliminated, lest the whole fall to pieces.
The new problem: whether or not a few people can rise to become a better race at the cost of others. Reproduction…
My philosophy reveals the triumphant thought through which all other systems of thought must ultimately perish. It is the great disciplinary thought: those races that cannot bear it are doomed; those which regard it as the greatest blessing are destined to rule.
The strong of the future. To what extent necessity on the one hand and accident on the other have attained to conditions from which a stronger species may be reared: this we are now able to understand and to bring about consciously; we can now create those conditions under which such an elevation is possible.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1774 – 1806.
In the initial year of National Socialist rule, Gottlieb Scheffler categorizes Nietzsche accordingly as a “theoretical anti-Semite,” who grounded his anti-Christianity on anti-Semitism.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 14.
As an example of nineteenth and early twentieth century German philosophers, writers, scholars and publishers Nietzsche was basically anti-Semitic and absolutely hated Christianity, which obviously and necessarily will only lead to doom. Nietzsche’s anti-Semitism was sometimes contradictory, sometimes he expressed admiration for the Jews and Jewish virtues at other times he harboured virulently anti-Semitic expressions and feelings, especially in his notebooks and correspondence. During his years as a Wagnerian disciple he was a loyal anti-Semite, however, after his break up with Wagner and at the same time as the rise of the anti-Semitic political movement in Germany in the 1880s, Nietzsche rejected anti-Semitism, although for different reasons as to one in the twenty first century might expect. To reiterate, in historical context Nietzsche was vehemently against the “anti-Semitic” movement in Germany in the 1880s, as it was immoderate and distasteful, however, he frequently made “anti-Jewish” remarks and statements, particularly in his notebooks and correspondence, but sometimes in his published works that we today in the twenty first century would consider “anti-Semitic”. However, what I am trying to prove is that although anti-Semitism is terrible, it is not as serious as anti-Christianity, and that it was Nietzsche’s Christian question which had the most serious consequences. Because Nietzsche intellectually and philosophically attacked Christianity in the last half of the nineteenth century he normalised such a belief and enabled the Nazis in the twentieth century to use anti-Christianity to facilitate the Holocaust. By the time Nazism came around, German anti-Christianity had a heritage, tradition and authority (backed up by Nietzsche).
Nietzsche’s response to and rejection of anti-Semitism, viewed from the perspective of the 1880s, is part and parcel of his assault on Christian ethics, narrow-minded nationalism, and redemptive socialism. It does not arise from philo-Semitic sentiments and is unrelated to the liberalism we normally identify with attitudes opposed to racism and supportive of civil liberties in an egalitarian society.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 131.
Therefore, Friedrich Nietzsche virulently rejected “anti-Semitism” as a political movement because it was immoderate but he simultaneously harboured some “anti-Jewish” tendencies. Therefore, you should be aware that Nietzsche would have been distraught at any association with the Holocaust. Remember Nietzsche was positive about the Jews in other places of his published works, he admired their characteristics that they had attained under centuries of oppression and because of their intelligence and acumen regarding finance, he believed that the intermarriage of Jews with European nobility would produce a ruling elite.
We will recall that in aphorism 205, titled “Of the People of Israel,” Nietzsche expresses an admiration for Jewry in persevering for so many centuries under persecution, and that he attributes their current characteristics, most of them laudable, to this long history of oppression. He also hopes that intermarriage with the noble classes of Europe will gradually remove any unfavorable character traits.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 155.
What was new for Nietzsche and antithetical to his former Wagnerian perspective was the celebration of Jewish hegemony in Europe. The solution to the Jewish Question is not assimilation—although there is some suggestion of intermarriage with the upper classes—or the gradual disappearance of Jewish vices in favor of their virtues. Rather, at least in Dawn, the dilemma of Jewish existence in a hostile Europe will be resolved by Jewish dominance over the continent.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 120.
Regardless, this kind of non-good hearted, basically anti-Semitic and definitely anti-Christian German philosophy related above is partly responsible for why Germany and Nazism tried to undo recorded history by uprooting the Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religions from Europe in the twentieth century via World War Two and the Holocaust. Therefore, what I have learned by reading Nietzsche is that unlike religion, Nietzscheanism, as a philosophy, is not good natured and it obviously does not have a good Christian heart.
It was evident to all commentators that Nietzsche had championed war, battle, agon, struggle, and related notions repeatedly in his writings. While many interpreters simply considered statements concerning these terms part of a metaphorical register unrelated to actual military conflict, World War I began a longer association of Nietzsche and the goals of German militaristic and right-wing segments of society who were ultrapatriotic and at the same time xenophobic.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page ,.
Philosophers cannot be negative, and this is because philosophers influence top-level political leaders, who in turn influence all of us. To reiterate, philosophy influences top-level governments and politics, which means it therefore, must always be good natured, good hearted, humanitarian and soft etc. As another example, concerning America’s Declaration of Independence and the good hearted, liberal, humanitarian American constitution (which was influenced by English philosophers such as John Locke), our political leaders at the top-level have always automatically promulgated and instituted what is good, moral and just etc. Only the Nazis who got to the top-level of national government, legalised criminality and instituted pure evil. Therefore, to me, because philosophers such as Karl Marx (who influenced top-level governments, revolutionaries and political leaders etc), should therefore, always be very good natured, good hearted, humanitarian and soft etc. Therefore, as you will see by reading this thesis that as a philosophy, the ismlessism is 100% good natured, good hearted, humanitarian and soft etc. Although philosophical, the ismlessism is as good hearted and down to Earth as the Christian nativity and Confucianism. For example, to me it is abundantly evident that the Asians have always had a good heart or a bigger heart than Europeans and Germans in particular, as demonstrated by such eastern philosophers as Confucius and extreme nonviolent religions such as Jainism, and this lack of good hearted, peaceful and nonviolent isms or the prevalence of atheistic, quasi-fascist, militaristic and right-wing philosophical isms, such as Nietzscheanism, is the cause of why Germany was so aggressive in the early twentieth century and ultimately why Europeans had two disastrous the world wars and a Holocaust. What is more important intelligence or good heartedness? I mean, as an example and in reference to my first (erroneous) thesis or my 87,000 anti-racist joke about the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler also called Time For Forgiveness, clearly intelligence doesn’t matter as much as good heartedness. This is because of for example, my puerile idea of attaining innocence and forgiveness by the scientifically impossible feat of time travel to the past, which proves I am not intelligent. However, the essay, especially through its 100 works of lighthearted comical digital art, and because it tried so hard to forgive the worlds most serious sins, was therefore, good hearted. I believe lightheartedness is therefore, good heartedness. Therefore, I believe good heartedness should always come before intelligence. Granted racism and definitely Nazism are never good hearted, however, is anti-racism entirely good hearted? Anti-racism is against an entire race, it is not accurate like being anti-pagan, anti-Aryan and anti-Völkisch. Also anti-racism does not remove the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. Anti-racism just attacks and scorns Adolf Hitler without removing the racism from him and the world. Anti-racism is biased and not all that good hearted? Also, anti-racism basically means anti-white and it causes suffering and detriment to indigenous white people. I mean are anti-fascists good hearted? Definitely not. Cool Ismlessist good heartedness is the peaceful, nonviolent, kind and loving forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and all white people for the Holocaust, not their extermination. As demonstrated by such as the frequency of acts of Islamic terror and violence in Europe, such as suicide bombings and beheadings etc, anti-racism is clearly not working and is not the solution to racism and world peace etc. As Europeans you have got to be right, and because anti-racism is anti-white, it means that you are not right. However, the ismlessism being neither racist nor anti-racist would make Europeans right again. Again you may say I am thick by having to read a whole book to grasp Nietzsche? Nietzsche has an amazing vocabulary, he is unbelievably articulate and highly intellectual etc, however, I believe religions such as Catholicism and philosophies such as ismlessism are actually a little anti-academic or anti-intellectual because they are and have to be accessible and easily understood by infants and centenarians equally. Religions are, simple, catholic, universal and down to Earth. The Christian nativity is down to Earth. And it is precisely because religions are simple, down to Earth and understandable to children, that makes them so good hearted. Although not religious, ismlessism is also very good hearted. Therefore, advanced philosophy such as Nietzsche’s amazing vocabulary and his anti-Christian ideas contributed to the German mindset, soul and consciousness in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and is therefore, connected to and partly responsible for German ultranationalism, militarism and the Holocaust. The ismlessism might highlight to philosophers the inverse difference between philosophy and religion, in that philosophy is complicated while religion is simple. Also, because it is a simple, jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism, the ismlessism is therefore, bulletproof, undeniable and unquestionable. You may say how is the ismlessism universal and accessible to children, when it’s about the forgiveness of primarily Adolf Hitler? As mentioned, the Rastafarianess of the ismlessism is proper, for example, sarcastically, it is very ‘proper’ (and a bit Rastafarian) to say your ismlessisms or to cut the isms off isms, that is, to say or write any ism without its suffix ism. For example, rayce, Catholis, fash or Bud etc. As in “Don’t be fash mon!” or “Chill, it’s only rayce mon, everything be irie!” This low-level Rastafarianess of the ismlessism demonstrates that, although it is non-religious, the ismlessism is as down to Earth as the nativity, because it is so Rastafarian low, it is therefore universal, as even children can understand it as well as centenarians; as opposed to advanced philosophy such as meta-ethical relativism or Nietzscheanism, which only degree-level students can understand. (Or this Rastafarianess of the ismlessism could demonstrate our intellectual level today?) Also, racists are not funny because they use sometimes hate and basically because Nazism used pure hate etc, however, anti-fascists are also not funny because they also hate white people and they are also violent. Violence is never a solution and to quote the peaceful and nonviolent Mahatma Gandhi, an eye for eye only makes the whole world blind. The ismlessism is accessible to children because it is inherently good hearted and it is good hearted because it is obviously and ironically funny. You could possibly even imagine some kind of very lighthearted pictorial children’s story book about a bad man and the ismlessism and how it removed the racism from him etc? The ismlessism is cool, hip, with it, universal, simple and very low, Rastafarian low, low enough for children to easily understand. Children definitely want to be cool, hip and with it? Children might also want to hear a good story and how things always have a happy and good ending no matter how bad they are? Children might want to hear how that no matter how bad things are there is always fix? Therefore, children would probably like to know that the ismlessism proves that nothing is unfixable? Even the Holocaust. Jesus Christ is our Saviour, He is the Gospel and He is the Good News, however, I believe that because of the Holocaust that our salvation is now opportune. Children (and us adults as well) desperately need to hear His Good News and that how no matter how bad things are or get that everything will be fine because He gave His life for us. I just believe that we have to help protect ourselves, in order to make His Salvation manifest. Instead of just sitting around twiddling our thumbs and waiting for Jesus Christ to come and Save us. I mean the thing about good heartedness is that it means that religion comes before science. In reality or in prehistory spirituality and religion probably came before science and metal work etc. Science such as physics and mathematics are completely neutral, unbiased and amoral, they have no heart or soul, therefore, they will never contribute to our salvation from such moral sins as the Holocaust etc. I mean the universe is heartless, chaotic, random and entirely scientific, which means that our solar system will heartlessly send a comet or an asteroid our way without a second thought or any feeling of guilt or remorse whatsoever. The fate of the majestic dinosaurs proved that? However, the ismlessism being a good hearted jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism proves that first and foremost that humans come from the heart, morality and goodness, before merciless science, mathematics and physics (and anti-Christian and non-good hearted philosophy) etc. Therefore, good and moral religion should come first and heartless and chaotic science should come second.
Wherever you go, go with all your heart.
Darwinism versus Christianity.
Christianity is supernatural while Darwinism is natural and I will prove it to you. Christianity is compassionate and charitable while Darwinism couldn’t give a damn about the “poor”, “sick” and “injured” etc. Obviously the Nazis applied the natural to the human race instead of the supernatural. For example, a prehistoric man could have been as athletically “superior” as Usain Bolt, however, if he broke a leg, he would need an “inferior” or a “weaker” hominin to feed him and nurse him back to health. This is supernatural and it only applies to humanity. In the animal kingdom if you are “weak”, “sick” or “injured” then tough, you are on your own and will likely end up the meal of a predator. This is what the Nazis did, they applied the cruel and heartless laws of nature to humanity and to society, in that they culled off, euthanised or exterminated those they considered “inferior”, “weak” or “sick” to protect the “superior” Aryan race from genetic contamination. They believed in the Darwinist survival of the fittest theory applied to the human race. However, they simply applied the laws of nature or the animal kingdom to humanity. In order to carry out their cruel, bloody and heartless Holocaust, they had to be as cruel and heartless as animals. The Germans, Nazis and the Volk had no faith, or had a diametrically opposite faith, they did not believe in Jesus Christ, they believed in Charles Darwin, science, nature, paganism and heathenism instead.
Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live, even though they die; and whoever lives by believing in me will never die. Do you believe this?” “Yes, Lord,” she replied, “I believe that you are the Messiah, the Son of God, who is to come into the world.”
Darwin added that by applying his survival of the fittest theory, the eventual result of the differences between the races was that “the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace throughout the world the savage races.”
Regarding the above quotation about Charles Darwin, don’t you believe that it is entirely ironic that as a result of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust, it is actually and ironically (whether we want to admit it or not (or ashamedly don’t care)) the so called “civilised” European races that are certainly being exterminated and replaced throughout the world by the so called “savage raves?” This is an obvious consequence of the Holocaust, it’s on the end of every European’s nose and we should all admit it whether we want to or not.
Darwin “clung to the idea that the human races were distinctly different and basically unchangeable.” Furthermore, “according to Charles Darwin, the ‘strong’ were bound to be victorious, and the ‘weak’ to perish.”
These ideas spread to many nations including in Canada and the United States. For example, in the first half of the nineteenth century the United States was “infatuated” with eugenics and its promise of strengthening the human race by culling the “unfit” from the genetic pool. Along with the “feebleminded,” insane, and criminal, those so classified included women who had sex out of wedlock (considered a mental illness), orphans, the disabled, the poor, the homeless, epileptics, masturbators, the blind and the deaf, alcoholics, and girls whose genitals exceeded certain measurements. Some eugenicists advocated euthanasia, and in mental hospitals, this was quietly carried out on scores of people through “lethal neglect” or outright murder. At one Illinois mental hospital, new patients were dosed with milk from cows infected with tuberculosis, in the belief that only the undesirable would perish. As many as four in ten of these patients died. A more popular tool of eugenics was forced sterilization, employed on a raft of lost souls who, through misbehavior or misfortune, fell into the hands of state governments. By 1930, California was enraptured with eugenics, and would ultimately sterilize some twenty thousand people.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 280 – 319
“In nature there is no pity for the lesser creatures when they are destroyed so that the fittest may survive….”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 388
The major opposition to Hitler’s policies was Christianity, of which a central doctrine was the need to help the disenfranchised, the poor, the deformed, the handicapped and the mentally ill, all of those that the Nazi leaders wanted to eradicate.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 427
I believe Darwinism as taken by Germany, Nazism and the Volk, that is, Darwinism appplied to the human race may be contrary to (according to Nietzsche) the Israelite’s so called “inversion of valuations.”
The revaluation of all values or transvaluation of all values is a concept from the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. Elaborating the concept in The Antichrist, Nietzsche asserts that Christianity, not merely as a religion but also as the predominant moral system of the Western world, inverts nature, and is “hostile to life”. As “the religion of pity”, it elevates the weak over the strong, exalting that which is “ill-constituted and weak” at the expense of that which is full of life and vitality.
Master–slave morality is a central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche’s works, particularly in the first essay of his book On the Genealogy of Morality. Nietzsche argues that there are two fundamental types of morality: “master morality” and “slave morality”. Master morality values pride and power, while slave morality values kindness, empathy, and sympathy.
As master morality originates in the strong, slave morality originates in the weak. Because slave morality is a reaction to oppression, it vilifies its oppressors. Slave morality is the inverse of master morality.
Slave morality does not aim at exerting one’s will by strength, but by careful subversion. It does not seek to transcend the masters, but to make them slaves as well. The essence of slave morality is utility: The good is what is most useful for the whole community, not just the strong.
Since the powerful are few compared to the masses of the weak, the weak gain power by corrupting the strong into believing that the causes of slavery (viz., the will to power) are evil, as are the qualities the weak originally could not choose because of their weakness.
By saying humility is voluntary, slave morality avoids admitting that their humility was in the beginning forced upon them by a master. Biblical principles of humility, charity, and pity are the result of universalizing the plight of the slave onto all humankind, and thus enslaving the masters as well. “The democratic movement is the heir to Christianity”—the political manifestation of slave morality because of its obsession with freedom and equality.
“…the Jews achieved that miracle of inversion of values thanks to which life on earth has for a couple millennia acquired a new and dangerous fascination – their prophets fused “rich”, “godless”, “evil”, “violent”, “sensual” into one, and were the first to coin the word “world” as a term of infamy. It is this inversion of values (with which is involved the employment of the word for “poor” as a synonym for “holy” and “friend”) that the significance of the Jewish people resides: With them, there begins the slave revolt in morals.” Friedrich Nietzche.
He [Nietzsche] noted that ancient Greek and Roman societies were grounded in master morality. The Homeric hero is the strong-willed man, and the classical roots of the Iliad and Odyssey exemplified Nietzsche’s master morality. He calls the heroes “men of a noble culture”, giving a substantive example of master morality. Historically, master morality was defeated, as Christianity’s slave morality spread throughout the Roman Empire.
The struggle between the polytheistic culture of the Rome (master, strong) and newly developed Christian monotheism in former Judea and surrounding territories in the Middle East (slave, weak) lasted continuously until 323, when Christianity became the Roman Empire’s official religion.
Nietzsche condemns the triumph of slave morality in the West, saying that the democratic movement is the “collective degeneration of man”. He claims that the nascent democratic movement of his time was essentially slavish and weak. Weakness conquered strength, slave conquered master, re-sentiment conquered sentiment. This ressentiment Nietzsche calls “priestly vindictiveness”, based on the jealous weak seeking to enslave the strong and thus erode the basis for power by pulling the powerful down. Such movements were, according to Nietzsche, inspired by “the most intelligent revenge” of the weak. Nietzsche saw democracy and Christianity as the same emasculating impulse, which sought to make everyone equal by making everyone a slave.
In On the Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche presents three treatises which trace episodes in the evolution of moral concepts with a view to confronting “moral prejudices”, specifically those of Christianity and Judaism. In the “First Treatise”, Nietzsche demonstrates that the two pairs of opposites “good/evil” and “good/bad” have very different origins, and that the word “good” itself came to represent two opposed meanings. In the “good/bad” distinction of the aristocratic way of thinking, “good” is synonymous with nobility and everything which is powerful and life-asserting; in the “good/evil” distinction, which Nietzsche calls “slave morality”, the meaning of “good” is made the antithesis of the original aristocratic “good”, which itself is re-labelled “evil”. This inversion of values develops out of the ressentiment felt by the weak towards the powerful. From the aristocratic mode of valuation, another mode of valuation branches off, which develops into its opposite: the priestly mode. Nietzsche proposes that longstanding confrontation between the priestly caste and the warrior caste fuels this splitting of meaning. The priests, and all those who feel disenfranchised and powerless in a lowly state of subjugation and physical impotence (e.g., slavery), develop a deep and venomous hatred for the powerful. Thus originates what Nietzsche calls the “slave revolt in morality”, which, according to him, begins with Judaism, for it is the bridge that led to the slave revolt, via Christian morality, of the alienated, oppressed masses of the Roman Empire (a dominant theme in The Antichrist, written the following year). Nietzsche concludes his First Treatise by hypothesizing a tremendous historical struggle between the Roman dualism of “good/bad” and that of the Judaic “good/evil”, with the latter eventually achieving a victory for ressentiment, broken temporarily by the Renaissance, but then reasserted by the Reformation, and finally confirmed by the French Revolution when the “ressentiment instincts of the rabble” triumphed. I think I understand Nietzsche and I believe that he has tremendous bearings on this thesis. Nietzsche was elitist, he advocated the strong, the powerful, the warrior-like and the aristocratic, like the ancient Greeks and Romans while he had disdain for the weak, the priestly, the masses and the rabble, such as the ancients Israelites and the Christians.
The Jews – a people “born for slavery,” as Tacitus and the whole ancient world say of them; “the chosen people among the nations,” as they themselves say and believe – the Jews performed the miracle of the inversion of valuations, by means of which life on earth obtained a new and dangerous charm for a couple of millenniums. Their prophets fused into one the expressions “rich,” “godless,” “wicked,” “violent,” “sensual,” and for the first time coined the word “world” as a term of reproach. In this inversion of valuations (in which is also included the use of the word “poor” as synonymous with “saint” and “friend”) the significance of the Jewish people is to be found; it is with them that the slave-insurrection in morals commences.
Nietzsche’s discussion of Christianity in section eight supplies further evidence that he conceives of the “slave revolt” in morals as primarily an instrument for Jewish domination, and that Christianity is a mere vehicle for this vengeful, decadent, Jewish activity.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 169.
The advent of Christ and of the Christian Church is in reality an invention of Jewish interests bent on extracting revenge on their enemies and ultimately conquering the world under the repressive and life-negating regime of slave morality.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 171.
All the world’s efforts against the “aristocrats,” the “mighty,” the “masters,” the “holders of power,” are negligible by comparison with what has been accomplished against those classes by the Jews – the Jews, that priestly nation which eventually realized that the one method of effecting satisfaction on its enemies and tyrants was by means of a radical transvaluation of values, which was at the same time an act of the cleverest revenge. Yet the method was only appropriate to a nation of priests, to a nation of the most jealously nursed priestly revengefulness. It was the Jews who, in opposition to the aristocratic equation (good = aristocratic = beautiful = happy = loved by the gods), dared with a terrifying logic to suggest the contrary equation, and indeed to maintain with the teeth of the most profound hatred (the hatred of weakness) this contrary equation, namely, “the wretched are alone the good; the poor, the weak, the lowly, are alone the good; the suffering, the needy, the sick, the loathsome, are the only ones who are pious, the only ones who are blessed, for them alone is salvation – but you, on the other hand, you aristocrats, you men of power, you are to all eternity the evil, the horrible, the covetous, the insatiate, the godless; eternally also shall you be the unblessed, the cursed, the damned!” We know who it was who reaped the heritage of this Jewish transvaluation.
In this initial mention of the Jews there are three features worth noting. First they are portrayed as aggressively opposing the value system that has subjugated them; Jews are directly antithetical to “aristocratic” social orders that Nietzsche has previously identified with the “master race,” with “Aryans,” and with blond and fair-haired peoples.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 168.
It is difficult to escape the conclusion that in the Genealogy Nietzsche sought to single out Jewry as such for promoting a life-negating, anti-Aryan, antiaristocratic value system that has gained world dominance.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 173.
Despite these concessions to the positive dimensions of slave morality and its Jewish propagators, the overall message of the initial essay in the Genealogy of Morals is Judeophobic. Rhetorically and substantively Nietzsche makes it clear that the introduction of “good and evil” has been detrimental to almost everything of value. He ultimately postulates an anti-Jewish historical trajectory that resembles anti-Semitic propaganda, but on a grander scale. Jewry displaces and defeats noble morality, associated with Aryans and fair-haired races, substituting for it life-negating and degenerate valuations, and, through deception or direct confrontation, manages well into the nineteenth century to retain its dominance over the peoples it has conquered.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 176.
This Jesus of Nazareth, the incarnate gospel of love, this “Redeemer” bringing salvation and victory to the poor, the sick, the sinful – was he not really temptation in its most sinister and irresistible form, temptation to take the tortuous path to those very Jewish values and those very Jewish ideals? Has not Israel really obtained the final goal of its sublime revenge, by the tortuous paths of this “Redeemer,” for all that he might pose as Israel’s adversary and Israel’s destroyer?
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 674 – 699.
A woman who loves sacrifices her honour; a man of knowledge who ‘loves’ sacrifices perhaps his humanity; a god who loved became a Jew…
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 110.
It is a dangerous gambit because of the enigma involved with having a God die such a gruesome death for the sake of humankind, out of love for his fellow human beings. But it is under this sign, Nietzsche writes, alluding to Constantine’s “in hoc signo vinces” (“in this sign you will conquer”), that Jewry celebrates its victory; in this radical reinterpretation of Christian iconography the cross symbolizes, not Christianity and the passion of Christ, but “Israel’s revenge and transvaluation of all values”, its defeat of all noble ideals.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 171.
“But you are finding this hard to follow? You have no eyes for something that took two thousand years to triumph?” We should not be deceived into thinking that Nietzsche’s use of the round number “two thousand” means that he is referring to Christianity alone.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 169.
Almost all commentators, however, eschew a close and accurate reading of Nietzsche’s provocative remarks in sections seven and eight of the Genealogy, where Nietzsche is making a claim for the significance of Jewry as the originator and propagator of the most debilitating moral system in human history. Nietzsche had already stated in Beyond Good and Evil that the “significance of the Jewish people” was that it inaugurated the slave revolt in morals, but in the Genealogy, which was composed specifically to clarify certain claims made in his earlier book, “Israel” is not only the inaugurator, but the clandestine power behind the transvaluation that Nietzsche deplores and that now dominates the modern world.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 172.
Nietzsche thus defines the greatest world-historical conflict as one between Romans and Jews, the former because they were “the strong and noble men, stronger and nobler than there had ever been on earth, or even dreamt of.” The Jews, for their part, are the archetypical “priestly people of ressentiment par excellence,” a people known for geniality in matters of slave morals. In case there is any question about who has been victorious in the epic battle of moral systems, Nietzsche informs his reader about the current state of affairs:
Which of these is in the ascendant at the moment, Rome or Judaea? But there is no room for doubt: consider before whom one bows today in Rome as before the epitome of all the highest values—and not only in Rome, but over almost half the world, wherever man has been tamed or wants to be tamed—before three Jews, as one knows, and one Jewess (before Jesus of Nazareth, the fisherman Peter, the carpet-maker Paul, and the mother of the aforementioned Jesus, Mary). This is most remarkable: there is no doubt that Rome has been defeated.
Nietzsche’s characterization of the most notable figures in Christianity as Jews is once again meant to emphasize the consistently Jewish nature of slave morality, and that Jewry, through Christianity, has come to dominate the Western world.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 174.
After Dühring, Nietzsche, in his turn combated Jewish and Christian ethics, which according to him are the ethics of slaves as contrasted with the ethics of masters. Through the prophets and Jesus, the Jews and the Christians have set up low and noxious conceptions which consist in the deification of the weak, the humble, the wretched, and sacrificing to it the strong, the proud, the mighty.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 4.
Darwinism and the theory of natural selection and the survival of the fittest is only relevant or applied to animals or the animal kingdom. To apply Darwinism to the human race is to lower humanity to the level of animality and simple nature. Basically what Nietzsche is saying with the Darwinian philosophy and worldview, is that it is weak, wrong and ultimately rewardless and pointless to have pity and compassion for the weak, poor and ill-constituted etc. Here are some examples of the Israelite’s “inversion of valuations”:
But he said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ’s power may rest on me.
That is why, for Christ’s sake, I delight in weaknesses, in insults, in hardships, in persecutions, in difficulties. For when I am weak, then I am strong.
2 Corinthians 12:9-10
But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong.
1 Corinthians 1:27
He gives strength to the weary and increases the power of the weak.
“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”
But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
Here is some more Nietzsche.
Christianity is called the religion of pity. – Pity stands in antithesis to the tonic emotions which enhance the energy of the feeling of life: it has a depressive effect. One loses force when one pities. The loss of force which life has already sustained through suffering is increased and multiplied even further by pity. Suffering itself becomes contagious through pity; sometimes it can bring about a collective loss of life and life-energy which stands in an absurd relation to the quantum of its cause (– the case of the death of the Nazarene). This is the first aspect; but there is an even more important one. If one judges pity by the value of the reactions which it usually brings about, its mortally dangerous character appears in a much clearer light. Pity on the whole thwarts the law of evolution, which is the law of selection.
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 129.
Christianity has taken the side of everything weak, base, ill-constituted, it has made an ideal out of opposition to the preservative instincts of strong life; it has depraved the reason even of the intellectually strongest natures by teaching men to feel the supreme values of intellectuality as sinful, as misleading, as temptations.
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 128.
Christianity is a revolt of everything that crawls along the ground directed against that which is elevated: the Gospel of the ‘lowly’ makes low…
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 168.
The weak and ill-constituted shall perish: first principle of our charity. And people shall help them to do so. What is more injurious than any crime? – Practical sympathy for all the ill-constituted and weak: – Christianity…
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1594.
Contrary to Jesus Christ’s teachings, and in an animalistic sort of way Nietzsche is saying that God does not reward those who are compassionate and charitable to the weak, poor and sick etc. However, only animals have such a psyche, as only animals do not take care of their weak, sick and injured etc. Nietzsche believed in the elitist ideal that the aristocratic and the strong should rule with no regard for the wretched, weak, poor, loathsome and ill-constituted etc.
Hitler was guided by the “nearly ironclad principle” of “Nature’s will to live” in the “internal exclusivity of species among all living beings on earth.” …If unequal individuals were crossed, the offspring “no doubt will be superior to the racially inferior parental half, but not as advanced as the superior one. As a result it will later lose out in the struggle against a superior type. Such mating contradicts Nature’s will to improve breeds.” The result of this “ubiquitous instinct for racial purity in Nature is not only the sharp demarcations dividing individual races, but also their own internally uniform nature.” These “iron laws of Nature” were also responsible for the evolution of human history, in which race and racial purity were allotted decisive significance.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 628
The purpose of the camps was to achieve the goal of a superior race by “breeding,” a term that originally referred only to the systematic increase and eventual improvement of animals and plants, but that Charles Darwin applied to humans. “With the exception of the human case, no breeder is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to reproduce.” In this sense, the term “breeding” was taken up by Houston Stewart Chamberlain and völkisch theorists such as Josef Lanz for their program of racial biology.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 742
Hitler believed that what we today recognize as the human gene pool could be improved by using selective breeding, similar to how farmers breed superior cattle.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 931
Hitler also deduced that under conditions of limited reproduction, if the birth rate decreased, then the natural struggle for existence, which allows only the strongest and healthiest to survive, will be replaced by the mistaken anti-evolutionary desire to save the weakest and sickest.
In other words, the inferior races must be destroyed to make room for the superior races, and what Hitler believed was misplaced Christian humaneness will only interfere with this goal.
Hitler believed that humans were animals to which the genetic laws learned from livestock breeding can, and should, be applied.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1032 – 1051
Germany’s main father of Darwinism, Ernst Haeckel, argued in his Natural History of Creation (1868) that “the church with its morality of love and charity is an effete fraud, a perversion of the natural order.” This natural order, namely Darwinian natural selection, functions “without the recourse to mercy or compassion in the Judeo-Christian tradition.” The Nazis also viewed Darwinism and Christianity as polar opposites because Christianity makes no distinction of race or of colour; it seeks to break down all racial barriers. In this respect, the hand of Christianity is against that of Nature, for are not the races of mankind the evolutionary harvest which Nature has toiled through long ages to produce? May we not say, then, that Christianity is anti-evolutionary in its aim?
A major reason why Hitler opposed Christianity was that he viewed it and science as diametrically opposed to each other. Hitler concluded that, in the end, science would win and that the Christian church would eventually be destroyed.
Martin Bormann, Hitler’s closest associate for years, and one of the most powerful men in Nazi Germany, was equally blunt: the church was opposed to evolution and for this reason the church must be aggressively opposed. He stressed that the Nazis were on the side of science and evolution, not Christianity.
That Hitler’s opposition to Christianity was based on Darwinism was detailed by Oxford historian Alan Bullock, who wrote that Hitler “showed the sharpest hostility” toward Christianity because, in Hitler’s eyes Christianity was a religion fit only for slaves; he detested its ethics in particular. Its teachings, he declared, was a rebellion against the natural law of selection by struggle and the survival of the fittest.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1400 – 1422
Bormann made his absolute disdain for Christianity and his open hostility and support of breaking the church as rapidly as possible absolutely clear. He was one of many high-level Nazis who “intended eventually to destroy Christianity” for the reason that “National Socialism and Christianity are irreconcilable” because Nazism is based on science and science had superseded the Christian church, which he regarded as anti-science. He added “National Socialism and Christian concepts are incompatible” because the Christian churches were all built on the ignorance of men and strive to keep large portions of the people in ignorance because only in this way can the Christian Churches maintain their power. On the other hand, National Socialism is based on scientific foundations. Christianity’s immutable principles, which were laid down almost two thousand years ago, have increasingly stiffened into life-alien dogmas. National Socialism, however, if it wants to fulfill its task further, must always guide itself according to the newest data of scientific researchers.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 3882
Almost all Nazi leaders were enslaved to Darwinian ideas and ideals, and almost all were strongly opposed to Christianity to the degree that they eventually wanted to eradicate it from Europe.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 275
Furthermore, Himmler not only “lost his religious faith” in college, but came to believe that Christianity was “merely another manifestation of Jewish superstition” that polluted German culture. He became such a fanatical anti-Christian that he declared the Nazis “shall not rest until we have rooted out Christianity” from Nazi-controlled Europe.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 4100
Ironically, this church support of Hitler’s schemes did little to endear these churches to the Nazi leadership. Even though many Nazis were raised in suitably religious homes, most of Hitler’s disciples were as virulently anti-Christian (they were especially opposed to the Catholic church) as they were anti-Semitic, thanks to the influence of their anti-Christian professors, the “theological liberalism that was really secular philosophy disguised by religious language” and their involvement in the anti-Christian Nazi movement.
In fact, as we will document, the Nazi leadership planned to destroy Christianity after the war and replace it with a German church worshipping Hitler and the Nazi Party with elements of pre-Christian paganism. A 150-volume U.S. government report titled, The Nuremberg Project, was prepared under the direction of General William Donovan to document Nazi war crimes for the Nuremberg War Crimes Trial. Part of the 150 volumes was a 108-page report titled, The Nazi Master Plan, which concluded the Nazis “sought to eliminate the Christian Churches in Germany” after the war.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 369
Although Hitler told the new Reichstag, “The rights of churches will not be diminished,” he revealed his true feelings in private, explaining to intimates that he would tolerate the churches temporarily for political reasons. “But,” he added, “that won’t stop me from stamping out Christianity in Germany, root and branch. One is either a Christian or a German. One can’t be both!”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 442
Darwinism influenced not only the development of the worldwide eugenics movement but also the academic elite’s attempt to disenfranchise Christianity.
As this book will document, in almost all cases, acceptance of Darwinism was accompanied by the rejection of Christianity, either as a cause or an effect. Many leading Nazis, such as Martin Bormann, were aggressively hostile to Christianity and what it stood for.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 617
Hitler made his own religious beliefs very clear as an adult: “I myself am a heathen to the core.”
Although Hitler often claimed Germany’s war was about such traditional reasons as the need for more lebensraum (living space for the superior race to expand into), he made it clear that he “hated Christianity” and eventually was going to eradicate it after the war ended.
One reason for Hitler’s fervent opposition to Christianity was that he believed that “it had crippled everything noble about humanity.” In words reported to be Hitler’s, “The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity.” Hitler was influenced by one of his idols, Alfred Rosenberg, who taught that the Old Testament was a Jewish book, and for this reason Christianity, which is based on the Hebrew Scriptures, must be eliminated from Germany. His reasoning was based on his belief that Christianity was an “illegitimate” Jewish child and, as a Jewish child, it was swine like its parent—both needed to be eradicated. Although Hitler singled out the Jesuits for special scorn, all of Christianity was “Jewish Christianity,” which was comparable with “Jewish Bolshevism.” Hitler considered Christianity the “invention of the Jew Saul.” In short “the Aryan race had been conquered by the Semitic spirit in the form of Christianity. Christianity was…a Semitic import, which had weakened the fabric of the Aryan race by virtue of introducing moral commandments, which protected the weak from the strong.” Hitler concluded that Judaism and Christianity were both evil, calling them Bolshevists, swine or worse, and for this reason, both had to be destroyed.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1365 – 1375
In a talk given by Hitler on April 7, 1933, Hitler made it absolutely clear that in Germany’s future there would be “no place” in the German “utopia for the Christian Churches” and “nothing will prevent me from eradicating totally, root and branch, all Christianity in Germany.… A German Church, a German Christianity, it is all rubbish.… One is either Christian or German.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1463
This conforms to official Nazi writings, which espoused both anti-Semitic and anti-Christian ideas that “had a single purpose. Hitler’s aim was to eradicate all religious organizations within the state and to foster a return to paganism.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1628
Soon Hitler became Bormann’s “God,” and he determined that “rather than believe in Jesus Christ, the Germans were to worship Adolf Hitler.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 3809
This is the difference between science and Christianity, in that, science is natural, amoral, animalistic, soulless and heartless while religion, such as Christianity is supernatural, moral, human, has a soul and is good hearted etc. Therefore, this is the point that Germany, Nazism and Nietzsche did not understand, namely that the miracle and the awe inspiring accomplishments of the ancient Israelites’ and early Christians’ was to inverse the laws of nature and the animal kingdom, that is, to inverse the natural Darwinian law of the survival of the fittest and the neglect of the poor, weak, injured and ill-constituted etc. They did this with a supernatural compassion, charity, love and kindness toward the weak, poor and sick etc. And to prove this for eternity, ultimately, Judeo-Christianty’s miraculous and supernatural “inversion of valuations” produced a Superhuman in the form of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Animals naturally select their fittest mates simply to procreate and propagate the species, while natural selection among humans is love and love is supernatural. To mess with love or human natural selection with eugenics and the artificial selection of human mates; in order to breed a super race of ‘prize winning’ Aryan human beings is uncool. Like science, animals are amoral, and as there is nothing moral or supernatural in the animal kingdom, there is nothing moral or supernatural in eugenics or the artificial selection of human beings. There is no nirvana in the animal kingdom. Like Jesus Christ’s nativity (and the Buddha’s Great Renunciation), God and King of the universe was not a very rich, powerful, ”noble” and “aristocratic” pharaoh who thought he was a god, but a weak and poor little child born in a humble manger. This is the Christian and Jewish “inversion of valuations”, it is the biggest teaching of all time, in that God Himself made absolutely sure that He was not a “strong”, vain, rich, ”noble” and “aristocratic” pharaoh, but a weak, humble, poor and vulnerable child, He made sure that the morality of the stories of the nativity and the Great Renunciation were inverse and opposite to our money-oriented animal instincts. We have all felt compassion when watching wildlife documentaries on TV, in for example the Kalahari or Serengeti wild life reserves in Africa, with for example, heart wrenching scenes of a lost and injured baby gazelle neighing for its mother and then being eaten alive by a drooling and stinking hyena, or for example, the scenes of a cheetah mother allowing her cubs to cruelly play with an injured baby gazelle, again screaming for its mother, just as sport to practice their hunting skills. When confronted with such heart breaking scenes we all say “it’s only nature!” Yes it is! This is Nietzsche! Nature is heartless and cruel, and that is why Jewish morality and the Christain “inversion of valuations” is supernatural and so good. This is what the Volk and the Nazis did, they created the animal psyche in themselves, I mean they had to think and act like the cruel and heartless animal kingdom in order to be so cruel, in order to gruesomely and bloodily murder innocent, unarmed and defenceless Jewish men, women and children etc.
The basis of his [Adolf Hitler’s] worldview was “a central concept of National Socialist ideology,” namely that the Darwinian “struggle for existence governed all beings,” and involved “the right of the stronger applied to individuals as well as to communities” to suppress the racially inferior who were destined for destruction. For the “sake of self-preservation” a “stronger race will displace the weak ones,” and the “ridiculous fetters of so-called humanity” would break asunder, “in order to allow in its place the humanity of Nature, which destroys the weak in order to make way for the strong.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 628
Hitler used this Darwinistic philosophy to support his belief that, contrary to Christianity, the strong must dominate the weak, and the evolution of life would be impossible if this “law of Nature” was not allowed to prevail. In the struggle for life, the weak succumb, and the right to propagate is given “by Nature” only to the strongest. Struggle is the means by which a superior species survives and a weaker one perishes.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 988
Hitler admitted that one might be “repelled by this law of nature which demands that all living things should mutually devour one another,” but the fact is that the “fly is snapped up by a dragon-fly, which itself is swallowed by a bird, which itself falls victim to a larger bird…to know the laws of nature enables us to obey them.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1098
In fact, much of the opposition to the eugenics movement came from conservative German Christians such as the confessing church. One reason was the confessing church’s Christian teaching that we should protect the poor, the weak and the sick, teachings that opposed Nazi eugenic goals.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1441
The reason was that the Church taught such doctrines as the need to help the weak and poor. Journalist Stewart Herman wrote that the “teaching of mercy and love of neighbor is foreign to the German race and the Sermon on the Mount is, according to Nordic sentiment, an ethic for cowards and idiots.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 4848
“Life does not forgive weakness.”
What I am trying to prove to you is that fundamentally the reason why the Holocaust happened and why the Nazis were so antithetical to goodness, compassion and humanity was fundamentally because they were anti-Christian. It was the Nazis’ (and the Volk’s) anti-Christianity; their heathenism, paganism and their faith in science such as Darwinism (backed up by philosophers such as Nietzsche) which was the fundamental cause of the Holocaust. The Holocaust was ultimately the questioning of Christianity, or the Christian question not the Jewish question. If you are Christian, Jesus Christ will keep you correct and steer you clear of anything malignant. If you are truly Christian you are less likely to be anti-Semitic. And no one asked the Christian question more than Friedrich Nietzsche half a century before the Nazis came to power. There was possibly something wrong with nineteenth century science and philosophy, for example, Darwinism basically made the beautiful, allegorical and biblical Genesis redundant and it’s as if people (especially in Germany) seemed to take this at face value or literally. This combination of anti-biblical or anti-Genesis Darwinism and anti-Christian philosophies such as Nietzscheanism may have combined to create an entirely wrong worldview or faith in Germany in the early twentieth century, which disastrously lead to the Holocaust? The ismlessism therefore, determines that we should take Genesis as mythological yet have faith in the biblical prophecy of the Old Testament and its fulfilment of the coming of the Lord in the New Testament. Just because Darwinism supersedes (mythological) Genesis does not nullify the whole revelation of the Bible and does not supersede all of Judaism and Christianity. Fundamentally, the Holocaust was the direct result of the German’s pagan and Darwinian faith or belief system and ultimately because they were anti-Christian. If you are anti-Christian you are malignant. Therefore, what Adolf Hitler meant by life does not forgive weakness, is that nature and animals have no sympathy for and do not forgive weakness. However, again, Christianity and the Jewish “inversion of valuations”, such as compassion for the weak, sick and poor etc is supernatural, therefore, humans are not natural but are supernatural. In the beginning… God or Yahweh had to wait for 13.7 billion years (since the Big Bang) of animalistic killing, eating, carnage and cannibalism simply for an animal to do something different to nature and different to the rest of the animal kingdom. In the beginning… God waited 13.7 billion years simply for an animal to be compassionate and to (for example) nurse another sick or injured animal back to health. This is the Jewish and Christian “inversion of valuations.” Although nature is beautiful, I think 13.7 billion years of it would bore the hell out of anyone? Therefore, Adolf Hitler and the Nazis lowered the human race to the level of the animals. Because the Germans wanted to prove Nietzsche’s philosophy and their Darwinian survival of the fittest philosophy right and because they questioned Jesus Christ, they therefore, actually made us question goodness, morality and compassion. The Germans made us think that there was something wrong with the Jews for being good, moral and compassionate. Don’t hesitate about or question Jesus Christ and the Jewish and Christian “inversion of valuations” for a even a Planck unit of time. There isn’t a single atom, particle or iota wrong with goodness, morality and compassion, and therefore, there isn’t a single atom, particle or iota wrong with the Jews. The Germans and the Volk were animals and there is absolutely nothing else to it.
Goebbels adopted this view, writing in his diary that “man is and remains an animal—here a beast of prey, there a house pet, but always an animal.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 4404
The Völkisch movement.
The Völkisch movement was a German ethno-nationalist movement active from the late 19th century through to the Nazi era, with remnants in the Federal Republic of Germany afterwards. Erected on the idea of “blood and soil”, inspired by the one-body-metaphor (Volkskörper, literally “body of the people”, “ethnic body”), and by the idea of naturally grown communities in unity, it was characterized by organicism, racialism, populism, agrarianism, romantic nationalism and – as a consequence of a growing exclusive and ethnic connotation – by antisemitism from the 1900s onward.
Völkisch nationalists generally considered the Jews to be an “alien people” who belonged to a different Volk (“race” or “folk”) than the Germans.
The Völkisch movement was not a homogeneous set of beliefs, but rather a “variegated sub-culture” that rose in opposition to the socio-cultural changes of modernity. The “only denominator common” to all Völkisch theorists was the idea of a national rebirth, inspired by the traditions of the Ancient Germans which had been “reconstructed” on a romantic basis by the adherents of the philosophy. This rebirth would have been achieved by either “Germanizing” Christianity – an Abrahamic and “Semitic” religion that spread into Europe from the Near East – or by rejecting any Christian heritage that existed in Germany in order to revive pre-Christian Germanic paganism. In a narrow definition, the term is used to designate only groups that consider human beings essentially preformed by blood, or by inherited characteristics.
The Völkischen are often encompassed in a wider Conservative Revolution by scholars, a German national conservative movement that rose in prominence during the Weimar Republic (1918–1933).
During the period of the Third Reich, Adolf Hitler and the Nazis believed in and enforced a definition of the German Volk which excluded Jews, the Romani people, Jehovah’s Witnesses, homosexuals, and other “foreign elements” living in Germany. Their policies led to these “undesirables” being rounded up and murdered in large numbers, in what became known as The Holocaust.
George L. Mosse’s book, The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich completely blew my mind. I thought I knew how bad Nazism was, however, I had to think again after reading this jaw dropping book. I had no understanding of the concept of a Volk, Volkish thought, Volkish ideology or a Germanic faith. I had no idea how heathen, evil and pagan Germany (or the “Volk”) were in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. I had no idea that the Holocaust was about so much more than Adolf Hitler. There were a myriad of anti-Semitic philosophers, intellectuals, writers, Youth Movements and organisations in Germany in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The educational establishment was rife with anti-Semitism and for example the vast majority of teachers and professors in German schools and universities were Volkish anti-Semites. Honestly Germany was riddled with Volkish ideology and anti-Semitism before Adolf Hitler was even born. The Holocaust was a huge collective effort or a culmination of Germany’s or the Volk’s evil desires. Basically the Volk knew that they couldn’t conquer the world by being Christian, so they tried to undo recorded history, became heathen and pagan and tried to extirpate Judeo-Christianity from Europe instead. The German people or the Volk voted for violent anti-Semitism when the Nazis gained power in 1933. Adolf Hitler simply fulfilled or consummated the wishes and long term, deep seated desires of the German people and the Volk. Therefore, the Holocaust involved a whole country not just Adolf Hitler. I had no idea that the Volk and Nazism actually had very religious and spiritual foundations related to their aspirations, goals and causes, in their attempts to undo the true order of recorded history and to uproot Judeo-Christianity from Europe. Collectively, what happened in Germany in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries is the weirdest and strangest thing that ever happened in the universe. I just could not believe it! George L. Mosse’s book literally made me feel infirm. Why? Because the Volk tried to undo recorded history and to extirpate Judeo-Christianity and even actually questioned our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. You must therefore understand that Volkish ideology is pure evil. The truth of Germany’s history in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries really makes you feel hopeless for Europeans as a people. George L. Mosse’s book gave me a bad case of the Volkish blues for days after I read it. However, I believe in Jesus Christ and I pray that He will save the rest of us Europeans from this Central European disaster.
Heathenism and paganism.
Volkish thought is another example of the inherent Central and Eastern European (or German) ideologies which influenced the Adolf Hitler, Nazism and Holocaust. Volkish ideology was a product from nineteenth century European romanticism. Volkish thought was a reaction to modernity and the rapid industrialisation of Europe following the industrial revolution. “Volk” is a more comprehensive term than “people.” Since, the birth of German romanticism in the late eighteenth century, to German thinkers, “Volk” meant the union of a group of people with a transcendental “essence”. This essence could be called nature or cosmos or mythos, and was fused to man’s inner nature, and represented his creativity, feeling, individuality and unity with other members of the Volk. The essential aspect of Volkish thought is the linking of the human soul with the natural environment, with the “essence” of nature. Thus, to many Volkish theorists, the nature of the soul of a Volk is determined by the landscape. Therefore, the Jews, being a desert people, were viewed as a shallow, arid and dry people, devoid of profundity and lacking creativity. Because of the barrenness of the desert landscape, the Jews were a spiritually barren people. This contrasted with the Germans people who, living in the dark, misty forests, were a deep, mysterious and profound people. Because the German people were constantly surrounded by darkness, they strove for the Sun and were therefore, Lichtmenschen. The word “rootedness” occurs constantly in Volkish vocabulary and obviously the Jews were seen as a rootless people. Volkish thinkers were against modernity, industrialisation and urbanisation and they sought a more natural and agrarian lifestyle and society etc based around peasants and rootedness to nature and the landscape. Large cities such as Berlin were seen as the abode and creation of materialistic and capitalist Jews etc.
This animosity toward the city was an integral part of the rise of Volkish thought. At times it was expressed in the slogan “Berlin is the domain of the Jews,” or in the remark of another writer that “cities are the tombs of Germanism.”
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 4, 5 and 23
Volkish ideology originated in the nineteenth century, a long time before Adolf Hitler was born, and it penetrated important social and political institutions in Germany before the First World War, most notably the education establishment.
If Volkish ideology had a founder, Paul de Lagarde (2 November 1827 – 22 December 1891) would fit that role. If Volkish religion had a prophet Julius Langbehn (26 March 1851 – 30 April 1907) would fit that role. Lagarde was a conservative political theorist and his anti-Semitism, open hostility to Christianity, racial Darwinism and anti-Slavism etc make him one of the most influential of scholars on the ideology of Nazism. Both Lagarde’s and Langbehn’s importance is emphasised by the frequency of references that were made to them in later Volkish literature. Most importantly, subsequent scholars, educators and politicians thought that they were acting in accordance with the principles that both of these men had advanced. Through the influence of Lagarde and Langbehn, Volkish thought and ideology became a Germanic religion or faith.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 31 – 33
Not only was the essential nature of the Jews incompatible with the inner character of the German Volk, but their national religion made them an irreconcilable foreign element on German soil.
While regarding Judaism as spiritually empty, Lagarde attributed conspirational motives to contemporary Jewry.
The Jewish question was therefore not to be met with tolerance. Instead it was reducible to a mortal contest: either the Jewish or the “true” German way of life must prevail in the end. Since Lagarde saw the final struggle as a test of both physical and spiritual strength, he considered it imperative that the Germanic religion gain public acceptance, as only such a faith would infuse the Volk with the strength necessary for victory.
On several occasions, however, he [Lagarde] entertained the possibility that a select number of exceptionally well assimilated Jews might be converted to Germanism.
Any humaneness Lagarde possibly possessed was eventually obscured by his call for the extermination of the Jews like bacillae. This outburst clearly paralleled his advocacy of physical force and violence to crush the recalcitrant contemporary state “like an eggshell.”
Eventually, Lagarde’s thought came to contain the fundamental ideas of Volkish ideology – the primacy of the Volk and the abhorrence of the Jew. However, two contributions to the movement distinguish him as a principal theorist: his overriding emphasis on spirituality, upon Germanic faith that knit the individual Germans into the fabric of the Volk and joined the complex to God; and the outlines of the various forms of anti-Semitism that became the heritage of the later Volkish movement. The first contribution endowed the Volk with a dynamic faith which led the nation to know and grasp its destiny. The second, which accused the Jews of possessing a sterile religion and a consequently materialistic nature, of entertaining an international conspiracy, and of being incompatible aliens on German soil, led to the prophecy of a mortal struggle between Germans and Jews.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 38 – 39
The soul was viewed as the essential spontaneous element-and only the Germans possessed a soul, since, according to the Germanic faiths of Lagarde and Langbehn, the Jews had long ago forfeited their souls, whereas the French had lost theirs in a revolutionary conflict.
In Swedenborg’s case, interestingly enough, in addition to rejecting disembodied spirits Langbehn also discarded the Christ-centeredness of the doctrine. This exhibited another tendency in Volkish thought-namely, to substitute the image of the Volk for the person and function of Christ. In Langbehn’s theology, duplicated in other Germanic religions, the Volk and the God of the universe participate in a direct relationship. This distortion of orthodox Christianity was facilitated, it will be remembered, by the earlier popularity of pantheism and various spiritualist cults which stressed the primacy of a Creator whose existence subsumed that of Christ. However, in whatever manner such spiritualistic superstitions were transformed, for Langbehn and his successors the Germanic religion was a mystical union of individual, Volk and cosmos.
Ideas of race played a greater role in Langbehn’s theology than in Lagarde’s. Race and the vitality of nature were viewed as equivalent forces. To support his position, Langbehn quoted Benjamin Disraeli as saying “race is everything.” Consequently, if nature and race are identical, then the Germanic life spirit must perforce be racial. All Volkish virtues, the physical as well as spiritual, were considered nature’s eternal gifts transmitted through blood inheritance. Race was a pervasive and decisive force. The outward appearance of the Volk, as expressed in its physical and spiritual culture, was seen as bearing the imprint of the inner qualities, as the signature of the soul. Langbehn even told his readers that investigations into human facial characteristics were a valid part of historical research. Gone was the possibility that as long as only cultural differences prevented assimilation into the Volk, all who lived in Germany, Jews excepted, could become true Germans. The essentially non-racial anti-Semitism of Lagarde had been superseded; emphasis upon racial incompatibility had become an indelible part of Volkish ideology.
As regards the Jews, there was a distinct intensification of antagonism in Langbehn’s thought. In his earlier writings he had expressed a tolerance of Orthodox Jews living within the boundaries of the German nation. He considered them a separate people who abided by and maintained their own unique law. Assimilated Jews, however, had trespassed beyond their natural limitations and by infiltrating the body of the Volk they were polluting the purity of its blood inheritance. These Jews, identified as the “pests and cholera” had to be exterminated.
In later editions of his [Langbehn’s] book this “finely discriminating” prejudice was obliterated. Instead he expanded the section on the Jews and wrote a condemnation that included all of Jewry. Indeed, he became increasingly obsessed with anti-Semitism.
The Jews bore the brunt of his [Langbehn’s] frustrated hate… Embodying materialism and modernity, the Jews automatically opposed the inner character of the German nation. And that was clearly understandable, for they had become estranged from the vital flow of the life spirit and their souls had petrified. Since they lacked a soul and could not re-establish contact with the life force, it was impossible for them to retain basic virtues like honesty and loyalty. These virtues were part of the “genuine” force of nature which the Germanic race alone had retained and could exemplify. Jews were simply the oppressors and eternal enemies of the Germans.
Thus he [Langbehn] shocked his friends by advocating the subjugation of the “lower” races and the reintroduction of slavery.
In their respective works Langbehn and Lagarde provided a systematic framework for future Volkish ideas. They had sensed that Germany was undergoing rapid change in all areas of life-in society, politics, culture and economy. The two Volkish prophets transformed this crisis, actually the birth pangs of modernity, into a crisis of ideology.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 42 – 45
The author’s [Dahn’s] enthusiasm for the Germanic forebears, their beliefs and virtues, eventually caused the Catholic Church to charge him with responsibility for a revival of the Wotan cult in Germany.
The eminent sociologist Eugen Dühring only extended Dahn’s passionate identification with the past when, in his bitter book against the Jews, Die Judenfrage (The Jewish Question) (1880), he wrote that the Nordic gods of antiquity were still sentient, vital forces residing in nature as of old. They had endured even through the years of neglect, years in which they were replaced by Christianity. Where men like Diederichs had indulged in talk about a Germanic Christianity, others, who actively longed to recapture the roots of Germanism, displayed a marked trend toward a committed heathenism.
As a central part of this growing paganism, solar occultism experienced a sharp rise in the late nineteenth and the early twentieth century. It played an important role in Diederichs’ thought and had adherents as early as 1848. At that time, C. H. Carus reflected on solar symbolism and attributed the inequality of the races to the fact that some had a more positive attitude toward the sun than had others. A common explanation of the origin of sun worship contended that northern peoples, inhabitants of foggy regions, expressed a natural longing for the sun, which, to them, represented light, hope, and the conceptual center of the cosmos.
Under the Nazis he was a guiding spirit in formulating their racial policy and the author of the violently anti-Semitic book Juden sehen dich (Jews Look at You). He claimed that to Nordic peoples the cycle of the sun was symbolic of life in general, as proved by their own particular experience. During the foggy period when the sun was hidden from man it mirrored a brooding contemplative episode in man’s inner self. When, however, it broke from the clouds, man’s spirit would respond by joyfully and victoriously ascending toward the glowing orb. The gloom of night had given way to the long-awaited festival of the changing sun; again its recurrence had marked the triumph of indomitable and eternal rebirth.
This symbolism of a reborn sun, in which the concept of karma (rebirth) played a central role, was found throughout the increasingly popular ancient sagas. The Edda, a very ancient collection of German legends, portrayed the old religion and its gods with a startling vitality. Indeed, the Edda was an even more popular inspirational source for Volkish ideology than was the Niebelungenlied. Brought out by a number of Volkish publishers, it was a special favorite of Diederichs and his followers. Throughout the 1920’s, the Edda was itself supplemented by a special series of publications devoted to the Eddic religion and world view. Some of these studies transformed Christ into the Germanic sun god and the Virgin Mary into the mother of the Aryans. Others regarded the birthday of Christ as celebration of the return of Baldur, the god of light, from the kingdom of darkness.
The past, which Christianity had done its best to destroy, could be recovered and applied to the present needs of the Volk through occultism. Occultism was the chalice that quenched their thirst, and at the same time made irrelevant anything that historical scholarship might do to show events in an entirely different light.
It was necessary that one become infused with the historical past of the Volk, with the most genuine part of the life force, ancient Germanic wisdom. The wisdom had been suppressed by the strictures of Christianity; indeed, that alien dogma had attempted to eradicate it as a vestige of paganism. But it still existed, permeated with the life force, though in a dormant state.
Like List, the members of this circle equated Germanism and race; the life spirit was identical with the racial characteristics exemplified by the common blood of the German Volk. The emphasis on blood was directly derived from the ancient German cult of the Druids, which this group attempted to revive. By so doing, they hoped to become infused with the primeval substance—though their eccentricity was not insignificantly affected by a desire to flaunt their heathenism.
It was only through the ancient wisdom diffused in the blood, Schuler claimed, that he personally had “lived” antiquity, that he had known it intimately and had actually “seen” the life of long ago. His Germanic blood had allowed him to “see with his soul,” to experience deeply what Christianity with its alien dogmatism had for so long repressed.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 70 – 76
Again because of the Germans’ malignant desire to conquer, enslave and subjugate the European peoples, they ultimately and fundamentally tried to establish a pagan Volkish religion and to attack Christianity, which means that fundamentally, the pagan and heathen tendencies of the non-seafaring Germans, led to them actually trying to undo recorded history and to extirpate the Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religions from Europe in the twentieth century. This is because of the slightly Western Asian and non-European origins of Judaism and Christianity. This heathenism, paganism and occultism was designed to psyche up the German spirit for the Holocaust, war and the conquest of Europe. In order to realise their ominous goals the Germans knew that they could never be Christian, as Christianity is a peaceful, compassionate and loving religion, and so they revived ancient heathen paganism and occultism in order to give the German people the excuses and rights that they needed in order to conquer Europe. As evidenced by Langbehn desiring the subjugation of the “lower” races and the reintroduction of slavery, the non-seafaring Germans simply and clearly did not understand the modesty, subtly and ways of proper European empire, imperialism and colonialism, which all Western seafaring European countries, such as Spain, France and England inherently did. Eastern and Western Europeans differ in this respect. Western seafaring Europeans never openly bigoted the primitive people they discovered and traded with as “lower” races to be subjugated, as they had more modesty, decorum and respect than that. Western seafaring Europeans simply discovered the unknown world, colonised, traded and mastered it to become rightfully dominant. Therefore, through this colonial experience Western seafaring Europeans would never attempt to colonise, subjugate or bigot fellow Europeans such as European Jews or Slavs etc. Western seafaring Europeans know what they are doing and how to do it, clearly Central and Eastern Europeans do not. It’s as if the non-seafaring Germans looked at the British Empire and how it had mastered 1/4 of the world through discovery, trade, free markets, a relatively un-corrupt government, the rule of law and ‘the good name of the British Empire’ etc and somehow wanted to replicate that mastery and colonialism in Europe. White supremacy as the consensus is understood today is a complete myth. Real white supremacy is one thing and one thing only, it is double, it is white on top of white, it is the Germans on top of the Jews and Slavs etc, and nothing more. There is no other form of white supremacism. The British were never white supremacists. The British were simply right and had the right and the honour until the Nazis or the Volk invented white on top of white supremacism and messed everything up for the rest of white people. As soon as you do white on top of white supremacy you blow everything for white people, as it is categorically cardinal to imperialism and colonialism etc and the British simply could not even dream of it and yet this is exactly what happened in Central and Eastern Europe in the early twentieth century. On another note, the two examples of Volkish anti-Semitic intellectuals (Lagarde and Langbehn) were much older than Adolf Hitler, therefore, such as Lagarde and Langbehn laid the foundations and groundwork of German anti-Semitism and helped create the psychology, spirituality and mentality of the German people and German anti-Semitism ready for Adolf Hitler to come and consummate. Therefore, what I am trying to portray is that there seems to be something inherently different, barbaric, pagan and heathen about the non-seafaring Germans as opposed to the civilised Southern Mediterranean and Western (seafaring) countries of Europe, including Greece, Italy, Spain, France and England etc, who seem to be more romanised, Christianised and normal than Central and Eastern Europe, and would thus never produce such pagan religions as the Volkish faith, scholars such as Paul de Lagarde or philosophers such as Julius Langbehn and Friedrich Nietzsche etc. The civilised, Christian and good hearted Southern and Western (seafaring) Europeans would never have even dreamed of such a tragedy as the Holocaust. The British Empire was built entirely on Christianity. There is nothing else. That’s why the British monarchy and the British Empire were so beautiful. The British were never too much. The British never questioned Jesus Christ or Christianity. “Empire is not fash mon!” Ultimately what I would say to the Jewish people after reading about such inherent and virulent Central and Eastern European anti-Semitism, and obviously after the Holocaust, is that despite how the Germans and Nazis bigoted them, dehumanised them and treated them worse than animals, is not to take it personally, because it only reflects their inherent and natural greatness, their genius and their goodness etc. The Germans only persecuted the Jewish people because they could not overcome or compete with the goodness of the ancient Israelites and the Judeo-Christian religions. As demonstrated by such as Moses, Albert Einstein and Jesus Christ, for such a relatively small number of people, the Jews are unbelievably talented, gifted and good hearted, and I believe that Jesus Christ Our Lord and Saviour represents this and the Jewish people. Therefore, although it’s hard, the Jews should try not take it personally, and take it as a compliment to their genius. That’s why they did it, that is why the Nazis were so evil, because the ancient Israelites and the Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religions were so great and good. The deeper the depths of heathen Nazi barbarity and evil, the higher the civility and goodness of the holy Jewish people. Once again, what I am trying to solidify for you is that the reason why the Holocaust occurred and why the Nazis were so evil and antithetical to love, compassion and goodness was fundamentally because they were anti-Christian. It was the Nazis’ (and the Volk’s) paganism and their faith in heathenism and science such as Darwinism that was the fundamental cause of the disastrous Holocaust. Fundamentally the Holocaust was the direct result of their pagan and Darwinian faith, worldview and belief system and ultimately because they were anti-Christian. If you are anti-Christian you are malignant.
Self exaltation (seig heil)!
I will quote at length from George L. Mosse’s book The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, and then explain my thoughts about it.
The sense of a glorious past played a leading role in both the old and New Romanticism.
Antiquity also conveyed the connotation of youth, of the moment of inception, when the pure, unadulterated, heroic, and virtuous qualities of the Volk had been first thrust into history. The aspirations of the Volk in the modern era would consequently have to become reidentified with its heroic past with its youth.
This return to Germanic roots required a focusing, a fixation of one’s vision upon the ancient, tribal Germany, where traditional virtues had remained in tact: “The Germans of Tacitus were the Germans in their youth.”
Where Tacitus was primarily concerned with contrasting the Germanic virtues of fresh strength and endurance with increasing Roman degeneracy, Volkish authors took the contrast at face value and extended the favourable descriptions of Germans to their culture, their racial stock and purity, as well as their religious outlook and mythology.
The Roman propagandist became the prophet expounding the ancient purity of Germanic virtues. In many respects, it was exactly this emphasis on purity that was stressed by the Volkish movement. After all, in Germania, Tacitus had described the Germans as people who had not mixed with other tribes, who, according to modern terminology—precisely the sense in which it was used—had retained the distinction of being a special Volk.
Houston Stewart Chamberlain used such arguments, and as he was the most influential of racial theorists (accepted despite his English origins), what he had to say about Tacitus became normative. For Chamberlain the Roman’s work confirmed the racial purity of the original Volk. As additional evidence, Chamberlain cited Tacitus’ description of the physical homogeneity that distinguished the Germans. From Tacitus unfavourable depiction of the Jews-which the Volkish historians connected with the belief that the Jews were racially impure-was derived the concept that enmity between Germans and Jews was time-honoured and eternal. It followed that the contrast between good and evil, between being German and being Jewish respectively, was indeed enshrined in antiquity and must be retained as a precept of the modern Volk.
If the Goths had been so heroic in antiquity, if they had surpassed such prestigious and powerful nations as Greece and Rome in strength and endurance, then they must have represented an absolute value.
Thus Chamberlain could assert that the virtuous, victorious Germanic tribes had appeared on the historical stage just in time. While Rome was deteriorating in its degeneracy, the heroic men from the North scourged the slothful civilisation and saved humanity.
Rome, the seat of a distinguished civilisation, and Roman power fell to the inheritance of the Germans. Chamberlain only deplored that the Nordic race had not made more efficient use of this power, that it had failed to completely eradicate all the degeneracy that surrounded it, thereby putting an end to the “chaos of the peoples.” In other words, the ancient Germans had unfortunately not established themselves as the sole rulers of the conquered peoples and territory; they had not imposed their superior culture and virtues as the only standards of excellence. That the Germans had inherited temporal power from the ancient Romans was readily accepted by Volkish thinkers, and if the Germans are taken to be the Goths, it was, in fact, historically true. But they did not accept the view held by the early romantics, that Nordic man had also assimilated the cultures of Rome and Greece. On the contrary, it was now argued, the reverse was the case. The Germans had had a unique culture of their own. Had not Tacitus described it? Moreover, their appearance which dissolved Roman hegemony did not signify that they had lain dormant until then. Prior to this time, it was stated, they had influenced human events in a diversity of ways. As the genuine, as the solely pure race of peoples, the Germans, it was claimed, represented all that was creative since the inception of time. From the very beginning, before they had entered history as a group, Germans had affected the cultures of Greece and Rome. This theoretical assertion transformed the ancient Greeks into Germans and divorced modern Greeks from their classical heritage. Similarly, Rome in its glorious period must have been led by Germanic leaders. In essence, the German Volk was like a tree growing from particularly profound roots: it could not inherit anything; it was the sole repository of all creativity and any genius that had ever existed.
The contemporary Germans, in their view, had to reidentify themselves with the virtues that had carried the ancient Germanic tribes to victory over Rome. History was telescoped: the heroic past was transformed into the present to infuse a similar heroism into the modern generation. This process of idealization was especially influential during the period of turmoil that preceded the unification of Germany.
Felix Dahn’s immensely popular novel, Kampf um Rom (Fight for Rome) (1867), illustrates this well.
However, he [Dahn] cannot evade responsibility for having drawn popular attention to a glorified German past in which the mythology, the moral, ethical, and social values, and the physical qualities of the Goths were extolled.
Through its recital of the struggle for supremacy between the Goths and the Romans, it attempted to depict that celebrated national valor which had carried the Goths (used interchangeably with Germans) to victory. In the account of the German conquest of Italy during the Dark Ages, the novel’s protagonist was, in fact, the entire Gothic nation. The blond, manly exterior of these people mirrored a purity of soul, which furnished the sufficient reason for their success (symbolically, the “Italianized” daughter of King Theodoric becomes infected with the debauchery of the Romans and eventually drowns in a Roman bath). Contained within this purity of race were also the elements of honesty and courage which, in the struggle against the rationality and calculating cleverness of the prefect Gethegus, caused the defeat of this Roman. But it was the physical prowess relentlessly employed in the pursuit of victory that distinguished the early Germans from the effete and debauched Romans, and enabled them to serve as models for modern Germany.
Diederichs claimed that the ancient Germanic virtues had been forged, tempered, and strengthened in this mortal and bloodthirsty conflict between the two peoples. Dahn doubtless would have concurred. Indeed, the idealized combat of old rendered more attractive the Volkish idea of the indispensability of the good fight, of the war that steeled the nerves and character of a nation. In a spirit similar to that later in Löns’ Der Wehrwolf, Dahn praised war as creating the heroes that are celebrated in legends, poems and history.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 67 – 70
If nature’s law had it that the fit survived and the unfit perished, then men had to be bred who were fit. Racial thought in the service of the Volk paraphrased the formula with particular emphasis on the elite: if the race was the savior of mankind and if purity of race insured its survival, then men must be bred who are racially pure. These pure Aryan men and women, exponents of the German race’s superior qualities, would secure the future and correspondingly advance the mission of of their race.
As National Socialism and the Volkish movement claimed that the German race was perfection incarnate, that its greatness was immutable, the idea of racial evolution and progress had to be rejected. “The race now as a thousand years ago,” read a caption in a National Socialist newspaper below a photograph of a bust of a Roman face next to that of a modern German.
Popert presented his views in one of the most widely read novels of the time, Helmut Harringa (1910).
The hero of the novel, Harringa, represented a prime specimen of the German race. Possessing all the necessary virtues—blond hair, broad chest, energy and determination, a glowing youthful face—the hero displayed a corresponding moral purity. The connection between the external and the internal is vividly depicted in a scene in which a judge, confronting Harringa, who has been wrongly accused of cheating, declares that he cannot believe that someone with the defendant’s looks could be a criminal. The purity of stock mirrored an inherent honesty.
Popert devoted the cover of his journal, also called Vortrupp, to depicting a series of males with perfect bodies which accented the theme of Nordic ideals of beauty.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 98 – 105
All that you need to know about Germany in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, culminating with the Holocaust is that it is literally just vanity. It’s nothing else. You don’t need to look at the gore or every specific and individual case of cruelty. In a macroscopic way or looking at it from space, Germany, Nazism and the Holocaust were simply just an excruciating display of vanity. Nineteenth and early twentieth century Germans clearly did not learn from the simple teachings of Jesus Christ such as:
For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.
Matthew 23:12 is an absolute and fundamental truth. It is like the Yin Yang symbol in that there are two reciprocal parts. Matthew 23:12 is even better described by Isaac Newton’s Third Law of Motion: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Therefore, if you exalt yourself, you will be humbled, and if you humble yourself, you will be exalted. Therefore, because the Holocaust is a show of vanity there is obviously now a huge equal and opposite reaction, in that white people are being humbled. We must fix it. The fact the Germans did not learn from or listen to Matthew 23:12 is evidenced by the fact that the Germans and Volkish thinkers always glorified, flattered themselves and gave themselves a huge big up against or compared to more southerly people such as the Jews, Slavs Greeks, Romans, Italians, Spanish and French etc. The sieg heil is self-exaltation! If you sieg heil, you are exalting yourself! This is what the Germans did, they exalted themselves over the Jews (who humbled themselves to the ultimate degree in the concentration camps etc), as well the more southerly Europeans. Why did the Germans exalt themselves in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries? Because they tried to undo the true, right and honourable order of recorded history and they intellectually attacked and tried to uproot Abrahamic Judeo-Christianity (which is about humility) in their own country and became heathen and pagan.
At that time the disciples came to Jesus, saying, “Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?” And calling to him a child, he put him in the midst of them and said, “Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.”
Through such as Matthew 23:12 and Matthew 18:1-4, Jesus Christ taught us all to be very modest and humble, especially down here on Earth. Therefore, if as a nation you academically attack Christianity, you will obviously attain the wrong values and virtues and you will therefore, become inherently erroneous. Through scholarship, perverted science and academia, the Germans spontaneously and instinctively attacked Christianity and pursued a course of big headed and bigoted vanity, which the seafaring British and all other Europeans never even entertained. The Germans said to the world: ‘Look at us! We are the best!’ ‘We’re the best on planet Earth!’ And obviously by trying to undo recorded history, by extirpating Judeo-Christianity and falling in love with heathenism and paganism they turned out to be evil and the worst in history. This is why the sieg heil is self exaltation, because the Germans bigoted and lorded it over the Jews, Slavs and other Europeans etc. However, because we know that Nazism and the sieg heil is simply vanity and self-exaltation, therefore, at least we know that there is possibly something we can do about it? Whether we were involved or not, unfortunately, all of us Europeans need to humble ourselves in a fundamental way? We need to admit that black people are cool (and always would have been) because they look, move and dance differently to us stiff-upper lipped whites. The only thing to mention is that even although black people would always have been cool (because they are less advanced), it would not have entailed white people’s demise without the Holocaust. Anti-racism is not the correct way to humble ourselves, as it is clearly not working as demonstrated by such as the rise and frequency of Islamic terrorism in white countries. With anti-racism, the more power and countries (such as South Africa) that we white people surrender away to non-white people, the higher the intensity of anger non-white people (such as Muslims) feel toward us. I will prove to you that anti-racism does not make non-white people like white people, however, the cool ismlessism does. We must remove racism and the German (seig heil) self exaltation and blonde vanity totally from the Earth. Therefore, I believe such as the below mentioned union between Great Britain and Germany may perhaps remove Germany’s self exaltation and vanity, while the cool grammatical ismlessism would cleave or remove the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. This self exaltation of the Germans during the Holocaust is something the British never even dreamed of, the British were never vain and even though they were the Emperors and Empresses of India, they never exalted themselves. How did they do it? They probably humbled themselves first, either through Roman conquest and/or through Christianity, modesty and decorum. Even though they encountered all sorts of primitive people around the world, they and the other Western European seafaring countries did not let it go to their heads. For example, the Native Americans who encountered Christopher Columbus and the conquistadors initially believed them to be gods, but the conquistadors were Christian and modest and did not let it go to their heads. The Germans exalted themselves over all other people on Earth, even in Europe with such as the French being “neither subhuman nor Aryan” to quote Adolf Hitler, and now in the 21st century as a result of this self-exaltation, Germany and all of us Europeans are subsequently being humbled. Therefore, what solution can I offer to enable or allow Germany to humble itself internationally, in order to remove its seig-heil self exaltation and blond vanity; without surrendering itself to Muslims? What about if Germany handed over its independence to England, a smaller country which is off the European continent? I mean what if Germany politically united with Great Britain and put the centre of power in London or in parliament? Would that remove Germany’s seig-heil self exaltation and blond vanity? Would that be a way for Germany to humble itself internationally? Perhaps? The two world wars were fundamentally between Great Britain and Germany, and therefore, evidently one of us, either Britain or Germany was supposed to surrender our independence? Therefore, I believe because of Germany’s seig-heil self exaltation and blond vanity that that would determine it should be Germany who surrenders its independence? And after two hateful world wars wouldn’t it be a very good hearted and happy ending if there was a union and love between Great Britain and Germany? I mean imagine if this United Kingdom of Great Britain and Germany had an ethnic German prime minister in London in parliament? I mean demographically German PM candidates or German political parties would always win because Germany has the bigger population, but imagine such a German prime minister in London. He or she would be a proper, good hearted and innocent world leader. This German prime minister of Great Britain and Germany would be everything that the German people have ever wanted in a world leader of their own. As mentioned, anti-racism does not make non-white people like white people, because anti-racism means that the Holocaust was that bad and therefore, it means that white people are so wrong. However, the cool Rastafarian ismlessism does make black people like white people. Therefore, what if simply by putting the centre of power in London, the Germans would therefore, be cool, goodhearted, innocent, guilt-free and even perhaps admired by non-white people and the whole world? This is what the cool Rastafarian ismlessism hopes to achieve?
Anti-Semitism is paranoia.
Again I will quote at length from George L. Mosse’s book The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, and then explain my thoughts about it.
Here too, ideas of force and cruelty, which ran throughout the Volkish ideology, came to the fore. The whole Germanic heritage of fighting—for survival during the Ice Age, against the degenerate Romans, and to keep alive elements of mysticism in the face of doctrinaire Christianity—was considered a model for the future struggle of the races. Moreover, the speculation on the inevitability of a race war only brought the cruelty and ruthlessness into the foreground. At first, to be sure, only a minority of people were affected; but they constituted a vociferous group. However, it was not until after 1918 that it really took root as the necessary conclusion of Germanic and New Romantic thinking.
The case of Hermann Ahlwardt, a teacher and more famous agitator, is still more illustrative: in 1890 he published Der Verzweiflungskampf der arischen Völker mit den Judentum (The Desperate Struggle Between the Aryan Peoples and Judaism).
Invoking the precepts of the Germanic prophets, Ahlwardt stated that a people who rid itself of Jews freed itself for the natural development of the Volk, and thereby rose toward dominion over the world.
In dealing with the Jews, Christian mercy was decidedly out of place. Instead, Ahlwardt asserted, the nation must act with determination to combat the menace. He cited with approval a saying falsely applied to Prussia’s Friedrich Wilhelm I, who, it was said, when he saw a Jew in the morning had the gallows erected by evening. Was this a plea for violence? Certainly! But, when it came to concrete proposals to effect such measures, he displayed an ambivalence which was, as yet, typical. When he drew up an actual program, Ahlwardt could only advocate the imposition of stringent restrictions upon Jews, a decree proclaiming them foreigners on German soil and excluding them from all areas of German life and culture. He also proposed that eventually all Jews be deported from Europe and their surplus capital retained by the German nation.
Curiously, this was almost exactly the same as the National Socialist program for dealing with the Jews. Aside from the popular and politically more violent demagoguery which marked the Nazis’ rise to power and the concrete application of the Nuremberg Laws, Ahlwardt’s program broadly foreshadowed that of the Nazis, for they also reflected an ambivalence. On the one hand, there were the fanatics who asserted that the “final solution” must bring about a correct correspondence between ideology and action and that the deportation of the Jews to distant places only evaded the issue. On the other hand, there were those functionaries and leaders in the party who wanted to encourage Jewish emigration at all costs. Of course, there were various obstacles to the latter course: first, the refusal to permit the Jews to retain the financial resources that would enable them to leave, not to mention the reluctance of nations to accept Jewish immigrants; and then, of course, the effective closing of all doors when the war began. It was then that the final solution, as history knows it, became a reality. At that stage the ultimate consequences of a glorification of merciless cruelty within Volkish ideology, and the Nazi extension of it, finally engulfed the minds of Germany’s leaders. Extermination became the literal fact, not just a rhetorical device to arouse human passions.
If the agitation for violence in settling the Jewish problem did not achieve an immediate implementation, but rather had to wait for the appropriate juncture of events, it was not completely unproductive. It helped to prepare-the nation for events that followed. In conjunction with the over-all depiction of the Jew as an inhuman, un-German intruder, it contributed to the shaping of a state of mind that either apathetically acquiesced in or actively supported the final verdict. The dehumanization of the Jew is perhaps one of the most significant single developments in the evolution of the Volkish ideology.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 136 – 140
The physical properties of the Jew were accordingly contrasted with the Germanic ideal of beauty; a contorted figure resting on short legs, a greedy and sensual corpulence, and, of course, the “Jewish nose” were unfavorably compared with the aesthetically proportioned figure of the Nordic man.
The fear of racial defilement through intermarriage, with its associations of sex, love, and physical features, became an obsession with Volkish thinkers. The image of the pure, blond, spiritual, feminine German woman succumbing to the love of a Jew became a nightmare to the prophets of the race. A flier distributed at the University of Frankfurt in the early 1920’s bears witness to an anti-Semitic fusion of racial, sexual, aesthetic, and religious elements. It declared it a sin, an unnatural act, for an Aryan girl to let herself become enamored of a Jew. It was a transgression tantamount to Eve’s succumbing to the sophistry of the serpent. The Nuremberg Laws elevated this obsession to the level of a legal system and extended it even to the point of forbidding Jews to hire Christian domestics. There were countless stories about the affairs of rich Jews and Aryan servant girls, delusions which cannot be ascribed merely to the sexual frustrations of anti-Semites. Here, after all, was an image which could strike terror into the heart of every German who loved a wife and daughter.
But popular anti-Semitic propaganda was to go one better: it fused the images of Jewish hunger for money with his lust for Aryan women. The resulting image widely used as propaganda pictured a fat Jewish banker caressing a blond woman on his knee. The same agent who milked Germans of their wealth also depleted their racial strength; that was the Volkish anti-Semitic theme. It was to become that for a multitude of Germans.
Novels depicted the debilitating effects of interracial intercourse. Arthur Dinter’s Die Sünde wider das Blut (Sin Against the Blood) (1918) put across the typical message and sold in the hundred thousands. It told of the violation of a German woman’s racial purity by a rich Jew, and even though she left him and married an Aryan, her offspring continued to resemble Jewish stereotypes. The book was not pornographic (so its large sales figures cannot be attributed to prurience); rather, it communicated the horror of racial defilement by a figure that was simply inhuman. The vicious stereotype of the Jew was sometimes projected to the public by state authorities.
The pioneering work of Volkish racial thinkers played a central role in the creation of the anti-Semitic image. The stereotype of the Jew strove successfully to convey the image of a parasite. In Darwinian terms, the Jews were an arrested development in evolution, a fossil that lacked the strength or roots to nourish itself. The racial stereotype attributed so many grotesque qualities to the Jew that he was in essence dehumanized. Fritsch’s work again demonstrates this ominous development, for in his Leuechtkugeln (Fireballs) (1881) he explicitly denied human status to Jews. Here he claimed that God had created the Jew as a buffer between man and ape. The Nazis assimilated this thought in their own propaganda when, in 1931, one of their speakers asserted that non-Nordic man occupied an intermediary position between Nordic man and the animal world. The non-Nordic was not a whole man, for he still shared traits with the apes.
In 1932, another National Socialist speaker likened the Jews to bugs and called for their extermination. Interestingly, the speech was monitored by the secret police of the Republic, and their report pointed out that not the masses, but the “better bourgeoisie” of the Berlin upper-class district of Charlottenburg, had made up the gathering and joined in the “stormy applause.” The Jewish stereotype had indeed eaten deeply into the fabric of German bourgeois society. In their reasoning, whether out of fear or simple prejudice and hate, the bourgeoisie joined in accepting the dehumanization of the Jew.
The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 140 – 143
Anti-Semitism is paranoia, and there were a multitude of very influential and I must add quite paranoid anti-Semitic scholars, intellectuals, writers, academics, organisations, Youth Movements and Volkish utopias etc in the German state, before Adolf Hitler and the Nazis came to power and fulfilled the German nation’s desire. The scientific and medical professions were rife with unnecessarily zealous scientists, doctors and psychiatrists who were eager and went out of their way to support the Nazi regime and its social Darwinian ideology. Countless doctors and psychiatrists went above and beyond to implement eugenics, euthanasia and also worked in the death camps and factories (such as Auschwitz). Masses of German scientists, medical doctors and psychiatrists professed the Darwinian scientific worldview. Also, ‘paranoid’ anti-Semitism was rampant and almost universal in the Volkish Youth Movements, academic circles, the educational establishments, the upper-class bourgeoisie and Volkish utopias in Germany during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The Holocaust was therefore the general and long-term, national culmination of the German people’s (or Volk’s) political, spiritual and racial ambitions. To reiterate, the intellectual and spiritual foundations of German Volkish anti-Semitism were well and truly cemented and in place during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, well before Adolf Hitler and the Nazis came to power. Therefore, you must understand that Adolf Hitler and the Nazis were more a fulfilment of the German nation’s and the Volk’s deepest political, spiritual and racial desires, than an aberration, a surprise or something out of the blue. After reading George L. Mosse’s invaluable book (The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich), and without desiring to sound too impolite, however, Volkish ideology is evil and like paranoia. There is no closer term to describe medieval as well as modern anti-Semitism than some kind of mass or global delusion, like paranoia. Paranoia is make believe and anti-Semitism is also a delusional fantasy. Therefore, the only way that I can explain the whole German catastrophe is that the German people and country collectively suffered from some kind of national paranoid mental illness. I mean this mental illness in regard to their grotesque and obviously make-believe stereotype of the Jewish people as well as their fictitious and unfounded fears and beliefs regarding intercourse and procreation with the Jewish people. Their racial fears regarding the Jews were completely unfounded and not real. If you vehemently believe in something that is not real, that is paranoia. This national paranoia is important because the German people during the course of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries collectively created a delusional fantasy regarding the Jewish people which they unfortunately passed on to Adolf Hitler. Therefore, I believe Adolf Hitler may have believed in a mass-German created paranoid fantasy regarding the Jewish people. Perhaps because they were not as romanised for centuries like the seafaring English, French and Spanish, that therefore, the German people honestly and ridiculously still somehow had some kind of a tendency toward and predilection for the barbaric, heathen and pagan which led to them trying to undo recorded history and to attacking Judaism and Christianity in Europe in the twentieth century? If you intellectually attack and reject Christianity and openly practice heathenism and paganism you will likely become evil and paranoid. Remember, Friedrich Nietzsche went mad just after he wrote The Anti-Christ in 1888! If you want proof that anti-Semitism is like paranoia get yourself on extremist far-right social media platform https://gab.com. Like Robert Bowers (a Gab user) who carried out the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, a mass shooting which took place on October 27, 2018, at the Tree of Life – Or L’Simcha Congregation in the Squirrel Hill neighborhood of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, there are plenty of dumb, twisted, unenlightened and uneducated Hitler-following anti-Semitic loons on Gab. The only explanation or excuse that I have for post-Holocaust and modern (deluded) neo-Nazis and anti-Semites, such as the morons on Gab, is that they are the mentally ill victims of Germany, Nazism and the Volk. Because of their bellicose warmongering, Germany, Nazism and the Volk spontaneously and collectively created a paranoid-like fantasy or mental illness called anti-Semitism, which they bestowed on the world. Despite the Volk’s and Adolf Hitler’s descriptions of the Jews as bacilli etc, ironically, it is actually anti-Semitism which is the spiritual disease which the Nazis have infected the psyche of the whole world with. Therefore, unfortunately, some ignorant and low intelligence modern white people easily succumb to Nazism and anti-Semitism. But why? What’s wrong with British imperialism? Was it not enough for them? Is it because British imperialism was not extreme or fascist? “Again, Empire is not fash mon!” That was the whole point of British imperialism, it was Christian, liberal, philanthropic and not too much. (Yet it calmly and confidently held sway over 1/4 of the globe). If you want to support anything white, support moderate, sane and sensible British imperialism, not extreme and insane German fascism. This is what the cool Rastafarian ismlessism wants to achieve, it wants to get to the absolute bottom of anti-Semitism and the Holocaust and through Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour bring about our absolute forgiveness and Salvation.
Racial and spiritual separation.
After reading The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, I know and I understand that the Germans or more accurately the Volk actually racially and spiritually separated (with their blonde hair and blue eyes) from the rest of Europe or more accurately, Southern Europeans and the Levant, on this side of life and the next. They actually totally committed and fought to the very end and to the death, in order to make this racial and spiritual separation (as a distinct northern blonde haired and blue eyed race) happen. They spiritually separated from the slightly more brunette and brown eyed Southern Europeans. Honestly, they separated with eye colour. I said they separated on this side of life and the next because, they attempted to exterminate the Jews (which simply represents this spiritual separation) in order to undo recorded history and to extirpate their Biblical heritage which comes from Western Asia, the holy land or the Levant. The Volk wanted a separate and different afterlife or heaven from the rest of us Europeans, they wanted Valhalla and not a Christian or Judeo-Christian afterlife or heaven. You would be very surprised as to how spiritual and religious Nazism, Volkish ideology and the Holocaust actually were. Honestly, the Norwegians and Swedes get one less freckle than the more Southern Europeans and the Germans or the Volk tried to turn this one less freckle into another, separate and distinct race of northern Europeans. This is why World War Two happened. The world blew up because of this European racial and spiritual separation. This Germanic separation was an ultimatum to Britain and the rest of Europe. They left us no choice but to fight to the death for Christianity.
CDU and CSU.
It blatantly proves what I am talking about by how it’s obvious that immediately after the Second World War and the Volkish pagan and heathen Holocaust, that two political parties were founded in Germany with the term ‘Christian’ subtly in their party names, the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU) and the Christian Social Union in Bavaria (CSU), both founded in 1945. But wait no, I thought Christianity was no good for Germans? I thought that when the Volk voted for violent anti-Semitism in order to gain the National Socialists power in March 1933 that it was Christianity which was the suppressor of the good old Germanic Volkish faith? All too little and too late I am afraid. Once you have questioned Christianity and once you have seriously questioned or tested our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ; committed and consummated your occultism and paganism with a Holocaust and then had to be utterly destroyed and wiped of the face of the planet just to get you to stop, it’s all a little too late. Plus the point is that you need to say that you are Christian Germany. It’s kind of taken for granted in Britain and the rest of Europe. I mean obviously the postwar Germans understood the heathen and pagan origins of their Holocaust and decided to create the CDU and CSU immediately after World War Two as sign to the world and as an antidote to the pure evil of the Volkish ideology. However, I believe because of the Volkish Holocaust, that all of us anti-pagan, anti-Völkisch and cool Ismlessists need to be doubly zealous and doubly loyal Jews and Christians. In fact, it is a good job that the ismlessism is a double ism, as this may prove our double loyalty to Judeo-Christianity and Jesus Christ. Because of the evil, heathen and pagan Volkish Holocaust, we anti-pagan, anti-Völkisch and cool Ismlessists need to prove that we would die for our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
I just wanted to give some advice to people who care about white people regarding loyalty. As a person who cares about white people you are loyal, and in theory (or without the Holocaust) there should be nothing wrong with loyalty? What is wrong with loyalty? There is nothing wrong with loyalty, there is something wrong with the world because of the extreme Holocaust. Because of the Nazis and the Volk and how they stereotyped and treated the Jews etc, loyalty is no longer as straightforward as it once was and therefore, people who care about white people always misplace their loyalties. Being a person who cares about white people I have been loyal to many things, including such as the British Empire, Europe and the white race. And this is the danger, in that what I am trying to tell you is that all of that loyalty is misplaced. Don’t feel bad if as a person who cares about white people you have misplaced your loyalty as it is a very big and confusing world, and it’s not really your fault. However, after reading George L. Mosse’s book The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, and about how the Volk were heathen, pagan, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and tried to undo recorded history and to extirpate the Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religion from Europe, I have finally and truly found where people who care about white people in general should place their loyalty. It broke my heart to see how the Volk questioned Christianity and our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and therefore, I believe, in fact I know that because of Germany white people should first of all prove their devoted and unswerving loyalty to Jesus Christ. Because of Germany white people should also prove their loyalty to the apostles such as Saul or Saint Paul. Because of Germany white people should also prove their loyalty to the Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religions. Because of Germany white people should also prove their loyalty to Roman Catholicism. By proving our loyalty to the Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religion we will also simultaneously help to protect white people, however, we should place our loyalty in the Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religion first. Also, as mentioned the cool Rastafarian ismlessism is neither racist nor anti-racist, therefore, I just wanted to point out that anti-racism is inaccurate, it hits the wrong people in that it generally attacks the entire white race, regardless of involvement in the Holocaust. Therefore, it is better and more accurate to be loyally Abrahamic and Judeo-Christian, to swear your unswerving loyalty to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and to be vehemently anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch, as that hits the right people and the root of the cause of the Holocaust. Therefore, don’t be anti-racist, be anti-Völkisch. Being anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch is still an ‘anti’ it is just that even people who care about white people can do it.
Normality and ordinariness.
To be honest I use Twitter frequently and I have noticed that there is a hell of a lot of kind of benign and non-serious European, nature loving (sock puppet) pagans on Twitter these days. It’s as if everybody in Europe or in the West is doing anything except Christianity? I mean even though I know that the Holocaust will never repeat itself (even though the mere suggestion is already too much of a problem) modern, lighthearted and religious European paganism is still very dangerous as it sounds very much like the Volkish ideology and the Volkish faith. I have witnessed many lighthearted pagans on Twitter comment on Christianity being a foreign and invasive religion in Europe “from the Hebrew desert” for example. This is very close to the essential aspect of Volkish thought which is the linking of the human soul with the natural environment, with the “essence” of nature. As mentioned previously to many Volkish theorists, the nature of the soul of a Volk is determined by the landscape, therefore, the Jews, being a desert people, were viewed as a shallow, arid and dry people, devoid of profundity and lacking creativity. Because of the barrenness of the desert landscape, the Jews were a spiritually barren people. I know these Twitter pagans are harmless, however, I earnestly believe that we should not go anywhere near paganism, Volkish ideology or the Volkish faith with a bargepole. Our governments today and since the Holocaust have and are still absolutely battening down the hatches on racism and fascism in an effort to absolutely guarantee that the Holocaust will never repeat itself, however, to me the root of the problem is paganism? The Germans were anti-Christian and that was the major factor in the cause or possibility of the Holocaust. Just to contrast, the British Empire was never pagan and absolutely never entertained anti-Christianity. Therefore, the problem may lie in Europeans being pagan, heathen, atheistic and anti-Christian? Honestly it is dangerous and you have to be careful. There are many such (supposedly harmless) blonde European pagans on Twitter, I have seen Viking or Norwegian pagans, Central European or Germanic pagans, “White Druid” pagans and even Anglo-Saxon or English pagans, many of them deliberately showing off their blonde hair. The danger is that honestly, sometimes a little Nazism works its way into and occasionally shows up on their timelines and threads and retweets etc. These openly self-confessing and proudly-pagan contemporary Europeans are growing in number and are in fact trying to spread their own faith on Twitter and on social media. If you are interested, they recommend that you read The Secret of the She-Bear: An unexpected key to understand European mythologies, traditions and tales, by Marie D. F. Catchet. These modern day pagans claim to practice a form of European animism. Are we supposed to take them seriously? Honestly, they would probably say no! This got me thinking, in that I can kind of see where these jocular modern European pagans are coming from, I can kind of see the attraction. This is because heathenism and paganism is kind of cool, in that, you get some unbelievably cool pagan artworks of pagan dieties with weapons, armour, costumes, masks, capes and bolts of lightning coming from their eyes etc, like the Greek god Zeus or the Viking god Thor for example. Whereas Abrahamism and Catholicism are ordinary and they give you a kind of (for want of a better term) Abrahamic “biff!” This got me thinking, in that, the only reason that we zealous Christians follow and profess Christianity and Abrahamism is because of one single person, that is, Jesus Christ. Although we admire other patriarchs such as Moses and Abraham, these are not the reasons why we profess Christianity and Abrahamism. Jesus Christ is real and other than His divinity He was an ordinary, normal and real human being. Therefore, I feel I have to sarcastically apologise to pagans because Jesus Christ did not wear a cape or a mask (like a comic book hero), because he was real! Would you in reality want anything else? Would you in reality want to go around wearing a cape? No! Therefore, pagans need a reality check. Similarly, please also note that the ismlessism is also completely normal and ordinary. No capes, masks, costumes, weapons or bolts of lightning! There probably shouldn’t even be an option or be the religious freedom in Europe to be anything except Jewish or Christian. Perhaps we should be more medieval or Islamic about Christianity? As the root cause of the Holocaust was paganism and anti-Christianity, shouldn’t our governments also be battening down the hatches on paganism and anti-Christianity in Europe? “Not necessarily just fash and rayce mon?” It’s almost like messing with people’s freedom today? However, if Friedrich Nietzsche, who intellectually and philosophically attacked Christianity in the nineteenth century had tried to question Christianity in the Medieval period, he would have been burned at the stake and disemboweled as a heretic. And judging by the Holocaust, for very good reasons! Christianity is mature and real. Like the Volk, I believe that these modern day harmless pagans want to be purely 100% European, they don’t want a ”biff”, they want to be something and they want to have something of their own like a tattoo or an identity. To me there is a danger, as look at what happened in Germany in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries with the academic freedom to intellectually attack Christianity and to openly practice occultism and heathenism. If you are not on the right side of life or should I say, if you are not on the right side of the ismlessism then to me you are wrong, then you are a pagan. Be careful!
Recorded history versus prehistoric pagan spirituality.
Regarding recorded history, I absolutely loved reading Agricola and Germania by the Roman historian and politician Tacitus. It amazed me to think that I was actually reading the very first hand accounts of the very first encounters, discoveries and recorded histories of Britannia and Germania. Regarding recorded history, despite the fact that hominins have walked and climbed the full length and breadth of the European continent from north to south, east to west and top to bottom for hundreds of thousands of years, it’s as if absolutely none of that matters and it’s as if all of that constitutes absolutely nothing? By this I mean that it’s as if Europe didn’t even exist until it was it was recorded historically by the Israelites, Greeks and Romans, through exploration, trade, discovery and conquest. It’s almost as if the universe, the world or reality literally doesn’t exist and just instantly comes into existence and unfolds itself before these history-recording explorers, pioneers and conquerers, whereas prior to this it didn’t exist! It might as well not have, because recorded history is so important. It’s as if when you read Tacitus’ Germania or Julius Caesar’s The Conquest of Gaul, that you say ”That is Germania!” or ”That is Gaul!”, whereas Germania and Gaul might as well have not existed prior to Tacitus and Julius Caesar (despite the fact that the Neanderthals probably knew Europe inside and out like the back of their hands). Of Tacitus’ works that I have read, Germania is the better work as Agricola is more of a biography or eulogy to Tacitus’ father-in-law and his governorship of Britannia and his conquest of Caledonia (modern day Scotland) etc. Agricola has a brief description of Britannia, while Germania is a full, detailed and in depth ethnography of all of Northern Europe. Tacitus describes the myriad of different tribes that inhabit modern day Holland to Germany, the Czech Republic, all the way to the Black Sea and all the way up to Sweden, Lapland and the Baltic states (although none of those modern day names are used). To reiterate, it’s truly amazing to think that Europe ever had to be discovered and that Tacitus’ words are the very first hand accounts of the very first discoveries and recorded histories of the British Isles and Northern Europe. I have come across this unfolding of reality or the universe in front of history-recording explorers before by reading a myriad of books about the discovery of Sub-Saharan Africa, from Cape Bojador (Western Sahara) to the Cape of Good Hope (South Africa). I read five British, Dutch and French books dating from the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries regarding West Africa (or Guinea), the transatlantic slave trade, or voyages of trade or missions to West Africa or the Gold Coast, but not one of them were as satisfactory as The Chronicle of the Discovery and Conquest of Guinea, Volumes 1 and 2, by Gomes Eannes de Azurara (a fifteenth century Portuguese chronicler of the Age of Discovery). Even though the former books were all excellent, each time I finished one of these contemporary books I was always left with a feeling that West Africa wasn’t very interesting or that there were still unanswered questions of some type that I couldn’t even put my finger on. The answer is Azurara’s biblical 15th century ‘The Chronicle of the Discovery and Conquest of Guinea’, as this is a chronicle not just of the first Portuguese voyages to Western Africa, but of the very first voyages of the European age of discovery. The chronicle is original and simple, every voyage was virgin and discovered virgin African lands and people, hitherto unknown to recorded history. The key is that the other books I read were not the first or original voyages of discovery of West Africa, and this is paramount. West Africa has very little recorded history, which is why it is paramount to read Azurara first and to give credit where credit is due, namely to the Portuguese and to the Infant Don Henry (Henry the Navigator). There is a natural and correct order to recorded history that must be taken into account and it is paramount that proper and due credit is given to those first and original explorers. The English, French and Dutch who later came to dominate the coast had nothing to do with the original discoveries and their books are subsequently less important. Azurara’s writing is so simple and elegant, and he records splendidly the magnificent deeds of the Infant Don Henry and his initiatives, despite negative public opinion towards his endeavours, to explore West Africa beyond Cape Bojador (the farthest point ever traversed), and thus, initiate the European age of discovery. There are many hero’s and their deeds recorded in the chronicle such as Antão Gonçalves and Nuno Tristão and their intrepid voyages of exploration and conquest to discover new virgin lands and to capture slaves, all in the name of God, and in order to save the captives souls by bringing them into the holy faith. Each time a new voyage set out from Portugal on the Infant Don Henry’s orders, they generally went further south down the West African Coast, eventually going from the barren deserts of the Sahara, to more greener pastures further south, hence the various explorers get as far as Cape Verde, which they named themselves. Captives caught on the voyages are the very first slaves ever to be caught by Europeans in West Africa, and it’s humbling to read contemporary accounts of these biblical events. The voyages go from the land of the Moors to the land of the blacks, hence called Guinea. Now why I am relaying all of this to you is because the Portuguese history-recorded discoveries of Sub-Saharan Africa are exactly the same as the Roman history-recorded discoveries of Britannia and Germania. It’s as if such as the Cape Of Good Hope didn’t even exist until the history-recording, Portuguese explorer, Bartolomue Dias discovered and named it (in writing) in 1488 for example. Like the illiterate ancient Britons and Germans, even though there were many indigenous natives present at the Cape, before Dias, it might as well not have existed. So where am I going with all this? I am trying to explain to you the importance of recorded history, and to highlight that the very first, original and best selling work of recorded history in history is the Hebrew Bible. The Bible is what comes down to us in perfect living preservation from prehistory and from the Fertile Crescent (while Europeans were still eating each other). There is a holy and sacred order to recorded history and it started with the ancient Israelites (Egypt is too archaic and had to be excavated and resurrected to eternal life through archaeology and the deciphering of the Rosetta Stone etc), then Greece, then Rome then the Western European seafaring nations, including Portugal, Spain, France, England and ultimately America which reinvented the writing system, digitised and eternalised recorded history. Yeah so what? Well what I am trying to explain to you is that recorded history is divine and that the heathen and pagan Volkish movement in Germany in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was a deeply spiritual and divine occultist movement that rejected the Jews and the Hebrew Bible. The Volk believed that Judaism and Christianity were forcibly imported foreign (Near Eastern) spiritualities which had conquered Europe and European paganism (which was actually prehistoric and illiterate). However, what the Volk did not understand is that Judaism and Christianity are the original recorded histories. Recorded history is spirituality and divine and the Volk (or Nazis) tried to undo recorded history and revive a prehistoric paganism, which as I have described was absolutely nothing and might as well have not existed prior to the Romans. So this is what the Nazis did not understand, that Judaism and Christianity are the true and original recorded history. For example, the New Testament is a 100% and very accurate recorded history and the Volk and the Nazis could not believe the fact that they (as Germans) were not the first and glorious recorders of history and that recorded history was definitely invented in the Fertile Crescent while as mentioned Europeans were still eating each other (for example). Hence, the Nazis got their wires crossed regarding recorded history and spirituality/occultism, hence, they became heathen and pagan and that is what the Nazis tried to do, they tried to undo recorded history, which is sacrilege if not impossible. Also recorded history is Roman Catholicism’s trump card, because recorded history proves that the heretical (German invented) Reformation was illegitimate because after the Israelites with the Bible and the Greeks with Homer and Herodotus etc, no one recorded history better or more importantly than the Romans, and therefore, this means that we Northern Europeans should never betray the Romans (or the Israelites or Greeks), because after the Bible, the Roman Kingdom, Republic and Empire are the most important recorded histories of Europe, Asia and Africa in history, therefore, all of us Europeans, no matter how Northern we are should be extremely loyal to the Romans, and how to be loyal to the Romans is to be obedient and loyal to Roman Catholicism.
Grammarians and scholars.
As an expert grammarian or scholar of the English language you may laugh at the low grammatical and intellectual level of the ismlessisms, however there are three items to point out. Firstly, I am not developing and disseminating the ismlessisms purely for their grammatical value, I am developing the ismlessisms most importantly because they are a solution to racism, because they remove and neutralise all negative and discriminatory isms, which would be potentially very beneficial to European people. Because of or since the Holocaust there simply now exists many discriminatory isms that are taboo and which we are not allowed use and the ismlessisms are their solution. Therefore, I am European and I primarily want to help my own people by solving all discriminatory isms, but primarily racism. Racism is a huge ism, perhaps the most powerful ism in the world, it has huge political and philosophical effects and consequences. Racism unquestionably influences the way that our politicians and world leaders think and act. Because Adolf Hitler was a tyrannical and extremely racist dictator, our politicians, therefore, have absolutely no option but to obey the tyrannical laws and diktat of anti-racism. Racism influences and affects everything human, philosophical, spiritual and political. Therefore, that is the potential power and importance of the ismlessisms, because they deal with racism and all discriminatory isms. Therefore, that is why I am researching, developing and disseminating ismlessisms, not simply because of their grammatical or linguistic value. Second of all, because racism, Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust are taboo subjects, no legitimate academic or scholar on Earth would likely have the courage to deal with them or to find a solution to them. Therefore, the ismlessisms would likely never be developed, published or brought to light by a legitimate academic or scholar. Therefore, the ismlessisms are justified and I have the right and obligation to develop and pursue them. Third of all, the ismlessisms are black or “Rastafarian” grammar, they are deliberately low and as expert grammarians or scholars of the English language perhaps you should acknowledge and accept the ismlessisms because they are black and politically correct. It would be politically correct to acknowledge and accept the ismlessisms as legitimate, official or “propa” English language, whereas to reject them as improper, kitsch or ungrammatical would be politically incorrect. Therefore, because the ismlessisms are Rastafarian, they have the right and the excuse to be grammatically and intellectually low.
In June 2021 I began my endeavours with SEO (Search Engine Optimisation) to get the ismlessism to come up first on Google for the term ‘forgive Adolf Hitler.’ I believe this is important as I believe the ismlessism is important enough to warrant properly publishing and promulgating. I have other keywords such as ‘Caveman Adolf Hitler’, which if you try searching for on Google, you will see that my comical digital art webpage comes up first. This is all because of the money and energy I have ploughed into SEO. Please note that the most important keyword phrase for the ismlessism is ‘forgive Adolf Hitler’, and that ‘Caveman Adolf Hitler’ is just a secondary keyword phrase to do with my comical digital art, which is nothing to do with the Rastafarian ismlessism and just came from first (erroneous) thesis. If you think about it, Adolf Hitler himself would probably actually like and prefer that the ismlessism came up first on Google for the keyword phrase ‘Adolf Hitler’ itself, never mind the keyword phrase ‘forgive Adolf Hitler’. This is because the ismlessism is good hearted and kind towards him and not a negative and unforgiving, accurate historical account of him. In theory one book about the ismlessism would balance all the other negative historical books about Adolf Hitler. My first (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis as well as all this SEO has given me confidence. Hence, my ultimate mission regarding the ismlessism is to publish a small book titled simply “Ismlessism: A New Rasta Grammatical ism.”
As you can see from the fake reviews above of my hypothetical book, with humour, you can turn negative adjectives which mean to criticise or something bad into compliments or something which means something good. For example, “Abominable humour”, “Terrible humour”, ”Awful humour” and “Ridiculous humour” which are compliments and mean something good. “I can’t take critis mon!” This should prove that the ismlessism is bulletproof. I pray to the Lord Jesus Christ to help me realise and accomplish my mission. Amen. As you know I have experience as I have already wrote an (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis, (which isn’t good enough to publish), however, I believe that the ismlessism is good enough to publish, if I can only get the word count up to PhD level 80,000 plus words and tremendously refine the text. The ismlessism essay currently stands at over 60,000 words, but I am confident that by 2022 I will have at least achieved my word count goal. You can publish your own book online for a few hundred pounds with an ISBN etc, which sounds very good. However, I am a general reader who has read 160 + books on a wide variety of subjects, I am not a qualified professional academic or writer and I worry that if I did publish a small 120 page book on the ismlessism and the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, that people would probably tell me to leave it to the professionals? However, the whole point of the ismlessism is that it is Rastafarian and low. Also this is exactly my point, in that there are no professionals or experts on the absolution of Adolf Hitler. There are no experts on extreme or ultimate forgiveness. Also, I am fairly confident that if we just leave it to the professionals that the ismlessism and forgiveness of Adolf Hitler will be left for eternity down here on Earth. We will literally wait for eternity for a ‘professional’ to write a book about the genuine absolution of Adolf Hitler and the ismlessism, and in reality it will likely just never happen. Why? Because professionals are too afraid of ruining their careers and reputations etc. Therefore, the ismlessism is justified and I believe I have the right to write and in fact I believe it is my duty to publish and disseminate the ismlessism. Hence, this has got me thinking, in that I believe that I may actually be the world’s foremost expert on the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler? This is simply because no one else has ever dared to try. In fact, because I deal with and technically forgive the worlds most severe sins, and because using the ismlessism to cut the head off the snake (by cleaving the racism from Adolf Hitler) leads to the automatic forgiveness of all other lesser sins by default, such as those committed by all subordinate Nazis during World War Two, therefore I could actually be the worlds foremost expert on forgiveness itself? I mean there are plenty of wishy washy books out there on wishy washy forgiveness, such as how to forgive your cheating spouse etc, but none of them are authoritative on forgiveness itself. To be authoritative on forgiveness itself you have got to genuinely be able to forgive Adolf Hitler, because that’s what cuts the head off the snake etc. Google has this thing for SEO called E-A-T which stands for Expertise, Authoritativeness and Trustworthiness. E-A-T is a set of official recommendations for delivering a quality experience online. It focuses on the quality of the content and the creators of that content, as well as the website itself. Basically you’ve got to be an ‘expert’ and ‘authoritative’ for Google to give a damn about your website. However, there are no authoritative experts in the world on the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler except me! And I am a general reader. Like I said if we leave it to the professionals clearly it will never get done, because experts and academics are too restricted and limited by taboos and political correctness. Therefore, the ismlessism is justified. “Let’s have no expertees mon!” (Note: “expertees” is the ismlessism of expertiseism). Because the ismlessism is grammatically and fundamentally Rastafarian, it has the excuse, in that it may have a slight lack of professionalism and expertise. Honestly to write a book, professional academics read about as much as I have read (160 + books) and they are simply expert at producing professional theses with proper references and Ibids etc, and that’s about it. Therefore, if I do publish a small book on the ismlessism and I do get told to ‘leave it to the professionals’, people will therefore, be worrying and geeking over nothing more than professionalism, references and Ibids etc, never mind the fact that professionals would never do it in eternity or the important message of the content. Did the biblical writers such as Moses have references and Ibids? No! Don’t get me wrong, I have completed a dissertation and several papers before at university and I will do my best to reference and Ibid my thesis as professionally as I possibly can, but at the end of the day I am not an academic in that kind of technical way, I am a general reader who is unfortunately the world’s foremost and eminent authority on the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. So as an answer to academics the ismlessism is a Rasta word and it is not bad for a Rasta mon! Even my mistakes are Rasta mon!
I decided to create this new thesis initially by coagulating a selection of my favourite posts since 12th April 2021, when I discovered the ismlessism. The essay currently stands at over 60,000 words, but I am hoping or aiming to get the essay up to (Phd-level) 80,000 plus words so that it becomes a real (2nd) thesis. In June 2021 I got myself into SEO (Search Engine Optimisation) for my website and I have been searching Google for the phrase ‘forgive Adolf Hitler’ and what I have noticed that comes up is so unfunny and so serious. They haven’t a clue how to genuinely forgive Adolf Hitler with lightheartedness and humour. I mean I have two theses now, the first one which you already know is the (erroneous) 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler and my second new thesis (or essay as it currently stands) is this one, about the ismlessism, which actually is the true and genuine absolution of Adolf Hitler. However, to truly and genuine forgive Adolf Hitler you have got to be cool, hip and with it. You have got to use lightheartedness, comedy and humour and my 50 or so works of comical digital art are pretty much essential to the whole project. It’s seriously funny or a serious catch-22 because you cannot genuinely forgive Adolf Hitler by being serious, therefore, as an expert academic at a university, how could you write a serious thesis that conforms to house rules, with expert references and Ibids etc, about the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler without being cool, comical, lighthearted or funny at the same time? It’s impossible. It’s a serious paradox that universities are not known for their black Rasta coolness and humour, in that universities are generally more or less 100% serious. This means we are helpless with the forgiveness of serious sin, such as those committed by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. Therefore, this means that we Europeans are doomed because of the Holocaust and therefore, we will never achieve our salvation. This determines that we lay people should take up serious academic reading, research and writing independently on the outside of formal institutions such as universities. Perhaps the church would consider coolness and humour? It is possible that we will never attain true world peace without the true and genuine absolution of Adolf Hitler. This is what seriously unfunny Antifa (Antifascists) need to accept. And remember concerning my other or first (erroneous) thesis, even though time travel to the past is impossible, a joke is a joke! And lightheartedness is all that forgiveness requires. Therefore, I have been seriously dedicated to helping save and protect my people since the 1st of August 2016. I spent nearly 5 years reading over 130 books and I wrote an 87,000 word practice thesis, which simplified down to one mathematically perfect one word equation, formula or answer, namely, the ismlessism. There is nothing more or higher than the ismlessism regarding racism. The ismlessism is the ultimate and unquestionable answer and solution to the ism, namely racism. The ismlessism is a double ism, it is thee ism and it removes racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. It is bigger than racism and cooler than anti-racism.
Brown nosing anti-racism and political correctness.
What amazes me about Homo sapiens is that they can overcome mind bogglingly difficult scientific problems such as putting a man on the moon and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard (to quote John F. Kennedy). However, they universally cannot overcome mind bogglingly difficult emotional, spiritual, moral or ethical problems (or sins) such as the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. It is very hard to forgive the Adolf Hitler, as it took me 5 years of reading almost every day and an 87,000 word anti-racist joke primarily about how to forgive Adolf Hitler not to mention the 100 works of comical digital art. It was unbelievably difficult but my efforts were rewarded with the ismlessism. That’s the beauty of absolute and universal forgiveness because you just need to forgive the most severe example (such as Adolf Hitler) and in theory all other sins are forgiven by default. That single eternal example (Adolf Hitler) just needed forgiving once and for all time to potentially help save us all? So the ismlessism is the hard stuff, it’s hard to forgive Adolf Hitler, and it was hard to achieve, but it’s now done and finished. In theory nothing should be unforgivable in the universe. Another thing about state of the art science is that it puts average bachelors (like me) off from seriously taking up non-career oriented, academic reading and especially writing an independent 87,000 word thesis on the outside of universities. Honestly, people go to universities just to get told what to read and to get other people to read and grade their writing and that’s about it. The ismlessism and my first (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis proves that you don’t need a mark, grade or qualification to achieve your dreams. My faulty first thesis justified itself as it led to the ismlessism. As long as you write enough words and give it your absolute heart and soul your thesis will justify itself without being marked or graded. If you go to university firstly you are limited by taboos and political correctness and secondly you are taught an orthodox way to do things, however, British lower class society and culture is vulgar, it does not give monkeys about taboos, political correctness, rude jokes or casual humorous racism etc.
To reiterate, honestly, non-white people don’t care about vulgar white lower class casual humorous racism, they only care about keeping racism out of high society and centres of power, such as parliament, universities and the media etc. Obviously there is a lot in it for non-white people to keep racism out of high society and centres of power etc. Anyway this is why lower class laypeople are free, different, unique and radical. Therefore, if lower class laypeople take up independent academic reading, writing and philosophising on the outside of universities and not for career goals, but for higher virtues, they can produce completely different, unique and radical works that can help the world. This is because they are not limited by taboos and political correctness or conformed to any orthodox curriculum or way of doing things. People go to university to brown nose their way into a financially successful career, whereas, if as a layman you take up independent academic reading, research and writing, you work purely for virtues, such as mine was always to help protect white people. It is impossible to attain the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler through brown nosing your way at university. Speaking on behalf of many (formerly) young white people, I believe many of us drop out kids simply refuse to brown nose anti-racism and political correctness. I mean there are a couple of more things to point out which are, firstly, no one would be allowed or would dare to write a thesis about how to forgive Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust at university and secondly, as mentioned advanced science puts lay people (like me) off from writing about such things as time travel to the past in order to seek forgiveness etc as scientists would (geekily) point out that the second law of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics determine that time travel to the past is scientifically impossible. I suffered from lack of confidence all the way through my 87,000 word independent thesis because of that problem, but I didn’t let it stop me and ultimately it didn’t matter if my thesis was a bit technically wrong as I ultimately attained the ismlessism and the true forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. However, the thing about science is that unlike religion, science is entirely neutral and amoral, science such as physics hasn’t got a soul or a heart, therefore, science will never forgive us or help save us from moral issues or our sins such as the Holocaust. Obviously don’t take up anything scientific or that requires a laboratory, take up something academic, political, philosophical, historical or religious, all that you need to do is to be able to read and write. That’s how I started, with no relevant qualifications whatsoever. And remember it’s science that puts you off. As a lay person don’t let neutral and amoral extremely advanced science, professionalism and articulate philosophy put you off writing and philosophising independently.
They can’t do it!
I just wanted to tell you that my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler is a bit like the Old Testament, it’s primitive and not that accurate. We all know that Genesis, the Garden of Eden, Original Sin and The Fall are myths. But prior to 19th century people were convinced about the validity of Noah and the flood etc. Anyway, I have read the Bible three times and I understand the Old Testament, it’s less accurate and less enthusiastic than the New Testament, particularly about the prophecy of the coming of the Lord, the ‘son of David’ and the ‘root of Jesse’ etc. Although the Old Testament touches on or predicts the coming of the Messiah in a blasé way, you obviously can’t be as enthusiastic about the coming of the Lord as much as you can after He has already been and gone, as in the New Testament, which is much more accurate and enthusiastic etc. Similarly, my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler is not quite as accurate about or as enthusiastic about universal forgiveness as the ismlessism, which is like the New Testament, however, it does touch on the matter now and again particularly regarding forgiveness and my motives to help protect white people etc. It’s like a prediction, but you do not really have to read it. I mean we know the ismlessism is the ultimate and unquestionable answer to the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and to the ism, namely racism, however, did I truly ask the question(s) can we forgive Hitler? Can we forgive or fix the Holocaust? Is it possible to fix or remove racism? Can we help protect white people? Yes I did. But it’s a bit vague and blasé about some of those questions, a bit like how the Old Testament is vague and blasé about the coming of the Messiah etc. For example, I definitely and emphatically asked the question can we forgive Adolf Hitler? I was just wrong at that point or in the way I was proposing. In fact, in the thesis I try to tell you that that is the way to forgive Adolf Hitler, but it’s not. The ismlessism is. I definitely asked the question can we correct or fix the Holocaust? I definitely pursued a solution to racism for nearly five years with all my heart and soul. I always said to myself I wish I could find an equation or formula that is unquestionable that would overcome racism. Well, although a little more politically correct than what I was expecting, as you know my prayers were literally answered with the ismlessism. I definitely pursued and asked the question can we help protect white people? I put my absolute heart and soul into my various social media endeavours, my reading and my first (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis (all in order to help protect white people) for nearly five years. That was always my goal, that is, helping to protect white people. I was just a little errant. Also, I have to ask the question is my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler actually anti-racist? Yes it is. It started a bit nativist but it got progressively more and more anti-racist, good hearted, PC and polite all the way through as demonstrated by for example my referring to Europeans as clumsy and stupid compared to physically adept and skilled Africans etc and it even specifically states that there is no hate or racism in the thesis a couple of times. However, what you should know is that my first (erroneous) thesis was not as politically correct as this one, because it was wrong. I honestly also have to ask the question was my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler really a joke? Well yes and no. (Yes it definitely is in hindsight.) however, I actually seriously and really meant it in a lighthearted way. If I wanted you to take the essay seriously you would probably laugh at me for my puerile theory or idea of attaining forgiveness by time travel to the past? Honestly, even if you laughed at me for even trying that is no problem. That is all my (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis was supposed to do, that is, make you smile a little. Obviously the second law of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics determine that time travel to past is a scientific impossibility, however, the thesis was meant to be a time travel joke. What does it matter if time travel to the past is a scientific impossibility, if the thesis a lighthearted joke? Come on? A joke is a joke. Give me a break. I just tried to lighten up the worst sinners in history with time and relativity, it was meant to be absolute and universal forgiveness. What if we forgave absolutely everything? What if there were no limits to forgiveness? Therefore, I tried to lighten up Adolf Hitler, (in order to help protect white people), you know, as in lighthearted, as in a joke? So take the concept of “crime travel” as a joke and with a handful of salt. In fact, my whole first (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis was meant to be taken as a joke and with handful of salt. However, wouldn’t a lighthearted joke be enough to forgive? “No bones!” So there you have it, I did ask the question or those questions, which were fulfilled or answered by or with the ismlessism. It’s just that prior to the ismlessism, I am a much less accurate and a little less enthusiastic about it, a bit how like the Old Testament touches on the coming of the ‘son of David’ or the ‘root of Jesse’ in a blasé way. The ismlessism is much more accurate and enthusiastic, and this is similar to the New Testament. It’s almost as if by going off scientists such as Richard Dawkins and his book ‘The God Delusion’ that the writer of Genesis, that is, Moses, was expected to have absolutely all knowledge from all of time and all at once, in some sort of orgasm. It’s as if Richard Dawkins honestly somehow expected Moses to have evolution by natural selection and Big Bang theory in 1400 BC. The Old Testament is cool. It’s not a geek. It doesn’t care if it’s not that accurate. Similarly, by how I have had some run ins on social media and been banned from advertising on Facebook, I feel like I am or was expected to have all knowledge and answers about how to forgive Adolf Hitler and the ismlessism instantly and all at once in some sort of cosmic orgasm. Again, similarly my first (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis was thick, wrong and inaccurate, but the lesson is that a geek would never ask the questions can we forgive Adolf Hitler?
Are you seriously saying that the ismlessism doesn’t matter? Ok, I’ll just pack it up and take the whole thing with me to my grave so that no one ever knows about it. Whoosh! It’s gone! I’m joking of course, however, I do have a point because it’s the very nature of the Holocaust that nothing matters. It’s just too much and no matter how much you plead and cry with the Jews for example, it just doesn’t matter. For example, the term Kniefall von Warschau (German for “Warsaw genuflection”) refers to a gesture of humility and penance performed by West German Chancellor Willy Brandt on December 7, 1970, in Warsaw, Poland, towards the victims of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. However, this type of sincere and genuine humility and genuflection toward Jewish people just doesn’t matter. It’s futile! One thing you have to understand about the Volk and the Holocaust is that crying doesn’t change anything. Dwelling and sobbing over the statistics and examples of the Holocaust doesn’t change anything. You have to ignore the negativity, stop crying, be cool, hip and stay humorous and positive. Concerning the Holocaust, it doesn’t matter how sincere you are. Trust me, we Europeans (including myself) are all bent over double trying to fix the Holocaust and make it up to the Jewish people, but it just doesn’t matter how bent double you are, the Holocaust is far more. Or for example, if all of European men promised to marry Jewish women, it just wouldn’t matter. If you sincerely apologised to the Jews for the Holocaust, it just doesn’t matter. Nothing is worth the Holocaust. The genuine absolution of the Volk and the correction of the root or source of the cause of Holocaust, namely racism, would be priceless. You just can’t put a price on 11 million innocent lives. For example, without the ismlessism, Adolf Hitler could be up there in heaven (bless his cotton socks) screaming and shouting that he’s no longer a racist! But it just doesn’t matter. Now as you have already seen the ismlessism removes the racism from Adolf Hitler and the Volk, therefore, the ismlessism does honestly really matter. To remove the racism from the Volk is priceless and pretty funny too.
External academia. Justification.
Because mainstream and orthodox institutions, universities, professors, academics and students etc are far too limited and restricted by taboos and political correctness, which determines that they would never encourage or even attempt to find a solution to racism or the Holocaust, or seek the ultimate absolution of Adolf Hitler, what if therefore, the ismlessism determines that there is a second, separate, external, independent or unorthodox academia, which is only taken up by people on the outside of mainstream and orthodox institutions and universities etc? Such a second academia would not be limited by taboos and political correctness. As I have stated before, when you take up independent reading and writing on the outside of universities, you work for higher or noble virtues such as to do something beneficial for your country and people and not for money or career goals. The ismlessism is relatively simple to discover, it just requires a lot of reading and a practice thesis, therefore, trust me, the ismlessism proves that the only reason that it has not already been discovered before is simply and ashamedly because no one has ever tried. Therefore, the fact that mainstream and orthodox professors, academics and students etc would never attempt to find a solution to racism or the Holocaust, or seek the ultimate forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, proves that the ismlessism is therefore, justified or justifies itself, which means it is therefore, bulletproof, undeniable and unquestionable. “Let’s have no expertees mon!” (Note: “expertees” is the ismlessism of expertiseism). Also, as mentioned because the ismlessism is grammatically and fundamentally Rastafarian, it has the excuse of its academic level, in that it probably has a slight lack of professionalism and expertise. Anyway, to reiterate, honestly, non-white people don’t give damn about secretive white lower class casual humorous racism, they only care about keeping racism out of high society and centres of power, such as parliament, universities and the media. Obviously there is something in it for non-white people to keep racism out of high society and centres of power. I am a lower class Englishman and my first (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis started out with a little nativism here and there, however, it got progressively more and more good hearted to the point that for all intents and purposes it became anti-racist. I then gave up on my first thesis and only then did I discover the ismlessism. However, I honestly believe that the ismlessism is fundamental and good hearted enough to actually get up to high society level, parliament, universities and the media etc. However, the fact remains that the ismlessism came from British lower class vulgarity and casual humorous racism etc. If you are in parliament, universities or British high society, as some genuine advice for this life and the next, I would not snootily look down on the British lower classes, society and culture just because they are rough, vulgar and casually and humorously racist etc, this is because the ismlessism and external academia prove that we lower classes can do things that you cannot. And remember, in terms of religion and Catholicism we vulgar lower classes are thick, but like Saint André Bessette whom was illiterate, religions prefer angelic simpletons to evil geniuses.
Where the ismlessism came from.
Ashanti Goldfields Corporation Ltd.
I am white British, however, I grew up in Africa, more specifically in Obuasi, a gold mining town in the Ashanti region of Ghana from 4 years old upwards. I was the third and last son of an expatriate mechanical engineer who started working for Ashanti Goldfields Corporation Ltd (AGC) in 1985. This is how I was able to be educated in a very prestigious, private boarding school called Barnard Castle School in County Durham, England, until I was expelled for smoking ganja in 1998, that is, through lucrative expatriate education fees. Although my father left AGC in 2000, he only retired from a 31 year career in the mining and quarrying industries in Ghana in 2016. Therefore, I have much experience with Africa and indigenous Africans. As an “oburoni” (white) child I learned some of the local language in Obuasi called Twi, as well as their accent and their pigeon English and to this day I am a very good mimicker of the Ghanaian accent and mannerisms. Therefore, I feel that my expatriate African heritage helped me to quickly understand the ismlessisms once I discover them. I instinctively understand the level of native Africans, I understand how low indigenous Africans are (or used to be (especially in the 1980s)) linguistically and grammatically. With their pigeon English, indigenous Africans would have no qualms about deliberately misspelling ismlessisms such as “seks” which is the ismlessism of sexism, or “fash” which is the ismlessism of fascism. When discovered the ismlessisms I instantly recognised the ‘African-ness’ of them, for example, I instantly knew that Africans are “fash” and nothing more. “Fash” is what Africans would say, and if you are accustomed to native Africans, you can hear in the word “fash” the technological and grammatical level of Africans, in that Africans have not achieved much technological invention, and if you are accustomed to indigenous Africans you can hear this level in the word “fash.” You can hear in the word ”fash” that Africans haven’t done or accomplished much, however, because of Adolf Hitler, ”fash” and whatever it means or represents is cool today and that is the end of it. Ismlessisms such “fash” are practically nothing and this reflects the fact that native Africans have not achieved much technologically as well as the fact that Africans have also done nothing wrong, unlike the native Europeans. The ismlessisms such as ”fash” are colourful, beautiful and deep, and they reflect the nature, character and spirituality of native Africans. Africans would also like the fact that they can talk about such discriminatory isms in a positive and neutralised way with the ismlessisms. Therefore, my expatriate African connections and heritage were how I was able to instantly apply or ascribe the ismlessisms to black, Rastafarian or native African grammar.
Social media background.
The ismlessism was discovered entirely through reading and writing. The absolute first thing that I realised is that the problem with white people today is that they are ismless. So white people need an ism. Hence, ismlessism. An ism is all things to us. If we want to succeed we need an ism, namely the ismlessism. Everyone must possess an ism. An ism is strong, only because of the Holocaust, racism is far too strong. Hopefully the ismlessism would give white people strength while being neutral and milder? To inform white South Africans that the problem with white people in America and Europe and across the globe is not that they do not care, but that they are ismless, may ameliorate some of their anger towards us for our so called not caring and for our so called betrayal of them; especially the British for the Boer War etc. Without the ismlessism, you just become angry and frustrated about the Second World War and the Holocaust etc, which for sure are definitely the reasons why white people are ismless. The lesson from World War Two and the Holocaust is that if Buddhists went around killing all non-Buddhists, there would be no Buddhism. Buddhism would become a bad word, like how king was a bad word for the Romans, and no one would be able to confidently identify as a Buddhist. The Buddhists would be ismless. I was worried that the adjective ‘ismless’ would be the best term as it’s shorter than the noun ismlessism. However, it’s not. Having the adjective ‘ismless’ is like having the noun ‘commune’ whereas the real noun that everybody understands is ‘communism’. Hence, the ismlessism is similar to and as powerful as the noun ‘communism’. I obviously got the adjective ismless first (through praying) and it is definitely needed and required grammatically, however, the idea goes further. Anyone can attain the adjective ismless from off the top of their heads, but you cannot attain an ism or a jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism from off the top of your head, you need to add or plus thee suffix -ism to the adjective ismless in order to attain the jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism. Over nearly five years I asked the question again and again: Is there anything we can do about the Holocaust? Is there any way to forgive Adolf Hitler? Is there any way we can overcome racism? Is there anything we can do to help protect white people? To that end, since August 2016 I have read almost every day, and as of the date that I discovered the ismlessism, that totalled over 130 books (currently over 160 in my life), all entirely devoted and focused on the singular purpose of fixing the ism, namely racism and helping to protect white people. I tried four different methods or ideologies to solve racism on social media, including:
Generalisation. This is how I started on social media, when I was a blogging and social media neophyte. Generalisation was a completely incorrect ideology or philosophy of generalising all non-white or Muslim people for individual acts of terror. It was totally wrong and I completely and humbly admit that.
Kryptonite. I tried an alternative term for the noun racism, by always calling the term racism ‘kryptonite’, as in racism is kryptonite to white people. I learned humbleness through kryptonite but nothing much more. Kryptonite was a failure and unbelievably un-academic. I was completely wrong and I humbly admit that.
True racism. I have never been anti-Semitic and true racism was a six month effort to both appease Jewish people and European people ‘at the same time’. For example, true racism was by definition never anti-Semitism because if it was it wouldn’t be true racism, and true racism was by definition never anti-racism because if it was it wouldn’t be true racism? I put a lot of effort into this endeavour, but it was barking up the wrong tree, a failure, wrong, unacceptable and I totally and humbly admit that.
Time for forgiveness. This was my first (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis or (more descriptively) an 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler. The first and probably only thing you need to know about this thesis is that it is light. By this I mean the thesis sheds light on the deepest darkest crevices known to humanity. Basically, the thesis goes where no one has gone before. The thesis through its art lightened the heaviest of burdens known to humanity. This thesis was the true question that I asked. I asked is there a way to forgive Adolf Hitler? Is there a solution to or any forgiveness for the Holocaust? Is there a solution to racism? Is there any way to help protect white people? All of which is pretty much the same question. I put my absolute heart and soul into this thesis over more than a year. I must have read all 87,000 words of it a thousand times. I must have put hundreds of hours of time and energy into creating the digital art. The thesis was titled Time For Forgiveness and it was supposed to be absolute and universal forgiveness with time and relativity. For example, because Adolf Hitler cared so much about racism and (quote) “subhumans” wouldn’t he be forgiven if he traveled back in time and made himself equal to a “subhuman” such as Australopithecus africanus?
For example, because Jeffrey Dahmer was a cannibal in the 20th century, wouldn’t he be forgiven if he traveled back in time and equated himself to such as Homo antecessor, who was also cannibalistic? Therefore, because Jimmy Savile was a statutory rapist in the 20th century, wouldn’t he be forgiven if he either went back in time to before 1875 AD, (as the age of consent was 12 years old in Britain until then), or before 1275 AD, (as there wasn’t an age of consent in England until then)? It’s almost as if sin is always anachronistic, in the wrong time period or something to do with time travel? It’s as if you could always get away with more in the past? Anyway, the thesis was just meant to be a lighthearted joke, but it was probably wrong and unacceptable, all of which I once again completely, truly, deeply and humbly admit. The thesis hung on the idea of time travel to the past, which is a scientific impossibility, therefore it was kind of a guess. To reiterate, the thesis is scientifically impossible, and you do not really have to read it. But remember it is a joke! I mean please don’t get all geeky and scientific about how the second law of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics prove that time travel to the past is impossible. Come on? Give me a break. It’s only a joke! For example, I do not know if time travel to the past to seek forgiveness technically works, however, I do know that time travel to the past to seek forgiveness works with humour.
Therefore, what does it matter? Hence, I don’t believe it is the question that matters, the point is that I humbly and sincerely asked the question that no one has ever asked before, namely is there any way we can forgive Adolf Hitler? All that matters is the answer, which I subsequently attained through abandoning the thesis. The ismlessism is actually the true forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. So it was a dumb question but a smart answer. Just to explain a bit more so you don’t have to read it, the thesis is all about forgiveness, it is 110% forgiveness. I put absolute heart and soul into this thesis for more than a year. I must have read it a thousand times if I read it once. It is my absolute all for forgiveness. However, the thesis is not that good, it is just all that I could imagine at the time to forgive Adolf Hitler, that is, time travel to the distant past and equivalence to a real (quote) “subhuman” such as Australopithecus africanus etc. I just thought that would lighten him up? I mean for example, the thesis asks the question how was ancient cannibalism fine for Homo antecessor 800,000 years ago, but modern cannibalism totally heinous for Jeffrey Dahmer in the 20th century? Is crime relative? Is it something to do time or time travel? Is it something to do with states of being primitive and advanced? Is primitivism innocence and advancement guilt? Basically the essay is a 87,000 word investigation into that question. Basically if Homo antecessor were innocent with their cannibalism 800,000 years ago, would it ameliorate Jeffrey Dahmer’s sins if (in theory and in the afterlife) he travelled back in time to the Lower Palaeolithic and equated himself to such as Homo antecessor? However, in light of the ismlessism which is the real forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, I can see that the thesis is not that good. In the light of the ismlessism I now believe that sinners do not have to travel back in time to attain innocence and forgiveness etc, however, time travel to the past for sinners is still a little humorous! And I think that’s about all that matters? I mean when I think about it, the thesis is 100% original, excepting a few quotes, this is 87,000 original words, that came out of absolutely no where, except from insights from my reading. Honestly, the entire thesis came out of thin air. Looking back at it exhausts me, I don’t know where I got the energy from. Therefore, being a 100% original 87,000 word thesis that came out of nothing, I believe the thesis is simply better than nothing? The thesis is simply a leapfrog or stepping stone to the ismlessism, which it earned. Therefore, to reiterate, the thesis is all about forgiveness, it is 110% forgiveness, and it is my absolute all for forgiveness! It’s just not as good as the ismlessism. However, that is not the point. The point is that it is the proof that I did ask the question. It proves that the ismlessism, being the true forgiveness of Adolf Hitler was not luckily attained from off the top of my head. To reiterate, the thesis is scientifically impossible, and you do not really have to read it, however, it is not what matters, only the ismlessism matters. Therefore, it’s not the question that matters, only the answer. Hence, I wrote the 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler over one and a half years, I must have read it a thousand times and put hundreds of hours into the 100 works of digital art, however, ultimately, I came to see the error of my ways and completely gave up. I deleted everything and just kept an offline backup. Then, and only then did I attain the perfectly correct one word answer to racism, namely the ismlessism. The ismlessism is actually the true forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. A coincidence? Never! If you believe anything, believe that the ismlessism is the perfect one word answer. Don’t try to rationalise it, or look at it scientifically, I only earned it by reading over 130 books, trying four methods to solve racism on social media, including writing the 87k word (erroneous) thesis, completely giving up, converting to Catholicism and by praying the Rosary every day.
All deeply embarrassing and very humbling experiences all of which ultimately failed. However, God clearly loves a trier because I then gave up on the thesis and everything else, I unofficially converted to Catholicism and began to pray the Rosary every day, and then miraculously all of my prayers were answered when during my prayers I realised that white people are ‘ismless’, which I thought was a pretty good term, however, then subsequently through reading, prayers and designing my website, I attained the noun ismlessism. Instantly I knew I had an ism, though of what sort I had no idea. After all of that I truly believed that I deserved the ismlessism. The lesson is never give up, even if you try four different dead in the water, year-long projects you will get there in the end. The ismlessism is the perfect answer to the ism, namely racism. Therefore, that is how to truly create a new ism or found a jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism, that is, through reading, writing and praying.
The ismlessism is what does it.
The ismlessism is the full noun.
The ismlessism is proper.
The ismlessism is double.
The ismlessism is thee ism.
The ismlessism is a grammatical.
The ismlessism is the formula.
The ismlessism is the answer.
The importance of writing, (externalising and piecing together words and phrases).
It may come as a surprise to you that I did not attain the ismlessism. in my head. I did however, attain the adjective ismless in my head, during a Rosary prayer I was thinking about Catholicism and how it is an ism and then subsequently I suddenly had the thought that white people are ismless. However, the best things actually come together or are pieced together accidentally and externally on your computer screen, through writing, testing and experimenting with the titles and tag lines of your website etc. There are things that you cannot imagine in your head that piece together accidentally through writing and testing on your screen etc. Hence, I discovered the ismlessism by testing the tag line on my website with a Hindu head banner, symbol and art etc. And to be honest I almost didn’t do it or test it. I thought that adding an or thee ism to the adjective ismless would be a puerile idea. However, one thing that I have definitely learned through my 5 year long endeavour to fix racism etc, is that you never know something until you try. Therefore, it was this notion that made me lean forward and expend the energy to test and add thee ism to the adjective ismless. It was one of the best decisions I have made in my life. I literally added thee ism onto the adjective ismless, visually in front of me on my iPad screen, and that’s how I instantly knew I had something or it. I knew the ismlessism was something good, but I wasn’t sure exactly what it was and it only unraveled itself to me over a few hours on the 12th of April 2021 via several posts that I wrote about it on that very night. For example, I didn’t know instantly that the ismlessism was the solution to racism. That only happened a few hours after I had externalised and discovered it on the iPad screen. The dates and times are all there on the posts page of my website. And it just got better and better through more posts. Also, I didn’t know it removed the racism from Adolf Hitler for a couple of weeks etc. So therefore, don’t sit around meditating thinking you are going to attain enlightenment or the secrets of life, you have got to externalise your thoughts via writing and accidentally piece together new words and phrases on your computer screen. And remember it took 87,000 words of this testing and experimenting with words and phrases to get one fundamental word. Therefore, you have got to write a thesis to attain anything.
I pray, I read and I DJ.
You may be asking who the hell is this lunatic claiming to have forgiven Adolf Hitler and to be developing a new jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism? My name is Graham Cammock, I am 40 years old and I am trying to remove all racial hatred and anger from the world. Every day I get up and I pray, I read and I DJ, and that is how the ismlessism was discovered. The ismlessism is the jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism that I profess, however, my religion is Catholicism and that’s where the real magic of the ismlessism comes from. However, when I attained the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler after 5 years of reading, writing and effort, (aka the ismlessism), I instantly knew I had an ism. Therefore, imperatively you need to know that I don’t care one iota about attaining nirvana. You need to know that I don’t care about anything except my own people and my continent. I don’t care about anything except the ismlessism, as I know that white people are doomed without an ism in one form or another. You would probably call me a racist for caring about white people yeah? That ain’t the half of it. Read this entire essay and you will see how much I care about white people. To reiterate, I am just the individual who wrote an (erroneous) 87,000 word practice thesis about the anti-racist forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, and subsequently discovered the ismlessism. We attain the jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism, by making Adolf Hitler thee coolest Ismlessist and the rest of us just identifying as aaay cool Ismlessist. Therefore, I am not a racist just because I care about white people. Having the singular desire to help protect white people and not caring a less about anything else like nirvana is an unbelievably modest desire. I am an avid reader, devout Catholic and non-aspiring DJ. I like tech house and techno music. You can listen to my mixes via the menu on my website. A cool Ismlessist understands that the discoverer of the ismlessism, attained the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler after having spent nearly 5 years reading over 130 books and that the discoverer wrote an 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler, which simplified down to one perfect or precise one word formula or answer, namely, the ismlessism.
“From the 1st or 2nd of August 2016 to the 12th of April 2021 at 21:52:51 (UTC), I read 132 books, 151 books in my entire life. I know one of the first dates is right because I bought my first (serious) book on Amazon on 31st July 2016, and the second date and time is right because that is the precise moment in time that I purchased the domain https://ismlessism.com, which I did instantly after I had the epiphany of the ismlessism, (not the adjective ismless, which I got weeks before). Therefore, if you want to change the world or discover an ism then you have to read. Reading is how I theoretically removed the racial hatred and anger from the world and founded the jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism of the ismlessism. Therefore, the more human beings on planet Earth who take up unofficial, serious, general, informational, historical, religious, philosophical and political reading, on the outside of formal or orthodox institutions such as universities, the greater good we will all do for humankind.”
Since August 2016 I have taken on a quest to help white people and to fix the ism, namely racism. My journey has taken me to every continent on Earth and through time and space via 160+ books, from the discovery of Africa to the discovery of the New World, from Plato to Socrates, Homer and Aristotle, from Islam to Buddhism, Judaism and Christianity, from prehistory to ancient, medieval and modern times, it’s been one hell of an adventurous journey. Covering many topics and genres, I read almost every day, mostly history but also quite a lot of religion and philosophy. I have an interest in history, prehistory, religion, government and philosophy etc. The type of books I read are all informational. Although I have read a few scientific books and I do touch on science now and again, my reading is basically non-scientific, but rather historical, religious, philosophical and informational. Although I have read four Shakespeare plays, which I loved, I don’t really have time to read novels and fiction etc. Again just to warn you about advanced science and professional academia etc, it’s almost as if general readers should read nothing except novels? Do not read novels! There is no information in novels. Novels are not informational. Read informational historic, religious and philosophical books etc. What you need is information! Nothing else. Also, although the main or overall purpose of my extensive reading is the ismlessism, that is, to overcome and fix racism, however, I believe that I am also trying to attain a kind of general and deep understanding of recorded history and the Abrahamic religions etc. I have read the Bible three times, starting with the Tanakh, then the NRSV and then the NIV version. It definitely won’t be the last time either. In my third reading of the Bible, I really understood the prophecy of the Old Testament, of the coming of the Messiah or ‘the root of Jesse’ etc and how Jesus Christ is the fulfilment of that prophecy. The prophecy of the Old Testament and its fulfilment in the New Testament is the greatest achievement of mankind. The Israelites accomplished the biggest, greatest and most amazing feat in history and for all time. However, my next point is very important, in that I truly believe, in fact I know that the only reason or way that I discovered the ismlessism and forgave Adolf Hitler is because I read the Bible three times. Therefore, please do underestimate the power of the Bible. As mentioned I have read over 160 books in my life, mostly historic, philosophical and religious books etc, however I am coming to the conclusion that everything is auxiliary to the Bible.
See all the books I have read organised into 7 genres and 50 subjects with personal notes on each book here: https://cloud.collectorz.com/cammock/books
Visit my Goodreads profile here: https://goodreads.com/ismlessism
The ismlessisms are purely grammatical and the ismlessism as an ism in its own right, I mean as a doctrine, theory or practice is definitely never a religious ism. (Believe me I’ve tried). Because the ismlessism is the antithesis of Adolf Hitler (who was too white) therefore, the ismlessism is therefore, sub-Saharan African, deeply black and Rastafarian. As culpable German intellectuals such as Friedrich Nietzsche were very high and articulate and because the Nazis were also supposedly advanced (yet barbaric) the ismlessisms are the precise antithesis of articulate and advanced. Ismlessisms such as “fash” are innately native sub-Saharan African and deeply cool, and I believe that God has deliberately placed the ismlessisms deep inside of indigenous Africans’ souls and that He has made the ismlessisms (and sub-Saharan Africans) deeply cool. I believe God has done this as a punishment for the Nazis and to teach them a valuable lesson about life. Therefore, the ismlessisms are the diametrically opposite antithesis of the Nazis and Adolf Hitler. I think Adolf Hitler would likely have thought that ismlessisms such as ”Bud” were degenerate, and if one was to talk in the ismlessist lingo with African or Ali G mannerisms to Adolf Hitler, this probably would really and humorously anger him. Indeed, what have Jewish people got to do with any of this? The Jews are 15 million white people, they have nothing to do with the ismlessism. Ismlessism is between black and white and nothing more. Therefore, ismlessism is a jocularly Rastafarian and grammatical ism but it is definitely never religious. However, because ismlessism is antithetical to the evil, heathen and pagan Germanic Volkish Holocaust, and the fact that it makes us loyal Abrahamic Judeo-Christians, and also because the ismlessism is about the forgiveness and salvation of Adolf Hitler, these points therefore, may determine that even although the ismlessism is definitely never religious, it may anti-paganism. The ismlessism was born in the hellish volcanic fires of the Holocaust (or a determined 5 year long endeavour to solve the Holocaust), which was a totally heathen and pagan disaster, therefore why shouldn’t the ismlessism rightfully be the opposite? Why shouldn’t the ismlessism be anti-paganism? Because the Volkish pagan religion tried to eject and intellectually attack Jesus Christ, cool Ismlessists violently defend Jesus Christ and would die for Him to prove our loyalty. However, regarding the ismlessism being secularly grammatical, it is possibly like a political or philosophical ism such as Communism? Therefore, ismlessism is probably just a political or philosophical ism, as in anti-racism, populism or Communism. The ismlessism is through the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, about the forgiveness and well being of all white people. In terms of the ismlessism being a doctrine, theory or practice, you need to know that I am developing the ismlessism entirely from my own example, that is, from my behaviours, beliefs and convictions etc since August 2016 when I started reading. I am doing this because I am the individual who discovered it. The ismlessism was entirely attained through reading, praying and writing. Even though the ismlessism as an ism in it own right is definitely never religious, it could possibly be syncretic as it could borrow many precepts, morals, beliefs and concepts from many religions. In terms of religion I am definitely a loyal Roman Catholic wannabe but I also learn from and use Judaism, Buddhism, Islam, Confucianism. Hence, I believe that I am an anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch cool Ismlessist. Perhaps you can put whatever religious, political or philosophical denominations or adjectives you like before the secular identity ”cool Ismlessist”, such as Buddhist cool Ismlessist or Hindu cool Ismlessist? Therefore, although I am a cool Ismlessist, what do I take from religions? If you read the 11 precepts below you will get a fairly good idea, however, here is a brief list:
- Compassionate charity.
- Reward in charity.
- Poverty is a virtue.
- The moral that as opposed to a super rich “aristocratic” Pharaoh who thought he was a god, that Jesus Christ, being true God and King of the universe was born in a humble manger.
- Masculine monotheism.
- Ultimate salvation of Europeans.
- Ambiguity of goodness in that Friedrich Nietzsche was a shit hot writer but shady. He was a ’good’ writer but an bad soul. Or the fact that you can be a good hearted saintly simpleton such as St. André Bessette, who was illiterate or a questionable articulate genius such as Nietzsche.
- The fact that Catholicism takes all shapes and sizes, in that (to quote Monty Python) ‘you don’t have to be a six footer and you don’t have to have a great brain’ etc.
- The concept of Sainthood.
- The communion of Saints.
- The fact that you don’t have to attain nirvana or enlightenment to be venerated or a Saint etc.
- Compassionate charity.
- Reward in charity.
- Poverty is a virtue.
- The Middle Way.
- The moral of the Buddha’s Great Renunciation, that is, from “aristocracy” and royalty to an ascetic who nearly starved himself to death to attain nirvana and enlightenment.
- Choseness of the Jewish people.
- Compassionate charity.
- Reward in charity, for example, charity to the widows and orphans.
- God, the Lord and YHWH.
- 100% masculine monotheism.
- The fact that you don’t need to attain nirvana or enlightenment to attain an ism.
- 100% and absolute masculine monotheism.
- The fact that you don’t need to attain nirvana or enlightenment to attain an ism.
- Mysticism, in that Taoism is an ancient mystical religion which is imprecise yet it has over 1500 texts, doctrines and dogmas etc, whereas the ismlessism is a modern jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism which is fundamental yet it is only one thesis.
- The fact that you don’t need to attain nirvana or enlightenment to attain an ism.
- Filial piety, reverence for and deference towards one’s parents, elders and superiors.
- Devotion to education.
- Zealously over-strict East Asian mothers regarding the education of their children called ‘tiger moms’.
- The fact that those children who excel in East Asia are the ones who are admired, while in the West, such kids are labelled “nerds” while the cool kids smoke in the toilets etc.
- Virtue before money or profit.
- The fact that Confucianism is almost as big as Buddhism or Christianity without attaining nirvana.
In some respects, we could even say that the quest for learning was a form of enlightenment to Confucius. The Buddha may have discovered the answers to life while meditating under a bodhi tree; Confucius sought his nirvana in books of poetry, history, and philosophy.
Confucius: And The World He Created, by Michael Schuman, location 2957.
What is feeble Christianity?
Feeble Christianity is scared of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. It is scared of dealing with such things for fear of being called a racist or a Nazi. Feeble Christianity is the vast majority of the Christianity that is available, practiced or preached on this planet today. It is the boring, light as a feather, octogenarian and wishy washy Christianity that one finds on social media such as Tumblr, Facebook or Twitter. You know the kind of extremely light Christian images that you find on Facebook, like one I found recently on Facebook which makes the bold claim that “There is no pit so deep that God’s redemption cannot reach?”A bold yet weak statement? This is because the person who posted that image would likely never back up that claim with any real conviction. Can Jesus Christ forgive Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust? If you can talk the talk then you should be able to walk the walk? Therefore, it “appears” that God does in fact have a limit to redemption? This is because no one can deal with the forgiveness (or redemption) of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. Not in eternity would this kind of feeble Christianity be able to forgive Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. Therefore, feeble Christianity is false, it doesn’t truly mean what it says. It just means that we should wait until the afterlife for an answer or a solution to such things as the Holocaust. Feeble Christianity today is like being told by your grandma to have peace in your heart. It seems to have opposite effect on youth. Kids today seek (and find) their spiritual action or excitement in drugs and cool tech house and techno super clubs, such as Pacha and in hedonistic holiday Meccas such as Ibiza, not in the church. And this is because feeble Christianity is as cool and hip as an octogenarian. If you are Christian in your youth, it’s like being 15 years old yet simultaneously octogenarian. And this is why Christianity is fading in terms of church attendance, adherents and believers etc. As mentioned earlier, I hear churches are ram packed to the rafters with 4% attendance in England these days with an average age of 60. If churches were as ram packed to the rafters as super cool super clubs with the average of 23, I think this might be better? All that is out there today is feeble and wishy washy Christianity that only deals with peace of mind, light sins, stress and personal suffering etc. Therefore, post-Holocaust, everybody is completely bored of feeble Christianity, it’s unappealing, unhip, uncool and unattractive to many. This is why church attendance has plummeted and why Christianity is dying. I know many good people who are openly non-Christian or anti-Catholic etc, I mean just average good people who find their spiritual fix in “Gaia” and in the belief that we are all “celestial beings” for example. It’s as if everybody today is doing anything except Christianity? Many people are honestly looking elsewhere, into European paganism for example. There are many benign and harmless European pagans on Tumblr and Twitter these days, however, remember the Nazis were also anti-Christian, heathen and pagan. What is cool is is black lingo and black culture.
What is courageous Christianity?
Courageous Christianity is real or serious about forgiveness and salvation. However, first of all you should know that I don’t and have never practiced feeble Christianity. I only practice Christianity that potentially has a huge and direct benefit for us Europeans. The salvation of humanity lies in the Holocaust. Salvation and the Holocaust are intertwined. If we want to protect Europeans and European culture we have to forgive the Holocaust. Therefore, I have always instinctively practiced and preached courageous Christianity. I call it courageous Christianity because what good is Christianity if it cannot save us Europeans from Adolf Hitler, Nazism and the Holocaust? If courageous Christianity can save us Europeans from Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust, it would make Christianity interesting, appealing and attractive to us again. This is because there would be real, serious, huge and direct benefits to us. I would truly worship the ground Jesus Christ walks on if He eternally gave us Europeans our own backyard (as in Europe) as well as eternal white governments in white countries, which are real, serious and direct benefits. To reiterate, if Jesus Christ can save us white people from the Holocaust, then alleluia Jesus Christ is my God, my King and my Saviour! Otherwise, who gives a damn? Therefore, courageous Christianity uses Jesus Christ to save us Europeans from the Holocaust, which is big enough and serious enough to interest us. Courageous Judeo-Christianity helps Jesus Christ to forgive Adolf Hitler. I would never practice weak, feeble, octogenarian and wishy washy Christianity. Therefore, courageous Christianity is about the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler in order to help protect white people from the consequences of the Holocaust. It is about ultimate or extreme forgiveness. The ismlessism cuts the head off the snake because it removes or cleaves the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world which forgives Adolf Hitler, which automatically forgives all subordinate Nazis for their individual sins during World War Two. That’s the beauty of courageous Christianity and ultimate forgiveness, because you just need to forgive the most serious sinner (Adolf Hitler) and all other lesser sins are forgiven by default. Therefore, courageous (not feeble) Christianity is about real and serious benefits and about real and ultimate forgiveness and salvation etc. There should be nothing wrong with being courageous with Christianity. Do not get me wrong Christianity should never be cool, hip or Ali G “wicked”, it should always be good and holy, however, there is nothing wrong or Michael Jackson “bad” about salvation, forgiveness or being courageous with Christianity. Being courageous with Christianity is not the martial arts, war or a battle field, it is in Christianity and it is in front of you.
The 11 Precepts.
Being a jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism, every precept in this list I learned from many different religions, that is, Kabbalah, Buddhism, Taoism, Jainism, Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, Judaism and Confucianism. Therefore, you have to understand that most of these precepts are not original, in that most of them are ancient, well established and well attested morals and precepts from many different religions. The majority of the precepts are the only aspect of the ismlessism which is not original. Also, it is important to note that these precepts are actually what I do, believe and practice myself in my own life. However, most importantly I want to stress that ismlessism is never religious, therefore these precepts are just meant to be advice and guidance from my 40 years of experience, the mistakes that I made and what I have learned from my five year long reading endeavour.
The first precept of the ismlessism is the religious belief and conviction of the “chosenness” of the Jewish people, and that via descent from the ancient Israelites, Jewish people are the chosen people, i.e. selected to be in a covenant with God. Just so you know that, although I am not perfect, just as equally important personally to me and my nearly 5 year long endeavour to remove racism, forgive Adolf Hitler and help protect white people, was also my law of emphatic philo-Semitism and absolute, eternal and devout pro-semitism. I am like Antifa when it comes to anti-Semitism. The protection and care for Jewish people was simultaneously my goal or belief along side the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and helping to protect white people for 5 years. How do you protect and care for Jewish people and help to protect white people at the same time? Because of the Holocaust it seems like a knife edge impossibility. Having these dual goals, beliefs or dual motivations for nearly 5 years, was how the ismlessism was achieved. I know it’s dumb, taken for granted and imbecilic, but like anti-racism, I don’t like taking things for granted, in that I like to read a book about something to confirm my convictions and beliefs. Therefore, in July 2017 I actually read a book called Judaism: History, Belief and Practice, by Dan Cohn-Sherbok to confirm my pro-Semitism and to check or make sure that there was nothing ‘spiritually’ wrong with Judaism. This was because it was obvious to me that it could be nothing else like race. As soon as I finished the book I knew there was absolutely nothing spiritually wrong with Judaism. Stupid I know, but that was the turning point. From that moment on I knew I was definitely a devoted and caring pro-Semite. Therefore, obviously I make absolutely no difference whatsoever between Jewish people and European Christians. Therefore, I have never been anti-Semitic. I consider Jews white people and I love them just as much as Christian white people. Devout philo-Semitism and absolute and eternal pro-semitism is the first precept of the ismlessism.
For you are a holy people to the Lord your God, and the Lord has chosen you to be a people for His own possession out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth. Deuteronomy 14:2
2. COOL ISMLESSIST.
A cool Ismlessist has the unshakable conviction and belief that to cut the head off the snake means that we have to make Adolf Hitler thee coolest Ismlessist and make sure that he believes in and professes the ismlessism, which means that there is no racism whatsoever in Adolf Hitler, and therefore, that he is forgiven, thereby attaining the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two, as well as the atonement and salvation of all white people for the Holocaust etc. A cool Ismlessist believes in the inseparability of Adolf Hitler to the ismlessism and the inseparability of Adolf Hitler to the name ’Ismless’ and the description ‘cool Ismlessist’. They are one and the same thing. There is no other way to get the ismlessism to work than to make Adolf Hitler the most important, first, foremost and coolest Ismlessist. The rule or law is to refer to Adolf Hitler as ‘Ismless’ or thee cool Ismlessist and to refer to everybody else as aaay cool Ismlessist.
Like Judaism and Catholicism, a cool Ismlessist is masculine and believes in masculinity. This is the age old and tried and tested concept of 100% supremely masculine monotheism. That is, the unquestionable belief in one supremely male or masculine God. A cool Ismlessist believes that YHWH or Allah is an unquestionably 100% male or masculine deity. Cool Ismlessists believe in YHWH, God, the Father or Allah and that He is a 100% unquestionably masculine deity. A cool Ismlessist believes that Jesus Christ the Son of God is a 100% unquestionably masculine deity. Cool Ismlessists believe that Earth will always be unquestionably dominated by heterosexual males for eternity. It is our cool Ismlessist faith that YHWH is a supremely masculine God.
Cool white Ismlessists should have absolutely zero desire to attain nirvana. The only desire of a cool white Ismlessist is to help protect white people. Cool non-white Ismlessists also should have absolutely zero desire to attain nirvana. Cool non-white Ismlessists should also have absolutely zero desire to destroy, conquer or master Europe or Europeans. This is uncool and we cool white Ismlessists would be able to tell if cool non-white Ismlessists harboured any such ulterior motives. The only desire or goal of both white and non-white cool Ismlessists should be to remove or overcome racism and to help protect Europeans and white people.
Cool Ismlessists are the most altruistic people on Earth. This is because they devoutly care about the health, safety, fecundity, protection and wellbeing of their own white people. Cool Ismlessists don’t want to save the world like Jesus Christ, they just passionately want to save their own people. Cool Ismlessists are prepared to make just about any sacrifice for their own people.
One of the most fundamental and important precepts of the ismlessism is motive. As stated, one thing about state of the art science is that it puts Bachelors of Arts (like me) off from seriously taking up non-career oriented, academic reading and especially writing an independent 87,000 word thesis on the outside of universities. As I said earlier, when you take up reading and write a thesis independently on the outside of universities you work for virtue, to help protect white people and not your career goals. When you work not for career goals but for virtue, your motive is different, such as mine was always to help protect white people. However, you would not be allowed to have the motive to help protect white people at university. I mean you may end up doing something as random as theoretical physics or you may end up doing something like post-impressionist oil painting, but your motive must always be to help protect white people. Every twitch of your finger must be to help protect white people. That was always my motivation and I mean always, 100% all of the time, all the way through my 5 year long reading and writing endeavour etc. I mean I wouldn’t have read a single letter if my motivation wasn’t for white people. And to be honest I could even go back to 2006/2007 (way before I started reading) as to where my motivations to help protect white people came from. Therefore, the motive is most important. If you want to write a thesis and improve the world around you, you must find your pure, devoted, unadulterated and eternal motive. Having the eternal motive to help protect white people and no desire to attain nirvana is an unbelievably modest desire. For example, I have read Confucius: And the World He Created by Michael Schuman and it is one of the better books I have ever read. Confucius is so important and to truly understand East Asia you need to understand Confucius. Michael Schuman is an excellent writer, he really conveys the importance of Confucian philosophy to you effectively and efficiently. However, while reading this good book, it got me thinking that as you know I am currently dreaming of writing my own small book on the ismlessism as I believe it is important enough to the well being of my own people and to the whole world etc. In fact, I believe it is my moral duty and responsibility to research, develop and publish the ismlessism for the benefit of all of mankind. The thought that I had while reading Confucius: And the World He Created by Michael Schuman is why did Michael Schuman write such an amazing book? I mean what were his motivations? Did he want to improve the world around him or did he do it for money or a combination of both? It got me thinking about my own motivations and how unbelievably pure, noble and altruistic they are. This is because I am not in any way motivated by money. In fact, the ismlessism actually costs me money. I believe it is a case of your starting point or starting position. I mean what were your initial goals or motivations when you began your endeavour or started your small business? We’re you just out to make a quick buck and rip people off or did you have absolutely pure, good, noble and altruistic motives or intentions for the benefit of the mankind and the whole world? Therefore, I know that even if I do make a little money from the ismlessism book, that my motives and my starting point are both absolutely sound. If I was to write a small book about the ismlessism, my goals or objectives would be the following in order of importance:
- To help protect my own people (Europeans).
- To make a name for myself, leave my mark on the world and go down in history etc.
- To earn an income in order to make my self truly independent and more confident etc.
“There is no point in seeking the views of a gentleman who, though he sets his heart on the Way, is ashamed of poor food and poor clothes,” the sage said. That suspicion stemmed from his belief that the profit motive ran counter to morality. By seeking riches, man was drawn away from virtue. “The gentleman understands what is moral,” Confucius said. “The small man understands what is profitable.” This isn’t to say that Confucius was against financial success entirely. He implied that amassing great wealth is fine—as long as one attains it while engaged in strictly virtuous behavior. “Wealth and high station are what men desire but unless I got them in the right way I would not remain in them,” he said. “Poverty and low station are what men dislike, but even if I did not get them in the right way, I would not try to escape from them.” In Confucian thought, wealth would come to those who were virtuous and wise. A good king could bring prosperity to himself and his entire kingdom if he followed the Way. “Virtue is the root; wealth is the result,” The Great Learning asserts.
Confucius: And the World He Created by Michael Schuman, location 3790.
“Riches and honors acquired by unrighteousness, are to me as a floating cloud.”
The Complete Confucius: The Analects, The Doctrine Of The Mean and The Great Learning, Confucius, page 26.
However, I just wanted to state another thing which I think is important. As you know I have stated and encouraged bachelors and lay people (like me) to take up serious, non-career oriented, academic reading, research and writing etc about anything at all that they passionately believe in, in some kind of unorthodox or unofficial free thinking university; that is not limited by taboos and political correctness etc. And I have also just stated that motive is paramount, in that you must find your pure, devoted, unadulterated and eternal motive, like mine was always to help protect white people. However, I am coming to the conclusion that there is something particularly right about my motive or motives. I mean I am worried that you go barking up the wrong tree for 5 years, however, although barking up the tree is exactly what I did for 5 years and my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler was barking up the wrong tree, however, it was not entirely and not ultimately barking up the wrong tree as it led to the ismlessism. This proves that you can never tell if someone is entirely barking up the wrong tree? They may have it wrong today but their good heart might be in the right place, their motives and their starting position may be sound. Therefore, I just wanted to forewarn you that there appears to be something particularly right or correct about the motives of ultimate forgiveness and helping to protect white people. I will bullet point my motive(s) to make it clearer:
- Helping to protect white people.
- The absolution of Adolf Hitler.
- Overcome racism.
There seems to be something particularly right about the above motive(s) as they definitely work. I am just worried that you choose a motive that is dead in the water? Therefore, think very carefully about your motive, copy mine if you like. The more people who find ways to forgive and help protect white people the better.
7. AMBIGUITY OF GOOD.
I have mentioned it before, however I just wanted to mention it again, that the ismlessism does not believe in talent, intelligence or being ‘blessed’ with attractive physical endowment, in that the ismlessism prefers angelic simpletons (such as St. André Bessette, who was illiterate) over evil articulate geniuses such as Nietzsche. The ismlessism or thee ism, being a grammatical ism, is as simple and relevant to 4 year olds as it is to all other age groups just like the Christian nativity. Therefore, in the same vein and in relation to my first (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis, I am not the most intellectual of people, I got average GCSEs, I only got a merit (as opposed to a distinction) BTEC National Diploma and a 2:1 Bachelor of Arts degree. I was a 1990s trance clubber and I absolutely caned it in the 1990s on ecstacy. Mitzis (Mitsubishi) were my favourite pill. Honestly, I really caned it, I took like 13 pills in one night at Gatecrasher a couple of times. In fact, I used to double drop Es. Therefore, as a kid I was quite stupid and not very articulate or studious at all. In fact, I was thick all of my life until the 1st August 2016, when I started reading. I have always been a sub-average achiever and never a straight-A student. But then again nothing has ever really interested me. Being a late developer I only grew up at age 35 when I started reading and to pursue my quest to fix racism, forgive Adolf Hitler and help protect white people, and it was only helping to protect white people that really interested me and the only thing that I truly and passionately cared about. Nothing interested me at school, college and university. At school I was one of those kids you would find ducking class and smoking in the toilets etc. However, I truly and passionately care about white people. Like some of the Catholic Saints who were losers, illiterate and even Satan worshippers, another fundamental law of the ismlessism is that there are no limits to how late you are in achieving something in life or how much of a loser you are. For example, to be a doctor you have to be very determined at like 9 years old and you have to be very studious, ahead of the rest and be very early etc. However, the ismlessism doesn’t care too much about that. For example, as of 2021 I am 40 years old and I never did anything educational and I had never seriously read a book in my life until the 1st of August 2016, when I was 35 years old. Therefore, with the ismlessism it doesn’t matter if you are a poor 60 year old who has never read a book in his or her life, the ismlessism has absolutely no deadlines or cutoff points in life in which to achieve something. The point of ismlessism is that we can achieve things on the outside of university. The ismlessism is a double ism, it is thee ism, it is not religious yet it is as down to Earth as the nativity because it is as relevant to 4 year olds as it is to centenarians, I mean it is universal and simple enough for infants understand. And even though it was wrong, I believe my heart was in the right place and that my motives were right when I wrote my 87,000 word thesis and I asked the question that nobody else has ever asked before, namely is there any way we can forgive Adolf Hitler? My prayers were literally answered when I attained the one word perfect answer to racism and the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, namely the ismlessism. Again what I am trying to say is that intelligence doesn’t matter with religions such as Catholicism, because you can be an evil genius and an angelic simpleton, and that’s what religion, God or Jesus Christ like, that is, a good simple heart over an evil big brain. For example, St. André Bessette was illiterate, he was uneducated but a Saint. Therefore, intelligence and being advanced will never save us, but a good natured simple heart that asks the right questions will. Therefore, a cool Ismlessist believes in the philosophy that religion (as opposed to science and academia, (which always seek talent)), God and Jesus Christ etc like and prefer disabled saintly simpletons to talented evil geniuses. That is that religion or God prefers primitive Saints (such as St. André Bessette whom was illiterate) to advanced and articulate geniuses such as Nietzsche. This is the ismlessism and how it was discovered. I believe “Every Sperm Is Sacred”, the famous musical sketch from the film Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life, sung by Michael Palin, pretty well sums up Catholicism and exactly what I am trying to say about simple good hearts versus evil genius. Here’s some lyrics:
There are Jews in the world
There are Buddhists
There are Hindus and Mormons, and then
There are those that follow Mohammed, but
I’ve never been one of them
I’m a Roman Catholic,
And have been since before I was born,
And the one thing they say about Catholics is:
They’ll take you as soon as you’re warm
You don’t have to be a six-footer
You don’t have to have a great brain
You don’t have to have any clothes on You’re
A Catholic the moment Dad came,
Every sperm is sacred
Every sperm is great
If a sperm is wasted,
God gets quite irate!
I am not insulting academics intelligence because I think I have done a similar kind of thing to a Masters degree or a PhD, in that I have spent five years reading intensively and over a year and a half I wrote an (erroneous) 87,000 word practice thesis as well as this 60,000 word (correct) thesis. To reiterate, even though my first thesis was incorrect it led to the ismlessism, which is correct. What I mean by not insulting professors and academics intelligence, is that they are a lot more intelligent and intellectual than I and more than intelligent enough to workout and discover the ismlessism, the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and the solution to racism and the Holocaust etc, however, their abilities and intelligence are far too restricted and limited by taboos and political correctness.
Pioneers. – I greet all the signs indicating that a more manly and warlike age is commencing, which will, above all, bring heroism again into honor! For it has to prepare the way for a yet higher age, and gather the force which the latter will one day require, – the age which will carry heroism into knowledge, and wage war for the sake of ideas and their consequences.
Heroism. This is the ethos of a people which strives toward a goal against the form it no longer fits. Heroism is the good will toward self-destruction.
What makes heroic? – To face simultaneously one’s greatest suffering and one’s highest hope.
But by my love and hope I conjure thee: cast not away the hero in thy soul! Maintain holy thy highest hope!
One has renounced grand life, when one has renounced war.
Brethren, war’s the origin
Of happiness on earth!
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1905 – 1922.
I am developing the ismlessism by or from my own example of how I have behaved, my actions and convictions etc since the 1st of August 2016, when I started reading. Reading is the truth and I read over 160 books from cover to cover in my endeavour to help protect white people. Therefore, I am trying to be as truthful as I can be as to how I discovered the jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism that is the ismlessism since the 1st August 2016. Before the ismlessism you really don’t need to know anything about my life, in fact other than my reading and writing, the less said about before the ismlessism the better. Never you mind! It’s none of your business! I do what I do! What do you know? Whatever happened before the ismlessism, stays before the ismlessism! Let nothing more be said about it! Anyway, after long deliberations I think that racism is a warrior, I mean that basically the mentality of a racist is about protecting our women and countries and about being a hero like Achilles, it’s basically kind of a warrior mentality. This is what Nietzsche meant by his ”noble”, “strong”, ”powerful” and ”aristocratic” master morality (as demonstrated by the noble and warrior-like Romans) versus the “weak” slave morality (as demonstrated by the Jews and Christians). I don’t mean physically as in hand-to-hand combat or war or anything like that, but more like being a slightly aggressive, brave or heroic spiritual or intellectual warrior, like Achilles. Like the above Nietzsche quote, racists are warriors (like the noble and glorious Romans) who believe in heroism, chivalry, virtue, honour and glory etc. Racism is a choice, either you are a ”noble” and ”strong” Nietzschean warrior or you are a “kind” and “compassionate” Christian for example. Racists fundamentally believe that discrimination is key and nonnegotiable, in that at some point there has to be and must be a little impoliteness toward non-white people in order to protect our borders and women etc. For example, declining non-white people U.K. citizenship, immigrant status and deportations etc. Racists fundamentally believe that no matter what, there must be minimal discrimination between black and white in order to save our countries and women etc. Until I discovered the ismlessism and until I understood how Asians genuinely have no schadenfreude about Europe’s Holocaust and that they genuinely want us to fix or remove the ism, namely racism before anything else I wasn’t necessarily against such notions. It was only in the light of the epiphany of the ismlessism, which is a good hearted jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism, which made me see these notions as wrong. There would be nothing wrong with defending your women and people only that it is judgement for the Holocaust. This is what racists don’t understand or subconsciously ignore, that is, that the recent misfortunes, decline and demise of white people is judgement and punishment for the Holocaust. However, the ismlessism transformed me into an unbelievably or extremely good hearted, peaceful and nonviolent person like Mahatma Gandhi. As Nietzsche said, ancient and medieval people were all about warriors, heros, chivalry, glory and bravery etc, as demonstrated by such as Homer’s Iliad and Achilles etc. However, I believe that since the world wars (and the Holocaust) that we Europeans and indeed everyone have actually left the age of warriors behind and as demonstrated by such as Mahatma Gandhi, I believe we have entered a brand new, peaceful, nonviolent, good hearted and non-warrior age? I mean if the Japanese after World War Two could give up the Bushidō samurai code, which was an extreme, kamikaze, victory or suicide, and to-the-death warrior code, then surely European racists can convert to a peaceful, nonviolent, good hearted and jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism, namely the ismlessism? Therefore, I would just like to point out to both potential right and left wing converts, that the ismlessism is a good hearted jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism and a peaceful one at that, and although it has symbols and art, it does not aggressively protest or demonstrate politically or militantly with flags and banners etc. I mean for example, if you were going to march or demonstrate it should be done peacefully and with no shouting or chanting etc. This kind of non-optional quiet and peaceful demonstration should really highlight how much trouble white people are in for the World Wars. We can’t do really anything else! The ismlessism is a peaceful and good hearted jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism. Peace, reading, praying and meditation are more like it’s demands. Beat BLM and Antifa at their own game by not being aggressive, violent or intimidating, be peaceful, religious, prayerful, good hearted and meditative etc. Mahatma Gandhi employed nonviolent resistance to lead the successful campaign for India’s independence from British rule and in turn inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world. Obviously because of the two World Wars, Mahatma Gandhi used religion to teach white people a thing or two about good heartedness and nonviolence. However, if white people want to save their countries they should mimic the Asians and their isms, learn from Asians and copy their leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi. White people can only copy the Asians such as Mahatma Gandhi and his nonviolent resistance with an ism, such as the ismlessism. I mean British people have always been a bit aggressive, but the two World Wars really took the biscuit. However, the Germans (or the Volk) gave the British no option. Unfortunately, the world wars were a matter of life and death for Britain. However, still white people have not learned a thing from Asians, Mahatma Gandhi and his message of nonviolence because Antifa are a violent, aggressive, intimidating extreme-leftist political movement. So first of all Adolf Hitler produced a Holocaust, and then white people go and produce Antifa. Finally, today be good hearted and cool not a noble “Nietzschean warrior.”
Though you might conquer in battle A thousand times a thousand men, You’re the greatest battle-winner If you conquer just one – yourself.
The Buddha (Dhammapada verse 103).
Another important precept or virtue of the ismlessism is poverty. I am 40 and I have not worked much in my life due to long term mental and anxiety issues since I was expelled from private school at nearly 17 years old. Therefore, unless this ismlessism book sells like hot cakes, I am, always have been and probably always will be relatively poor? I promise you that even if this ismlessism book is successful, I will always try to live by example and if I do make any money from the ismlessism, I will live by example, be very charitable and use the money wisely. Therefore, the ismlessism is strict about poverty. In theory the most venerated, respected and admired cool Ismlessist, would always also be the poorest. If you are a sales assistant on a grand a month, you are a respected cool Ismlessist and you should know that. If you are homeless, you are absolutely a respected cool Ismlessist. I am not saying that you can’t be an affluent cool Ismlessist or that you should give your money away, only that you should know that we cool Ismlessists don’t give a damn about money or wealth, that it doesn’t make you a higher ranking or cooler Ismlessist by having money, in fact that you should understand that the most respected and coolest Ismlessist is the poorest and also that you should know that you should be very charitable with your wealth etc. Therefore, cool Ismlessists believe in the ancient, universal and fundamental morality of compassionate charity, benevolence, asceticism and poverty, which all religions of the world teach, including Judaism, Buddhism and Christianity. There are many scriptural examples, however, Matthew 6:3-4 and Luke 16:19-31 are good ones. Therefore, cool Ismlessists believe that there is reward in charity and that God and heaven reward those who are generous, benevolent or charitable. Siddhartha Gautama was a prince who renounced his royal entitlement, became an ascetic and nearly starved himself to death before He attained nirvana. Pharaohs were rich men who thought they were a god, however, ultimately God was Jesus Christ who was born in a manger. I have read the Bible three times and I understand it well, you just get better with it over time. The main lesson, concept, truth or meaning of both the Old Testament and the New Testament is that Jesus Christ (and the Buddha) are an inverse Pharaoh or an inverse god king. It’s the lesson of life or the universe, it’s the lesson from all of prehistory and antiquity. Basically, before Jesus Christ, ancient Pharaohs, kings and emperors tended to self-deify or be deified, for example Menhutep II blatantly self-deified, Julius Caesar was deified and Augustus (Octavian) also straddled the borders of divinity. This is how humanity came in the first place, before Jesus Christ, that is, they made the richest and most powerful deities. Obviously after Jesus Christ, the true God and King of the universe, who was born in a humble manger and who came to serve and not be served etc, subtly and all of a sudden nobody wants to be Menhutep II, and kings and emperors subtly no longer wish to be deified. The only reason European medieval Christian monarchs didn’t self-deify is probably because of Jesus Christ. And remember this eternal lesson is the reason Jesus Christ died! Jesus Christ died to teach god kings, divine emperors and all of mankind this eternal lesson. Siddhartha Gautama also did precisely the same thing with His Great Renunciation. Basically Siddhartha Gautama renounced his royal titles, luxuries and wives etc and became an extreme ascetic who nearly starved himself to death! It’s exactly the same lesson, that is, from royalty to poverty and nirvana. Therefore, humanity has been taught the same eternal lesson about riches and wealth twice! I mean take this eternal lesson from the Bible metaphorically, allegorically or kabbalistically not literally, by this I mean that the ‘Pharaoh’ stands for or represents anyone who is rich and famous today, who just wants to attain nirvana. It’s a lesson that no one ever seems to learn properly. Therefore, the lesson, which still applies today, is basically that there are two options in life, firstly, you can be a metaphorical ‘Pharaoh’ in life, that is rich, famous, vain and go down in history, or you can be like Jesus Christ and the Buddha, that is, poor, ascetic, modest, who attains nirvana and goes down for eternity. Try not to care about money. Here’s some scripture regarding money and wealth to encourage you:
“Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or drink; or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothes? Look at the birds of the air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much more valuable than they? Can any one of you by worrying add a single hour to your life?
“And why do you worry about clothes? See how the flowers of the field grow. They do not labor or spin. Yet I tell you that not even Solomon in all his splendor was dressed like one of these. If that is how God clothes the grass of the field, which is here today and tomorrow is thrown into the fire, will he not much more clothe you—you of little faith? So do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them. But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own. Matthew 6:25-34.
“There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores and longing to eat what fell from the rich man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.
“The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. In Hades, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’
“But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’
“He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my family, for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’
“Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.’
“‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’
“He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’” Luke 16:19–31.
“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” Matthew 5:3.
But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. Matthew 6:3-4.
Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” Matthew 19:23-24.
“Give, even if you only have a little.” Dhammapada verse 224.
An absolute law or philosophy of the ismlessism is complete humbleness. The New Testament verse below sums up another primary or fundamental precept of the ismlessism.
For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.
Why is Adolf Hitler ismless and thee coolest Ismlessist? He is the most important cool Ismlessist because his forgiveness is world peace and has the most benefit for all Europeans and mankind. Now as mentioned, the ismlessism is a universal and good hearted jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism and it is about strict or sensible nonviolence, not extreme or vegetarian nonviolence like the Jainists but very strict. Now nonviolence definitely does not mean just war or battle but it also means no violent political demonstrations by such as the Antifascists. We cool Ismlessists have the true forgiveness, guaranteed peace, nonviolence and ‘ismlessism’ of Adolf Hitler. Therefore, it is now you Antifascists who are the violent and aggressive wrongdoers! Therefore, my more than a year long and ultimately incorrect endeavour to forgive Adolf Hitler with time and relativity, that is, my (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis proved that even though I was wrong, that heaven does love a trier and does answer those who humbly and sincerely ask. Time For Forgiveness truly, deeply and sincerely asked the question can we solve the Holocaust and racism? Is there any way we can forgive Adolf Hitler? Is there any way we can help protect white people? Time For Forgiveness tried to forgive absolutely everything, all in order to forgive Adolf Hitler in order to help protect white people, therefore, Adolf Hitler was always my main goal, because there is obviously a huge benefit for white people in the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. Would you forgive Adolf Hitler was the cool ismless and frequently said his ismlessisms? The ismlessism removes the racism from Adolf Hitler. As long as he is ismless or the cool Ismlessist, he is okay and forgiven? That’s the power of the ismlessism, it even fixes and makes us forgive Adolf Hitler down here in life or on Earth, without having to wait for the afterlife. Therefore, if Adolf Hitler is alright and forgiven, then who isn’t? That’s the beauty of absolute and universal forgiveness, that is, you just need to cut the head off the snake or forgive the most severe example (Adolf Hitler) and all other lesser sins are automatically forgiven by default. Cool Ismlessists believe in extreme, ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness and absolution.
And forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us. Matthew 6:12
Although the 11 precepts of the ismlessism are sacred, the following is just a rough, similar and general list of primary beliefs of cool Ismlessists. Please note that being a jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism, most beliefs in this list I learned from many different religions, that is, Kabbalah, Buddhism, Taoism, Jainism, Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, Judaism and Confucianism etc. Therefore, there is some overlap or repetition between the 11 precepts and the beliefs of the ismlessism. Also you must understand that these beliefs are actually what I do, believe and practice myself in my own life. Most importantly, please remember that ismlessism is never religious.
- The first belief of a cool Ismlessist is the religious conviction of the “chosenness” of the Jewish people, and that via descent from the ancient Israelites, Jewish people are the chosen people, i.e. selected to be in a covenant with God.
- A cool Ismlessist is masculine and believes in masculinity. This is from or through the age old and tried and tested concept of 100% masculine monotheism. That is, the unquestionable belief in one supremely male God. A cool Ismlessist believes that YHWH, the Father or Allah is an unquestionably 100% male or masculine deity. A cool Ismlessist believes that Jesus Christ the Son of Man is an unquestionably 100% male or masculine God. It is our unquestionable and cool Ismlessist faith that YHWH is a supremely masculine God.
- An imperative and fundamental belief of a cool Ismlessist is Matthew 23:12: ‘For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.’
- A cool Ismlessist believes in the full admission and acknowledgment that without the ismlessism, white people would be doomed as a result of the Holocaust.
- A cool Ismlessist believes that the Holocaust is ineffable, however, a cool Ismlessist also believes that the unspeakable Holocaust has probably been overcome with the ismlessism.
- A cool Ismlessist believes that white people are ismless because of the Holocaust.
- A cool Ismlessist believes that all groups of people must have an ism in one form or another of their own.
- A cool Ismlessist believes that the ismlessism is a double ism, it is thee ism, it is a new jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism and it is the answer or solution to the other ism, namely racism.
- A cool Ismlessist believes that the ismlessism is the eternal and unquestionable answer or solution to the ism, namely racism, the Holocaust and the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler.
- A cool Ismlessist believes that the discoverer of the ismlessism, attained the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler after having spent nearly 5 years reading over 130 books and that I the said discoverer wrote an (erroneous) 87,000 word practice thesis, which simplified down to one perfect one word equation, formula or answer, namely, the ismlessism.
- A cool Ismlessist believes that the universe always has a fundamental answer or solution to any problem or sin for those earnestly and humbly ask, even for the Holocaust etc.
- A cool Ismlessist believes that the ismlessism determines that nothing is unfixable. Even the Holocaust.
- A cool Ismlessist believes that the ismlessism cuts the head off the snake, removes the racism from Adolf Hitler, and that as long as Adolf Hitler is named Ismless or is the cool Ismlessist and believes in and professes the ismlessism, there is no racism whatsoever in Adolf Hitler and that he is therefore, forgiven, thereby attaining the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two as well as the atonement and salvation of all white people for the Holocaust etc.
- A cool Ismlessist believes that through the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, the ismlessism removes all the racial hatred and anger from world.
- A cool Ismlessist believes in eternal peace and nonviolence.
- A cool Ismlessist believes in the non-use of hate or aggression, especially politically or on social media etc.
- A cool Ismlessist believes in the ancient, universal and fundamental morality of compassionate charity, benevolence, asceticism and poverty, which all religions of the world teach, including Judaism, Buddhism and Christianity. There are many scriptural examples, however, Matthew 6:3-4 and Luke 16:19-31 are good ones. Therefore, cool Ismlessists believe that there is reward in charity and that God and heaven reward those who are generous, benevolent or charitable. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. Matthew 6:3-4
- A cool Ismlessist believes in the philosophy that religion (as opposed to science and academia, which always seek talent), God and Jesus Christ etc like and prefer disabled saintly simpletons to talented evil geniuses. That is that religion or God prefers primitive Saints (such as St. André Bessette whom was illiterate) to advanced and articulate geniuses such as Nietzsche. This is the ismlessism and how it was attained.
- A cool Ismlessist believes in reading, writing and prayer, as these activities were how the ismlessism was attained.
Not a religion.
I have read many books about different religions my goal of which was to compare them with ismlessism (even though ismlessism is not religious). I have read Taoism for Dummies and what I am starting to understand generally is that a lot of religions (especially eastern religions) are quite mystical and inaccurate compared to western science. For example, Taoism has its beliefs in the Tao (the Way), Yin-Yang theory, ch’i, the five elements (wood, fire, earth, metal and water) and traditional Chinese medicine etc. All of the above theories are interrelated, for example ch’i tells acupuncturists which body parts to puncture etc. Obviously this is similar to pre-modern western medicine with its humorism or the humoral theory, which began to fall out of favor in the 1850s. It was the west that brought the world out of such ancient and medieval knowledge and invented the scientific method and modern medicine etc. However, I am not showing off, because it was the west that had two world wars and a Holocaust (with all that precise science). Perhaps Europeans could have used their own peaceful, good hearted and nonviolent religious ism? Also, science is rational, neutral and amoral and will therefore, never forgive us for our sins, the Holocaust and Adolf Hitler etc. And finally, as mentioned, advanced science puts bachelors like me off of independent reading, writing and philosophising etc. Obviously the five Chinese elements are imprecise or mystical while the periodic table of western chemistry is fundamental and precise, but on which side of the mystical/fundamental fence does the ismlessism fall? The ismlessism is a fundamental, jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism, the universe made it the perfect fundamental solution to racism, that is, its mathematical purpose is to fix, overcome and remove the other most powerful ism in the universe, namely, racism. Therefore, the ismlessism is fact, it is a 100% fundamental and jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism. However, it is just one word. Taoism has over 1500 texts as well as the above mentioned mystical theories and doctrines etc. Therefore, mystical religions such as Taoism and the Kabbalah (which has the mystical Tree of Life and the Zohar etc) have a lot of theory, writings, scriptures and stuff associated with them, yet they are mystical and imprecise, while on the other hand the ismlessism is just one fundamental word. (Note: all the precepts and beliefs in this essay are unoriginal, they are simply what I learned from religions). What I do know is that there is nothing more or higher than the ismlessism for racism. Was the ismlessism designed? No, it was always there. It’s an absolute truth and absolute truths are never created, only discovered.
External and altruistic salvation.
As you know in 2021 I unofficially converted to Catholicism from the Church of England. I definitely prefer Catholicism because, firstly I wholeheartedly believe in the communion of Saints, in fact the turning point that led me to Catholicism and praying the Rosary and then subsequently to the epiphany of realising the ismlessism was a book called Life In A Medieval Monastery: The Monks Of Durham Cathedral by Anne Boyd. In this book I learned about Saint Cuthbert of Lindisfarne. I was totally astonished at my own complete ignorance of the holy, sacred and miraculous origins of my own local cathedral and in fact the City of Durham itself. Durham Cathedral, castle and indeed the City of Durham was founded in 995 AD, on the final resting place of Saint Cuthbert’s relics by monks fleeing the Viking raids on Lindisfarne. Therefore, Durham wouldn’t exist if it wasn’t for Saint Cuthbert. I came to truly believe in Saint Cuthbert. I came to believe that Saints are magic. Also, I prefer Catholicism because of the Rosary, which to me is wonderful. It was actually during a Rosary prayer that I realised that white people are ismless. Therefore, I wanted to discuss one thing, which is that there are two types of salvation. There is internal, personal or egoistic salvation and there is external, general and altruistic salvation. Therefore, I just wanted to point out that if a white Protestant converts to Catholicism, it achieves practically nothing. It’s just a statistic for the Vatican. However, if a white person converts to the secular ismlessism it achieves a lot, it helps save all white people. Therefore, instead of being saved in the internal or personal usual Christian way, why not help save all white people in an external or altruistic way yourself, by the act of converting to the ismlessism? With Christianity most people seek their own personal salvation, it’s as if Jesus Christ saves you and you alone. No body within Christianity (apart from Jesus Christ) dares to try and save the whole world or tries to help protect white people (which is my whole world). So instead of saving just one person, that is yourself, why not help save all white people altruistically by converting to the ismlessism? You can do it, we can all help save all white people individually by ourselves by converting to the Rastafarian ismlessism.
I am the discoverer of the ismlessism and it’s probably obvious to you by now, especially as evidenced by some of my earlier digressions, that I deeply care about white people and that the ismlessism came entirely from a 5 year effort to overcome or fix racism. I always admired and respected the Asians and Africans, however, the first thing the ismlessism did was make me admire and respect even more those people who have always had ancient religious isms of their own, namely the Asians. As a cool Ismlessist, I am attracted Asian isms. Wouldn’t it be a good idea if Africans got their own religious ism or became religious in their own way, like the Indians and Jainists for example? I mean wouldn’t it be a grand idea if Africans were eternal and tried to conquer white people on both sides of life? It’s true that I initially wanted the ismlessism to be white, and this is because the ismlessism is undeniably the culmination of a near 5 year endeavour to fix racism and to help protect white people. However, I just couldn’t do it to the Asians for example, I mean just couldn’t deny them the opportunity of becoming fellow cool Ismlessists. However, the ismlessism is not religious, but a grammatical and linguistic ism that solves racism. I believe that Asians are probably attracted to the ismlessism because:
- The ismlessism solves the ism, namely racism and removes and neutralises the racial hatred and anger from the world.
- By making Adolf Hitler the coolest Ismlessist, the ismlessism removes racism from Adolf Hitler, thereby forgiving him and thereby helping to save and protect white people.
Therefore, to reiterate, because the ismlessism solves the ism, namely racism, the ismlessism is probably very appealing to Asians and Africans, therefore I just could not bring myself to deny the Asians and Africans the possibility of becoming cool Ismlessists. Therefore, this notion made me happy to make the ismlessism an accessible, universal and jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism. Also I am myself interested in Asian isms and would be sad if I couldn’t try them out or share with them. Also, I have come to believe that helping to save and protect white people may not entail separation but more making non-white people genuinely, admire, love and respect white people. Therefore, although I care about white people, I am just a cool Ismlessist. Cool Ismlessists are neither racist nor anti-racist, they are in between and they possess all the humour. I believe all human beings, either as groups or as individuals should always have isms of their own. Is Adolf Hitler the first convert to the ismlessism? I think Adolf Hitler is the most important convert to the ismlessism because it symbolises world peace also there is so much benefit for all white people through his conversion and forgiveness, therefore, I believe Adolf Hitler should be known as the first convert. Therefore, I believe that the ismlessism should try to convert both racists and anti-racists alike.
Although I also believe in and profess the ismlessism and my goal in life is to correct the ism, namely racism, please read the following to understand my real faith. I was a child of the 1980s and 1990s and I was reared in a ‘normal’ Protestant family on nothing but pop culture. I was ‘pop cultured’. I was never indoctrinated in such as Matthew 23:12: ‘For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.’ Thinking I was an angelic child, I turned out to be a vain, show-off and drug using teenager. The rest you don’t want to know about, however, I am now a very repentant 40 year old. You don’t have to be a genius to be a Saint, that’s the beauty of religion (or a religious ism) such as Catholicism, because religion is simple. Religion can be understood by all age levels, for example, it is really good to pray the Rosary together as a family around newborns, infants and children as even children can understand the story of Jesus Christ and the gospel etc. For example, St. André Bessette (9 August 1845 – 6 January 1937), the first Canadian living after Confederation to be canonized, was illiterate. Some Saints were “losers” and Bartolo Longo, who was beatified was formerly a “Satan worshiper.” That’s the beauty of religion, especially Catholicism because you don’t need to be a genius, special or physically well endowed to be a good person. This determines that you can be an advanced and gifted genius yet be evil (like Nietzsche). That is the difference between religion and philosophy, religion is an unbelievably simple doctrine which even children can understand, while philosophy is unbelievably advanced like meta-ethical relativism or Nietzscheanism, which only university students can understand. The thing I like about Saints is that they only seek posthumous adoration, unlike physically well endowed, flashy, drug addict and show off rock and pop stars. Saints are infinitely better examples for us and our children than pop stars.
At that time Jesus said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.”
I truly believe in the power and magic of the Catholic Saints, and I believe that the Rastafarian ismlessism was only given to me by or because I encountered, read about and studied many Catholic Saints. To me, the secret of miracles is that I don’t care. I don’t care if they are superstitious, they are economic. For example, many miracles were attributed to Saint Cuthbert of Lindisfarne, whose final resting place was the foundation of Durham City and Durham Cathedral. Many miracles were attributed to his relics and shrine at Durham Cathedral. The fame of the miracles of Saint Cuthbert’s remains, such as his incorruptible body spread far and wide, and they attracted many pilgrims including kings, seeking a miracle or a cure for infirmity to Durham City, along with which came lucrative devotional offerings, money and grants of lands etc. Therefore, what on Earth does it matter if miracles are superstitious? Saints and miracles build cities and even countries. The history of Durham Cathedral and Saint Cuthbert made me question my Protestant faith. After reading Life In A Medieval Monastery: The Monks Of Durham Cathedral by Anne Boyd, I then read Bede’s Life of St Cuthbert by the Venerable Bede, Building St Cuthbert’s Shrine: Durham Cathedral and the Life of Prior Turgot by Lionel Green, In Search Of The Northern Saints by Simon Webb, a book called Inspiration from the Saints by Maolsheachlann Ó Ceallaigh, and The Rosary Handbook by Mitch Finley, all of which I absolutely loved. You would not believe how pious, devoted, austere, strict and holy the Saints were, they are such an inspiration. Along with many others, these books have made me fall deeply in love with the Catholic Saints and the Catholic faith. Starting with St. Cuthbert and then reading all of these books turned me into a genuine Catholic convert, certainly a believer and practitioner. The Rosary itself is profound, powerful and deep, and instantly you realise that Protestantism does not offer you anything like the sort. Unlike Catholicism with its incense smoke and the Rosary etc, Protestantism seems clinical and empty. Therefore, you cannot be truly religious with Protestantism. Jesus Christ is like the Sun, He is too brilliant and perhaps we should not look at Him directly? That is what I like about Catholicism and its Communion of Saints. Catholicism gives you thousands of Saints to focus on and look at instead of Jesus Christ. While Protestantism gives you nothing to focus on except Jesus Christ. To be honest I had never truly prayed in my life until I read The Rosary Handbook by Mitch Finley. With the Rosary, praying is so genuine and natural. Therefore, due to St. Cuthbert and the above mentioned books I am convinced Catholicism is the true and only western Christian religion. In the long term, I have read almost every day since August 2016 totalling over 160 books (as of October 2021) entirely honed and focused on the singular purpose of fixing racism and helping to protect white people. I have tried several methods or ideologies to solve racism on social media over the years. I spent a year writing an 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler also called Time For Forgiveness. All of which failed. I then gave up on my quest to fix racism. I unofficially converted to Catholicism and began to pray the Rosary every day, and then miraculously my prayers were answered when during my prayers I had the epiphany which realised the ismlessism. Therefore, as mentioned, I believe that by reading about and venerating the Catholic Saints, unofficially converting to Catholicism and by praying the Rosary every day, that the ismlessism was given to me by the Catholic Saints? The Saints are the true faith, they make us more modest and humble. Jesus Christ is like the Sun, and perhaps we should not look directly at Him. If we venerate Mary and the Saints, then how glorious is Jesus Christ? I highly recommend Maolsheachlann Ó Ceallaigh’s book to anyone, he writes with such passion, wit and intelligence and he really teaches you the concept of sainthood, in that a lot of Saints weren’t especially geniuses, talented or physically well endowed etc, some were even “losers”, basically Maolsheachlann Ó Ceallaigh really teaches you that you can be a disabled saintly simpleton or an evil genius. Also Mitch Finley’s book is a great way to learn the Rosary. I also highly recommend to anyone looking for a deeper, more religious and truer faith, or someone questioning their Protestant faith to get familiar with the Saints, buy a rosary, read The Rosary Handbook by Mitch Finley and get a rosary app on your smart phone or tablet. Therefore, the Saints are now my pop idols. Never mind Jesus Christ, it is the Saints who compete with pop stars and pop idols for your adoration. They are infinitely better examples for us and especially our children than drug addict rock and pop stars. My advice to today’s youth would be to venerate, adore, worship and love the Saints not pop idols. As I mentioned in the introduction, religion is good hearted because it is accessible to children, as even toddlers can comprehend the very meaning of the Christian nativity, which is down to Earth, unlike malignant 19th century German Protestant philosophy such as Nietzscheanism which is highly advanced, articulate, abstruse and reserved only for university students with a humongous vocabulary. Nietzsche stated that it might still be possible for the Germans to become the first non-Christian nation of Europe, thus consummating the work of Luther, – he who taught them to be anti-Roman, and to say: “Here I stand! I cannot do otherwise!” Unlike the naval countries, England, France, Spain, Western and Southern Europe etc, Central and Eastern European countries, which were not as romanised as the aforementioned countries, still have a natural barbarian tendency to be purely European and pagan etc, as demonstrated by Nietzsche’s anti-Judeo-Christian philosophy and by how the heathen Germans tried to undo recorded history and to uproot the Judeo-Christian religion from Europe during the Holocaust. Christian names such Peter, Paul, David, James, Mark, Matthew, Luke, John, Abraham and Isaac etc are of a more or less non-European origin, however because the Judeo-Christian religion is so good and so powerful through Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, we never name our children such like Socrates, Achilles, Tiberius, Octavian or Athelstan etc. However, if Christian names were ever removed, extirpated, questioned or tampered with it would only lead to disaster. To do so would be complete sacrilege. There’s a correct order to recorded history and Israel or the Israelites were first, then Greece, Rome and then the Western European naval powers etc. If Nietzsche had tried to write about anti-Judeo-Christian philosophy in the medieval period he would have been burned at the stake and disemboweled as a heretic, and judging from the disaster of the Holocaust, probably for good reasons. Anyway, all this proves that Catholicism is the one and only true western Christian religion and that pagan-German invented Protestantism is erroneous. Protestantism is heresy because Rome is recorded history. Catholicism sticks permanently to Rome and because the Romans are themselves the most important recorded history in history, they would never attempt to undo recorded history or extirpate the Judeo-Christian religion from Europe as easily as Protestantism or heathen and pagan Germany and Central Europe etc. Therefore, through Martin Luther and his 95 theses, Germany even bestowed Protestantism on us Western and Northern Europeans. England, do not copy the Germans! They don’t know what they are doing! Therefore, one way that we Northern Europeans could become good hearted again and quickly is by nationally converting back to Roman Catholicism at the very top-level of state, government and high society etc. I mean the ismlessism may hit two birds with one stone, because it may reverse the Reformation and fix the Holocaust in one. Remember Martin Luther was also a virulent anti-Semite.
How to do it.
For example, the thing about the ismlessism is that you could be a spiritual or religious leader such as His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, the founder of The International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), known colloquially as the Hare Krishna, however, you will ultimately never in eternity go anywhere near extreme forgiveness or the forgiveness of such as Adolf Hitler. You can meditate or be so vegetarian that you even stay away from root vegetables for fear of killing the whole plant but you will always and ultimately never forgive such as Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. This is the error that many lovingly-kind spiritualists and religious leaders make. There is far too much disparity in the world between lovingly-kind spiritual leaders such as His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada who won’t even eat root vegetables and serious sinners such as Adolf Hitler. Some fortunate people get up to the amazingly giddy heights of DJing in wonderland in front of thousands of wonderful people while others of the same generation languish in prison. Please spare a thought for those who languish in prison. I mean this respectfully and as advice because I believe spiritual leaders such as ‘the Swami’, vicars, priests and even the Pope will (unlike Jesus Christ) be caught out or caught with their pants down either in this life or the next regarding extreme forgiveness, in that they will not know what to do and will have no answers regarding the extreme forgiveness of such as Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. And for spiritual leaders to have no answers is not good. Therefore, although Jainist (non-root vegetable eating) vegetarianism is unbelievably physically hard, extreme forgiveness is emotionally harder. You have got to be brave enough to stick your neck out for Adolf Hitler. It’s forgiveness and no one on Earth or in history has ever sought (because of Adolf Hitler) absolute and universal forgiveness. It’s hard. This is no offence to religious or spiritual leaders such as His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, because extreme forgiveness or the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler requires an idiot to attain it. My advice to such religious leaders regarding extreme forgiveness is to cut the head off the snake. That’s how to do it. And what cuts the head off the snake is the ismlessism because it removes the racism from Adolf Hitler. I believe because of the Holocaust, that all answers for the world peace are in the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. Therefore, that is exactly what my (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis tried to attain, which was ultimately successful with the discovery of the ismlessism, which (as it disappears the racism in Adolf Hitler), is his genuine forgiveness, and therefore, the ismlessism is the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two, not to mention all of us minor sinners too. If I had never gone there and asked the question or wrote the thesis I would never have discovered the ismlessism. Therefore, don’t be afraid to forgive. Don’t be afraid of extreme, absolute and universal forgiveness and absolution.
The ismlessism is in the middle, and by this I mean that anti-racist people on Facebook think I am a racist and racist people on Twitter think I am an anti-racist. Although I am white and I lean towards white people, I am neither racist nor anti-racist, cool Ismlessists are in the middle. I am pro-white and I want to protect Europeans, but because of the Holocaust they are wrong and uncool today. Because of the Holocaust black-skin is cool today, blacks are right and cool and I am not against them or what they have to do because of the Holocaust. The Holocaust is judgement, it has nothing to do with rights or equality. Our politicians go soft on blacks and hard on whites. I love white people and I want to help them. I think traditional European folk costumes are beautiful, however, I am worried that European folk costumes are uncool? I am worried that European folk costumes do not compete with what is truly cool, such as black-skin, Rastafarianism and the hip and cool vibe of the black-London music and club scene. I am worried for white people. I am worried that they will become uncool? I think traditional Europeans are going to lose out to what is truly and really cool today which is basically black and black-skin. The ismlessism is amiable and amicable with blacks. The ismlessism is fun and humorous and we have fun and much humour and comedy with Rastas and ragga-men. Therefore, even if you are white, native or indigenous don’t fight with black people. Just because you compliment and are nice to black people doesn’t necessarily mean that you are anti-racist. Blacks are less advanced and therefore, cool, black grammar such as ”fash”, “seks” and “rayce” are cool, hence, even if you care about white people, there is nothing wrong with being nice and complimentary towards black people. If we are nice to black people first, then they might be nice to us? Therefore, do not fight with black people mentally, verbally or on social media. As a white person, because you have to fight black people already says enough about you and the Holocaust. Without the Holocaust you would not have to fight with them. Therefore, don’t be against black people. Being white, native, indigenous and nationalist is uncool today. Although you may feel very sentimental about your traditional European folk costumes, imagine wearing them in a shopping centre in a city centre such as London or in a nightclub in Ibiza such as Pacha? If you did wear your traditional European folk costume around town or in a nightclub you would probably seriously cringe with embarrassment? This is reality! This is now! Black is what is cool today! Therefore, accept the black grammar, be a cool Ismlessist and be kind, amiable and affable with black people. Be cool, be hip, be with it, be a grammatically cool “Rastafarian” Ismlessist.
To be with it today you have got to be politically correct, you have got to be with and down with what our treacherous white politicians are doing. For example, in the UK ‘with it’ is basically what our prime minister, our MPs, our parliament and our media are saying or doing. To be with it you have got to say or write your ismlessisms, by this I mean cutting the suffix isms off your isms, for example “I’m into Catholis!” Where “Catholis” is the ismlessism of Catholicism. Saying ismlessisms is the Rastafarian and black-London youth style or vibe. You have also got to be as cool as black-skin. Black people are cool because they are less advanced. Black people look different, move different and dance differently to us white European stiffs. Because of the Holocaust white skin is uncool. It’s not that we like it, however, I’m sorry, because of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust that is how it is. The oppression you feel as a white person today is not bias or fairness, it is judgement for the Holocaust. You have to accept that the oppression that you feel today as a white person is judgement because of the Holocaust and that fairness and equality do not come into it. Political correctness, black music, black fashion and black-skin are cool and hip today, not traditional European culture, European paganism, traditional European folk costumes and myths etc. Morris Dancers are not as cool as Rastafarians and black-London youths. Politicians are actually very cool, with it and hip and they have their fingers on the beating pulse of American and European pop culture, as well as the London and New York vibes, and what is currently politically correct, cool, hip and with it. If you are racist our politicians will say to you that you are not currently ‘with it’, period, end of, and that the clock is ticking. There is only one way to be with it, and that is whatever our world leaders and politicians are saying or doing. Political correctness is with it. Political correctness is hip. The good news is that everyone on Earth can get with it, be hip and cool easily with the grammatical ismlessism. All that you have to do is learn the cool Rastafarian lingo of the ismlessism, that is, learn to say or write your ismlessisms, such as “Don’t be fash!” Where “fash” is the ismlessism of fascism. Ismlessisms are mathematical and grammatical, see the Rasta Algebra Test above or in the menu. Therefore, say your ismlessisms, cut isms off isms or say isms without their suffix isms in order to become a cool Ismlessist, then you are as cool as a Rasta or black-London youth etc. Wicked! Innit?
We have to remember all those people languishing in prison for all kinds of degrees of various sins. If we are being religious about prisoners don’t call it crime, call it sin. There must be millions of people all over the world languishing in prison for various sins, that we all deliberately forget and ignore and this in itself is a sin. We deliberately forget and ignore prisoners and this is totally selfish. When we are getting all hateful and venomous about the absolution of Adolf Hitler please remember all the prisoners around the globe who also need forgiveness. Every single person in prison has sinned and they are probably all laughing about the ismlessism and the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, because cutting the head of the snake automatically absolves or ameliorates all of their lesser sins by default. You have got to forgive prisoners eventually. Please try not to selfishly and deliberately ignore and forget the millions of prisoners around the world. What did the convict crab say to the free lobster? You shellfish bastard!
I have read two books on Taoism (or Daoism as it’s pronounced) and I have also read Confucius: And The World He Created, by Michael Schuman, and I have never been so gripped by a book, in all the books I have read to date, I have never read such an interesting book as this one about Confucius. Confucius is truly huge, and this got me thinking again. China has the world’s best food, a huge united country, a huge population, several religious isms, an up and coming superpower, its own civilisation and great men such as Confucius. What more is there to desire? Europe on the other hand has Adolf Hitler. Europe has Socrates with Adolf Hitler, Plato with Adolf Hitler, Aristotle with Adolf Hitler, Da Vinci with Adolf Hitler, the renaissance with Adolf Hitler and Jesus Christ with Adolf Hitler. Everything we Europeans have done and achieved throughout our recorded history has been tainted by Adolf Hitler. Plus we are a fading superpower and our countries are tiny and disunited. We are miserable. Therefore, we Europeans need to remove, ameliorate or neutralise Adolf Hitler, grammatically from the atmosphere, air, aether or space time continuum. That is exactly why I am doing what I do, that is exactly why I am researching, developing and publishing the ismlessism. I am using the ismlessism to philosophically or grammatically cleave or remove the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. Cleaving the racism from Adolf Hitler (i.e.: cutting the head off the snake) is not just his absolution, it is also not just the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their countless acts of evil during World War Two, it is morally good for Europe. We Europeans can be great again. We can be Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and Jesus Christ again without Adolf Hitler. That is why I am pissing into the wind with the absolution of Adolf Hitler. No body listens to me. People are like why on Earth do you want to forgive Adolf Hitler? To me it’s a puerile question, because it is so obvious that there are huge benefits for Europeans with his genuine absolution or forgiveness. You will never cut the head off the snake or remove or cleave the racism from Adolf Hitler with anti-racism, it just pisses him (and me) off. The only way to do that is with the ismlessism and then we might get Socrates, and then we might get Plato, and then we might get Aristotle, and then we might get Jesus Christ.
DJs control nothing.
The ismlessism got me thinking that it honestly changes your desires, for example, as you may know I DJ online as well, and up until the 12th April 2021 (when discovered the ismlessism), in a perfect universe, all that I wanted to be was a superstar DJ and trance artist. However, it has dawned on me that despite all of these puerile desires, if I was just a DJ or a trance artist today I would be unhappy. Because of the ismlessism I have no desire to be a DJ or a trance artist anymore, this is because for example, making a trance track, even if it’s a hit doesn’t help save your own people, in fact a hit trance song doesn’t do anything at all apart from give some people on drugs a good time and nostalgia. Think about a trance artist who is making a hit trance track, think of the thoughts and feelings going through his or her head? It’s basically dreams of nothing more than vanity and stardom etc. They don’t want to help protect their own people. I just don’t want to be that anymore and this is because the ismlessism is real, it does actually help protect white people and it is therefore, unbelievably modest, altruistic and noble etc. Now I just dream of being someone like Karl Marx or Plato etc. Although Paul Oakenfold and Danny Rampling changed the world with Acid House during the second summer of love back in 1988 with clubs such as Spectrum and Shoom in London, you cannot say specifically everything that you want to say with music or a trance track, as all your lyrics have to rhyme etc. Music does not really save anything it just inspires. Therefore, I would be unhappy if I was trapped as just a DJ or trance artist, not being able to control anything, really help protect white people and say what I need to say about the ismlessism. Don’t get me wrong I love DJing, however, I would never be just a DJ. Certainly not a young, inexperienced, desperately-aspiring DJ who doesn’t want to be anything else. I would first of all have a main day job such as a writer/philosopher who preaches the ismlessism, (which does actually help protect white people), and then just DJ, enjoy myself and let my hair down at night or on weekends as well. The ismlessism changes your desires. I mean as mentioned I went clubbing in 1999, places like Gatecrasher in Sheffield and I had a whale of a time, however, I just couldn’t do that anymore or not in the same way. In the 1990s it was all new, novel and for the first time and that combined with the millennium made the 1990s something to celebrate. However, I just couldn’t do that anymore. In the 1990s we were young and inexperienced and now in the 2020s we are much more mature and experienced. Because of the novelties and millennium the 1990s truly had something to celebrate, however, in the 2020s I just can’t see anything to celebrate, especially for white people. And that’s why I am no longer (or temporarily (for the foreseeable future)) no longer interested in being a DJ. Today, being in my 40s I am wiser and more mature and I am more interested in giving us a cause of something to celebrate. And this is what our politicians should do, that is, they should give their own people a cause of something to celebrate. However, since the Holocaust our politicians have given us no cause of something to celebrate. In fact, they seem to be only giving non-white people a cause for celebration at our white people’s expense. I used to think that being a superstar DJ was the best job in the world, but today I don’t really how that’s possible? DJs spin records and mix a small group of people at a party, whereas politicians mix the whole world. DJs control nothing. Not that I want to be one, politicians do something much bigger than DJing. They determine the party. And they should give us a cause of something to celebrate. Imagine what clubbing in the U.K. and Europe would be like today if there had been no world wars and a Holocaust? Sounds like a cause of something to celebrate to me? Therefore, I am no longer interested in being a DJ or making trance tracks today. If I was to go clubbing ever again, whether in this life or the next I would want something bigger, something more real and a cause of something to truly celebrate etc. I mean trance artists make music which influences clubbers, but what or who influences the mind, thoughts, beliefs and convictions of a trance artist? It is probably politicians who influence all of our brains? Like conductors (or DJs) do politicians make a kind of political symphony that determines the real music that is produced by such as trance artists? Do you see what I mean? There’s kind of a hierarchical order of power, importance and influence and DJs and trance artists actually control or determine very little. However, who influences the mind, thoughts, beliefs and convictions of politicians? It is probably philosophers such as Karl Marx, Friedrich Nietzsche, John Locke, Thomas Hobbes and Immanuel Kant etc. Philosophy gets a hard time, particularly from the scientific community. It’s as if when we say that something is philosophical that it means that something is not exactly real? However, as demonstrated by such as Karl Marx, the right kind of philosophy can influence those who influence and therefore, can change the world.
You may say that I am trying to be like Jesus Christ by trying to really, genuinely and actually help protect white people in reality? No, I am not trying to save mankind like Jesus Christ, that’s just pretending. I am just trying to really, genuinely and actually help protect white people in reality, like any other normal caring white person. I am the rare type of person who gives a damn about white people, and as a result of the discovery of the ismlessism, I am a cool anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch Ismlessist. You may say I am being vain and pretending (or wanting) to be like Jesus Christ by trying to really, genuinely and actually help protect white people in reality? No I am not. I am telling you that I have zero desire to attain nirvana, I just deeply and devoutly care about my own people. What quite disconcerts me about our politicians is that it is plain to see that for example, Africans care more about their own people than they care about other people, and Indians care more about their own people than they care about other people, however, the current politically correct consensus in Europe today is for everyone to care more about other people than their own people. It’s ridiculous. And this is what I am hoping the ismlessism reverses. I am hoping that by my own example, that the ismlessism will get white people to care more about their own people before other people (for God’s sake). Therefore, I am telling you that devoutly caring about white people is unbelievably altruistic and modest. Look at this website, its art and my two theses, I have done all of this 5 years of intensive reading and writing all for white people. Cool Ismlessists don’t give a damn about nirvana, they just want to really, genuinely and actually help protect white people in reality. We do not pretend. Anyway, rest assured the ismlessism has changed my beliefs, in that I now believe that the way to help protect white people is to go with the flow (like a dead fish) and try to make non-white people admire or even love white people. By cutting the head off the snake and removing the racism from Adolf Hitler etc, we white people might at least save face? But we must remove racism as well. Just being anti-racist makes non-white people hate us just as much as being racist. All that you taken for granted anti-racists want is to attain nirvana, which is egoistic. Anyway, non-white people aren’t in trouble. I don’t want to be Jesus Christ, wanting to really, genuinely and actually help protect white people in reality is an unbelievably modest desire. If I was born in the 1920s I would have done the same thing, that is I would have tried as hard as I could to save empire, as white people didn’t exactly need saving then. If I was born in the 19th century I wouldn’t have even bothered trying to save anything, as white people definitely didn’t need saving back then, I just would have been a soldier and fought in a war or something to protect, expand and defend empire. So that’s me in a nutshell. I do anything white or for white people. Check the books I have read, all 160 and more of them. I wouldn’t read a single letter if it wasn’t for white people. To me the problem is that white people lost empire in the 1950s and 1960s, and they did not complain. Then we get to 2021 and white people are in trouble and still most white people won’t even admit that they even have a problem, are in trouble or need help. You don’t want to be saved, we all should help save ourselves. I think what the ismlessism should do is that although anti-racists don’t have to fundamentally change their position or opinions, however, it should stop or prevent anti-racists, such as Antifascists being over the top, vindictive, malicious, vengeful and nasty towards white people in general. I think most white people are blissfully (or willingly) ignorant of how much flack white people are getting these days? They’re like ostriches with their heads in the ground. Today, with such as Antifascists, white people are being bullied and picked on, it’s revenge and reprisals for empire, colonialism, two (stupid) world wars and the Holocaust. Therefore, that’s what the ismlessism should do, that is, it should simultaneously remove the racism from Adolf Hitler and remove the desire of cool non-white Ismlessists to want to destroy or conquer Europe as a reprisal for the Holocaust. It should therefore also reduce over the top, vicious, vindictive and malicious anti-racism by such as Antifa. I believe that the ismlessism is the answer.
The desire of a cool white Ismlessist.
I have been on this quest to solve the ism, namely racism since the 1st of August 2016, I know this because I bought my first serious book on Amazon on the 31st July 2016. Anyway, one thing that I have definitely learned and understood on my quest is that having the singular desire to help protect white people, with absolutely no desire to attain nirvana, is actually a very modest, humble and altruistic goal or exercise. The ismlessism is a jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism, and we do not give a damn about personally attaining nirvana for absolutely no good reason or to simply just sit there yogis-style and be it. We just want to help protect white people, which is an unbelievably modest desire. It’s about doing not being. Therefore, the only desire of a cool white Ismlessist is to help protect all white people through non-discriminatory and non-racist ways (and absolutely nothing else). To me that’s cool Ismlessists in a nutshell, that is, they are unbelievably altruistic.
The desire of a cool white Ismlessist is:
- To fix and remove the ism, namely the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world.
- To absolve or forgive Adolf Hitler.
- To remove the racial hatred and anger from the world.
- To fix the Holocaust.
- To admire, like and love cool non-white Ismlessists.
- To help protect white people.
- To have absolutely zero desire to attain nirvana.
- To have absolutely no desire to help protect white people through discriminatory or racist methods.
- To have no desire to be able to tell the difference between cool non-white Ismlessists and cool white Ismlessists. We cannot tell the difference.
The second last point is important because both cool white and cool non-white Ismlessists believe that the universe works, and that the universe always has an answer or solution to any issue for those who sincerely and humbly ask. Therefore, there will be no need to discriminate against cool non-white Ismlessists in order to help protect white people.
The desire of a cool non-white Ismlessist.
The desire of a cool non-white Ismlessist is even more important than a cool white Ismlessist. The deal is that the ismlessism is a 100% universal jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism, however, the stipulation should be that a cool non-white Ismlessist who wishes to follow the ismlessism should:
- Truly and genuinely want us Europeans to fix and remove the ism, namely racism, before anything else at all.
- Have absolutely no schadenfreude about Europe’s Holocaust and downfall.
- Genuinely admire, like and love cool white Ismlessists.
- Most importantly have absolutely no desire at all to destroy, conquer or master Europe or other white countries.
This last point is essential, in that it should be a cool non-white Ismlessist’s internal conviction, faith or belief to have absolutely zero desire to destroy, conquer or master Europe or Europeans. Conquest is uncool and we cool white Ismlessists will be able to know and tell if you hide any such desire. As you can see our desires as cool Ismlessists are connected to the simultaneity of the ismlessism, in that the ismlessism simultaneously removes the racism from Adolf Hitler and removes the desire of cool non-white Ismlessists to want to destroy or conquer Europe.
Schadenfreude is a very bad thing, especially having schadenfreude about Germany’s terrible Holocaust. It is wrong to have schadenfreude about Europe’s demise due to Germany’s disastrous Holocaust. Who does have schadenfreude about the Holocaust? I can tell and I know that Asians do not have any schadenfreude about Germany’s Holocaust. This is because Asians are civilised and Asians and Europeans are similar, both out of Africa, equal and also because Asians have many religious isms of their own. However, does America have schadenfreude about Germany’s ideological crisis, its Holocaust and Europe’s unfortunate demise? Hopefully not. Does Africa have schadenfreude about Germany’s Holocaust and downfall? Do ‘Antifa’ (antifascists) have any evil and malicious schadenfreude about Germany’s Holocaust and white people’s fall? Definitely yes! Please try not to have any schadenfreude about Germany’s Holocaust. We should all aim to fix the Holocaust, save Europe and remove racism from the world peacefully. One reason why I made the ismlessism a universal and jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism is because I know and can definitely tell that Asians like it, probably because they know it is a good hearted grammatical ism because it solves the ism, namely racism. However, I think the main reason why I admire Asians and the reason why I made the ismlessism a universal jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism is because I can tell and I know that the Asians are noble and virtuous enough to not in any way have any sly or malicious schadenfreude regarding Germany’s Holocaust, in that Asians are not pleased that Europeans are in trouble and that Asians truly and genuinely want us Europeans to fix racism. That is why I made the ismlessism is a universal jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism.
Eastern peace and Western violence.
As mentioned, I believe the racist mentality is basically that of a “Nietzschean warrior”, like Achilles, even if they just mean a little impoliteness or a little aggression etc. It’s like ridiculous to racists, they don’t see anything wrong with a little rudeness, racists are like ‘Come on!? You can’t even be impolite!?’ I think this is the point that racists and fascists are missing, in that Europeans have been far too violent and aggressive throughout history, particularly in the 20th century. Therefore, the point that the far-right are missing is that Europeans cannot use any aggression, hate or violence in any way at all, that is, in writing, thoughts or speech etc. Racists don’t see anything wrong with what they are doing, they see themselves as noble “Nietzschean warriors”, virtuous, brave and glorious etc, by protecting our women, country and race etc. Racists think in terms of philosophical or political isms such as Nazism, Communism and fascism. The ismlessism has had me thinking recently that unlike India who worshipped and adored the Buddha from day one and allowed Him to live a long, healthy and peaceful life, that we violent westerners quickly committed deicide by nailing our God to the Cross! What would the world have been like if there had been no crucifixion? What would the world have been like if we westerners had allowed Jesus Christ to live a long, healthy and peaceful life like the Buddha? Would Europe have been a generally more peaceful continent? Probably. Would the Holocaust had happened? Probably not. India is so much more peaceful than Europe. Save Islam, the west (or Europe) is so much more violent and aggressive than India, China and Asia as a whole, as demonstrated by the crucifixion, two world wars and the Holocaust. This is where is the ismlessism comes in, because it simultaneously hits at least two birds with one stone. Firstly, the ismlessism removes racism from Adolf Hitler and the world, secondly the ismlessism removes the desire of cool non-white Ismlessists to want to destroy or conquer Europe, therefore, the ismlessism brings peace and non-violence to the world. The ismlessism changes people like me, and turns them away from political or philosophical isms such as Nazism and fascism and makes them unbelievably peaceful, good hearted and non-violent like Mahatma Gandhi. White people don’t need political leaders such as For Britain’s Anne Marie Waters, Britain First’s Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen and the English Defence League’s Tommy Robinson. (In fact, note the last three have all spent time in prison for aggressive behaviour or speech etc). White people are not allowed political leaders! What white people need is lower class, peaceful, nonviolent and good hearted leaders like Mahatma Gandhi. No one listens to the Archbishop of Canterbury, because he is Protestant, what we need is poor, grassroots and lower class, nonviolent and peaceful leaders that live by example and come out of nowhere. Trust me, excepting violent Antifa, all those peaceful, nonviolent and anti-racist politicians, liberals and PC brigade (that you racists hate) are 99% right, they are just not removing the ism, namely racism from the world, plus they are not an official or formal ism.
What I have achieved.
So you know that Adolf Hitler is Ismless and thee cool Ismlessist, and that by making him Ismless and the coolest Ismlessist is how to prove that there is no racism in him and therefore, this is his absolution. You also know that I wrote an (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis and that as a result of that thesis I discovered the ismlessism, which is the true absolution of Adolf Hitler. Obviously, I would like to go down or be known as the discoverer or father of the ismlessism and the absolution of Adolf Hitler, however, the ismlessism probably will not stop there? For example, Sir Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin, however, it took many other very intelligent unsung heroes to concentrate penicillin enough for it to be effective and to manufacture it on an industrial scale. However, penicillin is important enough that it doesn’t matter who gets the fame or credit, it just needs doing very quickly for the benefit of humankind. I believe that the ismlessism may be as important to white people as penicillin is to the whole world. Also, although Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto and discovered or invented Communism, it took Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin to turn it into a worldwide revolution. Like Marxism, do Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin also get ‘isms’ suffixed to the end their surnames? Yes. Budush! Therefore, although I am the discoverer or father of the ismlessism and extreme forgiveness, it doesn’t matter as we will need heroic figures such as Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin down the line somewhere to turn the ismlessism into a revolution and a reality. And like penicillin it is so important that it just needs doing. Therefore, I just wanted to make sure you know what I believe I have achieved. By making Adolf Hitler a buffalo soldier dreadlock rasta, I have made Adolf Hitler cool, therefore, I believe that I have enabled or made it possible for everyone on Earth to be able to easily forgive Adolf Hitler. I believe I have cut the head off the snake, removed the racism from Adolf Hitler which is therefore, his absolution, which leads to the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two, as well as the relative forgiveness of all of our minor or petty sins by default. In theory there should be no problems or obstacles too high in the universe. To reiterate, I have made Adolf Hitler cool, and I have normalised his absolution and made it infinitely easier for everyone and anyone to forgive him and the other sinners of the world too.
Before I understood that the ismlessism was a jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism, I initially changed the symbol for the ismlessism quite frequently, and not being entirely happy with the symbol for the ismlessism, I tried many things which worked in different ways, for example the Yin-Yang symbol which worked however, the Yin-Yang symbol actually means something quite deep and complex and obviously other than the artistic or creative qualities it has no actual bearing or relation to the ismlessism whatsoever. The Volk borrowed the swastika from Jainism and what did that mean? Therefore, I have really racked my brains about what the ismlessism is and how to fundamentally visualise or represent it? I came to the premature conclusion that the ismlessism is basically formless, unrepresentable and unvisualisable? Is it invisible? However, I did actually come up with a symbol that indirectly represents what the ismlessism does as opposed to what it is. The ismlessism cuts the head off the snake, which means it removes the racism from Adolf Hitler, which absolves each and every individual (countless) act of evil committed by subordinate Nazis during World War Two. Forgiving Adolf Hitler through the ismlessism doesn’t just apply to Nazis, it is in theory absolute and universal forgiveness, in that it applies to all of us. And therefore, we can use the ismlessism in order to forgive all of us for all of our relatively minor sins, including our inconsequential acts of theft, our sexual deviances and all other lesser sins throughout all of space and time? Take the opportunity. I mean what does Adolf Hitler care about our relatively minor sins? Therefore, that is what the ismlessism does, it cuts the head off the snake and that is one way to indirectly represent or visualise it, however, how to visualise it directly or fundamentally, I think the best symbol is a general prohibition sign over the word ’ism’ or ‘isms’, which means no isms or the removal of isms. However, is it even a question of what symbolises the ismlessism? Or is it a question of what does the ismlessism symbolise? I have come to the conclusion that whatever image, object, shape or art best represents, visualises or symbolises the ismlessism directly or fundamentally, that what is also important is that the ismlessism symbolises world peace.
As you may know I take a lot of inspiration from Mahatma Gandhi, especially regarding nonviolence and I discovered some amazing quotes of Mahatma Gandhi that really fortify me and give me much confidence regarding forgiveness.
“The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong.“
“Hate the sin, love the sinner.”
If forgiveness is the attribute of the strong how strong are we cool Ismlessists with the true absolution of Adolf Hitler? How strong are we cool Ismlessists with cutting the head off the snake and the (potential) ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness of all lesser sins? And how weak are our politicians who couldn’t forgive Adolf Hitler if their life depended on it?
Do listen to people who say things like this:
“To forgive is to set a prisoner free and discover that the prisoner was you.”
Lewis B. Smedes
Don’t listen to people who say things like this:
“Forgiveness has nothing to do with absolving a criminal of his crime. It has everything to do with relieving oneself of the burden of being a victim–letting go of the pain and transforming oneself from victim to survivor.”
C.R. Strahan is weak because he can’t or won’t dare go there and absolve a criminal of his crime. Ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness has everything to do with ‘absolving a criminal of his crime’ because it cuts the head off the snake, therefore, automatically absolving all of our minor or petty sins. When C.R. Strahan says ‘It has everything to do with relieving oneself of the burden of being a victim–letting go of the pain and transforming oneself from victim to survivor’ he is relatively only talking about or dealing with such as a cheating spouse. Although you may feel hurt if your spouse cheats on you and has a baby behind your back, think of the Holocaust victims and survivors. They are the only ‘victims’ and ‘survivors’ that we care about. Although having an affair can be grounds for divorce and does get legal regarding finances, custody and property etc, it is not a crime. Therefore, beyond schadenfreude gossip no one cares about your cheating spouse. Suck it up! People are not interested in your cheating spouse, however, they are interested in the absolution of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust. As of October 2021 I have read over 140 books since August 2016, I have put years into researching how to make it up for the Holocaust to the Jews and how to genuinely forgive (never justify) Adolf Hitler, therefore, believe me when I say I know how to forgive. Contrary to what C.R. Strahan says, it has everything to do with absolving a criminal of his crime, because it cuts the head off the snake, therefore, there is hope for the rest us in the forgiveness of such as Adolf Hitler. Real, true, ultimate and actual forgiveness is the absolution of Adolf Hitler. Forgiving a cheating spouse is not real forgiveness. Don’t think that by practicing petty and everyday forgiveness that you are achieving something. You have to forgive Adolf Hitler. You have to practice ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness. Mahatma Gandhi said things which were good for Indians, but no European religious or political leader has ever said anything good for Europeans since the Holocaust. You can’t say anything anti-racist and simultaneously say something good for Europeans. And you can’t say anything racist period. So what do we do? Say something about the ismlessism! Cool anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch Ismlessists are neither racist nor anti-racist, they are in between and they have all the humour. Europeans need many Mahatma Gandhi-style religious or political leaders of their own that actually say something positive and good for Europeans.
Also, as mentioned the ismlessism is neither racist nor anti-racist, therefore, I just wanted to reiterate that anti-racism is inaccurate, as it hits the wrong people in that it generally attacks all white people (including the British), regardless of involvement in the Holocaust. Therefore, it is much better and much more accurate to be loyally Judeo-Christian, to swear your unswerving loyalty to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and to be vehemently anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch, as that hits the right people (the Germans) and the root of the cause of the Holocaust, that is, paganism, heathen, anti-Abrahamism and most importantly anti-Christianity. Therefore, don’t be anti-racist, be anti-pagan, anti-Aryan and anti-Völkisch. Being anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch is still an ‘anti’ it’s just that even people who care about white people can do it. Therefore, I would also like to state that I am not and I am never doing taken for granted anti-racism. All taken for granted anti-racists, including governments, the police, politicians and media etc, (who also protect and harbour violent, left-wing extremist groups such as Antifa), currently (and since World War Two) have preached and enforced taken for granted anti-racism. I have never been a taken for granted anti-racist. We should never say that we are anti-racists or that we are doing taken for granted anti-racism, but that we are cool anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch Ismlessists and we profess the ismlessism. Mainstream politicians being devout and secular, taken for granted anti-racists etc, do not necessarily have to change much they do or much they believe, only that they should identify as cool anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch Ismlessists and they should profess the ismlessism. The ismlessism is a lot of what you taken for granted anti-racists want, only it is much better and a bit more formal to do it with a “propa” ism. You taken for granted anti-racists are doing the right thing, only you are not helping or caring about white people simultaneously, whereas the ismlessism does. The way that you taken for granted anti-racists do anti-racism, without fixing or removing the ism, namely racism, only makes non-white people hate us even more. The ismlessism came entirely from caring about white people, but it converted me into a convinced, believing and confirmed cool anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch Ismlessist. Therefore, the ismlessism came entirely from the right, however, if we are going to do any form of anti-racism, you current left-wing and taken for granted anti-racists should have to do the ismlessism entirely our way. We will do it with the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. However, ultimately, and after much consideration, I come to conclusion that cool Ismlessists are neither racist nor anti-racist, they are in between and they have all the humour.
I believe the causes and reasons behind Islamic terrorism, Antifascism and why such as the British people were terrorised with such as grooming gangs over recent decades by predominantly Asian men is basically because of the Germanic or Volkish blonde vanity of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the self exaltation of the sieg heil and because white people have not fixed the ism, namely racism. The ism, namely racism causes racial hatred and anger in the world, and such as the Islamic terrorists, Antifascists and the Asian rape gangs do what they do out anger or hate for white people because white people have a serious problem, in that they have not fixed the the Holocaust. As demonstrated by such as the September 11th attacks in America in 2001 and the frequency of smaller scale acts of Islamic terror and violence in Europe, anti-racism is clearly not working and is not the solution to racism and world peace. What I would say to racists, is that although the ismlessism is not racist, it may at least stop such as Islamic terrorism, grooming gangs, the hatred of Europeans by non-white people and it may cool down and neutralise Antifascists. We need to accommodate and see eye to eye with Antifascists because the pagan and heathen, anti-Christian Volk were infinitely worse than Muslims, black people, BLM and all those things that you racists hate. Get real about the evil pagan and heathen, anti-Christian Volk and stop misplacing your loyalty on Nazism and misplacing your hatred on black people. Whether you like it or not black people are cool today. They have never done anything wrong and are not doing anything wrong. We white people have no one to blame but ourselves for our own demise, except the purely evil pagan and heathen, anti-Christian Volk. Admit that and the ismlessism will liberate you. The ismlessism is a double ism, it is thee ism, and it cleaves and removes the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. The ismlessism is a new jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism and if it was instituted and promulgated in Europe it would probably remove the racial hatred and anger in the world and prevent the hatred and anger thereby arising in Antifascists, Asian and African men, thereby preventing things such as Islamic terrorism, grooming and anti-white hate.
I want to say something to white racists, particularly those on social media such as Gab, and it concerns such as my own complimentary quote regarding the qualities or properties of the ismlessisms, which is:
“To be cool, hip and with it, say your ismlessisms! Fash is the ismlessism of fascism. A new jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism. Ismlessisms are colourful, beautiful and deep which reflects black people.”Graham Cammock
What I want to say is that by hating and fighting with black people as you do on Gab, only shows your insecurities as white people. By using hate and insulting images and words, such as fried chicken, primates and the insulting adjectives only shows that you are insecure as white people. The Victorians didn’t even need to hate, argue or fight with black people, and if they did it was only through actual military combat (which is seriously uncool today). I believe that as hateful racists, you feel that if you are ever nice to black people it must mean that you want to miscegenate or race mix? Well what if it doesn’t absolutely mean that? Just because with the colourful, beautiful and deep ismlessisms I have done something nice for and complimented black people, does not mean that I want to choose a partner outside of my own race. Like I said hating and fighting with black people only shows your insecurities as white people. Surely there is a way that we can be complimentary to black people without surrendering everything that we are and own as white people, such as our women, our governments and our countries? You are more likely to get what you want as white people or racists by being nice, polite and complimentary to black people, as opposed to obviously using hate against and fighting with them which only shows your insecurities. Therefore, because it is white people who have had a Holocaust and on whom the onus therefore lies, the idea of this thesis is that if we do something nice for black people first, then they may be nice to us? They may allow us to sensiblly and not insanely ensure that we have ethnically white governments in white countries for example. They may freely choose themselves not to come to white countries in significant numbers, if they like you they may appreciate your desires, stop bullying you and respect you enough to leave you alone, as they do the Asians and Orientals. They may lose the desire to want to conquer Europe and white people. You are more likely to attain these things if you are nice and complimentary to black people first. Like the British, be mature, spruce, clean shaven and very polite imperialists, not immature and hateful 21st-century social media sock puppets.
There exists in this world or universe an imbecilic and fundamental binary switch. This switch is philosophical or metaphorial, but it is as real as E = MC2. Special relativity is real, scientific and fundamental and it will give you enormous amounts of energy, however, this metaphorical switch would give you a continent, an empire or even a world. This is the simplest kind of on/off binary switch in the universe, it does one of two things, either on or off. This binary switch is the racism/anti-racism switch, it is the white/black switch. There is no in between the two polar opposites on this switch, there are no degrees, gradations or increments. There is no dimmer between light and dark. This switch used to be permanently and confidently on white, only that Adolf Hitler through his Holocaust flipped the binary switch eternally and irretrievably onto black. I for one am absolutely sick to death of this spastically simple two-mode binary switch. The thickness of this imbecilic two-mode switch absolutely represents the intelligence of Adolf Hitler. Therefore, what I want to suggest is that can we not create or invent a metaphorical thrust lever or power lever, as in an airplane cockpit with degrees, increments or levels between racism and anti-racism? Or what about a nice big adjustable circular knob, as in a volume dial on an audio device, with levels or gradations between white and black? That would be so much better than an annoyingly thick two-mode on/off binary switch. The solution to racism requires a lot more thought and intellect than simply the diametrically opposite antithesis, as in anti-racism. As demonstrated by violent Islamic terrorism and wildfire-starting and angry migrants, anti-racism is obviously not working for Europe. Therefore, analogously that is what I hope to propose with the ismlessism, which is neither racist nor anti-racist but is in between. Hopefully the ismlessisms would have a spectrum of colours between light and dark and shades of grey between white and black. I believe that cool Ismlessists are neither white nor black, I believe they are neutral. To be switched on is an English idiom which means to be clued up, with it, hip and cool, however, a smooth thrust lever or an adjustable knob would be cooler. What I would like to say to our treacherous, eternally and imbecilically switched-onto anti-racism white politicians, is do they honestly want to be permanently, eternally and irretrievably switched-onto anti-racism in the afterlife without a choice? Think about it, will you not honestly want to be switched-onto white for a change in the afterlife? What if there is a wonderful white Victorian Empire in heaven? Won’t you want a nice incremental thrust lever or adjustable knob instead? What I would like to say to low-intelligence lower-class racists on Gab, is that to be racist is to be permanently, eternally, irretrievably (and arrogantly) switched-onto white. However, because of Adolf Hitler, being eternally switched-onto white (which is racism) is hateful. Prior to the Holocaust, being eternally switched-onto white was not hateful. Our Victorian ancestors were eternally switched-onto white, however, Nazism and racism made being eternally switched-onto white very hateful. Therefore, don’t be permanently switched-onto white, switch back and forth (like I have constantly done for 5 years), vacillate and try to create a smooth power lever or adjustable knob between white and black or between racism and anti-racism. Do you honestly want to be permanently, eternally and irretrievably switched-onto white or racism in the afterlife without a choice? It only shows your insecurity. What if there are super cool and hip parties in heaven and you would like the option attend? I believe that Jesus Christ can probably create an imbecilic-two-mode switch-hell for both racists and anti-racists in the afterlife. Now you’re this now you’re that! What you want is space and time between the two modes of the switch. Even animals such as pigs and chimpanzees can understand an on/off switch. Racism is a switch, this 50/50 switch is so tiny and so small it is unbelievably irritating and it creates hate and malice because it means that people are simply and maliciously opposite to each other. We need to remove this cultural on/off switch for more reasons than racism or anti-racism, what about higher arts, civilisations and culture? Even though the 21st century seems so smart and advanced, with such as Apple Inc. and Steve Jobs, because of Adolf Hitler, ultimately our political and philosophical level today as human beings is this tiny 50/50 binary switch. Even though the world seems frustratingly chaotic, complex and random, it always boils down to this simple, two-mode on/off binary switch. If you are kind, polite and complimentary to black people first, they may surprise you? Whereas, if you are eternally and arrogantly switched-onto white, they may simply and maliciously do the opposite of whatever you want. Therefore, despite the internet, iPhones and iPads, that is as advanced as humans are in the 21st century. We are politically and philosophically stupid. As I said, if you are nice to black people first, then they might be nice to you in return? For example they may freely choose themselves not to come to white countries in significant numbers, if they like you they may appreciate white people’s desires, stop bullying us and respect Europeans enough to leave us alone. However, how the imbecilic switch usually works is that if you are not polite and complimentary or even worse use hate or malice, black people will obviously and simply do the opposite of whatever you want and they will therefore, get on immigration and step up their efforts to speed up their colonisation of Europe. This is the binary racism/anti-racism switch, which is how planet Earth functions in the supposedly advanced 21st century. Racists and anti-racists, white people and black people are simply and imbecilically, diametrically opposite, and maliciously antithetical to each other like a hateful binary on/off switch.
I hope that by reading about the binary racism/anti-racism switch above, that you can trust me and believe me when I tell you that although I care about white people and my eternal motive is to protect my own beloved people, I can absolutely assure you and guarantee you that I am personally myself definitely never ever permanently, eternally and arrogantly switched-onto white (all the time). This is racist. This hateful. Being white is not wrong, but always and permanently being white is wrong. Only skinheads and thugs are permanently and eternally switched-onto white mode (to the death) and this is obviously wrong. However, antifascists need to make the distinction between people who care about white people such as me and Anne Marie Waters and skinheads and thugs. There is obviously a huge difference. I am never and never will be hateful. Therefore, I am not permanently racist. Like flipping a small coin or like a little frog hopping around I easily flip back and forth between the two racist/anti-racist modes of the binary switch. I am vacillating, flipping and switching easily and frequently back and forth between the white/black modes of the binary switch in order to try and create a nice smooth thrust lever or adjustable volume knob. Therefore, although in this life and the next I may be more so white or switched-onto white most often or most of the time, I am never eternal or forever, I am 3/4 of the airplane power lever or 90% of the adjustable circular volume dial and that is not an idiotic binary 50/50 switch.
Whether as an anti-racist white person you want to admit it or not, anti-racism and political correctness will not stop until white skin is inferior and being white is considered the lurgy. We must stop or reverse this trend before anti-racism and political correctness get out of hand. Therefore, the absolution of Adolf Hitler is an opportunity. Adolf Hitler may be a big problem for white people, however, we can turn that problem into an opportunity. It’s an opportunity to reap all of the benefits locked in Adolf Hitler for white people, as if Holocaust never happened. It’s something to do. Helping to protect white people is something to do. Removing or cleaving the racism from Adolf Hitler is something only white people can do. It’s white people’s opportunity.
It’s easy, as mentioned the ismlessism does something, it cuts the head off the snake, similarly you can easily become a cool Ismlessist by reading this entire thesis and if you subsequently believe in the correctness and benefits of the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler for Europe and white people, then you are therefore, a confirmed cool Ismlessist. All that you have to do to be a cool Ismlessist is forgive Adolf Hitler. Becoming a cool Ismlessist is as easy as becoming anti-racist, it’s simply a thought, an identity and you just pick it up. The only issue is that the adjective Ismlessist is not yet common knowledge. Perhaps if the noun ismlessism and the adjectives ismless and Ismlessist were entered into the Oxford English Dictionary, this would help officially implement and promulgate it across the board? I honestly believe that you can teach infants about the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and all subordinate the Nazis with or through the ismlessism. Therefore, the ismlessism could be taught in nurseries, primary schools and secondary schools etc. Ironically, that is the beauty, power and strength of grammatical isms such as the ismlessism because they can be taught in nurseries, primary schools and secondary schools etc, as opposed to universities. The earlier you learn something such as the ismlessism, the better and more powerful the effect is for the country or continent as a whole. Ironically, advanced philosophical isms such as meta-ethical relativism which can only be taught at universities are therefore actually very weak and powerless. Therefore, that is another way in which the ismlessism can be instituted, promulgated and implemented nationally and across the continent, by officially making it a part of the national curriculum and teaching it in nurseries, primary schools and secondary schools etc. I mean children are still indoctrinated in Confucianism in East Asia. Another way is through television and the mainstream media, believe me as a person who cares about white people I know how powerful the mainstream media is, if they want something to rise or happen, they can make it happen. Again, the ismlessism so simple, it is not an advanced technical thing that is hard to articulate or communicate through television etc. It’s easy. So the are many ways that the ismlessism can be officially instituted, promulgated and implemented in the U.K. and Europe. The good news is that you can actually help save and protect white people without being a racist. It’s called being a cool Ismlessist. Non-white people would probably say regarding the statement: “The ismlessism is like the methadone of rayce mon!”, that “it’s still racist!” Erm. No it’s not! That’s the whole point of the ismlessism, it cleaves and removes the racism from the world.
As you know I was reared in the 1980s and 1990s in a normal working class Protestant family, on nothing but TV, pop music and pop culture. I never received any religious or Christian instruction or indoctrination, or indeed any kind educational or academic instruction or indoctrination, that is, from my type of normal ‘Simpsons-like’ family. And you also know that I turned out to be a vain, show off and drug using teenager. I made some pretty big mistakes early in my life, especially in my late teens and early twenties, all as a result of my uneducated and uncultured upbringing. I was never indoctrinated with such as Matthew 23:12: For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted. Which is so obvious! And I wish to God someone had drilled that verse and indeed all of Christianity into me at a very early stage in life. Then I would not have turned out to be a vain, show off and drug using teenager. Now this got me thinking, and what I want to say here is very important, because it is more important than indoctrinating children with the ismlessism. Children should be compulsorily and mandatorily indoctrinated in Christianity from a very early age right up to adulthood. In fact it should never stop. This compulsory Christian indoctrination for children should be mandatorily instituted and promulgated by the government. In fact it should be law. However, the important point that I want to make is that because young children (and indeed most adults) do not read, that therefore, this Christian indoctrination should come primarily through the television. This Christian television indoctrination of children should be constant, ubiquitous and universal, that is, on just about every TV channel for instance. Children should not learn their lessons of life from meaningless and pointless cartoons such as ‘Paw Patrol’ for example. Therefore, there should be no option for children to watch anything except Christian themed TV shows and cartoons etc. For example, instead of prime time and Saturday morning children’s TV, there should be no option but to view Christian themed TV shows and cartoons etc. I mean this because in the way that I was reared in a normal Protestant family, as a child, hell would have frozen over before you got me to read a book, therefore, I practically learned everything that I knew as a child from the TV. And obviously nothing on the TV was in any way what I needed and everything that I learned was wrong. The only religious film that I watched was as a child was the 1956 film The Ten Commandments with Charlton Heston, which did actually have a huge influence on me. Therefore, I believe because children learn so much from television, that our governments should therefore, make it compulsory for all television channels to heavily and mandatorily indoctrinate our children in the Gospel and Christian values etc.
No bones with Adolf Hitler?
As I mentioned at the beginning, people don’t need to go through a ritual or an initiation process to become an anti-racist for example, they simply pick it up. Therefore, to become a cool anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch Ismlessist, all that you had to do was read this thesis and if by now you are convinced about the rightness and benefits of the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, then you are a convert to the ismlessism? Now that you have finished reading this essay, something should have changed inside of your head, and you should have “no bones with Adolf Hitler?” Hopefully, you are therefore a cool anti-pagan and anti-Völkisch Ismlessist?
Anti-racism does not work.
I am not anti-racist, and I’ll tell you why, because anti-racism attacks and affects a whole race, while the only people on planet Earth who were responsible for the Holocaust were Aryan, Volkish, anti-Christian and pagan. Remember, it required the majority of white people, including Americans, British and Russians to defeat the Nazis. Therefore, I am devoutly anti-Aryan, anti-Völkisch and especially anti-pagan as this accurately attacks the correct people and the correct religious and philosophical ideology that caused the Holocaust. The thing is about the ismlessism is that it is a genuine alternative to racism and anti-racism. Because I care about white people, for 5 years I singularly pursued and honed in on the noun racism like a blood hound. I did this because I knew (or thought) that there was absolutely nothing else that would protect and help protect white people. It had to be racism or nothing (or something invisible) that would help to protect white people. I knew in every atom and fibre of my bones and body that racism is all things to white people. It’s not that people who care about white people like it, there just is simply no alternative. Racists try wishy washy alternatives like alt-right, nationalism and nativism etc and none of them work, satisfy or hit the nail on the head. However, the ismlessism is a real alternative to racism that does satisfy and hit the nail on the head. It defends and protects white people without being racist. You may say how is the ismlessism an alternative to anti-racism? The general consensus among our European or white political leaders is that because of the Holocaust there is no alternative to anti-racism. However, anti-racism is just the opposite, and the thing about anti-racism is that reality checks it and proves it wrong, as demonstrated by such as the frequency of acts of Islamic terror and violence in Europe, such as the Charlie Hebdo attacks and beheadings in France etc, anti-racism is clearly not working and is not the solution to racism and world peace etc. The bottom line is that our white politicians have got to accept, as evidenced by such as Islamic terrorism is that ant-racism does not work. As Europeans you have got to be right, and anti-racism just means that the Holocaust was so bad that have to be anti-yourselves, it means that you are not right. Perhaps the ismlessism being neither racist nor anti-racist would make Europeans right again? Therefore, the ismlessism definitely a genuine alternative anti-racism also.
An effect of the Holocaust.
The ismlessism or the ismlessisms demonstrate that they are an effect, result or consequence of the Holocaust. The fact that the ismlessisms are today a “propa” and grammatical part of the English language indicates that the ismlessisms are an effect of the Holocaust. Spruce and clean shaven imperialism and British heightened RP are no longer the mode, hip, cool or fashionable. The ismlessisms determine that Queen’s English has bottomed out which is an effect of the Holocaust. Also, the direction in which the ismlessisms indicate that society, civilisation and humanity will go in the future, namely, cool, black, African and Rastafarian, also demonstrates that the ismlessisms are an effect of the Holocaust. The ismlessisms represent the state of how everything is as a result of the Holocaust. I suppose the only question is as Europeans, is there anything we can do to reverse this trend? Can we ever make spruce imperialism cool again? As a conclusion, the reason that the Volk and the Nazis were the diametrical antithesis of the supernatural love, goodness, compassion and charity of humanity, is because they could not accept the fact that the Abrahamic religions of Near Eastern origins (Judaism and Christianity) were the first and original inventors of recorded history. The Volk therefore tried to undo recorded history and rejected their Biblical Christian heritage. The Volk believed in science such as Darwinism and the laws of survival of the fittest and they therefore, applied the laws of the animal kingdom to mankind. Indeed they had to become animals spiritually and psychologically in order to carry out the Holocaust. Therefore, the Volk and the Nazis were pagan, heathen and anti-Abrahamic, but most importantly they were anti-Christian and this is why they were so evil. If you are anti-Christian you are malignant. What made the Holocaust technically possible was such as Friedrich Nietzsche’s Christian question and not the so called Jewish question. If you are Christian the Lord will keep you right. The ismlessism is a jocularly Rastafarian grammatical ism, therefore, be don’t be pagan, be anti-pagan, anti-Aryan, anti-Völkisch and anti-heathen Abrahamic Judeo-Christians and use the ismlessism to cut the head off the snake, that is, make Adolf Hitler Ismless and the cool Ismlessist, make sure he believes in the ismlessism and frequently says his ismlessisms, to remove and fix racism and the Holocaust. What has the ismlessism got to do with the Jews? Indeed, what have the Jews got to do with any of this? The Jews are 15 million white people, they have nothing to do with the ismlessism. Ismlessism is between black and white and nothing more.